- Joined
- Aug 17, 2025
- Messages
- 3,390
- Solutions
- 2
- Time Online
- 8d 8h
- Reputation
- 10,602
- Location
- Not the United Kingdom
goated at taking accountability and not commiting crimesblack men are goated why does he hate himself
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
goated at taking accountability and not commiting crimesblack men are goated why does he hate himself
I know the most common one has a test for children and a test for adultsNever heard this ever, tests are meant to be quantifiable to age
mad cuz they have bigger dicks smhgoated at taking accountability and not commiting crimes
the milkjar character projects a lot on 'ethnics' due to the homophobia thing.true but only cuz theyre insecure about themselves
a social myth, not actual racial biology.mad cuz they have bigger dicks smh
false this isnt a mytha social myth, not actual racial biology.
nah every white guy ive dated had a smaller dick then black mena social myth, not actual racial biology.
can confirm im only 50 percent and I have an absolute choppermad cuz they have bigger dicks smh
if you've dated enough men to have a statistically relevant sample size, that's depressing.
View attachment 195918
anecdotes btw
*extremely* reliable source. just wrote down what came to mind
lolman the fuck am i even doing arguing with gutter people over dick sizes i need to go for a walk
you will die soon, spend your time in better placesman the fuck am i even doing arguing with gutter people over dick sizes i need to go for a walk
self reported measurements make the sources noise. when measurements are done under controlled medical conditions(which are rare), the differences between populations are small enough to be statistically trivial and overlap almost completely. individual variation dwarfs any average group difference.
oh no that was a blatant lieyou will die soon, spend your time in better places
Glad to hear thatoh no that was a blatant lie
Of course you give me low IQ because I am ragebaiting on this account and can't speak proper englishFirst, a map (ChatGPT) :
70–79 (Borderline range)
80–89 (Low average)
- Roughly 6% of people.
- Cognitive processing is noticeably below average; abstract reasoning and complex problem-solving are challenging.
- People here can still live independently, but academic learning often requires strong structure and repetition.
90–109 (Average)
- About 16% of people.
- Can handle daily life and most jobs competently. Abstract or theoretical concepts might feel frustrating or “foggy.”
- Tend to do better with concrete tasks than conceptual reasoning.
110–119 (High average)
- About 50% of people fall here.
- Capable of reasoning, learning, and understanding ideas of average complexity.
- The world is designed for this group — education systems, most professions, and social expectations are calibrated here.
- Roughly 16% of people.
- Grasp abstract ideas faster, can strategize and connect patterns with less explicit instruction.
- Often called “bright,” though not necessarily “gifted.” They thrive in analytical or creative fields when motivated.
120–129 (Superior)
130–144 (Highly gifted)
- Around 7% of the population.
- Often labeled as “gifted.” Capable of deep understanding, rapid learning, and advanced abstract thought.
- If curiosity and discipline match intelligence, they can excel in intellectually demanding fields.
145+ (Exceptionally gifted / profoundly gifted)
- About 2% of people.
- Very high reasoning ability and fast learning speed. They see relationships others miss, often creating their own conceptual frameworks.
- Prone to perfectionism or existential frustration if unstimulated. Many scientists, inventors, and polymaths fall here.
- Less than 0.1% of people.
- Extremely fast and deep cognitive processing, sometimes to the point of struggling to relate socially or emotionally to peers.
- They can conceptualize systems-level ideas — physics, philosophy, or abstract mathematics — with near-instinctive clarity.
Often have asynchronous development: mental maturity outpaces emotional grounding.
Now..
1. @lumen - 120-125. However, their most interesting aspect is the very high emotional intelligence, not readily captured by g.
2. @Night - 105-115. Need, just a little more information
3. @Rau Le Creuset - 125–129. From my discussions with him on anthropology, he can condense large amounts of information into clear, readable paragraphs. Shows real skill in distilling complexity.
4. @vespertine - 110-119. Need a bit more to say. Seems capable, but interactions haven’t revealed much yet.
5. @RAD - 115 - 125. Good at abstract reasoning. Thinks through problems logically, connects ideas well.
6. @slopslinger - 115–125. A little reserved so conversations have been short. It could be so high because of wishful thinking from my end
7. @over0 - 122.7. Impressive
8. @apatheia - humble 123. Humble to the extent of being likeable
9. @Genetics - 123. However, plagued by overthinking
10. @johnfkennedy - humble 123. Quite articulate, almost all conversations have been fruitful
11. @faithful - 105-113. Additionally, emotionally intelligent. Not readily captured by g
12. @Lebensmude - 119 who thinks he's 130
13. @rovea - Hidden and underrated 113
14. @RRM67 - 95-100
15. @Spuffy - very humble 121. Seen a few long responses from them. Handles abstract reasoning smoothly, articulate, and doesn’t get bogged down in unnecessary verbosity.
16. @milkjar - 105-110 jail
17. @hannah - 119 who thinks they're 138
18. @Warden - humble 126. Most articulate user on forum in terms of their writing
19. @tuberculosisinmybal - 110. Could absolutely be higher
20. @Riggedahrage - 90-99
21. @acketar - 119 who thinks he's 122.7
22. @AuggyDauggy - 100 - 109
23. @pompompurino - 100-109
24. @Kaari - 100 - 109
25. @Schizotypalcel - 115-119. Favourite forum philosopher
26. @NewFuckingDay - hidden and humble 120. Another one for whom emotional intelligence dominates
27. @Logicpilled - 119-?. Larping as you was quite fun.
28. @limo8 - 100-105. Although very cute and likeable
29. @giga.mia - 100- 105
30. @Nbernical - 100 - 109
31. @Casablanco - 100 - 109
32. @BigDihDiddy - 90-99.
33. @Darkeningstar - 130-135. If they indeed are pursuing a PHD in physics, it could be higher by just a couple more points. Yes, I know pursuing a PHD in and of itself is not indicative of intelligence since there are many more variables at play. Most importantly conscientiousness. I just feel it would be superfluous to give my reasoning here.
A point that's completely off topic..
Although, their writing is undeniably articulate, and their knowledge is definitely not all lie. I have, never in my life witnessed a person so arrogant and narcissistic about their intelligence. Their vanity and egregiousis solipsism is almost entertaining to watch
34. @blanquita444 - 100 - 109
35. @Stardust_ - 80-95. Such an interesting person to watch make sense of the world
36. @RottingCarrie - 90-105.
37. @huntergirl - 100- 109
38. @TonyDr - 115 - 119. I loved reading his responses for the time he was here. Very similar to Randomized in terms of personality and writing.
39. @Knight - 100 - 109
39. @97baHater -125 -129. Interactions with him were pleasantly surprising. He falls down the pitfalls of black and white thinking often. Regardless, his fluency in scientific discussion is undeniable.
40. @Jeezy - 95- 105
41. @cindythetvisleaking - 100 - 109
42. @SkinnyDennis - 149 silent guardian and observer
43. @Striking_4 - 105-115
44. @xy2m - 105- 109
45. @Transposon - 119 who thinks he's 149
Disclaimer : I apologize if you feel I’ve underestimated your IQ.
Obviously, any analysis based on interactions is inherently limited. This thread is half sarcasm, half serious.
If you think I’m wrong, chances are you’re right, since I probably am.
heh 100 iq i knew itFirst, a map (ChatGPT) :
70–79 (Borderline range)
80–89 (Low average)
- Roughly 6% of people.
- Cognitive processing is noticeably below average; abstract reasoning and complex problem-solving are challenging.
- People here can still live independently, but academic learning often requires strong structure and repetition.
90–109 (Average)
- About 16% of people.
- Can handle daily life and most jobs competently. Abstract or theoretical concepts might feel frustrating or “foggy.”
- Tend to do better with concrete tasks than conceptual reasoning.
110–119 (High average)
- About 50% of people fall here.
- Capable of reasoning, learning, and understanding ideas of average complexity.
- The world is designed for this group — education systems, most professions, and social expectations are calibrated here.
- Roughly 16% of people.
- Grasp abstract ideas faster, can strategize and connect patterns with less explicit instruction.
- Often called “bright,” though not necessarily “gifted.” They thrive in analytical or creative fields when motivated.
120–129 (Superior)
130–144 (Highly gifted)
- Around 7% of the population.
- Often labeled as “gifted.” Capable of deep understanding, rapid learning, and advanced abstract thought.
- If curiosity and discipline match intelligence, they can excel in intellectually demanding fields.
145+ (Exceptionally gifted / profoundly gifted)
- About 2% of people.
- Very high reasoning ability and fast learning speed. They see relationships others miss, often creating their own conceptual frameworks.
- Prone to perfectionism or existential frustration if unstimulated. Many scientists, inventors, and polymaths fall here.
- Less than 0.1% of people.
- Extremely fast and deep cognitive processing, sometimes to the point of struggling to relate socially or emotionally to peers.
- They can conceptualize systems-level ideas — physics, philosophy, or abstract mathematics — with near-instinctive clarity.
Often have asynchronous development: mental maturity outpaces emotional grounding.
Now..
1. @lumen - 120-125. However, their most interesting aspect is the very high emotional intelligence, not readily captured by g.
2. @Night - 105-115. Need, just a little more information
3. @Rau Le Creuset - 125–129. From my discussions with him on anthropology, he can condense large amounts of information into clear, readable paragraphs. Shows real skill in distilling complexity.
4. @vespertine - 110-119. Need a bit more to say. Seems capable, but interactions haven’t revealed much yet.
5. @RAD - 115 - 125. Good at abstract reasoning. Thinks through problems logically, connects ideas well.
6. @slopslinger - 115–125. A little reserved so conversations have been short. It could be so high because of wishful thinking from my end
7. @over0 - 122.7. Impressive
8. @apatheia - humble 123. Humble to the extent of being likeable
9. @Genetics - 123. However, plagued by overthinking
10. @johnfkennedy - humble 123. Quite articulate, almost all conversations have been fruitful
11. @faithful - 105-113. Additionally, emotionally intelligent. Not readily captured by g
12. @Lebensmude - 119 who thinks he's 130
13. @rovea - Hidden and underrated 113
14. @RRM67 - 95-100
15. @Spuffy - very humble 121. Seen a few long responses from them. Handles abstract reasoning smoothly, articulate, and doesn’t get bogged down in unnecessary verbosity.
16. @milkjar - 105-110 jail
17. @hannah - 119 who thinks they're 138
18. @Warden - humble 126. Most articulate user on forum in terms of their writing
19. @tuberculosisinmybal - 110. Could absolutely be higher
20. @Riggedahrage - 90-99
21. @acketar - 119 who thinks he's 122.7
22. @AuggyDauggy - 100 - 109
23. @pompompurino - 100-109
24. @Kaari - 100 - 109
25. @Schizotypalcel - 115-119. Favourite forum philosopher
26. @NewFuckingDay - hidden and humble 120. Another one for whom emotional intelligence dominates
27. @Logicpilled - 119-?. Larping as you was quite fun.
28. @limo8 - 100-105. Although very cute and likeable
29. @giga.mia - 100- 105
30. @Nbernical - 100 - 109
31. @Casablanco - 100 - 109
32. @BigDihDiddy - 90-99.
33. @Darkeningstar - 130-135. If they indeed are pursuing a PHD in physics, it could be higher by just a couple more points. Yes, I know pursuing a PHD in and of itself is not indicative of intelligence since there are many more variables at play. Most importantly conscientiousness. I just feel it would be superfluous to give my reasoning here.
A point that's completely off topic..
Although, their writing is undeniably articulate, and their knowledge is definitely not all lie. I have, never in my life witnessed a person so arrogant and narcissistic about their intelligence. Their vanity and egregiousis solipsism is almost entertaining to watch
34. @blanquita444 - 100 - 109
35. @Stardust_ - 80-95. Such an interesting person to watch make sense of the world
36. @RottingCarrie - 90-105.
37. @huntergirl - 100- 109
38. @TonyDr - 115 - 119. I loved reading his responses for the time he was here. Very similar to Randomized in terms of personality and writing.
39. @Knight - 100 - 109
39. @97baHater -125 -129. Interactions with him were pleasantly surprising. He falls down the pitfalls of black and white thinking often. Regardless, his fluency in scientific discussion is undeniable.
40. @Jeezy - 95- 105
41. @cindythetvisleaking - 100 - 109
42. @SkinnyDennis - 149 silent guardian and observer
43. @Striking_4 - 105-115
44. @xy2m - 105- 109
45. @Transposon - 119 who thinks he's 149
Disclaimer : I apologize if you feel I’ve underestimated your IQ.
Obviously, any analysis based on interactions is inherently limited. This thread is half sarcasm, half serious.
If you think I’m wrong, chances are you’re right, since I probably am.
a genius in the central african republicI'm 87 iq
I will be starting to making threads, i just don't have the discipline to take myself seriously.Some of my favorite replies and threads have been from him.I would unironically like to see more sincere content from him in the future (or at least privately if not on the forum). The way he communicates privately is also very nice. I've enjoyed talking about books with him.
I will be starting to making threads, i just don't have the discipline to take myself seriously.
Thank you for the kind words.
Yah but that's to make it accurate for the age demographic lolI know the most common one has a test for children and a test for adults
TwinI'm 87 iq
No it's beacuse people who frequent these forums are autist who focus on statistics and blacks are very much subpar on average for many important statistics. And also beacuse of the nature of these places (the better you are the more good you are and the worse the more evil) blacks are understood to be eviltrue but only cuz theyre insecure about themselves
Common struggles I see, issues with romance, discipline, and self confidence.
inb4 unemployed ramblings dnrFirst, a map (ChatGPT) :
70–79 (Borderline range)
80–89 (Low average)
- Roughly 6% of people.
- Cognitive processing is noticeably below average; abstract reasoning and complex problem-solving are challenging.
- People here can still live independently, but academic learning often requires strong structure and repetition.
90–109 (Average)
- About 16% of people.
- Can handle daily life and most jobs competently. Abstract or theoretical concepts might feel frustrating or “foggy.”
- Tend to do better with concrete tasks than conceptual reasoning.
110–119 (High average)
- About 50% of people fall here.
- Capable of reasoning, learning, and understanding ideas of average complexity.
- The world is designed for this group — education systems, most professions, and social expectations are calibrated here.
- Roughly 16% of people.
- Grasp abstract ideas faster, can strategize and connect patterns with less explicit instruction.
- Often called “bright,” though not necessarily “gifted.” They thrive in analytical or creative fields when motivated.
120–129 (Superior)
130–144 (Highly gifted)
- Around 7% of the population.
- Often labeled as “gifted.” Capable of deep understanding, rapid learning, and advanced abstract thought.
- If curiosity and discipline match intelligence, they can excel in intellectually demanding fields.
145+ (Exceptionally gifted / profoundly gifted)
- About 2% of people.
- Very high reasoning ability and fast learning speed. They see relationships others miss, often creating their own conceptual frameworks.
- Prone to perfectionism or existential frustration if unstimulated. Many scientists, inventors, and polymaths fall here.
- Less than 0.1% of people.
- Extremely fast and deep cognitive processing, sometimes to the point of struggling to relate socially or emotionally to peers.
- They can conceptualize systems-level ideas — physics, philosophy, or abstract mathematics — with near-instinctive clarity.
Often have asynchronous development: mental maturity outpaces emotional grounding.
Now..
1. @lumen - 120-125. However, their most interesting aspect is the very high emotional intelligence, not readily captured by g.
2. @Night - 105-115. Need, just a little more information
3. @Rau Le Creuset - 125–129. From my discussions with him on anthropology, he can condense large amounts of information into clear, readable paragraphs. Shows real skill in distilling complexity.
4. @vespertine - 110-119. Need a bit more to say. Seems capable, but interactions haven’t revealed much yet.
5. @RAD - 115 - 125. Good at abstract reasoning. Thinks through problems logically, connects ideas well.
6. @slopslinger - 115–125. A little reserved so conversations have been short. It could be so high because of wishful thinking from my end
7. @over0 - 122.7. Impressive
8. @apatheia - humble 123. Humble to the extent of being likeable
9. @Genetics - 123. However, plagued by overthinking
10. @johnfkennedy - humble 123. Quite articulate, almost all conversations have been fruitful
11. @faithful - 105-113. Additionally, emotionally intelligent. Not readily captured by g
12. @Lebensmude - 119 who thinks he's 130
13. @rovea - Hidden and underrated 113
14. @RRM67 - 95-100
15. @Spuffy - very humble 121. Seen a few long responses from them. Handles abstract reasoning smoothly, articulate, and doesn’t get bogged down in unnecessary verbosity.
16. @milkjar - 105-110 jail
17. @hannah - 119 who thinks they're 138
18. @Warden - humble 126. Most articulate user on forum in terms of their writing
19. @tuberculosisinmybal - 110. Could absolutely be higher
20. @Riggedahrage - 90-99
21. @acketar - 119 who thinks he's 122.7
22. @AuggyDauggy - 100 - 109
23. @pompompurino - 100-109
24. @Kaari - 100 - 109
25. @Schizotypalcel - 115-119. Favourite forum philosopher
26. @NewFuckingDay - hidden and humble 120. Another one for whom emotional intelligence dominates
27. @Logicpilled - 119-?. Larping as you was quite fun.
28. @limo8 - 100-105. Although very cute and likeable
29. @giga.mia - 100- 105
30. @Nbernical - 100 - 109
31. @Casablanco - 100 - 109
32. @BigDihDiddy - 90-99.
33. @Darkeningstar - 130-135. If they indeed are pursuing a PHD in physics, it could be higher by just a couple more points. Yes, I know pursuing a PHD in and of itself is not indicative of intelligence since there are many more variables at play. Most importantly conscientiousness. I just feel it would be superfluous to give my reasoning here.
A point that's completely off topic..
Although, their writing is undeniably articulate, and their knowledge is definitely not all lie. I have, never in my life witnessed a person so arrogant and narcissistic about their intelligence. Their vanity and egregiousis solipsism is almost entertaining to watch
34. @blanquita444 - 100 - 109
35. @Stardust_ - 80-95. Such an interesting person to watch make sense of the world
36. @RottingCarrie - 90-105.
37. @huntergirl - 100- 109
38. @TonyDr - 115 - 119. I loved reading his responses for the time he was here. Very similar to Randomized in terms of personality and writing.
39. @Knight - 100 - 109
39. @97baHater -125 -129. Interactions with him were pleasantly surprising. He falls down the pitfalls of black and white thinking often. Regardless, his fluency in scientific discussion is undeniable.
40. @Jeezy - 95- 105
41. @cindythetvisleaking - 100 - 109
42. @SkinnyDennis - 149 silent guardian and observer
43. @Striking_4 - 105-115
44. @xy2m - 105- 109
45. @Transposon - 119 who thinks he's 149
Disclaimer : I apologize if you feel I’ve underestimated your IQ.
Obviously, any analysis based on interactions is inherently limited. This thread is half sarcasm, half serious.
If you think I’m wrong, chances are you’re right, since I probably am.
Common struggles I see, issues with romance, discipline, and self confidence.
These would be made up by me with the use of reflection threads. There’s no cure for struggle except through oneself.
Most here light a match and let it burn, whether it’s depression or something else. Sometimes, all it takes is one sentence to spark a thought, to make someone recognize a pattern. I find that enlightening to see.
Taking literally any statistic from SSA seriously is questionable
thank you very much randomized, youre very sweetA trait of Spuffy that I really appreciate is her ability to understand something and then explain it. I've unironically been confused several times by what people have said on here, and I've sent it to her and ask her if she understands it and she always explains it. So she understands quickly, can explain it quickly and is overall kind.
Some of my favorite replies and threads have been from him.I would unironically like to see more sincere content from him in the future (or at least privately if not on the forum). The way he communicates privately is also very nice. I've enjoyed talking about books with him.
Tony is experienced in a lot of things and is probably one of the more "handy" people I know. His ability to understand machinery (maybe technology is a better word?) is also impressive. He's mentioned some stuff extremely casually that broke my brain trying to understand. He's a good and smart dude.
First, a map (ChatGPT) :
70–79 (Borderline range)
80–89 (Low average)
- Roughly 6% of people.
- Cognitive processing is noticeably below average; abstract reasoning and complex problem-solving are challenging.
- People here can still live independently, but academic learning often requires strong structure and repetition.
90–109 (Average)
- About 16% of people.
- Can handle daily life and most jobs competently. Abstract or theoretical concepts might feel frustrating or “foggy.”
- Tend to do better with concrete tasks than conceptual reasoning.
110–119 (High average)
- About 50% of people fall here.
- Capable of reasoning, learning, and understanding ideas of average complexity.
- The world is designed for this group — education systems, most professions, and social expectations are calibrated here.
- Roughly 16% of people.
- Grasp abstract ideas faster, can strategize and connect patterns with less explicit instruction.
- Often called “bright,” though not necessarily “gifted.” They thrive in analytical or creative fields when motivated.
120–129 (Superior)
130–144 (Highly gifted)
- Around 7% of the population.
- Often labeled as “gifted.” Capable of deep understanding, rapid learning, and advanced abstract thought.
- If curiosity and discipline match intelligence, they can excel in intellectually demanding fields.
145+ (Exceptionally gifted / profoundly gifted)
- About 2% of people.
- Very high reasoning ability and fast learning speed. They see relationships others miss, often creating their own conceptual frameworks.
- Prone to perfectionism or existential frustration if unstimulated. Many scientists, inventors, and polymaths fall here.
- Less than 0.1% of people.
- Extremely fast and deep cognitive processing, sometimes to the point of struggling to relate socially or emotionally to peers.
- They can conceptualize systems-level ideas — physics, philosophy, or abstract mathematics — with near-instinctive clarity.
Often have asynchronous development: mental maturity outpaces emotional grounding.
Now..
1. @lumen - 120-125. However, their most interesting aspect is the very high emotional intelligence, not readily captured by g.
2. @Night - 105-115. Need, just a little more information
3. @Rau Le Creuset - 125–129. From my discussions with him on anthropology, he can condense large amounts of information into clear, readable paragraphs. Shows real skill in distilling complexity.
4. @vespertine - 110-119. Need a bit more to say. Seems capable, but interactions haven’t revealed much yet.
5. @RAD - 115 - 125. Good at abstract reasoning. Thinks through problems logically, connects ideas well.
6. @slopslinger - 115–125. A little reserved so conversations have been short. It could be so high because of wishful thinking from my end
7. @over0 - 122.7. Impressive
8. @apatheia - humble 123. Humble to the extent of being likeable
9. @Genetics - 123. However, plagued by overthinking
10. @johnfkennedy - humble 123. Quite articulate, almost all conversations have been fruitful
11. @faithful - 105-113. Additionally, emotionally intelligent. Not readily captured by g
12. @Lebensmude - 119 who thinks he's 130
13. @rovea - Hidden and underrated 113
14. @RRM67 - 95-100
15. @Spuffy - very humble 121. Seen a few long responses from them. Handles abstract reasoning smoothly, articulate, and doesn’t get bogged down in unnecessary verbosity.
16. @milkjar - 105-110 jail
17. @hannah - 119 who thinks they're 138
18. @Warden - humble 126. Most articulate user on forum in terms of their writing
19. @tuberculosisinmybal - 110. Could absolutely be higher
20. @Riggedahrage - 90-99
21. @acketar - 119 who thinks he's 122.7
22. @AuggyDauggy - 100 - 109
23. @pompompurino - 100-109
24. @Kaari - 100 - 109
25. @Schizotypalcel - 115-119. Favourite forum philosopher
26. @NewFuckingDay - hidden and humble 120. Another one for whom emotional intelligence dominates
27. @Logicpilled - 119-?. Larping as you was quite fun.
28. @limo8 - 100-105. Although very cute and likeable
29. @giga.mia - 100- 105
30. @Nbernical - 100 - 109
31. @Casablanco - 100 - 109
32. @BigDihDiddy - 90-99.
33. @Darkeningstar - 130-135. If they indeed are pursuing a PHD in physics, it could be higher by just a couple more points. Yes, I know pursuing a PHD in and of itself is not indicative of intelligence since there are many more variables at play. Most importantly conscientiousness. I just feel it would be superfluous to give my reasoning here.
A point that's completely off topic..
Although, their writing is undeniably articulate, and their knowledge is definitely not all lie. I have, never in my life witnessed a person so arrogant and narcissistic about their intelligence. Their vanity and egregiousis solipsism is almost entertaining to watch
34. @blanquita444 - 100 - 109
35. @Stardust_ - 80-95. Such an interesting person to watch make sense of the world
36. @RottingCarrie - 90-105.
37. @huntergirl - 100- 109
38. @TonyDr - 115 - 119. I loved reading his responses for the time he was here. Very similar to Randomized in terms of personality and writing.
39. @Knight - 100 - 109
39. @97baHater -125 -129. Interactions with him were pleasantly surprising. He falls down the pitfalls of black and white thinking often. Regardless, his fluency in scientific discussion is undeniable.
40. @Jeezy - 95- 105
41. @cindythetvisleaking - 100 - 109
42. @SkinnyDennis - 149 silent guardian and observer
43. @Striking_4 - 105-115
44. @xy2m - 105- 109
45. @Transposon - 119 who thinks he's 149
Disclaimer : I apologize if you feel I’ve underestimated your IQ.
Obviously, any analysis based on interactions is inherently limited. This thread is half sarcasm, half serious.
If you think I’m wrong, chances are you’re right, since I probably am.
View attachment 195942
Same guy btw
You actually got pretty close, i'm 122 iq.
The degradations of our brains is already starting to occur again
I cannot stress enough how much I believe that, by the way.i appreciate your recognition that simplifying and condensing complex topics shows intelligence, because i think it does too.
By the way, for me, I find reading long passages that are actually, passionately and mindfully trying to tackle a topic and challenge it, to be very, very fun. I have observed @Warden does that pretty often, that day you too, were discussing some topics related to feminism with that Mogden guy it was very nice to read. I also find you tackling biology rarely. And then there was that day where I had a very fun discussion with @tuberculosisinmybal about love being conditional or not.i appreciate that you think i dont use unnecessary verbosity as well because my messages can be on the long side
Common struggles I see, issues with romance, discipline, and self confidence.
These would be made up by me with the use of reflection threads. There’s no cure for struggle except through oneself.
Most here light a match and let it burn, whether it’s depression or something else. Sometimes, all it takes is one sentence to spark a thought, to make someone recognize a pattern. I find that enlightening to see.