Join 43,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Rage I hate people who make sunscreen their entire personality on social media

Why does Patrick Ivan and Paul Saladino look like utter shit then? Gatis looks his age as well
I don’t know much about Patrik Ivan,I just see him on TikTok eating and stuff.
Paul Saladino,also not really a fan of him and I don’t know why exactly he looks like that,maybe his past diet from when he was younger?
Also I don’t know how old Paul is.
Goatis I can understand,dude was vegan during late stage puberty and a bit after.
But like,out of all 3,I don’t really think any of those have exactly my opinion.
Goatis would come close,but this dude barely gets like 60 grams of carbohydrates while I consume 120 grams,20-30 grams being from honey.
 
I don’t know much about Patrik Ivan,I just see him on TikTok eating and stuff.
Paul Saladino,also not really a fan of him and I don’t know why exactly he looks like that,maybe his past diet from when he was younger?
Also I don’t know how old Paul is.
Goatis I can understand,dude was vegan during late stage puberty and a bit after.
But like,out of all 3,I don’t really think any of those have exactly my opinion.
Goatis would come close,but this dude barely gets like 60 grams of carbohydrates while I consume 120 grams,20-30 grams being from honey.

@Whitepill Patrick is a gymcel = stress and aging
Paul saldaino eats a lot of fruit and sugar. he also does gym= aging
Goatis was vegan but now he looks much better than when he was vegan. so yeah
 
But I’d like to talk about cancer.
Any type of cancer is the bodies inability to get rid of dead cells.
Usually of course,the dead cells build up and turn into a tumor right?
So, not all tumors are inherently cancerous and not all cancer turns into tumors. Leukemia is a good example.

Cancer is mutated cells multiplying uncontrollably. Cells grow and divide to create new cells as needed. Old or damaged cells die naturally and are replaced by 'new' ones. In rare cases, damaged or abnormal cells start multiplying uncontrollably - which is cancer. Sometimes it forms tumors, sometimes it doesn't. I'm not sure I would call a tumor a clog of dead cells.

This is an oversimplification of cancer, but I hope you get the idea.

What if I told you,toxins and heavy metals are also the main reason of this cause.
Like I explained,metals accumulate by the skin,the sun plays a role in this but it absolutely shouldn’t play a role if those heavy metals are not present.
I know what the concept of sunscreen is of course,no explanation needed.
So I’ve never seen someone talk about how heavy metals play a huge role in skin cancer,maybe aajonus vonderplanitz did but I never heard.
I would need to conduct a study or an experiment with this to properly confirm.
But here’s my theory that in my opinion makes the most sense:

A high concentration of heavy metals on a specific part of your skin,this attracts and heats the surrounding cells up,causing them to die,with a high total of toxin amount in the body,your immune system and bacteria cannot properly regenerate those cells properly.
This in term causes as cancer is known,a build up of dead cells that cannot be digested by macrophages and other cells of the immune system and also bacteria.
A wow,you have skin cancer.
For the sake of argument, I'm going to assume you mean skin cancer. The most common types of skin cancer is Basal Cell Carcinoma, Melanoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma - All mainly caused by UV light. Even in the case of Nonmelanoma (an umbrella term to describe cancers that are not Melanoma), UV light causes most of the DNA changes in skin cells. So it makes sense why this is the case.

If sunburn is damaged tissue (due to DNA damage) caused by UV light, then the skin sheds the damaged cells, and new ones regenerate by multiplying and dividing the cells. While this process is happening, because this is a normal process for our skin to do, sometimes cancer can form. If cancer is abnormal cells multiplying and dividing, then being constantly exposed to UV light increases your chances of cancer because you're increasing your chances of abnormal cells forming.

By your logic, the cause of the cells regenerating are being caused by surface level metals heating up and then killing the cells - and not sunburn killing those cells. I'm not sure I agree, but I can understand why you might think that way. But this does not disprove the theory that UV light causes skin cancer - you said you simply don't agree that sunburn exists in the manner that it's understood. For your argument to make sense, you have to first disprove sunburn does not exist via UV light. Maybe metals can be a factor in some skin cancers, but I don't see how this would prove that sunburn (as we currently understand it) does not exist. Or why this would disprove the effect of sunscreen.

This study would be somewhat easy to confirm. You would just get skin samples of patients who have skin cancer, and compare it to people who don't. Obviously I don't expect you to study people's skin, but it might be something you can submit to an educational research institute and see if they'd look into it.

I can’t get my head around the concept of sunlight hitting all parts of your body (if the individual is unclothed of course) and specifically targeting one single spot.
Because this is not how it works. First, it's nearly impossible for sunlight to hit all of your body parts, even unclothed. It's unlikely (not impossible) for someone to get skin cancer in their armpit for example. When you look up images of skin cancer, it's mainly the face, arms, shoulders, back, and whatnot - stuff that faces towards the sun.

When you're driving a car, your left shoulder is closer to the window than your right shoulder. That small exposure makes a differences in regards where the cancer might form. It just doesn't randomly develop on the bottom of your foot, because the sunlight does not hit all of your body parts evenly, 24/7, even when fully unclothed.

I find your theory interesting, but I'm struggling to understand. I want to understand it, but I don't understand why you came to the conclusion that you did.
 
So, not all tumors are inherently cancerous and not all cancer turns into tumors. Leukemia is a good example.

Cancer is mutated cells multiplying uncontrollably. Cells grow and divide to create new cells as needed. Old or damaged cells die naturally and are replaced by 'new' ones. In rare cases, damaged or abnormal cells start multiplying uncontrollably - which is cancer. Sometimes it forms tumors, sometimes it doesn't. I'm not sure I would call a tumor a clog of dead cells.

This is an oversimplification of cancer, but I hope you get the idea.


For the sake of argument, I'm going to assume you mean skin cancer. The most common types of skin cancer is Basal Cell Carcinoma, Melanoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma - All mainly caused by UV light. Even in the case of Nonmelanoma (an umbrella term to describe cancers that are not Melanoma), UV light causes most of the DNA changes in skin cells. So it makes sense why this is the case.

If sunburn is damaged tissue (due to DNA damage) caused by UV light, then the skin sheds the damaged cells, and new ones regenerate by multiplying and dividing the cells. While this process is happening, because this is a normal process for our skin to do, sometimes cancer can form. If cancer is abnormal cells multiplying and dividing, then being constantly exposed to UV light increases your chances of cancer because you're increasing your chances of abnormal cells forming.

By your logic, the cause of the cells regenerating are being caused by surface level metals heating up and then killing the cells - and not sunburn killing those cells. I'm not sure I agree, but I can understand why you might think that way. But this does not disprove the theory that UV light causes skin cancer - you said you simply don't agree that sunburn exists in the manner that it's understood. For your argument to make sense, you have to first disprove sunburn does not exist via UV light. Maybe metals can be a factor in some skin cancers, but I don't see how this would prove that sunburn (as we currently understand it) does not exist. Or why this would disprove the effect of sunscreen.

This study would be somewhat easy to confirm. You would just get skin samples of patients who have skin cancer, and compare it to people who don't. Obviously I don't expect you to study people's skin, but it might be something you can submit to an educational research institute and see if they'd look into it.


Because this is not how it works. First, it's nearly impossible for sunlight to hit all of your body parts, even unclothed. It's unlikely (not impossible) for someone to get skin cancer in their armpit for example. When you look up images of skin cancer, it's mainly the face, arms, shoulders, back, and whatnot - stuff that faces towards the sun.

When you're driving a car, your left shoulder is closer to the window than your right shoulder. That small exposure makes a differences in regards where the cancer might form. It just doesn't randomly develop on the bottom of your foot, because the sunlight does not hit all of your body parts evenly, 24/7, even when fully unclothed.

I find your theory interesting, but I'm struggling to understand. I want to understand it, but I don't understand why you came to the conclusion that you did.
The problem is we have 2 completely different ideas on how skin cancer is formed.
We can’t simply agree on one thing,simply because you blame UV rays,I blame heavy metals.
We have also surprisingly other views on how cancer (not only skin cancer but in general is formed).
I have to admit,you bring up solid arguments,but it’s nearly impossible to respond to them with my own beliefs on this topic.
But the example you said about the car,in my opinion dosen’t make sense at all.
So you’re telling me,a perfectly healthy toxic free human can develop skin cancer from just a couple minutes of extra exposure on his shoulder?
Then why doesn’t it affect other parts?
For example,we walk different directions,the sunlight shines also from different directions.

This my opinion,my theory,that a heavily concentrated amount of heavy metals on a very small area of the skin causes this makes more sense than a skin cancer being caused by a body part that is slightly more exposed to the sun and it’s UV rays.
Yes and I’m aware that cancer cells multiply,but cancer cells from the beginning of this stage is a accumulation of dead cells that mutate into cancer cells.
 
I’m not going to reply to all of this since you believe the complete opposite of what I believe,that is the “main theory” of sunburn.
But I’d like to talk about cancer.
Any type of cancer is the bodies inability to get rid of dead cells.
Usually of course,the dead cells build up and turn into a tumor right?
What if I told you,toxins and heavy metals are also the main reason of this cause.
Like I explained,metals accumulate by the skin,the sun plays a role in this but it absolutely shouldn’t play a role if those heavy metals are not present.
I know what the concept of sunscreen is of course,no explanation needed.
So I’ve never seen someone talk about how heavy metals play a huge role in skin cancer,maybe aajonus vonderplanitz did but I never heard.
I would need to conduct a study or an experiment with this to properly confirm.
But here’s my theory that in my opinion makes the most sense:

A high concentration of heavy metals on a specific part of your skin,this attracts and heats the surrounding cells up,causing them to die,with a high total of toxin amount in the body,your immune system and bacteria cannot properly regenerate those cells properly.
This in term causes as cancer is known,a build up of dead cells that cannot be digested by macrophages and other cells of the immune system and also bacteria.
A wow,you have skin cancer.

I can’t get my head around the concept of sunlight hitting all parts of your body (if the individual is unclothed of course) and specifically targeting one single spot.

@Whitepill @shredded4summer @Currycelloser
I also want y’all opinions on this theory,let me know what y’all think.
“Seems” legit but you never know something until you test it and we’re not scientists

I wish that science was funded by government rather than business with an agenda so we could see some proof for these topics that really matter

Either way idm I just like my diet now
 
Back
Top