Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
attraction is usually partially effected by societal norms, hence why things like blue eye makeup and bbl lips were popular (even though these dont look that good)in your opinion
i do think there’s objectively esp like cl+ everyone will agree that someone is good lookingattraction is usually partially effected by societal norms, hence why things like blue eye makeup and bbl lips were popular (even though these dont look that good)
I do think there is some objectivity to it though. It's hard to picture an alternative world where the indian janitor is bl than chico
Less than 30%, the "types" ppl have a usually just one part of your face that is different, or other things like style and personality.in your opinion
i agree it’s around but a little less then 30%Less than 30%, the "types" ppl have a usually just one part of your face that is different, or other things like style and personality.
Id say like 40% ishin your opinion
why so high in ur opinion?Id say like 40% ish
coloring and ethnicity is all prefrencein your opinion
i mog u either wayBlackpill forum talking about some "Subjective looks", maybe 10% bro lol
that’s true and beauty standards change depending on regioncoloring and ethnicity is all prefrence
i am that schizo but i’m also only hmtnafter you've reached htn you can happily relax unless you're a schizo that wants to max everything out.
for women it's hmtb, the neotenous you're the more likely that a man would love you
why's this n***a mad? just stop white knighting I wasn't even talking shit about you this time loli mog u either way
i’m not mad bhai i just wanted to see others opinionswhy's this n***a mad? just stop white knighting I wasn't even talking shit about you this time lol
Yeah after you become a millionaire you can just happily relax unless you're insane and want to become a billionaire. I'll take that advice to heart when I reach the top 10% of the world, wouldn't want to go overboard afterall (as if htn is guaranteed by coming onto this forum lmao)after you've reached htn you can happily relax unless you're a schizo that wants to max everything out.
then you need a li'l bit of fixing and you can be a hhtn or chadlitei am that schizo but i’m also only hmtn
you gotta be htn + to get them to notice u tho nglQuite a bit. In fact, one of the best ways to build attraction is to interact with other people rather than with the person you’re interested in (provided they notice you)
nah my ceiling lower ngl im fully soft maxxed but i should be mhtn after surgeriesthen you need a li'l bit of fixing and you can be a hhtn or chadlite
Nahyou gotta be htn + to get them to notice u tho ngl
Region and nurture are cope, nature is the only thing that matters. And that can't be a part of the subjectivity because EVERY race likes white people the most and south-asians the least. The ethnic tax is a factual thing, but im guessing by nature you mean things like being neurodivergent, which have a huge tax on your overall SMVi don’t think it’s less then 10% cuz there’s so many factors and preferences like region, nature, nurture ect
what please explain
wait cuz u described my cousinEthnic prefences, body type prefrences, style prefrences, age prefrences, all play a role. Some people are also attracted to features that are not conventionally attarctive (i find close set eyes, thin lips, big noses, nct, and compact faces attractive) even if they areant the ideal
girls drool whenever there's someone htn+ and lol at their cuck boyfriends that watch that and still be with themyou gotta be htn + to get them to notice u tho ngl
i don’t think region is cope, asians have far different beauty standards then the west doesRegion and nurture are cope, nature is the only thing that matters. And that can't be a part of the subjectivity because EVERY race likes white people the most and south-asians the least. The ethnic tax is a factual thing, but im guessing by nature you mean things like being neurodivergent, which have a huge tax on your overall SMV
1)Face
2)Height
3)Frame
4)Money
5) "Personality" (irrelevant)
^race goes into the first 4 because of obvious realities
I would say like 30% and then around 10% which is subjective but not truly subjective since it’s the norm around you (for example ‘sleepy’ eyes trending)in your opinion
ehhh maybe my friend is easily htn and his daily life and interactions aren’t that different then minegirls drool whenever there's someone htn+ and lol at their cuck boyfriends that watch that and still be with them
good explanationI would say like 30% and then around 10% which is subjective but not truly subjective since it’s the norm around you (for example ‘sleepy’ eyes trending)
Statistics show otherwise, white men perform the best literally everywhere. ESPECIALLY in Asia, where geomaxxing is the easiest lolasians have far different beauty standards then the west does
?nurture isn’t either because of upbringing and what society deems attractive
can i tapwait cuz u described my cousin
that’s trueStatistics show otherwise, white men perform the best literally everywhere. ESPECIALLY in Asia, where geomaxxing is the easiest lol
?
yeh personally a white guy with blue eyes and brown hair is the hottest thng a man can doStatistics show otherwise, white men perform the best literally everywhere. ESPECIALLY in Asia, where geomaxxing is the easiest lol
?
maybe ill set u guys upcan i tap
Nowadays such things stopped existing, trust me as a guy who was literally raised in a village and small town, even the people there have internet access and ability to go to cities, nobody "Lives" in villages anymore and every girl sees the same chads on social media, which is precisely why hypergamy is so fucking horrible nowadays lol, but yes this would've been true like 20 years agosorry not society as a whole i met localized society like family , small towns, (think niche maxxing like cowboys, pretty boys ect)
good point iclNowadays such things stopped existing, trust me as a guy who was literally raised in a village and small town, even the people there have internet access and ability to go to cities, nobody "Lives" in villages anymore and every girl sees the same chads on social media, which is precisely why hypergamy is so fucking horrible nowadays lol, but yes this would've been true like 20 years ago
True to an extent but places do get trapped in echo chambers of sorts of social norms/ what’s attractive.Im not sure if that’s as applicable in America (if that’s where u r from) but I see it in the UK.While there is universal attractive people/types of people there are some ‘niches’ which would only be attractive in certain areas,but maybe that’s only applicable for the UK,since it’s small but each region is quite different.Nowadays such things stopped existing, trust me as a guy who was literally raised in a village and small town, even the people there have internet access and ability to go to cities, nobody "Lives" in villages anymore and every girl sees the same chads on social media, which is precisely why hypergamy is so fucking horrible nowadays lol, but yes this would've been true like 20 years ago
I'm not.America (if that’s where u r from)
maybe in school bro, but certainly not once there's access to dating apps.get trapped in echo chambers of sorts of social norms/ what’s attractive
It gets worse in universities/around that (pretty much till 40 I have seen)I'm not.
maybe in school bro, but certainly not once there's access to dating apps.
Because im being generous and creating hope for myselfwhy so high in ur opinion?
UR FINE BRO CHILLBecause im being generous and creating hope for myself
i would say that "types" are real, and some people have preferences that sometimes override our typical methodology of evaluating looksi do think there’s objectively esp like cl+ everyone will agree that someone is good looking
what abt like a % in ur opinion im curious to hear other opinions
ITS BECAUSE WE R SO ND WE KNOW THESE THINGS BRO FUCKi would say that "types" are real, and some people have preferences that sometimes override our typical methodology of evaluating looks
But "type" usually just refers to a phenotype
Girls say they like guys who "look like they haven't slept in days"
When in reality this just means a north atlantid phenotype with slight under eye bags, and scalera show.
like 50% bc the guys I like all look the exact same but are also usually somewhat conventionally attractive, so it excludes a lot of attractive people but still represents expected standardsin your opinion