Looksmaxxing Forum Logo

Join 70,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

Register Log in
  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

i hate talkimg stages

candycaro said:
Come on. They wouldn’t. You say anything cause subhuman women don’t even exist in yalls world view
Click to expand...
truth but subhumans are outliers, they are never treated as equals. and if a woman is subhuman due to being fat - that's her own choice.
 
candycaro said:
Definition doesn’t make it voluntary
Click to expand...
R we reading the same thing, a femcel is not the opposite of an incel. they are volcels because they have that lack of oppurtunies. compare this to the incel definition. incel = someone who believes that they are unfairly deprived of opportunities to have sex
 
Barbie said:
R we reading the same thing, a femcel is not the opposite of an incel. they are volcels because they have that lack of oppurtunies. compare this to the incel definition. incel = someone who believes that they are unfairly deprived of opportunities to have sex
Click to expand...
Well lack of opportunities could be not a lot of opportunities or it could also be none. Just the same as deprived of opportunities can mean none but not necessarily.
 
Barbie said:
R we reading the same thing, a femcel is not the opposite of an incel. they are volcels because they have that lack of oppurtunies. compare this to the incel definition. incel = someone who believes that they are unfairly deprived of opportunities to have sex
Click to expand...
candycaro said:
Well lack of opportunities could be not a lot of opportunities or it could also be none. Just the same as deprived of opportunities can mean none but not necessarily.
Click to expand...
I wouldn’t argue this by the definition anyways though
 
  • Like
Reactions: bby
candycaro said:
Well lack of opportunities could be not a lot of opportunities or it could also be none. Just the same as deprived of opportunities can mean none but not necessarily.
Click to expand...
deprived - do not have at all, the meaning is different
 
Barbie said:
R we reading the same thing, a femcel is not the opposite of an incel. they are volcels because they have that lack of oppurtunies. compare this to the incel definition. incel = someone who believes that they are unfairly deprived of opportunities to have sex
Click to expand...
Femcels are people deprived of the opportunities to have a sexual relationship involuntarily due to, looks, social awkwardness and trauma Volcels are voluntary meaning they CAN persue sexual relationships but choose not to

Femcels =! Volcels
 
candycaro said:
does being sleep deprived mean I didn’t get even a minute of sleep? No
Click to expand...
sleep deprived is something different, you are not getting my point bro. im not a personal dictionary learn the meaning of the words you use
 
  • Like
Reactions: bby
Byro said:
Femcels are people deprived of the opportunities to have a sexual relationship involuntarily due to, looks, social awkwardness and trauma Volcels are voluntary meaning they CAN persue sexual relationships but choose not to
Click to expand...
nah as a female, femcels are usually volcels. when u read into the history of it comes from voluntary abstinence and blah blah
 
Barbie said:
nah as a female, femcels are usually volcels. when u read into the history of it comes from voluntary abstinence and blah blah
Click to expand...
Usually the point she was trying to make is that not all of them are making it hard to use as a general statement
 
Barbie said:
How would ya then ?
Click to expand...
Well I’d say that you would still find guys that would have sex with even a subhuman female. At the same time I’d say you’d find girls that would have sex with a subhuman male. I don’t think incels or femcels exist in the way they always say they do. They make the absolute statement that there isn’t even a single member of the opposite sex in this world that would tap that. That’s realistically actually not true considering all the weird shit some people out there are into. I see it that way: the ones who call themselves femcels or incels actually both just have a huge lack of options. Barely anyone wants them (not no one) and it would be hard for them to find the one that would still want them. Also a lot of they would not even consider/reject the person that would want them.
 
candycaro said:
Well I’d say that you would still find guys that would have sex with even a subhuman female. At the same time I’d say you’d find girls that would have sex with a subhuman male. I don’t think incels or femcels exist in the way they always say they do. They make the absolute statement that there isn’t even a single member of the opposite sex in this world that would tap that. That’s realistically actually not true considering all the weird shit some people out there are into. I see it that way: the ones who call themselves femcels or incels actually both just have a huge lack of options. Barely anyone wants them (not no one) and it would be hard for them to find the one that would still want them. Also a lot of they would not even consider/reject the person that would want them.
Click to expand...
Just because someone WOULD doesn’t mean that someone will though
 
Barbie said:
sleep deprived is something different, you are not getting my point bro. im not a personal dictionary learn the meaning of the words you use
Click to expand...
You don’t know the meaning of deprivation then
 
Byro said:
Usually the point she was trying to make is that not all of them are making it hard to use as a general statement
Click to expand...
candycaro said:
Well I’d say that you would still find guys that would have sex with even a subhuman female. At the same time I’d say you’d find girls that would have sex with a subhuman male. I don’t think incels or femcels exist in the way they always say they do. They make the absolute statement that there isn’t even a single member of the opposite sex in this world that would tap that. That’s realistically actually not true considering all the weird shit some people out there are into. I see it that way: the ones who call themselves femcels or incels actually both just have a huge lack of options. Barely anyone wants them (not no one) and it would be hard for them to find the one that would still want them. Also a lot of they would not even consider/reject the person that would want them.
Click to expand...
Nah due to hypergamy most girls wouldn't fuck the subhuman male even if they are their looks match its just how it is
but the whole im doomed to never have sex thing is tarded yeah
 
Barbie said:
Nah due to hypergamy most girls wouldn't fuck the subhuman male even if they are their looks match its just how it is
but the whole im doomed to never have sex thing is tarded yeah
Click to expand...
Not you feeding into hypergamy as a female. Done arguing
 
Barbie said:
Nah due to hypergamy most girls wouldn't fuck the subhuman male even if they are their looks match its just how it is
but the whole im doomed to never have sex thing is tarded yeah
Click to expand...
You are definitely right with the hypergamy theory girls will always date above them when possible
 
candycaro said:
Acting like being fat can’t be predetermined by genetics, environmental and socioeconomic factors. Also there are female subhumans who are skinny
Click to expand...
Yeah the point of using a subhuman femcel and using a controllable factor is moronic it’s much easier to change your weight then your bone structure
 
Barbie said:
Females biologically do this, it is uncontrollable r****d. Cope
Click to expand...
What this community will refuse to understand is that hypergamy is mainly about social hierarchy and not looks. But im so done arguing this. The signs are everywhere on the walls lmao. Ridiculous to believe this as a woman when you could honestly ask YOURSELF if you wouldn’t date down if your ideal partner came along.
Also, this:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 8 (Looksmaxxers: 0, Guests: 8)
Back
Top