- Joined
- Sep 5, 2025
- Messages
- 1,664
- Time Online
- 4d 22h
- Reputation
- 3,192
I agree with you
Htn is still a normie btw
I’d say you’re htn ngl
Htn is still a normie btw
I’d say you’re htn ngl
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i mean i just take no pleasure in ripping people apart for their looks, i rated him honestly bcs i do think his colorings r bad and he looks unwell in half his pics (which is very unappealing)You .com raters are soft lmao this is why org is better
Cat boyI’m a man
Cat mommyCat boy
Then leave? Org is full of trolls anywaysYou .com raters are soft lmao this is why org is better
I didn’t say to insult the person, just give an honest rating. Keep in mind ltn is average, NOT mtni mean i just take no pleasure in ripping people apart for their looks, i rated him honestly bcs i do think his colorings r bad and he looks unwell in half his pics (which is very unappealing)
i can rate whilst also being nice and giving constructive criticism, theres no point in giving a rating when all u do is sit there and insult the person whilst not helping them out like at all
Pretty sure mtns are more common than ltnsI didn’t say to insult the person, just give an honest rating. Keep in mind ltn is average, NOT mtn
nahPretty sure mtns are more common than ltns
Common high iq rad moment
I’ve literally seen it on every single rarity scale. What would you say the rarity of a ltn is compared to a mtn
I dont what you mean by the rarity of a ltn compared to a mtn, because a ltn is more common than a mtn, someone whose rated mtn would be attractive, they wouldn’t have any prominent fallios like a common person would, their face would be proportioned well but they wouldnt have striking features like high cheekbones and a really good eye area that someone rated htn+ would have. If you think of some of the best looking males in your school they realistically arent above mtn/hmtn.I’ve literally seen it on every single rarity scale. What would you say the rarity of a ltn is compared to a mtn
Hltn lmtn is pretty averagePretty sure mtns are more common than ltns
the argument isn’t specific enough ngl. It depends where you live and stuff but with every rarity scale I’ve seen says ltns fall around 1/5 but mtns 1/2. This is probably comparing lltns and lmtns on the dot. I typically see more dead average looking people than deformed lookingI dont what you mean by the rarity of a ltn compared to a mtn, because a ltn is more common than a mtn, someone whose rated mtn would be attractive, they wouldn’t have any prominent fallios like a common person would, their face would be proportioned well but they wouldnt have striking features like high cheekbones and a really good eye area that someone rated htn+ would have. If you think of some of the best looking males in your school they realistically arent above mtn/hmtn.
idk maybe because youre younger people havent really fully grown into their faces yet so everyone kinda looks averagethe argument isn’t specific enough ngl. It depends where you live and stuff but with every rarity scale I’ve seen says ltns fall around 1/5 but mtns 1/2. This is probably comparing lltns and lmtns on the dot. I typically see more dead average looking people than deformed looking
I mean people are typically uglier before puberty hits. That’s like the whole baseline for these corny grifters on tiktok who post “ascensions”.idk maybe because youre younger people havent really fully grown into their faces yet so everyone kinda looks average