LOOKSMAXXING

Join 82,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

Register Log in
  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Info Bonesmashing is cope - a debunk of this nonsense

Mystericus said:
I doubt it does - there's a 99% chance this is just bias from being in this community too long. Even if it did work, it doesn't distract from the many risks subsequent of bonesmashing, if you keep doing it you will look worse.


"Real change" as in it working whatsoever, it's what i said before this. Swelling is too unpredictable & insignificant for there to be any point in doing it, you'll just end up looking like 2024 clav
Click to expand...
Swelling is unpredictable if your just bashing your face BUT if your doing it a certain way it makes the swelling look good
 
ehh I've seen lil bit of results in my cheekbones it's def not cope
 
Horrible thread, bonesmashing is the best
 
fxceless.sico said:
Swelling is unpredictable if your just bashing your face BUT if your doing it a certain way it makes the swelling look good
Click to expand...
I entertained genio's argument because he seems smart enough to bother voicing reason - you however do not match this description; get the fuck off my thread, you retarded ape
 
😂😂😂

IMG_4649.webp
 
Mystericus said:
I'll start by addressing the popularity of bonesmashing: "bonesmashing" is meme turned into "method" by exploitative content-creators on social-media. Those like Kshami, baby shitly, and jester Patel have sworn-by this utter nonsense since the early looksmax boom on tiktok - alongside other copes like mewing & pulling-exercises pushed by the same jesters. The proposed mechanic of bonesmashing was originally "Wolff's law', a semi-valid mechanical-stress theory from 19th century Germany
Which in aesthetic contexts is false, and if anything disproves bonesmashing as a valid method for facial-aesthetics. Wolff's law is a slow & gradual process subsequent of loading, not hitting your face with a hammer.
To put it shortly: acute trauma won't improve your bone-structure, your bones will either remain the same or worsen due to repeated damage. The list of side effects is reason enough to never practice this BS
  • Facial fractures
  • Swelling and bruising
  • Nerve damage
  • Tooth and root-damage
  • TMJ injury and bite changes
  • Infection if the skin breaks
  • Facial asymmetry
  • Chronic pain or numbness
  • Concussion or vertigo
  • Permanent scarring
  • Disfigurement
Facial-aesthetics expert Mariana Martinez perfectly explains why it doesn't work in this article linked bellow, because contrary to popular belief, insecure teenagers on looksmaxing forums actually don't know more than university graduates, what a shocker.
www.perfectb.com

Bone Smashing Doesn't Work. What to Do Instead.

Discover expert Facial Sculpting in Doral FL. Learn the truth about the Skims Face Wrap, Face Lifting Non Surgical, and real results.
www.perfectb.com www.perfectb.com

When one wrong-move with filler injections can induce facial-paralysis from nerve damage, what did you ever think hours of repeated blunt-force trauma would do?
These aesthetic experts aren't trying to avoid people ascending from bonesmashing, if anything people fucking up their face from it would increase their profits, so there's no reason not to trust them on this. Arguments in favor of bonesmashing will always trace their roots in greed or incompetence, opposed to real scientific logic.
And no, scar-tissue logic doesn't debunk this, why on earth people ever thought this deducts from the endless list of established risks is beyond me.

If you actually want the results jesters claim it'll give you, get filler. There's many people versed on this topic floating around the looksmaxing community, @Orka is a good example on this forum, read his guides or pay up, brokie.
Click to expand...
wish this would be pinned so there wouldnt be 80 13 year olds signing up to ask how to bonesmash everyday because they saw clavicular do it in a tt edit
 
Everyone already knows implants & filler are superior.
 
had good chuckle
 
Fucking bone smashing 🤣. Most fuckers have never had their faces punched and kicked on the regular. Pussyholes.
 
Mystericus said:
I'll start by addressing the popularity of bonesmashing: "bonesmashing" is meme turned into "method" by exploitative content-creators on social-media. Those like Kshami, baby shitly, and jester Patel have sworn-by this utter nonsense since the early looksmax boom on tiktok - alongside other copes like mewing & pulling-exercises pushed by the same jesters. The proposed mechanic of bonesmashing was originally "Wolff's law', a semi-valid mechanical-stress theory from 19th century Germany
Which in aesthetic contexts is false, and if anything disproves bonesmashing as a valid method for facial-aesthetics. Wolff's law is a slow & gradual process subsequent of loading, not hitting your face with a hammer.
To put it shortly: acute trauma won't improve your bone-structure, your bones will either remain the same or worsen due to repeated damage. The list of side effects is reason enough to never practice this BS
  • Facial fractures
  • Swelling and bruising
  • Nerve damage
  • Tooth and root-damage
  • TMJ injury and bite changes
  • Infection if the skin breaks
  • Facial asymmetry
  • Chronic pain or numbness
  • Concussion or vertigo
  • Permanent scarring
  • Disfigurement
Facial-aesthetics expert Mariana Martinez perfectly explains why it doesn't work in this article linked bellow, because contrary to popular belief, insecure teenagers on looksmaxing forums actually don't know more than university graduates, what a shocker.
www.perfectb.com

Bone Smashing Doesn't Work. What to Do Instead.

Discover expert Facial Sculpting in Doral FL. Learn the truth about the Skims Face Wrap, Face Lifting Non Surgical, and real results.
www.perfectb.com www.perfectb.com

When one wrong-move with filler injections can induce facial-paralysis from nerve damage, what did you ever think hours of repeated blunt-force trauma would do?
These aesthetic experts aren't trying to avoid people ascending from bonesmashing, if anything people fucking up their face from it would increase their profits, so there's no reason not to trust them on this. Arguments in favor of bonesmashing will always trace their roots in greed or incompetence, opposed to real scientific logic.
And no, scar-tissue logic doesn't debunk this, why on earth people ever thought this deducts from the endless list of established risks is beyond me.

If you actually want the results jesters claim it'll give you, get filler. There's many people versed on this topic floating around the looksmaxing community, @Orka is a good example on this forum, read his guides or pay up, brokie.
Click to expand...
Cope thread lol
 
Mystericus said:
No refutes after all this time
Click to expand...
>Osteocites sense disturbances within the bone matrix.
>Osteocites degradates SOST gene expression.
>Less SOST expressed means free LRP5 and LRP6 receptors for the WNT binding.
>GSK-3B get locked by Akt and ERK.
>WNT growth factor floods the cell turning on growth genes like BMP.
 
Big Biceps said:
>Osteocites sense disturbances within the bone matrix.
>Osteocites degradates SOST gene expression.
>Less SOST expressed means free LRP5 and LRP6 receptors for the WNT binding.
>GSK-3B get locked by Akt and ERK.
>WNT growth factor floods the cell turning on growth genes like BMP.
Click to expand...
Just spamming medical jargon. Mechanical loading doesn't translate to hitting your face with a hammer

flawed logic. Anyways you didn't mention the risks
 
Hypertrophy said:
Because of numerous anecdotal reports proving it makes a difference

I don't do it myself personally but it makes a difference.
Click to expand...
The super reputable anecdotes from insecure idiots in the looksmaxxing community. It's over
 
Hypertrophy said:
Do you expect clinical trials for bonesmashing jfl
Click to expand...
No. But abiding by basic scientific models, bonesmashing doesn't work, and in fact injures you. There's zero valid logic to support bonesmashing

and shitty anecdotes from this community doesn't do anything for it either. Drop the BS
 
Mystericus said:
No. But abiding by basic scientific models, bonesmashing doesn't work, and in fact injures you. There's zero valid logic to support bonesmashing
Click to expand...
@genio chin looks good so there is supporting factors for it
Mystericus said:
and shitty anecdotes from this community doesn't do anything for it either. Drop the BS
Click to expand...
Shitty anecdotes is all we have, think about a lot of drugs in this community. Alot of them rely on animal research and anecdotes

And animal research has supported mechanical loading... Thus BSing
 
Hypertrophy said:
@genio chin looks good so there is supporting factors for it
Click to expand...
I don't care if his chin looks good, that doesn't prove anything

Hypertrophy said:
Shitty anecdotes is all we have, think about a lot of drugs in this community. Alot of them rely on animal research and anecdotes

And animal research has supported mechanical loading... Thus BSing
Click to expand...
You can't replicate lab environment mechanical loading, it's a slow, gradual process that requires medical precision; not hitting your face with whatever blunt object you find. Acute trauma isn't mechanical loading,
 
Hypertrophy said:
@genio chin looks good so there is supporting factors for it

Shitty anecdotes is all we have, think about a lot of drugs in this community. Alot of them rely on animal research and anecdotes

And animal research has supported mechanical loading... Thus BSing
Click to expand...
IMG_4850.webp

Where this n***a get his information
Total side harm was 61% but note that this formula doesn’t have any maxillary measurements yet
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (Looksmaxxers: 0, Guests: 2)
Back
Top