Join 70,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

I’m tired of these r****d ass rates

You .com raters are soft lmao this is why org is better
i mean i just take no pleasure in ripping people apart for their looks, i rated him honestly bcs i do think his colorings r bad and he looks unwell in half his pics (which is very unappealing)
i can rate whilst also being nice and giving constructive criticism, theres no point in giving a rating when all u do is sit there and insult the person whilst not helping them out like at all
 
i mean i just take no pleasure in ripping people apart for their looks, i rated him honestly bcs i do think his colorings r bad and he looks unwell in half his pics (which is very unappealing)
i can rate whilst also being nice and giving constructive criticism, theres no point in giving a rating when all u do is sit there and insult the person whilst not helping them out like at all
I didn’t say to insult the person, just give an honest rating. Keep in mind ltn is average, NOT mtn
 
I’ve literally seen it on every single rarity scale. What would you say the rarity of a ltn is compared to a mtn
I dont what you mean by the rarity of a ltn compared to a mtn, because a ltn is more common than a mtn, someone whose rated mtn would be attractive, they wouldn’t have any prominent fallios like a common person would, their face would be proportioned well but they wouldnt have striking features like high cheekbones and a really good eye area that someone rated htn+ would have. If you think of some of the best looking males in your school they realistically arent above mtn/hmtn.
 
I dont what you mean by the rarity of a ltn compared to a mtn, because a ltn is more common than a mtn, someone whose rated mtn would be attractive, they wouldn’t have any prominent fallios like a common person would, their face would be proportioned well but they wouldnt have striking features like high cheekbones and a really good eye area that someone rated htn+ would have. If you think of some of the best looking males in your school they realistically arent above mtn/hmtn.
the argument isn’t specific enough ngl. It depends where you live and stuff but with every rarity scale I’ve seen says ltns fall around 1/5 but mtns 1/2. This is probably comparing lltns and lmtns on the dot. I typically see more dead average looking people than deformed looking
 
the argument isn’t specific enough ngl. It depends where you live and stuff but with every rarity scale I’ve seen says ltns fall around 1/5 but mtns 1/2. This is probably comparing lltns and lmtns on the dot. I typically see more dead average looking people than deformed looking
idk maybe because youre younger people havent really fully grown into their faces yet so everyone kinda looks average
 
idk maybe because youre younger people havent really fully grown into their faces yet so everyone kinda looks average
I mean people are typically uglier before puberty hits. That’s like the whole baseline for these corny grifters on tiktok who post “ascensions”.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top