Serious Blackpill: Hypergamy is Biologically Beneficial

[genio]

Blackpill: Hypergamy is Biologically Beneficial

I’m sure everybody has seen this graph many, many times. It’s true. It’s just how women are biologically. “But saar! That’s so unfair! Why is muh looksmatch going for Chad and not me?!” It’s because hypergamy is biologically beneficial for the human race.

The whole point of our existence (BIOLOGICALLY) is to reproduce and make successful offspring. Genetics are obviously the largest factor in this, so why choose 5’9 LTN who’s your looksmatch instead of 6’4 Chad who’ll fuck anything with legs? The answer is that you don’t fucking choose the LTN. You choose Chad.

But there’s more to this than “Who’s better genetically?”

As a man, think about how much effort you put into raising a fetus. Make some money, provide for your woman right? Completely optional. Obviously I’m not saying it should be how YOU should handle having a baby, but there are many men who just don’t care at all and just leave. You also get to have children with as many women as you want (if they find you attractive) within any amount of time you want. You can go impregnating two women within a few hours if you so wished.

Now if imagine being a woman (or if you’re a woman in the first place). Think about how much effort YOU have to put into raising a child. Nine months of pure misery; watching everything you eat, suffering through pregnancy pains, having to carry another human in your womb. You lose SO MUCH MORE having a child compared to a man. You can’t even have more children during the time being. There’s even a chance you do all this just for a miscarriage.

So, if you were a woman, would you rather fuck an LTN and have to suffer through all that pregnancy to give birth to a recessed ugly fuck that won’t amount to shit or choose Chad? Oh and to mention that there’s a chance that man leaves and stops providing for you too. Biology says pick fucking Chad because your child will be so much more successful and the whole point of life (biologically) is to produce thriving offspring.

Over time and on a large scale, hypergamy will ensure the future generations mogs. Survival of the fittest.

Now that’s not to say you can’t get women as an LTN. Nuances are very real and it would be very easy if you were simply just neurotypical. But oh well you can’t change that. A lot of us actually are neurodivergent so it may just be over for those ones.

Tldr; Chad is better than LTN genetically, so women choose Chad to fulfill their biological purpose (having successful offspring)

Trvthnvke

 

[Dandelions]

DNRD aggot get mogged, not a single molecule was read from your subhuman fingers you stinky dalit

 

[genio]

DNRD aggot get mogged, not a single molecule was read from your subhuman fingers you stinky dalit

n***a never call me that indian shit again id rather die

 

[catlady]

View attachment 350356I’m sure everybody has seen this graph many, many times. It’s true. It’s just how women are biologically. “But saar! That’s so unfair! Why is muh looksmatch going for Chad and not me?!” It’s because hypergamy is biologically beneficial for the human race.

The whole point of our existence (BIOLOGICALLY) is to reproduce and make successful offspring. Genetics are obviously the largest factor in this, so why choose 5’9 LTN who’s your looksmatch instead of 6’4 Chad who’ll fuck anything with legs? The answer is that you don’t fucking choose the LTN. You choose Chad.

But there’s more to this than “Who’s better genetically?”

As a man, think about how much effort you put into raising a fetus. Make some money, provide for your woman right? Completely optional. Obviously I’m not saying it should be how YOU should handle having a baby, but there are many men who just don’t care at all and just leave. You also get to have children with as many women as you want (if they find you attractive) within any amount of time you want. You can go impregnating two women within a few hours if you so wished.

Now if imagine being a woman (or if you’re a woman in the first place). Think about how much effort YOU have to put into raising a child. Nine months of pure misery; watching everything you eat, suffering through pregnancy pains, having to carry another human in your womb. You lose SO MUCH MORE having a child compared to a man. You can’t even have more children during the time being. There’s even a chance you do all this just for a miscarriage.

So, if you were a woman, would you rather fuck an LTN and have to suffer through all that pregnancy to give birth to a recessed ugly fuck that won’t amount to shit or choose Chad? Oh and to mention that there’s a chance that man leaves and stops providing for you too. Biology says pick fucking Chad because your child will be so much more successful and the whole point of life (biologically) is to produce thriving offspring.

Over time and on a large scale, hypergamy will ensure the future generations mogs. Survival of the fittest.

Now that’s not to say you can’t get women as an LTN. Nuances are very real and it would be very easy if you were simply just neurotypical. But oh well you can’t change that. A lot of us actually are neurodivergent so it may just be over for those ones.

Yeah yeah dnr but I lowkey choose my partners based on what I want my kids to look like.

 

[genio]

Yeah yeah dnr but I lowkey choose my partners based on what I want my kids to look like.

EXACTLY n***a WHY CHOOSE LTN

 

[emeraldpill]

Dnr but yeah it is natural to look for attractive characteristics or characteristics showing genetic superiority for reproduction in a partner, one will aim for the highest ‘level’ they can achieve in terms of genetic quality

The prevalence, severity and gender inequality in humans is abnormal though

 

[catlady]

EXACTLY n***a WHY CHOOSE LTN

I’ll feel guilty tbh if my kids are less gl than I am because I decided to give an ugly f*g a chance. Anyways I am not planning on having children anytime soon but biologically you’re supposed to be attracted to someone you’ll have a good offspring with.

 

[genio]

Dnr but yeah it is natural to look for attractive characteristics or characteristics showing genetic superiority for reproduction in a partner, one will aim for the highest ‘level’ they can achieve in terms of genetic quality

The prevalence and severity in humans is abnormal though

Not abnormal its natural

 

[genio]

I’ll feel guilty tbh if my kids are less gl than I am because I decided to give an ugly f*g a chance. Anyways I am not planning on having children anytime soon but biologically you’re supposed to be attracted to someone you’ll have a good offspring with.

That’s basically tldr of what i said lowk

 

[Ladiesman217]

EXACTLY n***a WHY CHOOSE LTN

To make sure i dont get mogged

 

[wxnter]

DNRD aggot get mogged, not a single molecule was read from your subhuman fingers you stinky dalit

never saw u get this mad

 

[Trevor]

Shit ur right

 

[Trevor]

Dnr tho

 

[wxnter]

I actually read praise me

 

[genio]

Shit ur right

Trvth nvke

 

[genio]

I actually read praise me

Fuck you hypergamous foid

 

[emeraldpill]

Not abnormal its natural

Read what I said again I edited
It should be somewhat equal on both sides ‘naturally’, but it’s not

 

[wxnter]

Fuck you hypergamous foid

i hope in ur next life you reincarnate as an amputee goat

 

[genio]

Read what I said again
It should be somewhat equal on both sides ‘naturally’, but it’s not

No i read it
Also it shouldnt be equal on both sides naturally because of the nature of pregnancy
A woman loses so much more from getting pregnant than a man
She’ll be much more selective than a man

 

[Roxas]

saved this

 

[genio]

i hope in ur next life you reincarnate as an amputee goat

Ok n***a

 

[genio]

saved this

Thanks n***a

 

[wxnter]

Ok n***a

with no ability to speak so you just lay there with no limbs for your entire lifespan

 

[emeraldpill]

No i read it
Also it shouldnt be equal on both sides naturally because of the nature of pregnancy
A woman loses so much more from getting pregnant than a man
She’ll be much more selective than a man

Cope, humans should mate for life and men should have multiple kids with the same woman spanning years, there’s no need for one to be more selective than the other if that is the case

 

[genio]

Cope, humans should mate for life and men should have multiple kids with the same woman spanning years, there’s no need for one to be more selective than the other if that is the case

Js cause we should doesnt mean we would

 

[wxnter]

with no ability to speak so you just lay there with no limbs for your entire lifespan

and all the normal goats will laugh and make fun of you because goats are evil ash and so you just wait until the farmer takes you to the butcher shop

 

[Dandelions]

never saw u get this mad

Dw, it’s a copy and paste

Js cause we should doesnt mean we would

Yes it does bhai

 

[wxnter]

Dw, it’s a copy and paste

Yes it does bhai

i was scared u were turning evil like the evil, savage, baal descendents aka goats

 

[emeraldpill]

Js cause we should doesnt mean we would

But we do? If you want to go down the route of 10000 years ago when we lived in caves and r***d a different woman each week I’m not interested bc that’s not how things are

Generally, humans (after a period of trial and error) mate for life, so there’s no need for an unequal weighting in which gender gets to have a “higher level” of selection

 

[genio]

But we do? If you want to go down the route of 10000 years ago when we lived in caves and r***d a different woman each week I’m not interested bc that’s not how things are

Generally, humans (after a period of trial and error) mate for life, so there’s no need for an unequal weighting in which gender gets to have a “higher level” of selection

But we dont. At least in the West. Thats why hypergamy is such a large “issue”
We used to, but we don’t anymore
Even so, it’s still beneficial for future generations if a Chad goes around impregnating 1000 women a day

 

[chudlite67]

Blackpill: Hypergamy is Biologically Beneficial

View attachment 350356

I’m sure everybody has seen this graph many, many times. It’s true. It’s just how women are biologically. “But saar! That’s so unfair! Why is muh looksmatch going for Chad and not me?!” It’s because hypergamy is biologically beneficial for the human race.

The whole point of our existence (BIOLOGICALLY) is to reproduce and make successful offspring. Genetics are obviously the largest factor in this, so why choose 5’9 LTN who’s your looksmatch instead of 6’4 Chad who’ll fuck anything with legs? The answer is that you don’t fucking choose the LTN. You choose Chad.

But there’s more to this than “Who’s better genetically?”

As a man, think about how much effort you put into raising a fetus. Make some money, provide for your woman right? Completely optional. Obviously I’m not saying it should be how YOU should handle having a baby, but there are many men who just don’t care at all and just leave. You also get to have children with as many women as you want (if they find you attractive) within any amount of time you want. You can go impregnating two women within a few hours if you so wished.

Now if imagine being a woman (or if you’re a woman in the first place). Think about how much effort YOU have to put into raising a child. Nine months of pure misery; watching everything you eat, suffering through pregnancy pains, having to carry another human in your womb. You lose SO MUCH MORE having a child compared to a man. You can’t even have more children during the time being. There’s even a chance you do all this just for a miscarriage.

So, if you were a woman, would you rather fuck an LTN and have to suffer through all that pregnancy to give birth to a recessed ugly fuck that won’t amount to shit or choose Chad? Oh and to mention that there’s a chance that man leaves and stops providing for you too. Biology says pick fucking Chad because your child will be so much more successful and the whole point of life (biologically) is to produce thriving offspring.

Over time and on a large scale, hypergamy will ensure the future generations mogs. Survival of the fittest.

Now that’s not to say you can’t get women as an LTN. Nuances are very real and it would be very easy if you were simply just neurotypical. But oh well you can’t change that. A lot of us actually are neurodivergent so it may just be over for those ones.

Tldr; Chad is better than LTN genetically, so women choose Chad to fulfill their biological purpose (having successful offspring)

Trvthnvke

Good thread for all the retards here

 

[kbp]

going for your looksmatch because "that's who you should reproduce with" is dumb, why wouldn't you try to secure the best future for you kids not marry and further your recessed manlet bloodline. good take.

 

[genio]

going for your looksmatch because "that's who you should reproduce with" is dumb, why wouldn't you try to secure the best future for you kids not marry and further your recessed manlet bloodline. good take.

I agree with my own take too

 

[emeraldpill]

But we dont. At least in the West. Thats why hypergamy is such a large “issue”
We used to, but we don’t anymore
Even so, it’s still beneficial for future generations if a Chad goes around impregnating 1000 women a day

??????? Yes we do what are you talking about
Only in uncivilised and primitive populations is it commonplace to have kids with multiple women on purpose

Yes there are exceptions and odd family dynamics, maybe you had a partner and they die, they cheat, you separate whatever so you get a new one but that is not the norm. Just because something does happen it doesn’t mean it is common or normal for that thing to happen

 

[genio]

??????? Yes we do what are you talking about
Only in uncivilised and primitive populations is it commonplace to have kids with multiple women on purpose

Yes there are exceptions and odd family dynamics, maybe you had a partner and they die, they cheat, you separate whatever so you get a new one but that is not the norm. Just because something does happen it doesn’t mean it is common or normal for that thing to happen

Oh well you might be right
Maybe so but hypergamy is beneficial is my main claim anyways even if it may not happen as i claim in reality
Chads having children with multiple women on purpose would still benefit the human race

 

[emeraldpill]

Oh well you might be right
Maybe so but hypergamy is beneficial is my main claim anyways even if it may not happen as i claim in reality
Chads having children with multiple women on purpose would still benefit the human race

It would, but don’t you think it would be even more beneficial if a chad decided to only reproduce with a Stacy? Less kids but theoretically better gene pool for them

donate sperm tbh

 

[chudlite67]

It would, but don’t you think it would be even more beneficial if a chad decided to only reproduce with a Stacy? Less kids but theoretically better gene pool for them

donate sperm tbh

yeah that is a good point emerald pill but that doesnt support the argument that men can sleep around and women cant so dnr

 

[emeraldpill]

yeah that is a good point emerald pill but that doesnt support the argument that men can sleep around and women cant

Anyone can sleep around man or woman, we are talking about having children

so dnr

If you’d read all my replies you wouldn’t have said your point

 

[chudlite67]

Anyone can sleep around man or woman, we are talking about having children

If you’d read all my replies you wouldn’t have said your point

i was making a joke and trying to integrate sarcasm and stuff
i guess it didnt land
and yeah i didnt read all your replies i only read the one that that i replied to
sorry bro

 

[genio]

It would, but don’t you think it would be even more beneficial if a chad decided to only reproduce with a Stacy? Less kids but theoretically better gene pool for them

donate sperm tbh

It would be beneficial if chad decided to reproduce with multiple stacies

 

[Bozo.nass]

Dnr