An estimation of .com userbase IQ megathread

[vespertine]

black men are goated why does he hate himself

goated at taking accountability and not commiting crimes

 

[RottingCarrie]

Never heard this ever, tests are meant to be quantifiable to age

I know the most common one has a test for children and a test for adults

 

[blanquita444]

goated at taking accountability and not commiting crimes

mad cuz they have bigger dicks smh

 

[Transposon]

true but only cuz theyre insecure about themselves

the milkjar character projects a lot on 'ethnics' due to the homophobia thing.
He's dissatisfied with some of the political conservatism associated with his culture and projects that to ethnics, is my guess.
I still think most of it is ragebait

 

[vespertine]

mad cuz they have bigger dicks smh

a social myth, not actual racial biology.

 

[acketar]

a social myth, not actual racial biology.

false this isnt a myth

 

[blanquita444]

a social myth, not actual racial biology.

nah every white guy ive dated had a smaller dick then black men
i even looked up the statistics and they said they usually had atleast above average so not sure where ur getting that from

 

[acketar]

mad cuz they have bigger dicks smh

can confirm im only 50 percent and I have an absolute chopper

 

[blanquita444]

black men treat me so much better than white guys do too

 

[vespertine]

nah every white guy ive dated had a smaller dick then black men
i even looked up the statistics and they said they usually had atleast above average so not sure where ur getting that from

if you've dated enough men to have a statistically relevant sample size, that's depressing.


anecdotes btw

 

[blanquita444]

if you've dated enough men to have a statistically relevant sample size, that's depressing.

View attachment 195918
anecdotes btw

 

[vespertine]

View attachment 195919

*extremely* reliable source. just wrote down what came to mind

 

[vespertine]

man the fuck am i even doing arguing with gutter people over dick sizes i need to go for a walk

 

[blanquita444]

*extremely* reliable source. just wrote down what came to mind

 

[blanquita444]

man the fuck am i even doing arguing with gutter people over dick sizes i need to go for a walk

lol

 

[acketar]

man the fuck am i even doing arguing with gutter people over dick sizes i need to go for a walk

you will die soon, spend your time in better places

 

[vespertine]

View attachment 195921View attachment 195922

self reported measurements make the sources noise. when measurements are done under controlled medical conditions(which are rare), the differences between populations are small enough to be statistically trivial and overlap almost completely. individual variation dwarfs any average group difference.

 

[vespertine]

you will die soon, spend your time in better places

oh no that was a blatant lie

 

[pepelkant]

No tag forum definitely in deep shit

 

[acketar]

oh no that was a blatant lie

Glad to hear that

 

[pepelkant]

Also not including mandy or apatheia is doomed n***a

 

[Riggedahrage]

First, a map (ChatGPT) :
70–79 (Borderline range)

• Roughly 6% of people.
• Cognitive processing is noticeably below average; abstract reasoning and complex problem-solving are challenging.
• People here can still live independently, but academic learning often requires strong structure and repetition.

80–89 (Low average)

• About 16% of people.
• Can handle daily life and most jobs competently. Abstract or theoretical concepts might feel frustrating or “foggy.”
• Tend to do better with concrete tasks than conceptual reasoning.

90–109 (Average)

• About 50% of people fall here.
• Capable of reasoning, learning, and understanding ideas of average complexity.
• The world is designed for this group — education systems, most professions, and social expectations are calibrated here.

110–119 (High average)

• Roughly 16% of people.
• Grasp abstract ideas faster, can strategize and connect patterns with less explicit instruction.
• Often called “bright,” though not necessarily “gifted.” They thrive in analytical or creative fields when motivated.

120–129 (Superior)

• Around 7% of the population.
• Often labeled as “gifted.” Capable of deep understanding, rapid learning, and advanced abstract thought.
• If curiosity and discipline match intelligence, they can excel in intellectually demanding fields.

130–144 (Highly gifted)

• About 2% of people.
• Very high reasoning ability and fast learning speed. They see relationships others miss, often creating their own conceptual frameworks.
• Prone to perfectionism or existential frustration if unstimulated. Many scientists, inventors, and polymaths fall here.

145+ (Exceptionally gifted / profoundly gifted)

• Less than 0.1% of people.
• Extremely fast and deep cognitive processing, sometimes to the point of struggling to relate socially or emotionally to peers.
• They can conceptualize systems-level ideas — physics, philosophy, or abstract mathematics — with near-instinctive clarity.
• Often have asynchronous development: mental maturity outpaces emotional grounding.
  Now..
  
  1. @lumen - 120-125. However, their most interesting aspect is the very high emotional intelligence, not readily captured by g.
  2. @Night - 105-115. Need, just a little more information
  3. @Rau Le Creuset - 125–129. From my discussions with him on anthropology, he can condense large amounts of information into clear, readable paragraphs. Shows real skill in distilling complexity.
  4. @vespertine - 110-119. Need a bit more to say. Seems capable, but interactions haven’t revealed much yet.
  5. @RAD - 115 - 125. Good at abstract reasoning. Thinks through problems logically, connects ideas well.
  6. @slopslinger - 115–125. A little reserved so conversations have been short. It could be so high because of wishful thinking from my end
  7. @over0 - 122.7. Impressive
  8. @apatheia - humble 123. Humble to the extent of being likeable
  9. @Genetics - 123. However, plagued by overthinking
  10. @johnfkennedy - humble 123. Quite articulate, almost all conversations have been fruitful
  11. @faithful - 105-113. Additionally, emotionally intelligent. Not readily captured by g
  12. @Lebensmude - 119 who thinks he's 130
  13. @rovea - Hidden and underrated 113
  14. @RRM67 - 95-100
  15. @Spuffy - very humble 121. Seen a few long responses from them. Handles abstract reasoning smoothly, articulate, and doesn’t get bogged down in unnecessary verbosity.
  16. @milkjar - 105-110 jail
  17. @hannah - 119 who thinks they're 138
  18. @Warden - humble 126. Most articulate user on forum in terms of their writing
  19. @tuberculosisinmybal - 110. Could absolutely be higher
  20. @Riggedahrage - 90-99
  21. @acketar - 119 who thinks he's 122.7
  22. @AuggyDauggy - 100 - 109
  23. @pompompurino - 100-109
  24. @Kaari - 100 - 109
  25. @Schizotypalcel - 115-119. Favourite forum philosopher
  26. @NewFuckingDay - hidden and humble 120. Another one for whom emotional intelligence dominates
  27. @Logicpilled - 119-?. Larping as you was quite fun.
  28. @limo8 - 100-105. Although very cute and likeable
  29. @giga.mia - 100- 105
  30. @Nbernical - 100 - 109
  31. @Casablanco - 100 - 109
  32. @BigDihDiddy - 90-99.
  33. @Darkeningstar - 130-135. If they indeed are pursuing a PHD in physics, it could be higher by just a couple more points. Yes, I know pursuing a PHD in and of itself is not indicative of intelligence since there are many more variables at play. Most importantly conscientiousness. I just feel it would be superfluous to give my reasoning here.
  A point that's completely off topic..
  Although, their writing is undeniably articulate, and their knowledge is definitely not all lie. I have, never in my life witnessed a person so arrogant and narcissistic about their intelligence. Their vanity and egregiousis solipsism is almost entertaining to watch
  34. @blanquita444 - 100 - 109
  35. @Stardust_ - 80-95. Such an interesting person to watch make sense of the world
  36. @RottingCarrie - 90-105.
  37. @huntergirl - 100- 109
  38. @TonyDr - 115 - 119. I loved reading his responses for the time he was here. Very similar to Randomized in terms of personality and writing.
  39. @Knight - 100 - 109
  39. @97baHater -125 -129. Interactions with him were pleasantly surprising. He falls down the pitfalls of black and white thinking often. Regardless, his fluency in scientific discussion is undeniable.
  40. @Jeezy - 95- 105
  41. @cindythetvisleaking - 100 - 109
  42. @SkinnyDennis - 149 silent guardian and observer
  43. @Striking_4 - 105-115
  44. @xy2m - 105- 109
  45. @Transposon - 119 who thinks he's 149
  
  
  Disclaimer : I apologize if you feel I’ve underestimated your IQ.
  Obviously, any analysis based on interactions is inherently limited. This thread is half sarcasm, half serious.
  If you think I’m wrong, chances are you’re right, since I probably am.​

Of course you give me low IQ because I am ragebaiting on this account and can't speak proper english

 

[Spuffy]

i appreciate your recognition that simplifying and condensing complex topics shows intelligence, because i think it does too. i appreciate that you think i dont use unnecessary verbosity as well because my messages can be on the long side

 

[Spuffy]

mandy

 

[Incel]

First, a map (ChatGPT) :
70–79 (Borderline range)

• Roughly 6% of people.
• Cognitive processing is noticeably below average; abstract reasoning and complex problem-solving are challenging.
• People here can still live independently, but academic learning often requires strong structure and repetition.

80–89 (Low average)

• About 16% of people.
• Can handle daily life and most jobs competently. Abstract or theoretical concepts might feel frustrating or “foggy.”
• Tend to do better with concrete tasks than conceptual reasoning.

90–109 (Average)

• About 50% of people fall here.
• Capable of reasoning, learning, and understanding ideas of average complexity.
• The world is designed for this group — education systems, most professions, and social expectations are calibrated here.

110–119 (High average)

• Roughly 16% of people.
• Grasp abstract ideas faster, can strategize and connect patterns with less explicit instruction.
• Often called “bright,” though not necessarily “gifted.” They thrive in analytical or creative fields when motivated.

120–129 (Superior)

• Around 7% of the population.
• Often labeled as “gifted.” Capable of deep understanding, rapid learning, and advanced abstract thought.
• If curiosity and discipline match intelligence, they can excel in intellectually demanding fields.

130–144 (Highly gifted)

• About 2% of people.
• Very high reasoning ability and fast learning speed. They see relationships others miss, often creating their own conceptual frameworks.
• Prone to perfectionism or existential frustration if unstimulated. Many scientists, inventors, and polymaths fall here.

145+ (Exceptionally gifted / profoundly gifted)

• Less than 0.1% of people.
• Extremely fast and deep cognitive processing, sometimes to the point of struggling to relate socially or emotionally to peers.
• They can conceptualize systems-level ideas — physics, philosophy, or abstract mathematics — with near-instinctive clarity.
• Often have asynchronous development: mental maturity outpaces emotional grounding.
  Now..
  
  1. @lumen - 120-125. However, their most interesting aspect is the very high emotional intelligence, not readily captured by g.
  2. @Night - 105-115. Need, just a little more information
  3. @Rau Le Creuset - 125–129. From my discussions with him on anthropology, he can condense large amounts of information into clear, readable paragraphs. Shows real skill in distilling complexity.
  4. @vespertine - 110-119. Need a bit more to say. Seems capable, but interactions haven’t revealed much yet.
  5. @RAD - 115 - 125. Good at abstract reasoning. Thinks through problems logically, connects ideas well.
  6. @slopslinger - 115–125. A little reserved so conversations have been short. It could be so high because of wishful thinking from my end
  7. @over0 - 122.7. Impressive
  8. @apatheia - humble 123. Humble to the extent of being likeable
  9. @Genetics - 123. However, plagued by overthinking
  10. @johnfkennedy - humble 123. Quite articulate, almost all conversations have been fruitful
  11. @faithful - 105-113. Additionally, emotionally intelligent. Not readily captured by g
  12. @Lebensmude - 119 who thinks he's 130
  13. @rovea - Hidden and underrated 113
  14. @RRM67 - 95-100
  15. @Spuffy - very humble 121. Seen a few long responses from them. Handles abstract reasoning smoothly, articulate, and doesn’t get bogged down in unnecessary verbosity.
  16. @milkjar - 105-110 jail
  17. @hannah - 119 who thinks they're 138
  18. @Warden - humble 126. Most articulate user on forum in terms of their writing
  19. @tuberculosisinmybal - 110. Could absolutely be higher
  20. @Riggedahrage - 90-99
  21. @acketar - 119 who thinks he's 122.7
  22. @AuggyDauggy - 100 - 109
  23. @pompompurino - 100-109
  24. @Kaari - 100 - 109
  25. @Schizotypalcel - 115-119. Favourite forum philosopher
  26. @NewFuckingDay - hidden and humble 120. Another one for whom emotional intelligence dominates
  27. @Logicpilled - 119-?. Larping as you was quite fun.
  28. @limo8 - 100-105. Although very cute and likeable
  29. @giga.mia - 100- 105
  30. @Nbernical - 100 - 109
  31. @Casablanco - 100 - 109
  32. @BigDihDiddy - 90-99.
  33. @Darkeningstar - 130-135. If they indeed are pursuing a PHD in physics, it could be higher by just a couple more points. Yes, I know pursuing a PHD in and of itself is not indicative of intelligence since there are many more variables at play. Most importantly conscientiousness. I just feel it would be superfluous to give my reasoning here.
  A point that's completely off topic..
  Although, their writing is undeniably articulate, and their knowledge is definitely not all lie. I have, never in my life witnessed a person so arrogant and narcissistic about their intelligence. Their vanity and egregiousis solipsism is almost entertaining to watch
  34. @blanquita444 - 100 - 109
  35. @Stardust_ - 80-95. Such an interesting person to watch make sense of the world
  36. @RottingCarrie - 90-105.
  37. @huntergirl - 100- 109
  38. @TonyDr - 115 - 119. I loved reading his responses for the time he was here. Very similar to Randomized in terms of personality and writing.
  39. @Knight - 100 - 109
  39. @97baHater -125 -129. Interactions with him were pleasantly surprising. He falls down the pitfalls of black and white thinking often. Regardless, his fluency in scientific discussion is undeniable.
  40. @Jeezy - 95- 105
  41. @cindythetvisleaking - 100 - 109
  42. @SkinnyDennis - 149 silent guardian and observer
  43. @Striking_4 - 105-115
  44. @xy2m - 105- 109
  45. @Transposon - 119 who thinks he's 149
  
  
  Disclaimer : I apologize if you feel I’ve underestimated your IQ.
  Obviously, any analysis based on interactions is inherently limited. This thread is half sarcasm, half serious.
  If you think I’m wrong, chances are you’re right, since I probably am.​

heh 100 iq i knew it

 

[limo8]

Im too high my own chatgpt says im 80-90 or 115-120 if im intrested in the subject but usually 85

 

[Schizotypalcel]

I'm 87 iq

 

[vespertine]

I'm 87 iq

a genius in the central african republic

 

[Schizotypalcel]

Some of my favorite replies and threads have been from him. I would unironically like to see more sincere content from him in the future (or at least privately if not on the forum). The way he communicates privately is also very nice. I've enjoyed talking about books with him.

I will be starting to making threads, i just don't have the discipline to take myself seriously.
Thank you for the kind words.

 

[apatheia]

---

~—• @Schizotypalcel •—~​

---

I will be starting to making threads, i just don't have the discipline to take myself seriously.
Thank you for the kind words.

What would you write about?

 

[iluvegirl]

I know the most common one has a test for children and a test for adults

Yah but that's to make it accurate for the age demographic lol

 

[Feminist]

Why’d this turn into a dick size thread this some bs

 

[limo8]

I'm 87 iq

Twin

 

[limo8]

View attachment 195921View attachment 195922

Im bigger

 

[iluvegirl]

true but only cuz theyre insecure about themselves

No it's beacuse people who frequent these forums are autist who focus on statistics and blacks are very much subpar on average for many important statistics. And also beacuse of the nature of these places (the better you are the more good you are and the worse the more evil) blacks are understood to be evil

 

[iluvegirl]

.

 

[Schizotypalcel]

---

~—• @Schizotypalcel •—~​

---

What would you write about?

Common struggles I see, issues with romance, discipline, and self confidence.
These would be made up by me with the use of reflection threads. There’s no cure for struggle except through oneself.

Most here light a match and let it burn, whether it’s depression or something else. Sometimes, all it takes is one sentence to spark a thought, to make someone recognize a pattern. I find that enlightening to see.

 

[Kaari]

First, a map (ChatGPT) :
70–79 (Borderline range)

• Roughly 6% of people.
• Cognitive processing is noticeably below average; abstract reasoning and complex problem-solving are challenging.
• People here can still live independently, but academic learning often requires strong structure and repetition.

80–89 (Low average)

• About 16% of people.
• Can handle daily life and most jobs competently. Abstract or theoretical concepts might feel frustrating or “foggy.”
• Tend to do better with concrete tasks than conceptual reasoning.

90–109 (Average)

• About 50% of people fall here.
• Capable of reasoning, learning, and understanding ideas of average complexity.
• The world is designed for this group — education systems, most professions, and social expectations are calibrated here.

110–119 (High average)

• Roughly 16% of people.
• Grasp abstract ideas faster, can strategize and connect patterns with less explicit instruction.
• Often called “bright,” though not necessarily “gifted.” They thrive in analytical or creative fields when motivated.

120–129 (Superior)

• Around 7% of the population.
• Often labeled as “gifted.” Capable of deep understanding, rapid learning, and advanced abstract thought.
• If curiosity and discipline match intelligence, they can excel in intellectually demanding fields.

130–144 (Highly gifted)

• About 2% of people.
• Very high reasoning ability and fast learning speed. They see relationships others miss, often creating their own conceptual frameworks.
• Prone to perfectionism or existential frustration if unstimulated. Many scientists, inventors, and polymaths fall here.

145+ (Exceptionally gifted / profoundly gifted)

• Less than 0.1% of people.
• Extremely fast and deep cognitive processing, sometimes to the point of struggling to relate socially or emotionally to peers.
• They can conceptualize systems-level ideas — physics, philosophy, or abstract mathematics — with near-instinctive clarity.
• Often have asynchronous development: mental maturity outpaces emotional grounding.
  Now..
  
  1. @lumen - 120-125. However, their most interesting aspect is the very high emotional intelligence, not readily captured by g.
  2. @Night - 105-115. Need, just a little more information
  3. @Rau Le Creuset - 125–129. From my discussions with him on anthropology, he can condense large amounts of information into clear, readable paragraphs. Shows real skill in distilling complexity.
  4. @vespertine - 110-119. Need a bit more to say. Seems capable, but interactions haven’t revealed much yet.
  5. @RAD - 115 - 125. Good at abstract reasoning. Thinks through problems logically, connects ideas well.
  6. @slopslinger - 115–125. A little reserved so conversations have been short. It could be so high because of wishful thinking from my end
  7. @over0 - 122.7. Impressive
  8. @apatheia - humble 123. Humble to the extent of being likeable
  9. @Genetics - 123. However, plagued by overthinking
  10. @johnfkennedy - humble 123. Quite articulate, almost all conversations have been fruitful
  11. @faithful - 105-113. Additionally, emotionally intelligent. Not readily captured by g
  12. @Lebensmude - 119 who thinks he's 130
  13. @rovea - Hidden and underrated 113
  14. @RRM67 - 95-100
  15. @Spuffy - very humble 121. Seen a few long responses from them. Handles abstract reasoning smoothly, articulate, and doesn’t get bogged down in unnecessary verbosity.
  16. @milkjar - 105-110 jail
  17. @hannah - 119 who thinks they're 138
  18. @Warden - humble 126. Most articulate user on forum in terms of their writing
  19. @tuberculosisinmybal - 110. Could absolutely be higher
  20. @Riggedahrage - 90-99
  21. @acketar - 119 who thinks he's 122.7
  22. @AuggyDauggy - 100 - 109
  23. @pompompurino - 100-109
  24. @Kaari - 100 - 109
  25. @Schizotypalcel - 115-119. Favourite forum philosopher
  26. @NewFuckingDay - hidden and humble 120. Another one for whom emotional intelligence dominates
  27. @Logicpilled - 119-?. Larping as you was quite fun.
  28. @limo8 - 100-105. Although very cute and likeable
  29. @giga.mia - 100- 105
  30. @Nbernical - 100 - 109
  31. @Casablanco - 100 - 109
  32. @BigDihDiddy - 90-99.
  33. @Darkeningstar - 130-135. If they indeed are pursuing a PHD in physics, it could be higher by just a couple more points. Yes, I know pursuing a PHD in and of itself is not indicative of intelligence since there are many more variables at play. Most importantly conscientiousness. I just feel it would be superfluous to give my reasoning here.
  A point that's completely off topic..
  Although, their writing is undeniably articulate, and their knowledge is definitely not all lie. I have, never in my life witnessed a person so arrogant and narcissistic about their intelligence. Their vanity and egregiousis solipsism is almost entertaining to watch
  34. @blanquita444 - 100 - 109
  35. @Stardust_ - 80-95. Such an interesting person to watch make sense of the world
  36. @RottingCarrie - 90-105.
  37. @huntergirl - 100- 109
  38. @TonyDr - 115 - 119. I loved reading his responses for the time he was here. Very similar to Randomized in terms of personality and writing.
  39. @Knight - 100 - 109
  39. @97baHater -125 -129. Interactions with him were pleasantly surprising. He falls down the pitfalls of black and white thinking often. Regardless, his fluency in scientific discussion is undeniable.
  40. @Jeezy - 95- 105
  41. @cindythetvisleaking - 100 - 109
  42. @SkinnyDennis - 149 silent guardian and observer
  43. @Striking_4 - 105-115
  44. @xy2m - 105- 109
  45. @Transposon - 119 who thinks he's 149
  
  
  Disclaimer : I apologize if you feel I’ve underestimated your IQ.
  Obviously, any analysis based on interactions is inherently limited. This thread is half sarcasm, half serious.
  If you think I’m wrong, chances are you’re right, since I probably am.​

inb4 unemployed ramblings dnr

 

[vespertine]

Common struggles I see, issues with romance, discipline, and self confidence.
These would be made up by me with the use of reflection threads. There’s no cure for struggle except through oneself.

Most here light a match and let it burn, whether it’s depression or something else. Sometimes, all it takes is one sentence to spark a thought, to make someone recognize a pattern. I find that enlightening to see.

 

[iluvegirl]

View attachment 195921View attachment 195922

Taking literally any statistic from SSA seriously is questionable

 

[Spuffy]

A trait of Spuffy that I really appreciate is her ability to understand something and then explain it. I've unironically been confused several times by what people have said on here, and I've sent it to her and ask her if she understands it and she always explains it. So she understands quickly, can explain it quickly and is overall kind.


Some of my favorite replies and threads have been from him. I would unironically like to see more sincere content from him in the future (or at least privately if not on the forum). The way he communicates privately is also very nice. I've enjoyed talking about books with him.


Tony is experienced in a lot of things and is probably one of the more "handy" people I know. His ability to understand machinery (maybe technology is a better word?) is also impressive. He's mentioned some stuff extremely casually that broke my brain trying to understand. He's a good and smart dude.

thank you very much randomized, youre very sweet i really appreciate the way you treat everyone with such common sense and decency. it’s very rare to see someone who can stay that grounded and genuine online. you’re also unironically one of the funniest people here.

beyond that, you’ve given me so much support, more than you maybe realize. you’ve been such a genuinely good pal online, and youre somebody who can be trusted which isn’t something i say lightly. you’re the kind of person you feel lucky to come across online, and i think everyone here is better off for having you around. i could say this for @tuberculosisinmybal as well

 

[iluvegirl]

Should kill myself it fucking happen
Again

 

[Kaari]

First, a map (ChatGPT) :
70–79 (Borderline range)

• Roughly 6% of people.
• Cognitive processing is noticeably below average; abstract reasoning and complex problem-solving are challenging.
• People here can still live independently, but academic learning often requires strong structure and repetition.

80–89 (Low average)

• About 16% of people.
• Can handle daily life and most jobs competently. Abstract or theoretical concepts might feel frustrating or “foggy.”
• Tend to do better with concrete tasks than conceptual reasoning.

90–109 (Average)

• About 50% of people fall here.
• Capable of reasoning, learning, and understanding ideas of average complexity.
• The world is designed for this group — education systems, most professions, and social expectations are calibrated here.

110–119 (High average)

• Roughly 16% of people.
• Grasp abstract ideas faster, can strategize and connect patterns with less explicit instruction.
• Often called “bright,” though not necessarily “gifted.” They thrive in analytical or creative fields when motivated.

120–129 (Superior)

• Around 7% of the population.
• Often labeled as “gifted.” Capable of deep understanding, rapid learning, and advanced abstract thought.
• If curiosity and discipline match intelligence, they can excel in intellectually demanding fields.

130–144 (Highly gifted)

• About 2% of people.
• Very high reasoning ability and fast learning speed. They see relationships others miss, often creating their own conceptual frameworks.
• Prone to perfectionism or existential frustration if unstimulated. Many scientists, inventors, and polymaths fall here.

145+ (Exceptionally gifted / profoundly gifted)

• Less than 0.1% of people.
• Extremely fast and deep cognitive processing, sometimes to the point of struggling to relate socially or emotionally to peers.
• They can conceptualize systems-level ideas — physics, philosophy, or abstract mathematics — with near-instinctive clarity.
• Often have asynchronous development: mental maturity outpaces emotional grounding.
  Now..
  
  1. @lumen - 120-125. However, their most interesting aspect is the very high emotional intelligence, not readily captured by g.
  2. @Night - 105-115. Need, just a little more information
  3. @Rau Le Creuset - 125–129. From my discussions with him on anthropology, he can condense large amounts of information into clear, readable paragraphs. Shows real skill in distilling complexity.
  4. @vespertine - 110-119. Need a bit more to say. Seems capable, but interactions haven’t revealed much yet.
  5. @RAD - 115 - 125. Good at abstract reasoning. Thinks through problems logically, connects ideas well.
  6. @slopslinger - 115–125. A little reserved so conversations have been short. It could be so high because of wishful thinking from my end
  7. @over0 - 122.7. Impressive
  8. @apatheia - humble 123. Humble to the extent of being likeable
  9. @Genetics - 123. However, plagued by overthinking
  10. @johnfkennedy - humble 123. Quite articulate, almost all conversations have been fruitful
  11. @faithful - 105-113. Additionally, emotionally intelligent. Not readily captured by g
  12. @Lebensmude - 119 who thinks he's 130
  13. @rovea - Hidden and underrated 113
  14. @RRM67 - 95-100
  15. @Spuffy - very humble 121. Seen a few long responses from them. Handles abstract reasoning smoothly, articulate, and doesn’t get bogged down in unnecessary verbosity.
  16. @milkjar - 105-110 jail
  17. @hannah - 119 who thinks they're 138
  18. @Warden - humble 126. Most articulate user on forum in terms of their writing
  19. @tuberculosisinmybal - 110. Could absolutely be higher
  20. @Riggedahrage - 90-99
  21. @acketar - 119 who thinks he's 122.7
  22. @AuggyDauggy - 100 - 109
  23. @pompompurino - 100-109
  24. @Kaari - 100 - 109
  25. @Schizotypalcel - 115-119. Favourite forum philosopher
  26. @NewFuckingDay - hidden and humble 120. Another one for whom emotional intelligence dominates
  27. @Logicpilled - 119-?. Larping as you was quite fun.
  28. @limo8 - 100-105. Although very cute and likeable
  29. @giga.mia - 100- 105
  30. @Nbernical - 100 - 109
  31. @Casablanco - 100 - 109
  32. @BigDihDiddy - 90-99.
  33. @Darkeningstar - 130-135. If they indeed are pursuing a PHD in physics, it could be higher by just a couple more points. Yes, I know pursuing a PHD in and of itself is not indicative of intelligence since there are many more variables at play. Most importantly conscientiousness. I just feel it would be superfluous to give my reasoning here.
  A point that's completely off topic..
  Although, their writing is undeniably articulate, and their knowledge is definitely not all lie. I have, never in my life witnessed a person so arrogant and narcissistic about their intelligence. Their vanity and egregiousis solipsism is almost entertaining to watch
  34. @blanquita444 - 100 - 109
  35. @Stardust_ - 80-95. Such an interesting person to watch make sense of the world
  36. @RottingCarrie - 90-105.
  37. @huntergirl - 100- 109
  38. @TonyDr - 115 - 119. I loved reading his responses for the time he was here. Very similar to Randomized in terms of personality and writing.
  39. @Knight - 100 - 109
  39. @97baHater -125 -129. Interactions with him were pleasantly surprising. He falls down the pitfalls of black and white thinking often. Regardless, his fluency in scientific discussion is undeniable.
  40. @Jeezy - 95- 105
  41. @cindythetvisleaking - 100 - 109
  42. @SkinnyDennis - 149 silent guardian and observer
  43. @Striking_4 - 105-115
  44. @xy2m - 105- 109
  45. @Transposon - 119 who thinks he's 149
  
  
  Disclaimer : I apologize if you feel I’ve underestimated your IQ.
  Obviously, any analysis based on interactions is inherently limited. This thread is half sarcasm, half serious.
  If you think I’m wrong, chances are you’re right, since I probably am.​

Same guy btw

 

[Transposon]

View attachment 195942
Same guy btw

 

[Schizotypalcel]

View attachment 195944

You actually got pretty close, i'm 122 iq.

 

[Kaari]

View attachment 195944

The degradations of our brains is already starting to occur again

If you know you know

 

[Kaari]

This is also when I would mindlessly start shitting up the thread but I have to be a good Mossad agent now

 

[Transposon]

i appreciate your recognition that simplifying and condensing complex topics shows intelligence, because i think it does too.

I cannot stress enough how much I believe that, by the way.
There's this quote by Einstein I love, that made me understand what the meaning of this assertion is initially- “The definition of genius is taking the complex and making it simple."

i appreciate that you think i dont use unnecessary verbosity as well because my messages can be on the long side

By the way, for me, I find reading long passages that are actually, passionately and mindfully trying to tackle a topic and challenge it, to be very, very fun. I have observed @Warden does that pretty often, that day you too, were discussing some topics related to feminism with that Mogden guy it was very nice to read. I also find you tackling biology rarely. And then there was that day where I had a very fun discussion with @tuberculosisinmybal about love being conditional or not.
The offtopic channel is mostly there so you can have fun. So, reading serious discussions from time to time can be a good change of pace.

 

[apatheia]

---

~—• @vespertine •—~​

---

View attachment 195937

Except he's broke, on .com and smoking 99.7% pure cocaine.

Common struggles I see, issues with romance, discipline, and self confidence.
These would be made up by me with the use of reflection threads. There’s no cure for struggle except through oneself.

Most here light a match and let it burn, whether it’s depression or something else. Sometimes, all it takes is one sentence to spark a thought, to make someone recognize a pattern. I find that enlightening to see.

Perfect, I look forward to it then. I can't be talking, I am a hypocrite, but the forum is lacking some genuine threads with substance. Something that sparks genuine positive change in someone is always nice to see in places like these where it is mainly just baseless doomerposting. (I guess that statement applies anywheres now though).

I wish I hadn't deleted my old threads because someone sent in my personal messages recently telling me how their mindset shifted away from the exaggerated lookism blackpill due to my old posts. So, if I have the power to do that, I am more than confident that you do as well.

 

[Transposon]

This is also when I would mindlessly start shitting up the thread but I have to be a good Mossad agent now

n****r plss dont leave me alone here, my niggalink jus got updated, im sending you my fentlink over on our neuralink