Looksmaxxing Forum Logo

Join 53,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

Register Log in
  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

An estimation of .com userbase IQ megathread

over0 said:
Not enough sub 100 scores tbh
Click to expand...
Asked GPT to do some calculation.
The mean is 113 so you're completely correct.
The only thing I have to say is, I'm much more likely to remember users that impressed me than ones that didn't.
So, kind of a reporting bias
 
apatheia said:
~—• @Transposon •—~​



Thanks but no, not genuinely possible not in the slightest. I do not consider myself "high iq" and that's okay.
Click to expand...
if you're not high iq then im doomed

💀💀💀
 
Transposon said:
First, a map (ChatGPT) :
70–79 (Borderline range)
  • Roughly 6% of people.
  • Cognitive processing is noticeably below average; abstract reasoning and complex problem-solving are challenging.
  • People here can still live independently, but academic learning often requires strong structure and repetition.
80–89 (Low average)
  • About 16% of people.
  • Can handle daily life and most jobs competently. Abstract or theoretical concepts might feel frustrating or “foggy.”
  • Tend to do better with concrete tasks than conceptual reasoning.
90–109 (Average)
  • About 50% of people fall here.
  • Capable of reasoning, learning, and understanding ideas of average complexity.
  • The world is designed for this group — education systems, most professions, and social expectations are calibrated here.
110–119 (High average)
  • Roughly 16% of people.
  • Grasp abstract ideas faster, can strategize and connect patterns with less explicit instruction.
  • Often called “bright,” though not necessarily “gifted.” They thrive in analytical or creative fields when motivated.

120–129 (Superior)
  • Around 7% of the population.
  • Often labeled as “gifted.” Capable of deep understanding, rapid learning, and advanced abstract thought.
  • If curiosity and discipline match intelligence, they can excel in intellectually demanding fields.
130–144 (Highly gifted)
  • About 2% of people.
  • Very high reasoning ability and fast learning speed. They see relationships others miss, often creating their own conceptual frameworks.
  • Prone to perfectionism or existential frustration if unstimulated. Many scientists, inventors, and polymaths fall here.
145+ (Exceptionally gifted / profoundly gifted)
  • Less than 0.1% of people.
  • Extremely fast and deep cognitive processing, sometimes to the point of struggling to relate socially or emotionally to peers.
  • They can conceptualize systems-level ideas — physics, philosophy, or abstract mathematics — with near-instinctive clarity.
  • Often have asynchronous development: mental maturity outpaces emotional grounding.
    Now..

    1. @lumen - 120-125. However, their most interesting aspect is the very high emotional intelligence, not readily captured by g.
    2. @Night - 105-115. Need, just a little more information
    3. @Rau Le Creuset - 125–129. From my discussions with him on anthropology, he can condense large amounts of information into clear, readable paragraphs. Shows real skill in distilling complexity.
    4. @vespertine - 110-119. Need a bit more to say. Seems capable, but interactions haven’t revealed much yet.
    5. @RAD - 115 - 125. Good at abstract reasoning. Thinks through problems logically, connects ideas well.
    6. @slopslinger - 115–125. A little reserved so conversations have been short. It could be so high because of wishful thinking from my end
    7. @over0 - 122.7. Impressive
    8. @apatheia - humble 123. Humble to the extent of being likeable
    9. @Genetics - 123. However, plagued by overthinking
    10. @johnfkennedy - humble 123. Quite articulate, almost all conversations have been fruitful
    11. @faithful - 105-113. Additionally, emotionally intelligent. Not readily captured by g
    12. @Lebensmude - 119 who thinks he's 130
    13. @rovea - Hidden and underrated 113
    14. @RRM67 - 95-100
    15. @Spuffy - very humble 121. Seen a few long responses from them. Handles abstract reasoning smoothly, articulate, and doesn’t get bogged down in unnecessary verbosity.
    16. @milkjar - 105-110 jail
    17. @hannah - 119 who thinks they're 138
    18. @Warden - humble 126. Most articulate user on forum in terms of their writing
    19. @tuberculosisinmybal - 110. Could absolutely be higher
    20. @Riggedahrage - 90-99
    21. @acketar - 119 who thinks he's 122.7
    22. @AuggyDauggy - 100 - 109
    23. @pompompurino - 100-109
    24. @Kaari - 100 - 109
    25. @Schizotypalcel - 115-119. Favourite forum philosopher
    26. @NewFuckingDay - hidden and humble 120. Another one for whom emotional intelligence dominates
    27. @Logicpilled - 119-?. Larping as you was quite fun.
    28. @limo8 - 100-105. Although very cute and likeable
    29. @giga.mia - 100- 105
    30. @Nbernical - 100 - 109
    31. @Casablanco - 100 - 109
    32. @BigDihDiddy - 90-99.
    33. @Darkeningstar - 130-135. If they indeed are pursuing a PHD in physics, it could be higher by just a couple more points. Yes, I know pursuing a PHD in and of itself is not indicative of intelligence since there are many more variables at play. Most importantly conscientiousness. I just feel it would be superfluous to give my reasoning here.
    A point that's completely off topic..
    Although, their writing is undeniably articulate, and their knowledge is definitely not all lie. I have, never in my life witnessed a person so arrogant and narcissistic about their intelligence. Their vanity and egregiousis solipsism is almost entertaining to watch
    34. @blanquita444 - 100 - 109
    35. @Stardust_ - 80-95. Such an interesting person to watch make sense of the world
    36. @RottingCarrie - 90-105.
    37. @huntergirl - 100- 109
    38. @TonyDr - 115 - 119. I loved reading his responses for the time he was here. Very similar to Randomized in terms of personality and writing.
    39. @Knight - 100 - 109
    39. @97baHater -125 -129. Interactions with him were pleasantly surprising. He falls down the pitfalls of black and white thinking often. Regardless, his fluency in scientific discussion is undeniable.
    40. @Jeezy - 95- 105
    41. @cindythetvisleaking - 100 - 109
    42. @SkinnyDennis - 149 silent guardian and observer
    43. @Striking_4 - 105-115
    44. @xy2m - 105- 109
    45. @Transposon - 119 who thinks he's 149


    Disclaimer : I apologize if you feel I’ve underestimated your IQ.
    Obviously, any analysis based on interactions is inherently limited. This thread is half sarcasm, half serious.
    If you think I’m wrong, chances are you’re right, since I probably am.​
Click to expand...
you far overestimate me n***a. one time i decided to use toothpaste as lubricant
 
peachyfag said:
95 in processing speed btw
Click to expand...
visual processing speed, skip to the section of the report where she says my overall iq is an underestimate bc of my eye convergence disorder 🤣 underestimate and still mogs you, brutal
 
hannah said:
visual processing speed, skip to the section of the report where she says my overall iq is an underestimate bc of my eye convergence disorder 🤣 underestimate and still mogs you, brutal
Click to expand...
There it is 😂 :p
 
Transposon said:
First, a map (ChatGPT) :
70–79 (Borderline range)
  • Roughly 6% of people.
  • Cognitive processing is noticeably below average; abstract reasoning and complex problem-solving are challenging.
  • People here can still live independently, but academic learning often requires strong structure and repetition.
80–89 (Low average)
  • About 16% of people.
  • Can handle daily life and most jobs competently. Abstract or theoretical concepts might feel frustrating or “foggy.”
  • Tend to do better with concrete tasks than conceptual reasoning.
90–109 (Average)
  • About 50% of people fall here.
  • Capable of reasoning, learning, and understanding ideas of average complexity.
  • The world is designed for this group — education systems, most professions, and social expectations are calibrated here.
110–119 (High average)
  • Roughly 16% of people.
  • Grasp abstract ideas faster, can strategize and connect patterns with less explicit instruction.
  • Often called “bright,” though not necessarily “gifted.” They thrive in analytical or creative fields when motivated.

120–129 (Superior)
  • Around 7% of the population.
  • Often labeled as “gifted.” Capable of deep understanding, rapid learning, and advanced abstract thought.
  • If curiosity and discipline match intelligence, they can excel in intellectually demanding fields.
130–144 (Highly gifted)
  • About 2% of people.
  • Very high reasoning ability and fast learning speed. They see relationships others miss, often creating their own conceptual frameworks.
  • Prone to perfectionism or existential frustration if unstimulated. Many scientists, inventors, and polymaths fall here.
145+ (Exceptionally gifted / profoundly gifted)
  • Less than 0.1% of people.
  • Extremely fast and deep cognitive processing, sometimes to the point of struggling to relate socially or emotionally to peers.
  • They can conceptualize systems-level ideas — physics, philosophy, or abstract mathematics — with near-instinctive clarity.
  • Often have asynchronous development: mental maturity outpaces emotional grounding.
    Now..

    1. @lumen - 120-125. However, their most interesting aspect is the very high emotional intelligence, not readily captured by g.
    2. @Night - 105-115. Need, just a little more information
    3. @Rau Le Creuset - 125–129. From my discussions with him on anthropology, he can condense large amounts of information into clear, readable paragraphs. Shows real skill in distilling complexity.
    4. @vespertine - 110-119. Need a bit more to say. Seems capable, but interactions haven’t revealed much yet.
    5. @RAD - 115 - 125. Good at abstract reasoning. Thinks through problems logically, connects ideas well.
    6. @slopslinger - 115–125. A little reserved so conversations have been short. It could be so high because of wishful thinking from my end
    7. @over0 - 122.7. Impressive
    8. @apatheia - humble 123. Humble to the extent of being likeable
    9. @Genetics - 123. However, plagued by overthinking
    10. @johnfkennedy - humble 123. Quite articulate, almost all conversations have been fruitful
    11. @faithful - 105-113. Additionally, emotionally intelligent. Not readily captured by g
    12. @Lebensmude - 119 who thinks he's 130
    13. @rovea - Hidden and underrated 113
    14. @RRM67 - 95-100
    15. @Spuffy - very humble 121. Seen a few long responses from them. Handles abstract reasoning smoothly, articulate, and doesn’t get bogged down in unnecessary verbosity.
    16. @milkjar - 105-110 jail
    17. @hannah - 119 who thinks they're 138
    18. @Warden - humble 126. Most articulate user on forum in terms of their writing
    19. @tuberculosisinmybal - 110. Could absolutely be higher
    20. @Riggedahrage - 90-99
    21. @acketar - 119 who thinks he's 122.7
    22. @AuggyDauggy - 100 - 109
    23. @pompompurino - 100-109
    24. @Kaari - 100 - 109
    25. @Schizotypalcel - 115-119. Favourite forum philosopher
    26. @NewFuckingDay - hidden and humble 120. Another one for whom emotional intelligence dominates
    27. @Logicpilled - 119-?. Larping as you was quite fun.
    28. @limo8 - 100-105. Although very cute and likeable
    29. @giga.mia - 100- 105
    30. @Nbernical - 100 - 109
    31. @Casablanco - 100 - 109
    32. @BigDihDiddy - 90-99.
    33. @Darkeningstar - 130-135. If they indeed are pursuing a PHD in physics, it could be higher by just a couple more points. Yes, I know pursuing a PHD in and of itself is not indicative of intelligence since there are many more variables at play. Most importantly conscientiousness. I just feel it would be superfluous to give my reasoning here.
    A point that's completely off topic..
    Although, their writing is undeniably articulate, and their knowledge is definitely not all lie. I have, never in my life witnessed a person so arrogant and narcissistic about their intelligence. Their vanity and egregiousis solipsism is almost entertaining to watch
    34. @blanquita444 - 100 - 109
    35. @Stardust_ - 80-95. Such an interesting person to watch make sense of the world
    36. @RottingCarrie - 90-105.
    37. @huntergirl - 100- 109
    38. @TonyDr - 115 - 119. I loved reading his responses for the time he was here. Very similar to Randomized in terms of personality and writing.
    39. @Knight - 100 - 109
    39. @97baHater -125 -129. Interactions with him were pleasantly surprising. He falls down the pitfalls of black and white thinking often. Regardless, his fluency in scientific discussion is undeniable.
    40. @Jeezy - 95- 105
    41. @cindythetvisleaking - 100 - 109
    42. @SkinnyDennis - 149 silent guardian and observer
    43. @Striking_4 - 105-115
    44. @xy2m - 105- 109
    45. @Transposon - 119 who thinks he's 149


    Disclaimer : I apologize if you feel I’ve underestimated your IQ.
    Obviously, any analysis based on interactions is inherently limited. This thread is half sarcasm, half serious.
    If you think I’m wrong, chances are you’re right, since I probably am.​
Click to expand...
What about me 🥺
 
Transposon said:
15. @Spuffy - very humble 121. Seen a few long responses from them. Handles abstract reasoning smoothly, articulate, and doesn’t get bogged down in unnecessary verbosity.
Click to expand...
A trait of Spuffy that I really appreciate is her ability to understand something and then explain it. I've unironically been confused several times by what people have said on here, and I've sent it to her and ask her if she understands it and she always explains it. So she understands quickly, can explain it quickly and is overall kind.

Transposon said:
25. @Schizotypalcel - 115-119. Favourite forum philosopher
Click to expand...
Some of my favorite replies and threads have been from him. 👌 I would unironically like to see more sincere content from him in the future (or at least privately if not on the forum). The way he communicates privately is also very nice. I've enjoyed talking about books with him.

Transposon said:
38. @TonyDr - 115 - 119. I loved reading his responses for the time he was here. Very similar to Randomized in terms of personality and writing
Click to expand...
Tony is experienced in a lot of things and is probably one of the more "handy" people I know. His ability to understand machinery (maybe technology is a better word?) is also impressive. He's mentioned some stuff extremely casually that broke my brain trying to understand. He's a good and smart dude.
 
faithful said:
High effort thread. Why is @Casablanco only 5 IQ under me tho
Click to expand...
Hi there, since you're being so fucking weird via DM's I figured I would just reply to a couple of your posts publicly.

  1. NO, I will NOT send you a picture of my penis
  2. Based on the picture you sent me, you look like an overweight 15 or 16 year old girl at best, lose weight I do not have any advice for you
  3. You and I are NOT friends, stop trying to act like we are and stop getting butthurt over that shit.
 
Transposon said:
First, a map (ChatGPT) :
70–79 (Borderline range)
  • Roughly 6% of people.
  • Cognitive processing is noticeably below average; abstract reasoning and complex problem-solving are challenging.
  • People here can still live independently, but academic learning often requires strong structure and repetition.
80–89 (Low average)
  • About 16% of people.
  • Can handle daily life and most jobs competently. Abstract or theoretical concepts might feel frustrating or “foggy.”
  • Tend to do better with concrete tasks than conceptual reasoning.
90–109 (Average)
  • About 50% of people fall here.
  • Capable of reasoning, learning, and understanding ideas of average complexity.
  • The world is designed for this group — education systems, most professions, and social expectations are calibrated here.
110–119 (High average)
  • Roughly 16% of people.
  • Grasp abstract ideas faster, can strategize and connect patterns with less explicit instruction.
  • Often called “bright,” though not necessarily “gifted.” They thrive in analytical or creative fields when motivated.

120–129 (Superior)
  • Around 7% of the population.
  • Often labeled as “gifted.” Capable of deep understanding, rapid learning, and advanced abstract thought.
  • If curiosity and discipline match intelligence, they can excel in intellectually demanding fields.
130–144 (Highly gifted)
  • About 2% of people.
  • Very high reasoning ability and fast learning speed. They see relationships others miss, often creating their own conceptual frameworks.
  • Prone to perfectionism or existential frustration if unstimulated. Many scientists, inventors, and polymaths fall here.
145+ (Exceptionally gifted / profoundly gifted)
  • Less than 0.1% of people.
  • Extremely fast and deep cognitive processing, sometimes to the point of struggling to relate socially or emotionally to peers.
  • They can conceptualize systems-level ideas — physics, philosophy, or abstract mathematics — with near-instinctive clarity.
  • Often have asynchronous development: mental maturity outpaces emotional grounding.
    Now..

    1. @lumen - 120-125. However, their most interesting aspect is the very high emotional intelligence, not readily captured by g.
    2. @Night - 105-115. Need, just a little more information
    3. @Rau Le Creuset - 125–129. From my discussions with him on anthropology, he can condense large amounts of information into clear, readable paragraphs. Shows real skill in distilling complexity.
    4. @vespertine - 110-119. Need a bit more to say. Seems capable, but interactions haven’t revealed much yet.
    5. @RAD - 115 - 125. Good at abstract reasoning. Thinks through problems logically, connects ideas well.
    6. @slopslinger - 115–125. A little reserved so conversations have been short. It could be so high because of wishful thinking from my end
    7. @over0 - 122.7. Impressive
    8. @apatheia - humble 123. Humble to the extent of being likeable
    9. @Genetics - 123. However, plagued by overthinking
    10. @johnfkennedy - humble 123. Quite articulate, almost all conversations have been fruitful
    11. @faithful - 105-113. Additionally, emotionally intelligent. Not readily captured by g
    12. @Lebensmude - 119 who thinks he's 130
    13. @rovea - Hidden and underrated 113
    14. @RRM67 - 95-100
    15. @Spuffy - very humble 121. Seen a few long responses from them. Handles abstract reasoning smoothly, articulate, and doesn’t get bogged down in unnecessary verbosity.
    16. @milkjar - 105-110 jail
    17. @hannah - 119 who thinks they're 138
    18. @Warden - humble 126. Most articulate user on forum in terms of their writing
    19. @tuberculosisinmybal - 110. Could absolutely be higher
    20. @Riggedahrage - 90-99
    21. @acketar - 119 who thinks he's 122.7
    22. @AuggyDauggy - 100 - 109
    23. @pompompurino - 100-109
    24. @Kaari - 100 - 109
    25. @Schizotypalcel - 115-119. Favourite forum philosopher
    26. @NewFuckingDay - hidden and humble 120. Another one for whom emotional intelligence dominates
    27. @Logicpilled - 119-?. Larping as you was quite fun.
    28. @limo8 - 100-105. Although very cute and likeable
    29. @giga.mia - 100- 105
    30. @Nbernical - 100 - 109
    31. @Casablanco - 100 - 109
    32. @BigDihDiddy - 90-99.
    33. @Darkeningstar - 130-135. If they indeed are pursuing a PHD in physics, it could be higher by just a couple more points. Yes, I know pursuing a PHD in and of itself is not indicative of intelligence since there are many more variables at play. Most importantly conscientiousness. I just feel it would be superfluous to give my reasoning here.
    A point that's completely off topic..
    Although, their writing is undeniably articulate, and their knowledge is definitely not all lie. I have, never in my life witnessed a person so arrogant and narcissistic about their intelligence. Their vanity and egregiousis solipsism is almost entertaining to watch
    34. @blanquita444 - 100 - 109
    35. @Stardust_ - 80-95. Such an interesting person to watch make sense of the world
    36. @RottingCarrie - 90-105.
    37. @huntergirl - 100- 109
    38. @TonyDr - 115 - 119. I loved reading his responses for the time he was here. Very similar to Randomized in terms of personality and writing.
    39. @Knight - 100 - 109
    39. @97baHater -125 -129. Interactions with him were pleasantly surprising. He falls down the pitfalls of black and white thinking often. Regardless, his fluency in scientific discussion is undeniable.
    40. @Jeezy - 95- 105
    41. @cindythetvisleaking - 100 - 109
    42. @SkinnyDennis - 149 silent guardian and observer
    43. @Striking_4 - 105-115
    44. @xy2m - 105- 109
    45. @Transposon - 119 who thinks he's 149


    Disclaimer : I apologize if you feel I’ve underestimated your IQ.
    Obviously, any analysis based on interactions is inherently limited. This thread is half sarcasm, half serious.
    If you think I’m wrong, chances are you’re right, since I probably am.​
Click to expand...
Overrated everyone
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 7 (Looksmaxxers: 0, Guests: 7)
Back
Top