- Joined
- Sep 21, 2019
- Messages
- 538
- Online time
- 1d 6h
- Reputation
- 662
Damien Kater, Archie Salludon, and similar individuals could likely be considered average in three to four generations. The reasoning is straightforward: traits like eye shape, midface structure, and jawline are highly heritable from parent to child, with each generation's baseline potential increasing.
The most significant factor is the potential of embryo selection. By using techniques like genetic splicing and injecting genetic material into stem cells, it's possible to create hundreds of embryos. From these, the best can be selected based on desired traits, combined with practically limitless sperm. This process allows for precise control over genetic outcomes.
In just three to four generations, without even relying on advanced gene editing, a population could be created where the average individual resembles today's male models. Eugenics is already practiced in animals, so it’s illogical to assume it can’t work for humans. The idea that eugenics wouldn’t succeed is far stranger than its potential success. If individuals like Damien Kater or Archie Salludon are rated as 7 or 8 out of 10 by today’s standards, with rare cases like Hernan Drago reaching a 9 (and a 10 being unattainable within the current genetic bell curve), embryo selection could shift the average significantly closer to these standards within a few generations literally we want a society without incels and females want chads yet they won't do the basic eugenics the bare minimum to fix the average population it makes no sense
The most significant factor is the potential of embryo selection. By using techniques like genetic splicing and injecting genetic material into stem cells, it's possible to create hundreds of embryos. From these, the best can be selected based on desired traits, combined with practically limitless sperm. This process allows for precise control over genetic outcomes.
In just three to four generations, without even relying on advanced gene editing, a population could be created where the average individual resembles today's male models. Eugenics is already practiced in animals, so it’s illogical to assume it can’t work for humans. The idea that eugenics wouldn’t succeed is far stranger than its potential success. If individuals like Damien Kater or Archie Salludon are rated as 7 or 8 out of 10 by today’s standards, with rare cases like Hernan Drago reaching a 9 (and a 10 being unattainable within the current genetic bell curve), embryo selection could shift the average significantly closer to these standards within a few generations literally we want a society without incels and females want chads yet they won't do the basic eugenics the bare minimum to fix the average population it makes no sense