simply
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2024
- Messages
- 428
- Online time
- 1d 11h
- Reputation
- 527
based on the opinion of most lookmaxxers i have ever talked about this topic, ChatGPT, scientific research (links below)
SCALE (?/10):
1-4 Sub-4 25%
4.5-5 LTN 25%
5.5-6 MTN 28%
6.5-7 PrettyGirl 12%
7.5-8 StacyLite 7%
8.5-10 Stacy 3%
these percentages are very approximate and were obtained as a result of a ChatGPT request for girls who outwardly match the golden ratio
first of all, to rate women, you should divide the assessment of women's appearance into 2 important parts. PSL (golden ratio) and features that are exactly you find attractive (chubby cheeks or lips, face shape and other) (we cant call it appeal, bc everyone likes different features. For example i absolutely dont find chubby cheeks attractive, but my friend does. you can tell me that this can happen when evaluating a man's appearance, if his appearance is evaluated by a woman, but no. Even if a woman is not attracted, for example, to the hunter eyes in a man, this means that she would like to see eyes of a different shape in her man, but she is not disgusted by the eyes of a hunter. This is called a type. Men and women are very different in psychology and and perception of the world). We will call it subjective preferences, instead off appeal or just SP.
for example if i want to rate Andriana Lima first of all i should define her PSL:
Total FWHR: 1.62
ESR: 0.46
Eyebrow setness: 92%
FWHR (forehead height): 1.75
Chin-MidFace ratio: 1.85
Lower/Full face ratio: 0.61
Eye to Nose Ratio: 1.68
Neck Width to Jaw: 83%
Eyebrow tilt: 13.5°
Facial Thirds: 33:32:35
Canthal tilt: 6.5°
Jaw angle: ~123°
Jaw Width: 97% of ideal
MidFace ratio: 1.01
LL - UL (Lip height ratio): 1.58
Bitemporal to Bizygomatic width: 0.74
Nose width to height ratio: 0.65
Nasal Tip Angle: 98°
EME Angle (eye-mouth-eye): 78°
general: 9.6/10
now we should define her SP (subjective preferences). I will give her a 9.9/10 (+0,3) overall (human cant be perfect) based on my SP. Stacy
I rated her higher because based on my subjective preferences I like piercing eyes and this typa colouring in women.
for the opposite example, I will evaluate a woman who does not match my subjective preferences. Kate Moss
Total FWHR: 1.57
ESR (Eye Spacing Ratio): 0.48
Eyebrow setness: 88%
FWHR (Forehead Height): 1.71
Chin-MidFace Ratio: 1.76
Lower/Full Face Ratio: 0.58
Eye to Nose Ratio: 1.63
Neck Width to Jaw: 81%
Eyebrow Tilt: 11.7°
Facial Thirds (Upper:Mid:Lower): 34:30:36
Canthal Tilt: 4.9°
Jaw Angle: ~127°
Jaw Width: 94% of ideal
MidFace Ratio: 1.04
LL - UL (Lip Ratio): 1.53
Bitemporal to Bizygomatic Width: 0.72
Nose Width to Height Ratio: 0.67
Nasal Tip Angle: 101°
EME Angle: 76°
general: 8.3/10
based on my SP I will give her 7.7, because of
1) very strong jaw (-0,3)
2) blonde (-0,3)
StacyLite
I made a guide on assessing ONLY the face
www.girlschase.com
PS
pls dont estimate this so strictly, my first guide. I might have forgotten to add something.
SCALE (?/10):
1-4 Sub-4 25%
4.5-5 LTN 25%
5.5-6 MTN 28%
6.5-7 PrettyGirl 12%
7.5-8 StacyLite 7%
8.5-10 Stacy 3%
these percentages are very approximate and were obtained as a result of a ChatGPT request for girls who outwardly match the golden ratio
first of all, to rate women, you should divide the assessment of women's appearance into 2 important parts. PSL (golden ratio) and features that are exactly you find attractive (chubby cheeks or lips, face shape and other) (we cant call it appeal, bc everyone likes different features. For example i absolutely dont find chubby cheeks attractive, but my friend does. you can tell me that this can happen when evaluating a man's appearance, if his appearance is evaluated by a woman, but no. Even if a woman is not attracted, for example, to the hunter eyes in a man, this means that she would like to see eyes of a different shape in her man, but she is not disgusted by the eyes of a hunter. This is called a type. Men and women are very different in psychology and and perception of the world). We will call it subjective preferences, instead off appeal or just SP.
for example if i want to rate Andriana Lima first of all i should define her PSL:
Total FWHR: 1.62
ESR: 0.46
Eyebrow setness: 92%
FWHR (forehead height): 1.75
Chin-MidFace ratio: 1.85
Lower/Full face ratio: 0.61
Eye to Nose Ratio: 1.68
Neck Width to Jaw: 83%
Eyebrow tilt: 13.5°
Facial Thirds: 33:32:35
Canthal tilt: 6.5°
Jaw angle: ~123°
Jaw Width: 97% of ideal
MidFace ratio: 1.01
LL - UL (Lip height ratio): 1.58
Bitemporal to Bizygomatic width: 0.74
Nose width to height ratio: 0.65
Nasal Tip Angle: 98°
EME Angle (eye-mouth-eye): 78°
general: 9.6/10
now we should define her SP (subjective preferences). I will give her a 9.9/10 (+0,3) overall (human cant be perfect) based on my SP. Stacy
I rated her higher because based on my subjective preferences I like piercing eyes and this typa colouring in women.
for the opposite example, I will evaluate a woman who does not match my subjective preferences. Kate Moss
Total FWHR: 1.57
ESR (Eye Spacing Ratio): 0.48
Eyebrow setness: 88%
FWHR (Forehead Height): 1.71
Chin-MidFace Ratio: 1.76
Lower/Full Face Ratio: 0.58
Eye to Nose Ratio: 1.63
Neck Width to Jaw: 81%
Eyebrow Tilt: 11.7°
Facial Thirds (Upper:Mid:Lower): 34:30:36
Canthal Tilt: 4.9°
Jaw Angle: ~127°
Jaw Width: 94% of ideal
MidFace Ratio: 1.04
LL - UL (Lip Ratio): 1.53
Bitemporal to Bizygomatic Width: 0.72
Nose Width to Height Ratio: 0.67
Nasal Tip Angle: 101°
EME Angle: 76°
general: 8.3/10
based on my SP I will give her 7.7, because of
1) very strong jaw (-0,3)
2) blonde (-0,3)
StacyLite
I made a guide on assessing ONLY the face
Why to Throw Out the 1-to-10 Scale for Rating Women
Before stumbling into the world of pickup in late 2005, I'd never used the 1-to-10 scale. Maybe that's because I didn't really have friends; I wasn't comparing notes on girls. Or maybe it was because I wasn't trying to impress anyone by telling him I'd nailed a "total 10." But in pickup, it...
www.girlschase.com
pls dont estimate this so strictly, my first guide. I might have forgotten to add something.
Last edited:
