Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Discussion how much of attraction is subjective ?

Register to hide this ad
in your opinion
attraction is usually partially effected by societal norms, hence why things like blue eye makeup and bbl lips were popular (even though these dont look that good)


I do think there is some objectivity to it though. It's hard to picture an alternative world where the indian janitor is bl than chico
 

Attachments

  • images-122.webp
    images-122.webp
    25.8 KB · Views: 17
  • indian-man-with-mop-and-detergent-cleaning-at-home-WW6T29.webp
    indian-man-with-mop-and-detergent-cleaning-at-home-WW6T29.webp
    119.3 KB · Views: 18
attraction is usually partially effected by societal norms, hence why things like blue eye makeup and bbl lips were popular (even though these dont look that good)


I do think there is some objectivity to it though. It's hard to picture an alternative world where the indian janitor is bl than chico
i do think there’s objectively esp like cl+ everyone will agree that someone is good looking

what abt like a % in ur opinion im curious to hear other opinions
 
Less than 30%, the "types" ppl have a usually just one part of your face that is different, or other things like style and personality.
i agree it’s around but a little less then 30%
 
after you've reached htn you can happily relax unless you're a schizo that wants to max everything out.

for women it's hmtb, the neotenous you're the more likely that a man would love you
 
why's this n***a mad? just stop white knighting I wasn't even talking shit about you this time lol
i’m not mad bhai i just wanted to see others opinions

i don’t think it’s less then 10% cuz there’s so many factors and preferences like region, nature, nurture ect

sorry for being mean
 
after you've reached htn you can happily relax unless you're a schizo that wants to max everything out.
Yeah after you become a millionaire you can just happily relax unless you're insane and want to become a billionaire. I'll take that advice to heart when I reach the top 10% of the world, wouldn't want to go overboard afterall (as if htn is guaranteed by coming onto this forum lmao)
 
Quite a bit. In fact, one of the best ways to build attraction is to interact with other people rather than with the person you’re interested in (provided they notice you)
 
Quite a bit. In fact, one of the best ways to build attraction is to interact with other people rather than with the person you’re interested in (provided they notice you)
you gotta be htn + to get them to notice u tho ngl
 
Ethnic prefences, body type prefrences, style prefrences, age prefrences, all play a role. Some people are also attracted to features that are not conventionally attarctive (i find close set eyes, thin lips, big noses, nct, and compact faces attractive) even if they areant the ideal
 
i don’t think it’s less then 10% cuz there’s so many factors and preferences like region, nature, nurture ect
Region and nurture are cope, nature is the only thing that matters. And that can't be a part of the subjectivity because EVERY race likes white people the most and south-asians the least. The ethnic tax is a factual thing, but im guessing by nature you mean things like being neurodivergent, which have a huge tax on your overall SMV
1)Face
2)Height
3)Frame
4)Money
5) "Personality" (irrelevant)
^race goes into the first 4 because of obvious realities
 
Ethnic prefences, body type prefrences, style prefrences, age prefrences, all play a role. Some people are also attracted to features that are not conventionally attarctive (i find close set eyes, thin lips, big noses, nct, and compact faces attractive) even if they areant the ideal
wait cuz u described my cousin
 
Region and nurture are cope, nature is the only thing that matters. And that can't be a part of the subjectivity because EVERY race likes white people the most and south-asians the least. The ethnic tax is a factual thing, but im guessing by nature you mean things like being neurodivergent, which have a huge tax on your overall SMV
1)Face
2)Height
3)Frame
4)Money
5) "Personality" (irrelevant)
^race goes into the first 4 because of obvious realities
i don’t think region is cope, asians have far different beauty standards then the west does

nurture isn’t either because of upbringing and what society deems attractive

but i do agree with everything else u said
 
in your opinion
I would say like 30% and then around 10% which is subjective but not truly subjective since it’s the norm around you (for example ‘sleepy’ eyes trending)
 
girls drool whenever there's someone htn+ and lol at their cuck boyfriends that watch that and still be with them
ehhh maybe my friend is easily htn and his daily life and interactions aren’t that different then mine
 
I would say like 30% and then around 10% which is subjective but not truly subjective since it’s the norm around you (for example ‘sleepy’ eyes trending)
good explanation
 
Statistics show otherwise, white men perform the best literally everywhere. ESPECIALLY in Asia, where geomaxxing is the easiest lol

?
that’s true

sorry not society as a whole i met localized society like family , small towns, (think niche maxxing like cowboys, pretty boys ect)
 
Statistics show otherwise, white men perform the best literally everywhere. ESPECIALLY in Asia, where geomaxxing is the easiest lol

?
yeh personally a white guy with blue eyes and brown hair is the hottest thng a man can do 🤤 🤤 🤤
 
sorry not society as a whole i met localized society like family , small towns, (think niche maxxing like cowboys, pretty boys ect)
Nowadays such things stopped existing, trust me as a guy who was literally raised in a village and small town, even the people there have internet access and ability to go to cities, nobody "Lives" in villages anymore and every girl sees the same chads on social media, which is precisely why hypergamy is so fucking horrible nowadays lol, but yes this would've been true like 20 years ago
 
Nowadays such things stopped existing, trust me as a guy who was literally raised in a village and small town, even the people there have internet access and ability to go to cities, nobody "Lives" in villages anymore and every girl sees the same chads on social media, which is precisely why hypergamy is so fucking horrible nowadays lol, but yes this would've been true like 20 years ago
good point icl

ur smart sorry for being mean
 
Nowadays such things stopped existing, trust me as a guy who was literally raised in a village and small town, even the people there have internet access and ability to go to cities, nobody "Lives" in villages anymore and every girl sees the same chads on social media, which is precisely why hypergamy is so fucking horrible nowadays lol, but yes this would've been true like 20 years ago
True to an extent but places do get trapped in echo chambers of sorts of social norms/ what’s attractive.Im not sure if that’s as applicable in America (if that’s where u r from) but I see it in the UK.While there is universal attractive people/types of people there are some ‘niches’ which would only be attractive in certain areas,but maybe that’s only applicable for the UK,since it’s small but each region is quite different.
 
I'm not.

maybe in school bro, but certainly not once there's access to dating apps.
It gets worse in universities/around that (pretty much till 40 I have seen)
 
i do think there’s objectively esp like cl+ everyone will agree that someone is good looking

what abt like a % in ur opinion im curious to hear other opinions
i would say that "types" are real, and some people have preferences that sometimes override our typical methodology of evaluating looks


But "type" usually just refers to a phenotype


Girls say they like guys who "look like they haven't slept in days"


When in reality this just means a north atlantid phenotype with slight under eye bags, and scalera show.
 
i would say that "types" are real, and some people have preferences that sometimes override our typical methodology of evaluating looks


But "type" usually just refers to a phenotype


Girls say they like guys who "look like they haven't slept in days"


When in reality this just means a north atlantid phenotype with slight under eye bags, and scalera show.
ITS BECAUSE WE R SO ND WE KNOW THESE THINGS BRO FUCK
 
in your opinion
like 50% bc the guys I like all look the exact same but are also usually somewhat conventionally attractive, so it excludes a lot of attractive people but still represents expected standards

like if i were to think of celebrities who are exact expamples of what im attracted to they all look very similar (Jacob elordi, joseph gordon Levitt, heath ledger, hayden Christensen) so "types" are def real imo
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top