The distance between inner eyebrows:
Low: 0.74
High: 1.30 *significant
Face length from bottom inner brow to top part of lip:
Low: 3.57
High: 3.18
Face length from pupil to top part of lip:
Low: 2.88
High: 3.10
Pupil-pupil distance:
Low: 2.96
High: 2.96
Distance from inner canthus-inner canthus:
Low: 1.57
High: 1.75
Distance from outer canthus-outer canthus:
Low: 4.18
High: 4.18
Width of nose:
Low: 1.61
High: 2.17 *significant
Distance between mouth corners(mouth width):
Low: 2.36
High: 2.67
Zygo-zygo:
Low: 6.19
High: 7 *significant
Lower third length:
Low: 3.89
High: 3.07 *significant
Philtrum length:
Low: 0.77
High: 0.64
Vertical eye length:
Low: 0.61
High: 0.48
Chin length:
Low: 2.33
High: 1.56 **Significant
CONCLUSION: the high Fighting success face is different than we thought, a extreme Long lower third is a cultural sign of masculinity rather than a natural effective one
Width and angularity is still the highest indicator of Fighting success, such as wide distance between inner canthus to inner canthus, mouth width, distance from zygo to zygo etc.
especially zygo width, most soycucks and aesthetic faggots These days might have a defined and somewhat protruding zygos, but no one of them has a lean 7 Inch zygos, it's a rare trait often only found in very exotic and brutish phenotypes
Nosewidth is also a factor, masculine noses Arent simply wide, the nose Bridge of a masculine nose is actually quite thin, it's just the width of the nostrils which make a masculine nose, masculine noses are thus ironically even less bulbous and "thickish", they have a somewhat stunted-angular-wide look
also interesting is this study graphic which Shows the differences between the low threat and high threat face
www.semanticscholar.org
The first noticeable differences is the way higher FWHR on the high threat face along with significant more sharper and rectangle shaped eye angularity
rounded lower eyelids are not only feminine asfuck, they also give you the typical emotional unstable aspie stare
The bonestructure on the low threat face is way more recessed and less Forward grown resulting in sagging Skin and folds, the gonial angle is higher and the chin is more roundish and pointy, the hairline is rounded with a tall forehead while the high threat face has a typical Broad squarish forehead/hairline
Low: 0.74
High: 1.30 *significant
Face length from bottom inner brow to top part of lip:
Low: 3.57
High: 3.18
Face length from pupil to top part of lip:
Low: 2.88
High: 3.10
Pupil-pupil distance:
Low: 2.96
High: 2.96
Distance from inner canthus-inner canthus:
Low: 1.57
High: 1.75
Distance from outer canthus-outer canthus:
Low: 4.18
High: 4.18
Width of nose:
Low: 1.61
High: 2.17 *significant
Distance between mouth corners(mouth width):
Low: 2.36
High: 2.67
Zygo-zygo:
Low: 6.19
High: 7 *significant
Lower third length:
Low: 3.89
High: 3.07 *significant
Philtrum length:
Low: 0.77
High: 0.64
Vertical eye length:
Low: 0.61
High: 0.48
Chin length:
Low: 2.33
High: 1.56 **Significant
CONCLUSION: the high Fighting success face is different than we thought, a extreme Long lower third is a cultural sign of masculinity rather than a natural effective one
Width and angularity is still the highest indicator of Fighting success, such as wide distance between inner canthus to inner canthus, mouth width, distance from zygo to zygo etc.
especially zygo width, most soycucks and aesthetic faggots These days might have a defined and somewhat protruding zygos, but no one of them has a lean 7 Inch zygos, it's a rare trait often only found in very exotic and brutish phenotypes
Nosewidth is also a factor, masculine noses Arent simply wide, the nose Bridge of a masculine nose is actually quite thin, it's just the width of the nostrils which make a masculine nose, masculine noses are thus ironically even less bulbous and "thickish", they have a somewhat stunted-angular-wide look
also interesting is this study graphic which Shows the differences between the low threat and high threat face
Figure 1 from Running head: THE FACE RATIO AND THREAT POTENTIAL Investigating the Relationship between the Facial Width-to-Height Ratio and Physical and Psychological Threat Potential By | Semantic Scholar
Figure 1. Examples of stimuli with small and large FWHRs used in study 2. Procedure - "Running head: THE FACE RATIO AND THREAT POTENTIAL Investigating the Relationship between the Facial Width-to-Height Ratio and Physical and Psychological Threat Potential By"
www.semanticscholar.org
The first noticeable differences is the way higher FWHR on the high threat face along with significant more sharper and rectangle shaped eye angularity
rounded lower eyelids are not only feminine asfuck, they also give you the typical emotional unstable aspie stare
The bonestructure on the low threat face is way more recessed and less Forward grown resulting in sagging Skin and folds, the gonial angle is higher and the chin is more roundish and pointy, the hairline is rounded with a tall forehead while the high threat face has a typical Broad squarish forehead/hairline
