Join 81,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Damien kater archie salludon could probably be average in like 3 to 4 generations

reptiles

Well-known member
Banned
Established
Joined
Sep 21, 2019
Messages
538
Online time
1d 6h
Reputation
662
Damien Kater, Archie Salludon, and similar individuals could likely be considered average in three to four generations. The reasoning is straightforward: traits like eye shape, midface structure, and jawline are highly heritable from parent to child, with each generation's baseline potential increasing.


The most significant factor is the potential of embryo selection. By using techniques like genetic splicing and injecting genetic material into stem cells, it's possible to create hundreds of embryos. From these, the best can be selected based on desired traits, combined with practically limitless sperm. This process allows for precise control over genetic outcomes.


In just three to four generations, without even relying on advanced gene editing, a population could be created where the average individual resembles today's male models. Eugenics is already practiced in animals, so it’s illogical to assume it can’t work for humans. The idea that eugenics wouldn’t succeed is far stranger than its potential success. If individuals like Damien Kater or Archie Salludon are rated as 7 or 8 out of 10 by today’s standards, with rare cases like Hernan Drago reaching a 9 (and a 10 being unattainable within the current genetic bell curve), embryo selection could shift the average significantly closer to these standards within a few generations literally we want a society without incels and females want chads yet they won't do the basic eugenics the bare minimum to fix the average population it makes no sense
 
Register to hide this ad
No even when people can chose their kids genetics most normies won't consider looks. It'll also only be reserved for the elite for a good while

It literally won't stop us. The cost of genomics has gone down massively. It's the Jewish government spending billions educating low-IQ deathnics and snow n*****s that's stopping this. We are so fucking close, it's on the precipice.
 
Damien Kater, Archie Salludon, and similar individuals could likely be considered average in three to four generations. The reasoning is straightforward: traits like eye shape, midface structure, and jawline are highly heritable from parent to child, with each generation's baseline potential increasing.


The most significant factor is the potential of embryo selection. By using techniques like genetic splicing and injecting genetic material into stem cells, it's possible to create hundreds of embryos. From these, the best can be selected based on desired traits, combined with practically limitless sperm. This process allows for precise control over genetic outcomes.


In just three to four generations, without even relying on advanced gene editing, a population could be created where the average individual resembles today's male models. Eugenics is already practiced in animals, so it’s illogical to assume it can’t work for humans. The idea that eugenics wouldn’t succeed is far stranger than its potential success. If individuals like Damien Kater or Archie Salludon are rated as 7 or 8 out of 10 by today’s standards, with rare cases like Hernan Drago reaching a 9 (and a 10 being unattainable within the current genetic bell curve), embryo selection could shift the average significantly closer to these standards within a few generations literally we want a society without incels and females want chads yet they won't do the basic eugenics the bare minimum to fix the average population it makes no sense
Impossible jfl
 
Impossible jfl

I mean this is denying evoutlion it's like saying buying a million lottery tickets doesn't increase the odds winning the lottery well clearly it does your choosing the best combo every generation obviously the the base line will rise massively the stretch is to think they couldn't that's the stretch
 
n***a, that's not how genetics work. Someone like Delon is considered handsome in any time period
 
n***a, that's not how genetics work. Someone like Delon is considered handsome in any time period
Handsome is relative to the population. The symbol α (alpha) represents standard deviations, which allows us to understand what is considered attractive relative to the average. However, with each generation, the bell curve shifts—standards tend to rise. As a result, someone like Damien Kater or Hernán Drago may become less appealing over time, as more people meet or exceed previous attractiveness thresholds. This is how active selection works: we choose the best genetic material (ovarian or otherwise) for the job."
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top