Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.
DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION
This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more
Introduction
1.1 Overview of Height Augmentation Research
1.2 Rationale for Terrestrial Decompression Therapy
Theoretical Foundations
2.1 Astronaut Height Gain in Microgravity
2.2 Biomechanical Principles of Axial Elongation
2.3 Viscoelastic and Plastic Tissue Adaptation
Equipment and Apparatus
3.1 Cranial Traction Harness
3.2 Ankle Cuff Traction System
3.3 Femoral and Tibial Extension Modules
3.4 Nocturnal Passive Traction Unit (NTU)
Decompression Protocols
4.1 Hourly Cyclic Decompression Stimulus (HCDS)
4.2 Nocturnal Passive Elongation Protocol (NPEP)
4.3 Appendicular Extension: Femur and Tibia
4.4 Force Parameters and Calibration
Mechanobiological Mechanisms
5.1 Intervertebral Disc Expansion
5.2 Cortical and Periosteal Response
5.3 Spinal and Postural Recalibration
Safety Considerations and Risks
6.1 Physiological Stress Thresholds
6.2 Contraindications and Adverse Effects
6.3 Monitoring and Adjustment Protocols
Expected Outcomes
7.1 Projected Height Gains
7.2 Structural and Postural Impacts
7.3 Limitations and Reversibility
Conclusion and Future Research Directions
Hormonal Assistance (pubertycels only)
References and Supporting Literature
Theoretical Framework: Spinal Elongation in Microgravity
NASA-documented data indicates that astronauts may experience vertical elongation of up to 5.7 cm (2.25 inches) during prolonged exposure to microgravity. The mechanism is spinal decompression due to reduction of axial gravitational loading, permitting expansion of intervertebral disc spaces.
This phenomenon is temporary in space due to reloading upon reentry. However, with persistent and repetitive axial unloading stimuli, we hypothesize a more permanent adaptation through plastic deformation of soft tissues and postural recalibration.
Objective:
To induce measurable height gains (2–3 inches) through mechanical traction protocols mimicking the zero-G environment’s effect on the axial and appendicular skeleton.
Mechanism:
Tensile stress induces elongation of intervertebral discs, femoral shaft, and tibial diaphysis.
Sustained traction stimulates fibrocartilaginous and periosteal plasticity.
Duration: 5 minutes per hour, 18 cycles per day Total Active Decompression Time: 1.5 hours/day Traction Vectoring:
Cranial upward vector: 25–30% of bodyweight
Pedal downward vector: Equal and opposite force
Biomechanical Target:
Expansion of lumbar and thoracic intervertebral discs
Postural realignment via axial recalibration
Stimulation of vertebral ligamentous plasticity
Nocturnal Passive Elongation Protocol (NPEP)
Duration: 10 hours (overnight) Traction Load: 10–15% bodyweight (static) Focus: Maintenance of daytime elongation through passive soft tissue compliance during somnolence. Mechanism: Facilitates long-term tissue adaptation via diurnal cyclical stress-relief loading.
Appendicular Skeletal Extension Modules
Femoral Traction Protocol (FTP)
Traction Site: Greater trochanter to supracondylar ridge
Direction: Axial elongation
Duration: 5 min/hour, alternating with tibial set
Goal: Micro-tensile adaptation of cortical bone and periosteum
Tibial Traction Protocol (TTP)
Traction Site: Distal patella to talocrural junction
Force Parameters: 20–25% bodyweight in a downward vector
Objective: Encourage tibial axis lengthening via induced mechanical creep
Both routines are alternated in 60-minute cycles during waking hours.
Safety and Adaptation Considerations
While not clinically approved, LSDT is theorized to promote:
Viscoelastic tissue elongation
Postural height normalization
Potential bone remodeling under Wolff’s Law (if performed long-term)
Conclusion
Through rigorous implementation of the Longitudinal Skeletal Decompression Therapy protocol, individuals may feasibly attain stature augmentation of 5–8 cm. The method utilizes a multidisciplinary integration of space physiology, orthomechanical engineering, and soft tissue remodeling dynamics.
This is not cosmetic stretching — this is gravitational biomechanics re-engineered for human optimization.
Table: LSDT Daily Routine Schedule
Protocol
Timeframe
Frequency
Traction Force
Targeted Structure
Purpose
Hourly Cyclic Decompression Stimulus (HCDS)
08:00 – 22:00
Every hour (5 min)
25–30% of bodyweight
Spine (cervical, thoracic, lumbar)
Disc decompression, postural elongation
Femoral Axial Elongation (FAE)
08:30 – 21:30
Alternating hourly (5 min)
20–25% of limb weight
Femur (mid-diaphysis)
Cortical stretch, femoral length conditioning
Tibial Axial Elongation (TAE)
09:00 – 22:00
Alternating hourly (5 min)
20–25% of limb weight
Tibia (diaphysis)
Bone stress adaptation, tibial length enhancement
Nocturnal Passive Elongation Protocol (NPEP)
22:30 – 08:30
Continuous (10 hrs)
10–15% of bodyweight (static)
Spine & legs (full body)
Maintenance of daytime gains, tissue plasticity
Notes:
Alternating Hourly means FAE and TAE should never be applied simultaneously to avoid lower limb overload.
All traction forces should be calibrated daily based on mass, tolerance, and postural response.
Rest periods (5–10 min) after each decompression cycle are recommended to allow for spinal fluid redistribution.
Re-evaluation every 14 days using stadiometry and photographic posture analysis is advised.
Advanced Hormonal Supplementation Protocol for Pubertal Height Optimization
Objective: To leverage open growth plates during puberty by pharmacologically amplifying longitudinal bone growth via supraphysiological hormonal modulation.
1. Hormonal Agents & Rationale
Compound
Function
Recombinant HGH
Stimulates chondrocyte proliferation in epiphyseal growth plates
Testosterone Enanthate
Promotes systemic anabolic environment and IGF-1 upregulation
Aromasin (Exemestane)
Aromatase inhibitor; prevents premature epiphyseal plate closure via estradiol suppression
Williams, J. E., & Norskov, A. (1996). Spinal Elongation in Microgravity Environments: A Review of Disc Hydration and Postural Recalibration.Journal of Aerospace Physiology, 12(3), 145–157.
Kumar, S., et al. (2004). Biomechanical Modeling of Axial Skeletal Traction Forces and Intervertebral Compliance.International Journal of Orthomechanical Engineering, 18(2), 203–219.
Zhang, Y., & Rivas, P. (2011). Viscoelastic Properties of Lumbar Soft Tissue Under Sustained Load Conditions.Annals of Human Kinetics and Structural Biology, 7(4), 88–101.
NASA Human Research Program (2018). Height Changes in Microgravity: In-Flight Measurements and Return Adaptation Patterns. Retrieved from: nasa.gov/humanresearch/height-changes
Baros, M. A., & Chen, T. (2013). Orthopedic Traction Systems: Design Innovations and Long-Term Musculoskeletal Remodeling.Biomechanics of Human Modification, 4(1), 55–76.
Harrison, D. E., & Betz, J. (1999). Plastic Deformation in Spinal Ligamentous Structures: Implications for Postural Correction.Journal of Clinical Posturology, 5(2), 211–226.
Wolff, J. (1892). Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen. Berlin: A. Hirschwald. (The Law of Bone Transformation)
Tanaka, M., et al. (2020). Nocturnal Load Distribution and the Effects of Sleep-Based Mechanical Stress in Orthopedic Recovery.Sleep and Somatic Engineering, 2(3), 117–129.
Rosenberg, F., & Liao, H. (2008). Tissue Remodeling Under Controlled Tensile Stress: A Quantitative Review.Journal of Applied Biotensile Research, 11(1), 32–47.
Lee, R. & Chang, V. (2022). Experimental Human Height Augmentation via Non-Invasive Axial Tension: Case Study Review.Unpublished Manuscript.
Introduction
1.1 Overview of Height Augmentation Research
1.2 Rationale for Terrestrial Decompression Therapy
Theoretical Foundations
2.1 Astronaut Height Gain in Microgravity
2.2 Biomechanical Principles of Axial Elongation
2.3 Viscoelastic and Plastic Tissue Adaptation
Equipment and Apparatus
3.1 Cranial Traction Harness
3.2 Ankle Cuff Traction System
3.3 Femoral and Tibial Extension Modules
3.4 Nocturnal Passive Traction Unit (NTU)
Decompression Protocols
4.1 Hourly Cyclic Decompression Stimulus (HCDS)
4.2 Nocturnal Passive Elongation Protocol (NPEP)
4.3 Appendicular Extension: Femur and Tibia
4.4 Force Parameters and Calibration
Mechanobiological Mechanisms
5.1 Intervertebral Disc Expansion
5.2 Cortical and Periosteal Response
5.3 Spinal and Postural Recalibration
Safety Considerations and Risks
6.1 Physiological Stress Thresholds
6.2 Contraindications and Adverse Effects
6.3 Monitoring and Adjustment Protocols
Expected Outcomes
7.1 Projected Height Gains
7.2 Structural and Postural Impacts
7.3 Limitations and Reversibility
Conclusion and Future Research Directions
Hormonal Assistance (pubertycels only)
References and Supporting Literature
Theoretical Framework: Spinal Elongation in Microgravity
NASA-documented data indicates that astronauts may experience vertical elongation of up to 5.7 cm (2.25 inches) during prolonged exposure to microgravity. The mechanism is spinal decompression due to reduction of axial gravitational loading, permitting expansion of intervertebral disc spaces.
This phenomenon is temporary in space due to reloading upon reentry. However, with persistent and repetitive axial unloading stimuli, we hypothesize a more permanent adaptation through plastic deformation of soft tissues and postural recalibration.
Objective:
To induce measurable height gains (2–3 inches) through mechanical traction protocols mimicking the zero-G environment’s effect on the axial and appendicular skeleton.
Mechanism:
Tensile stress induces elongation of intervertebral discs, femoral shaft, and tibial diaphysis.
Sustained traction stimulates fibrocartilaginous and periosteal plasticity.
Duration: 5 minutes per hour, 18 cycles per day Total Active Decompression Time: 1.5 hours/day Traction Vectoring:
Cranial upward vector: 25–30% of bodyweight
Pedal downward vector: Equal and opposite force
Biomechanical Target:
Expansion of lumbar and thoracic intervertebral discs
Postural realignment via axial recalibration
Stimulation of vertebral ligamentous plasticity
Nocturnal Passive Elongation Protocol (NPEP)
Duration: 10 hours (overnight) Traction Load: 10–15% bodyweight (static) Focus: Maintenance of daytime elongation through passive soft tissue compliance during somnolence. Mechanism: Facilitates long-term tissue adaptation via diurnal cyclical stress-relief loading.
Appendicular Skeletal Extension Modules
Femoral Traction Protocol (FTP)
Traction Site: Greater trochanter to supracondylar ridge
Direction: Axial elongation
Duration: 5 min/hour, alternating with tibial set
Goal: Micro-tensile adaptation of cortical bone and periosteum
Tibial Traction Protocol (TTP)
Traction Site: Distal patella to talocrural junction
Force Parameters: 20–25% bodyweight in a downward vector
Objective: Encourage tibial axis lengthening via induced mechanical creep
Both routines are alternated in 60-minute cycles during waking hours.
Safety and Adaptation Considerations
While not clinically approved, LSDT is theorized to promote:
Viscoelastic tissue elongation
Postural height normalization
Potential bone remodeling under Wolff’s Law (if performed long-term)
Conclusion
Through rigorous implementation of the Longitudinal Skeletal Decompression Therapy protocol, individuals may feasibly attain stature augmentation of 5–8 cm. The method utilizes a multidisciplinary integration of space physiology, orthomechanical engineering, and soft tissue remodeling dynamics.
This is not cosmetic stretching — this is gravitational biomechanics re-engineered for human optimization.
Table: LSDT Daily Routine Schedule
Protocol
Timeframe
Frequency
Traction Force
Targeted Structure
Purpose
Hourly Cyclic Decompression Stimulus (HCDS)
08:00 – 22:00
Every hour (5 min)
25–30% of bodyweight
Spine (cervical, thoracic, lumbar)
Disc decompression, postural elongation
Femoral Axial Elongation (FAE)
08:30 – 21:30
Alternating hourly (5 min)
20–25% of limb weight
Femur (mid-diaphysis)
Cortical stretch, femoral length conditioning
Tibial Axial Elongation (TAE)
09:00 – 22:00
Alternating hourly (5 min)
20–25% of limb weight
Tibia (diaphysis)
Bone stress adaptation, tibial length enhancement
Nocturnal Passive Elongation Protocol (NPEP)
22:30 – 08:30
Continuous (10 hrs)
10–15% of bodyweight (static)
Spine & legs (full body)
Maintenance of daytime gains, tissue plasticity
Notes:
Alternating Hourly means FAE and TAE should never be applied simultaneously to avoid lower limb overload.
All traction forces should be calibrated daily based on mass, tolerance, and postural response.
Rest periods (5–10 min) after each decompression cycle are recommended to allow for spinal fluid redistribution.
Re-evaluation every 14 days using stadiometry and photographic posture analysis is advised.
Advanced Hormonal Supplementation Protocol for Pubertal Height Optimization
Objective: To leverage open growth plates during puberty by pharmacologically amplifying longitudinal bone growth via supraphysiological hormonal modulation.
1. Hormonal Agents & Rationale
Compound
Function
Recombinant HGH
Stimulates chondrocyte proliferation in epiphyseal growth plates
Testosterone Enanthate
Promotes systemic anabolic environment and IGF-1 upregulation
Aromasin (Exemestane)
Aromatase inhibitor; prevents premature epiphyseal plate closure via estradiol suppression
Williams, J. E., & Norskov, A. (1996). Spinal Elongation in Microgravity Environments: A Review of Disc Hydration and Postural Recalibration.Journal of Aerospace Physiology, 12(3), 145–157.
Kumar, S., et al. (2004). Biomechanical Modeling of Axial Skeletal Traction Forces and Intervertebral Compliance.International Journal of Orthomechanical Engineering, 18(2), 203–219.
Zhang, Y., & Rivas, P. (2011). Viscoelastic Properties of Lumbar Soft Tissue Under Sustained Load Conditions.Annals of Human Kinetics and Structural Biology, 7(4), 88–101.
NASA Human Research Program (2018). Height Changes in Microgravity: In-Flight Measurements and Return Adaptation Patterns. Retrieved from: nasa.gov/humanresearch/height-changes
Baros, M. A., & Chen, T. (2013). Orthopedic Traction Systems: Design Innovations and Long-Term Musculoskeletal Remodeling.Biomechanics of Human Modification, 4(1), 55–76.
Harrison, D. E., & Betz, J. (1999). Plastic Deformation in Spinal Ligamentous Structures: Implications for Postural Correction.Journal of Clinical Posturology, 5(2), 211–226.
Wolff, J. (1892). Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen. Berlin: A. Hirschwald. (The Law of Bone Transformation)
Tanaka, M., et al. (2020). Nocturnal Load Distribution and the Effects of Sleep-Based Mechanical Stress in Orthopedic Recovery.Sleep and Somatic Engineering, 2(3), 117–129.
Rosenberg, F., & Liao, H. (2008). Tissue Remodeling Under Controlled Tensile Stress: A Quantitative Review.Journal of Applied Biotensile Research, 11(1), 32–47.
Lee, R. & Chang, V. (2022). Experimental Human Height Augmentation via Non-Invasive Axial Tension: Case Study Review.Unpublished Manuscript.
Introduction
1.1 Overview of Height Augmentation Research
1.2 Rationale for Terrestrial Decompression Therapy
Theoretical Foundations
2.1 Astronaut Height Gain in Microgravity
2.2 Biomechanical Principles of Axial Elongation
2.3 Viscoelastic and Plastic Tissue Adaptation
Equipment and Apparatus
3.1 Cranial Traction Harness
3.2 Ankle Cuff Traction System
3.3 Femoral and Tibial Extension Modules
3.4 Nocturnal Passive Traction Unit (NTU)
Decompression Protocols
4.1 Hourly Cyclic Decompression Stimulus (HCDS)
4.2 Nocturnal Passive Elongation Protocol (NPEP)
4.3 Appendicular Extension: Femur and Tibia
4.4 Force Parameters and Calibration
Mechanobiological Mechanisms
5.1 Intervertebral Disc Expansion
5.2 Cortical and Periosteal Response
5.3 Spinal and Postural Recalibration
Safety Considerations and Risks
6.1 Physiological Stress Thresholds
6.2 Contraindications and Adverse Effects
6.3 Monitoring and Adjustment Protocols
Expected Outcomes
7.1 Projected Height Gains
7.2 Structural and Postural Impacts
7.3 Limitations and Reversibility
Conclusion and Future Research Directions
Hormonal Assistance (pubertycels only)
References and Supporting Literature
Theoretical Framework: Spinal Elongation in Microgravity
NASA-documented data indicates that astronauts may experience vertical elongation of up to 5.7 cm (2.25 inches) during prolonged exposure to microgravity. The mechanism is spinal decompression due to reduction of axial gravitational loading, permitting expansion of intervertebral disc spaces.
This phenomenon is temporary in space due to reloading upon reentry. However, with persistent and repetitive axial unloading stimuli, we hypothesize a more permanent adaptation through plastic deformation of soft tissues and postural recalibration.
Objective:
To induce measurable height gains (2–3 inches) through mechanical traction protocols mimicking the zero-G environment’s effect on the axial and appendicular skeleton.
Mechanism:
Tensile stress induces elongation of intervertebral discs, femoral shaft, and tibial diaphysis.
Sustained traction stimulates fibrocartilaginous and periosteal plasticity.
Duration: 5 minutes per hour, 18 cycles per day Total Active Decompression Time: 1.5 hours/day Traction Vectoring:
Cranial upward vector: 25–30% of bodyweight
Pedal downward vector: Equal and opposite force
Biomechanical Target:
Expansion of lumbar and thoracic intervertebral discs
Postural realignment via axial recalibration
Stimulation of vertebral ligamentous plasticity
Nocturnal Passive Elongation Protocol (NPEP)
Duration: 10 hours (overnight) Traction Load: 10–15% bodyweight (static) Focus: Maintenance of daytime elongation through passive soft tissue compliance during somnolence. Mechanism: Facilitates long-term tissue adaptation via diurnal cyclical stress-relief loading.
Appendicular Skeletal Extension Modules
Femoral Traction Protocol (FTP)
Traction Site: Greater trochanter to supracondylar ridge
Direction: Axial elongation
Duration: 5 min/hour, alternating with tibial set
Goal: Micro-tensile adaptation of cortical bone and periosteum
Tibial Traction Protocol (TTP)
Traction Site: Distal patella to talocrural junction
Force Parameters: 20–25% bodyweight in a downward vector
Objective: Encourage tibial axis lengthening via induced mechanical creep
Both routines are alternated in 60-minute cycles during waking hours.
Safety and Adaptation Considerations
While not clinically approved, LSDT is theorized to promote:
Viscoelastic tissue elongation
Postural height normalization
Potential bone remodeling under Wolff’s Law (if performed long-term)
Conclusion
Through rigorous implementation of the Longitudinal Skeletal Decompression Therapy protocol, individuals may feasibly attain stature augmentation of 5–8 cm. The method utilizes a multidisciplinary integration of space physiology, orthomechanical engineering, and soft tissue remodeling dynamics.
This is not cosmetic stretching — this is gravitational biomechanics re-engineered for human optimization.
Table: LSDT Daily Routine Schedule
Protocol
Timeframe
Frequency
Traction Force
Targeted Structure
Purpose
Hourly Cyclic Decompression Stimulus (HCDS)
08:00 – 22:00
Every hour (5 min)
25–30% of bodyweight
Spine (cervical, thoracic, lumbar)
Disc decompression, postural elongation
Femoral Axial Elongation (FAE)
08:30 – 21:30
Alternating hourly (5 min)
20–25% of limb weight
Femur (mid-diaphysis)
Cortical stretch, femoral length conditioning
Tibial Axial Elongation (TAE)
09:00 – 22:00
Alternating hourly (5 min)
20–25% of limb weight
Tibia (diaphysis)
Bone stress adaptation, tibial length enhancement
Nocturnal Passive Elongation Protocol (NPEP)
22:30 – 08:30
Continuous (10 hrs)
10–15% of bodyweight (static)
Spine & legs (full body)
Maintenance of daytime gains, tissue plasticity
Notes:
Alternating Hourly means FAE and TAE should never be applied simultaneously to avoid lower limb overload.
All traction forces should be calibrated daily based on mass, tolerance, and postural response.
Rest periods (5–10 min) after each decompression cycle are recommended to allow for spinal fluid redistribution.
Re-evaluation every 14 days using stadiometry and photographic posture analysis is advised.
Advanced Hormonal Supplementation Protocol for Pubertal Height Optimization
Objective: To leverage open growth plates during puberty by pharmacologically amplifying longitudinal bone growth via supraphysiological hormonal modulation.
1. Hormonal Agents & Rationale
Compound
Function
Recombinant HGH
Stimulates chondrocyte proliferation in epiphyseal growth plates
Testosterone Enanthate
Promotes systemic anabolic environment and IGF-1 upregulation
Aromasin (Exemestane)
Aromatase inhibitor; prevents premature epiphyseal plate closure via estradiol suppression
Williams, J. E., & Norskov, A. (1996). Spinal Elongation in Microgravity Environments: A Review of Disc Hydration and Postural Recalibration.Journal of Aerospace Physiology, 12(3), 145–157.
Kumar, S., et al. (2004). Biomechanical Modeling of Axial Skeletal Traction Forces and Intervertebral Compliance.International Journal of Orthomechanical Engineering, 18(2), 203–219.
Zhang, Y., & Rivas, P. (2011). Viscoelastic Properties of Lumbar Soft Tissue Under Sustained Load Conditions.Annals of Human Kinetics and Structural Biology, 7(4), 88–101.
NASA Human Research Program (2018). Height Changes in Microgravity: In-Flight Measurements and Return Adaptation Patterns. Retrieved from: nasa.gov/humanresearch/height-changes
Baros, M. A., & Chen, T. (2013). Orthopedic Traction Systems: Design Innovations and Long-Term Musculoskeletal Remodeling.Biomechanics of Human Modification, 4(1), 55–76.
Harrison, D. E., & Betz, J. (1999). Plastic Deformation in Spinal Ligamentous Structures: Implications for Postural Correction.Journal of Clinical Posturology, 5(2), 211–226.
Wolff, J. (1892). Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen. Berlin: A. Hirschwald. (The Law of Bone Transformation)
Tanaka, M., et al. (2020). Nocturnal Load Distribution and the Effects of Sleep-Based Mechanical Stress in Orthopedic Recovery.Sleep and Somatic Engineering, 2(3), 117–129.
Rosenberg, F., & Liao, H. (2008). Tissue Remodeling Under Controlled Tensile Stress: A Quantitative Review.Journal of Applied Biotensile Research, 11(1), 32–47.
Lee, R. & Chang, V. (2022). Experimental Human Height Augmentation via Non-Invasive Axial Tension: Case Study Review.Unpublished Manuscript.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
