Sethro
Welp
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2023
- Messages
- 40
- Time Online
- 11h 55m
- Reputation
- 72
I'll never understand the people that say frame or strength is cope. I could show NUMEROUS studies and independent surveys that all say the same thing: Guys with an athletic frame and who are stronger are considered more attractive then those that are non-athletic and weak, on average. And Guys on this site will all still say "nah bro cope." When it could just be easier to say "I just dont like working out and dont wanna do it."
I get it, face and hair is most of your look. But most isnt all. And frame especially makes up alot of the rest of your look.
For example: theres you, Thad, who we'll just say is a 6/10 facaial aestetics wise, and you have a friend, Brad, who is also a 6/10 facial aestetics wise. You both have an average bone frame, simular muscle insertions and are the same height too. BUT! you have a scrawny body. Youre lean, but have very little muscle mass, average shoulders that look narrow because you are leaned out and never trained them, an average waist, and wost of all: chicken legs. You're weak and have trouble lifting even a couch. Nothing to write home about. But Brad... Brad trained his body. Brad has muscular, wide shoulders with well developed lats that both look big enough that they make his average sized waist look small. He has abs that pop, and well built legs. He benches 225, squats 325, and deadlifts 400lbs. He out does you in every lift possible. Now, Take the general population and tell me who they'll choose as being more attractive?
And if you say yourself, you're the coper here.
And before I hear it, YES you can be too muscular, obviously. Ronnie Coleman is a phenomenal human being but he still gets mogged from an attractiveness stand point of view.
Thanks for the read, you weirdo.
I get it, face and hair is most of your look. But most isnt all. And frame especially makes up alot of the rest of your look.
For example: theres you, Thad, who we'll just say is a 6/10 facaial aestetics wise, and you have a friend, Brad, who is also a 6/10 facial aestetics wise. You both have an average bone frame, simular muscle insertions and are the same height too. BUT! you have a scrawny body. Youre lean, but have very little muscle mass, average shoulders that look narrow because you are leaned out and never trained them, an average waist, and wost of all: chicken legs. You're weak and have trouble lifting even a couch. Nothing to write home about. But Brad... Brad trained his body. Brad has muscular, wide shoulders with well developed lats that both look big enough that they make his average sized waist look small. He has abs that pop, and well built legs. He benches 225, squats 325, and deadlifts 400lbs. He out does you in every lift possible. Now, Take the general population and tell me who they'll choose as being more attractive?
And if you say yourself, you're the coper here.
And before I hear it, YES you can be too muscular, obviously. Ronnie Coleman is a phenomenal human being but he still gets mogged from an attractiveness stand point of view.
Thanks for the read, you weirdo.
