Join 70,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

FaceIQ Labs isn’t inaccurate, it’s just not utilizing this important addition

genio

future htn
Contributor
Reputable ★★★
Established ★★★
Joined
Apr 8, 2026
Messages
11,223
Solutions
46
Online time
18d 23h
Reputation
22,859
Gave me 7 harmony 3.5 angularity 4.7 dimorphism and 6.8 features
Averages out to 5.3

Tbh im not a 5.3 im probably around 4.3-4.7 IMO
Based off life experiences it works out too
Im treated like a regular ass guy very average

I feel like its quite accurate for each pillar, but the overall rating is inflation because of a lack of looks penalty
I explored looks penalty in my previous thread on the 4 pillars of harmony
It basically is just deducting more points for larger disparities between the 4 pillars of attractiveness

We’ll use my simpler, but slighly less precise formula of (highest pillar - lowest pillar)/4 here
I would take (7 - 3.5)/4 which would be 0.875
And guess what? 5.3 - 0.875 =4.425
It works out to my estimation of my real rating based off IRL and whatnot

So, to anyone using FaceIQLabs, I’d recommend you to do this for yourself instead of calling it shit because it overrates

Yes, it overrates your overall score, but every pillar is quite accurate and i find it to be quite the useful tool

I wouldve posted rhis on looksmaxxing if not for my fuckass eyemaxxing thread being the only thing on my looksmaxxing post section for the past 3-4 days

Thanks @emeraldpill for labs
@foidslayer @UMTN
 
Register to hide this ad
Gave me 7 harmony 3.5 angularity 4.7 dimorphism and 6.8 features
Averages out to 5.3

Tbh im not a 5.3 im probably around 4.3-4.7 IMO
Based off life experiences it works out too
Im treated like a regular ass guy very average

I feel like its quite accurate for each pillar, but the overall rating is inflation because of a lack of looks penalty
I explored looks penalty in my previous thread on the 4 pillars of harmony
It basically is just deducting more points for larger disparities between the 4 pillars of attractiveness

We’ll use my simpler, but slighly less precise formula of (highest pillar - lowest pillar)/4 here
I would take (7 - 3.5)/4 which would be 0.875
And guess what? 5.3 - 0.875 =4.425
It works out to my estimation of my real rating based off IRL and whatnot

So, to anyone using FaceIQLabs, I’d recommend you to do this for yourself instead of calling it shit because it overrates

Yes, it overrates your overall score, but every pillar is quite accurate and i find it to be quite the useful tool

I wouldve posted rhis on looksmaxxing if not for my fuckass eyemaxxing thread being the only thing on my looksmaxxing post section for the past 3-4 days

Thanks @emeraldpill for labs
@foidslayer @UMTN
 
Gave me 7 harmony 3.5 angularity 4.7 dimorphism and 6.8 features
Averages out to 5.3

Tbh im not a 5.3 im probably around 4.3-4.7 IMO
Based off life experiences it works out too
Im treated like a regular ass guy very average

I feel like its quite accurate for each pillar, but the overall rating is inflation because of a lack of looks penalty
I explored looks penalty in my previous thread on the 4 pillars of harmony
It basically is just deducting more points for larger disparities between the 4 pillars of attractiveness

We’ll use my simpler, but slighly less precise formula of (highest pillar - lowest pillar)/4 here
I would take (7 - 3.5)/4 which would be 0.875
And guess what? 5.3 - 0.875 =4.425
It works out to my estimation of my real rating based off IRL and whatnot

So, to anyone using FaceIQLabs, I’d recommend you to do this for yourself instead of calling it shit because it overrates

Yes, it overrates your overall score, but every pillar is quite accurate and i find it to be quite the useful tool

I wouldve posted rhis on looksmaxxing if not for my fuckass eyemaxxing thread being the only thing on my looksmaxxing post section for the past 3-4 days

Thanks @emeraldpill for labs
@foidslayer @UMTN[/USER
[/QUOTE]

[/QUOTE]
 
Last edited:
Gave me 7 harmony 3.5 angularity 4.7 dimorphism and 6.8 features
Averages out to 5.3

Tbh im not a 5.3 im probably around 4.3-4.7 IMO
Based off life experiences it works out too
Im treated like a regular ass guy very average

I feel like its quite accurate for each pillar, but the overall rating is inflation because of a lack of looks penalty
I explored looks penalty in my previous thread on the 4 pillars of harmony
It basically is just deducting more points for larger disparities between the 4 pillars of attractiveness

We’ll use my simpler, but slighly less precise formula of (highest pillar - lowest pillar)/4 here
I would take (7 - 3.5)/4 which would be 0.875
And guess what? 5.3 - 0.875 =4.425
It works out to my estimation of my real rating based off IRL and whatnot

So, to anyone using FaceIQLabs, I’d recommend you to do this for yourself instead of calling it shit because it overrates

Yes, it overrates your overall score, but every pillar is quite accurate and i find it to be quite the useful tool

I wouldve posted rhis on looksmaxxing if not for my fuckass eyemaxxing thread being the only thing on my looksmaxxing post section for the past 3-4 days

Thanks @emeraldpill for labs
@foidslayer @UMTN
how much did you pay?
 
didn't he sell them as well if I'm not mistaken?
I’m not sure, but if he was, then I do 100% get why he got expelled. If it was for personal use though, that’s why I’m scared
 
hmm what if all your pillars are similar though? Is the penalty still accurate?

Like let’s say someone highest is 5 and lowest is 4.5, then the penalty would only be .125.

Still accurate? or no
 
hmm what if all your pillars are similar though? Is the penalty still accurate?

Like let’s say someone highest is 5 and lowest is 4.5, then the penalty would only be .125.

Still accurate? or no
I made a curve where it would tax you less for such a minimal difference
Using /4 i dont think its fair to tax that much
But should still be quite accurate
 
hmm what if all your pillars are similar though? Is the penalty still accurate?

Like let’s say someone highest is 5 and lowest is 4.5, then the penalty would only be .125.

Still accurate? or no
Using my specialized looks penalty formula you would get taxxed 0.09 which i find quite fair
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • wxnter
  • Trevor
  • Aeon
  • goddess
  • 2R0I2P0
  • tragaleon
  • Kittystrophic
  • dent
  • ecoli
  • E
  • tospaks
  • arya
  • HeavyMetal
  • Patrickbatman
  • hoodsickle
  • 𐲀 𐲢 𐲠 𐲀 𐲇 𐲰
Back
Top