- Joined
- Mar 28, 2025
- Messages
- 11,379
- Solutions
- 1
- Time Online
- 17d 8h
- Reputation
- 50,340
go by ur definition of a good person to answer the question
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
yawninb4 300 replies
what makes someone a bad person to you?No. And honestly same goes for 80% of people here
Inconsiderate to other people’s feelingswhat makes someone a bad person to you?
You can’t define what makes a bad person honestly,the amount you wrote proves it.Inconsiderate to other people’s feelings
Spreading gossip
Hypocrites
Not standing up to what they believe in. To defend someone
Being malleable and having opinions on people that change depending on who they’re talking to. For example saying they hate someone when talking to person A but then pretending they like them when talking to person B
The list goes on
Ofc it varies from person to person, these are just qualities in a person I think make them “not good”You can’t define what makes a bad person honestly,the amount you wrote proves it.
You’re my sugarI don't know what I am
Unicorn auraabsolute state of this forum
View attachment 163429
You bitch about this forum more than I do atp mate and you’ve been here 2 weeksabsolute state of this forum
View attachment 163429
You bitch about this forum more than I do atp mate and you’ve been here 2 weeks
Inconsiderate to other people’s feelings
Spreading gossip
Hypocrites
Not standing up to what they believe in. To defend someone
Being malleable and having opinions on people that change depending on who they’re talking to. For example saying they hate someone when talking to person A but then pretending they like them when talking to person B
The list goes on
yeah if these are traits u correlate w being a bad person more than 80% probNo. And honestly same goes for 80% of people here
water morality isnt objectiveYou can’t define what makes a bad person honestly,the amount you wrote proves it.
Is this coming from a philosophical angle or just sarcastic rambling?water morality isnt objective
just leave theoryabsolute state of this forum
View attachment 163429
boi im never sarcasticIs this coming from a philosophical angle or just sarcastic rambling?
Morality is objectiveboi im never sarcastic
Morality is objective
Okay boi, listen here boi. If someone were to shoot you in the head for no good reason would this be ‘up for debate’ or universally deemed criminal. Answer boi?
boi define a “good” reason boiOkay boi, listen here boi. If someone were to shoot you in the head for no good reason
would this be ‘up for debate’ or universally deemed criminal. Answer boi?
Hey n***a!Okay boi, listen here boi. If someone were to shoot you in the head for no good reason would this be ‘up for debate’ or universally deemed criminal. Answer boi?
not a single person on this world is a "good person"go by ur definition of a good person to answer the question
Emo final bossnot a single person on this world is a "good person"
Imma go have sex and dwell on this, that shit is deep. Brb!not a single person on this world is a "good person"
Emo final boss
fanboysImma go have sex and dwell on this, that shit is deep. Brb!
are u basing this off ur religion?not a single person on this world is a "good person"
That leans on an anthropocentric moral lens. I wouldn't classify it as being "universal."Okay boi, listen here boi. If someone were to shoot you in the head for no good reason would this be ‘up for debate’ or universally deemed criminal. Answer boi?
How is this lens anthropocentric? In this hypothetical thought experiment a human was shot by another human who will then go on to be judged and tried in a court full of humans so of course the argument will be from the lens that concerns humans and not a sand rat from timbuktu.. boii..That leans on an anthropocentric moral lens. I wouldn't classify it as being "universal."
Most people view moral as relativistic. And grounding moral to objective is almost impossible without invoking some sort of "conscious creator," or how else would you put it in an objective category?
Mine should be higher tbhMirin my post to rep ratio tbh. Shit is 4x.. sweeeet!
nahare u basing this off ur religion?
once a f****t always a f****t@hannah thanks for introducing ts sassy word ‘boi’ into my vocab boi
This nafri negro mewslim monkey n****r chimpanzee is sure fanboying me hard rn!once a f****t always a f****t
its just gonna be ppl either acting like they're saints or tommy tough knucklesinb4 300 replies
my favourite seasons were 3 and 4I'm good at fortnite![]()
boiiii why would someone have to be pure 100% good in order to be considered a good person? if u go by that no ones a bad person either. like ur saying every human is selfish, which i dont disagree with. if someone is selfish does that mean everything theyve done on earth has been selfish? no ones pure bad or good no ones pure anything.nah
every human is selfish, good people do exist but like pure goodness without selfish motives nah
i love that some1 could read this and genuinely say "oh but its only morally wrong because its from my perspective!"Okay boi, listen here boi. If someone were to shoot you in the head for no good reason would this be ‘up for debate’ or universally deemed criminal. Answer boi?
boi boi boi boiii@hannah thanks for introducing ts sassy word ‘boi’ into my vocab boi
boii what u say abt the baza bluds?boi boi boi boiii
How does court have to do anything with morals? And doesn't your sand rat argument literally make it relativistic not universal?How is this lens anthropocentric? In this hypothetical thought experiment a human was shot by another human who will then go on to be judged and tried in a court full of humans so of course the argument will be from the lens that concerns humans and not a sand rat from timbuktu.. boii..
I meant the moral objectivity from a metaphysical lens. Think of Aquinas’ argument for God. There being the perfect form of every emotion/standard set by reality.