I just found out my other crush is 13

[vespertine]

18

i think you can predict the next questions. would you have any nuance?

what about a lobotomized 22 year old? what about a 17 year old who smarter than the vast majority of adults, is self sufficient and makes his own money, and has a pilots license?

 

[Inanimate Pragmatist]

War for who? His government who detest him? Who rob him? r**e his babies?

You should live for yourself nobody else. Become the best person you can.

The reason 18yr old is better is obviously because 14 is a smaller number and 18yr olds are more mature and should be able to have larger age gap relations (though to a limit but it's impossible to regulate)

Tell me. How really is different 14-18? How? Both are still children, both are not finished developing their brains until they reach the age of 25-30 if not even later due to the worse conditions of what is imposed on the current generations. Answer me that clearly, if you are willing to write a line on a number then why not on the stage of one's literal brain development?

 

[Penalizer69]

Tell me. How really is different 14-18? How? Both are still children, both are not finished developing their brains until they reach the age of 25-30 if not even later due to the worse conditions of what is imposed on the current generations. Answer me that clearly, if you are willing to write a line on a number then why not on the stage of one's literal brain development?

This is a stupid fallacy in gradients. 4 years is a lot during your teen years, development is rapid during this time.

Also not how evolution works, you don't adapt to environment that quickly and all the tests on brain development were done in the modern era

 

[paulyune]

Fuck my life, never having a boyfriend is tolerable because what the fuck man

maybe don't look online

 

[paulyune]

Tell me. How really is different 14-18? How? Both are still children, both are not finished developing their brains until they reach the age of 25-30 if not even later due to the worse conditions of what is imposed on the current generations. Answer me that clearly, if you are willing to write a line on a number then why not on the stage of one's literal brain development?

yo u sound like a pedophile trying to justify themselves

 

[Inanimate Pragmatist]

This is a stupid fallacy in gradients. 4 years is a lot during your teen years, development is rapid during this time.

Also not how evolution works, you don't adapt to environment that quickly and all the tests on brain development were done in the modern era

Please, under the right place and time. The right trauma and reason, anyone can mature rather fast. Psychology is my finer understandings. There is barely a difference between those four years, both are immature teens in need of a proper trustable figure.

That is exactly how evolution works. You either do not adapt and perish, or you do. No ins and outs, or sideways. What of the brain developments? Regardless if they were in the modern age, the point stands. Why target a number when you can target a very measurable state of the very human body.

Also you write too slow. You are boring me highly. If you cannot respond within a minute max, I believe you are either lost for a reason to back your own statements or that you are a bit slow. Nothing wrong with being slow, after all; goyim are just that. Do not straw man with "I had things to do". We are both high posting users on an incel forum. I highly doubt it.

 

[Penalizer69]

i think you can predict the next questions. would you have any nuance?

what about a lobotomized 22 year old? what about a 17 year old who smarter than the vast majority of adults, is self sufficient and makes his own money, and has a pilots license?

Those would fall under different laws. Someone who is vulnerable and can't consent would be considered a victim of r**e not a victim of pedophilia.

The 17 year old is just a nuance issue, noone is gonna get mad at a 19 year old for fucking a 17 year old but if that gap is any larger it's an issue due to the intent for example. The older individual is still going to the encounter knowing the individual is younger and may not be mature enough, if they do know them then that's even weirder because they had the intention of having sexual relations with someone that young regardless

But anyway these rules are in place as a generalisation more than anything, you can't really truly stop complications. For example an 18 year old could fuck a 43 year old, and while that's wrong and predatory, there's not much you can do without banning 18 year olds from also fucking 21 year olds or something like that, once again, due to gradients

 

[Penalizer69]

Please, under the right place and time. The right trauma and reason, anyone can mature rather fast. Psychology is my finer understandings. There is barely a difference between those four years, both are immature teens in need of a proper trustable figure.

That is exactly how evolution works. You either do not adapt and perish, or you do. No ins and outs, or sideways. What of the brain developments? Regardless if they were in the modern age, the point stands. Why target a number when you can target a very measurable state of the very human body.

Those would fall under different laws. Someone who is vulnerable and can't consent would be considered a victim of r**e not a victim of pedophilia.

The 17 year old is just a nuance issue, noone is gonna get mad at a 19 year old for fucking a 17 year old but if that gap is any larger it's an issue due to the intent for example. The older individual is still going to the encounter knowing the individual is younger and may not be mature enough, if they do know them then that's even weirder because they had the intention of having sexual relations with someone that young regardless

But anyway these rules are in place as a generalisation more than anything, you can't really truly stop complications. For example an 18 year old could fuck a 43 year old, and while that's wrong and predatory, there's not much you can do without banning 18 year olds from also fucking 21 year olds or something like that, once again, due to gradients

 

[Glamour]

I'm European and it doesn't make it right

What happened to muhh stop following man made laws?

No your not european the uk left the eu

 

[Inanimate Pragmatist]

@Penalizer69 Fix the message so I can respond.

 

[Penalizer69]

No your not european the uk left the eu

Youre lesbian? I thought you were American

 

[Penalizer69]

@Penalizer69 Fix the message so I can respond.

Just respond to this

Those would fall under different laws. Someone who is vulnerable and can't consent would be considered a victim of r**e not a victim of pedophilia.

The 17 year old is just a nuance issue, noone is gonna get mad at a 19 year old for fucking a 17 year old but if that gap is any larger it's an issue due to the intent for example. The older individual is still going to the encounter knowing the individual is younger and may not be mature enough, if they do know them then that's even weirder because they had the intention of having sexual relations with someone that young regardless

But anyway these rules are in place as a generalisation more than anything, you can't really truly stop complications. For example an 18 year old could fuck a 43 year old, and while that's wrong and predatory, there's not much you can do without banning 18 year olds from also fucking 21 year olds or something like that, once again, due to gradients

 

[Glamour]

Youre lesbian? I thought you were American

No im not from Lebanon

 

[Inanimate Pragmatist]

Just respond to this

Penalizer69 said:
Those would fall under different laws. Someone who is vulnerable and can't consent would be considered a victim of r**e not a victim of pedophilia.

The 17 year old is just a nuance issue, noone is gonna get mad at a 19 year old for fucking a 17 year old but if that gap is any larger it's an issue due to the intent for example. The older individual is still going to the encounter knowing the individual is younger and may not be mature enough, if they do know them then that's even weirder because they had the intention of having sexual relations with someone that young regardless

But anyway these rules are in place as a generalisation more than anything, you can't really truly stop complications. For example an 18 year old could fuck a 43 year old, and while that's wrong and predatory, there's not much you can do without banning 18 year olds from also fucking 21 year olds or something like that, once again, due to gradients

Indeed, those are the laws. Yet why bring them up? You were the same man who mocked me for being lawful for the same laws made by "paedophile baby eating elites". You either follow order or you do not, make up your mind.

How come? It is highly common. If not it is a classic pattern that psychologists have found within younger girls going and fancying the older boys in school. I know this from being in high school myself, I remember the girls my age fawning for the older boys and even crossing with them. This is nothing new and never has been anything new due to one simple law in human nature and genetics. Women naturally develop faster than men do in regards to sexual maturity and in the psyche. Now you are left with two choices here with logic, you either limit the age of consent to how it is handled and managed which is highly fair or you limit it fully whilst it still happens.

Is it really predatory? Let me set you a very clear example. If you were a young 18 year old man and an attractive cougar in her 40s shared interest and would have accepted you as a paramour; then would you reject it? Do not lie to me. After all, this forum; this lonely pathetic generation would stab their own morals in the back in an instant for the sake of forfilling natural desires. Then the end example remains once more, is it really predatory if you are aware of your desire and your need for such to happen? Are you willing to call food false since a starving person wished to consume it?

 

[Inanimate Pragmatist]

yo u sound like a pedophile trying to justify themselves

Then justify a logical response beyond emotional pushing. By your logic, you might as well condemn 80 percent of the entire world.

 

[Penalizer69]

Indeed, those are the laws. Yet why bring them up? You were the same man who mocked me for being lawful for the same laws made by "paedophile baby eating elites". You either follow order or you do not, make up your mind.

Because he asked me what I'd change the age of consent to. The original reply was not to you but I thought it answered alot of your points

How come? It is highly common. If not it is a classic pattern that psychologists have found within younger girls going and fancying the older boys in school. I know this from being in high school myself, I remember the girls my age fawning for the older boys and even crossing with them. This is nothing new and never has been anything new due to one simple law in human nature and genetics. Women naturally develop faster than men do in regards to sexual maturity and in the psyche. Now you are left with two choices here with logic, you either limit the age of consent to how it is handled and managed which is highly fair or you limit it fully whilst it still happens.

The vaginas also gets wet as lubricant during r**e, does this mean it is good and she enjoys it?

You're right to a point, women do like older men naturally, but to an extent is it okay and appropriate. Obviously this changes with age, with the appropriate gap increasing as the younger party gets older.

Is it really predatory? Let me set you a very clear example. If you were a young 18 year old man and an attractive cougar in her 40s shared interest and would have accepted you as a paramour; then would you reject it? Do not lie to me. After all, this forum; this lonely pathetic generation would stab their own morals in the back in an instant for the sake of forfilling natural desires. Then the end example remains once more, is it really predatory if you are aware of your desire and your need for such to happen? Are you willing to call food false since a starving person wished to consume it?

because you desire something it doesn't make it right. The older person is still predatory and immoral because like I said the intent is bad. Even if it's not they have the intelligence to understand the potential risks if they do not then they are likely selfish and uncaring.

Its also a mental issue not a physical one like you make it out to be

 

[Inanimate Pragmatist]

Because he asked me what I'd change the age of consent to. The original reply was not to you but I thought it answered alot of your points

The vaginas also gets wet as lubricant during r**e, does this mean it is good and she enjoys it?

You're right to a point, women do like older men naturally, but to an extent is it okay and appropriate. Obviously this changes with age, with the appropriate gap increasing as the younger party gets older.

because you desire something it doesn't make it right. The older person is still predatory and immoral because like I said the intent is bad. Even if it's not they have the intelligence to understand the potential risks if they do not then they are likely selfish and uncaring.

Its also a mental issue not a physical one like you make it out to be

Yet by your own meaning, it is of Jewish elite construct. We are not talking about your view here in regards to law, we are talking about it in mine since it is between you and me, not between you and another.

What does r**e have to do with this? Are you running out of logic? I will pummel you and this thread with papers, statistics and the word of such people.

I am asking you a very simple query. Would you reject a 40 year old stacy at 18?

Everything I mentioned was of both mental and bodily.

 

[Inanimate Pragmatist]

Because he asked me what I'd change the age of consent to. The original reply was not to you but I thought it answered alot of your points

The vaginas also gets wet as lubricant during r**e, does this mean it is good and she enjoys it?

You're right to a point, women do like older men naturally, but to an extent is it okay and appropriate. Obviously this changes with age, with the appropriate gap increasing as the younger party gets older.

because you desire something it doesn't make it right. The older person is still predatory and immoral because like I said the intent is bad. Even if it's not they have the intelligence to understand the potential risks if they do not then they are likely selfish and uncaring.

Its also a mental issue not a physical one like you make it out to be

I will make it rather clear that you cannot stick one moral rule or another. Not like I was expecting much from a person who has 32k posts worth of nonsense shitposts.

 

[Penalizer69]

Yet by your own meaning, it is of Jewish elite construct. We are not talking about your view here in regards to law, we are talking about it in mine since it is between you and me, not between you and another.

It's a law that happens to be right, It's not right  because it's a law

What does r**e have to do with this? Are you running out of logic? I will pummel you and this thread with papers, statistics and the word of such people.

What? I just said I responded to him not you? Also yes they are because if a 12 year old and a 20 year old have "sex" that's r**e. The child can't consent.

I am asking you a very simple query. Would you reject a 40 year old stacy at 18?

Everything I mentioned was of both mental and bodily.

I'm not a moid, but if I was I probably wouldn't no. Like I said what the minor wants doesn't make it right as there's a power imbalance

 

[Inanimate Pragmatist]

It's a law that happens to be right, It's not right  because it's a law

What? I just said I responded to him not you? Also yes they are because if a 12 year old and a 20 year old have "sex" that's r**e. The child can't consent.

I'm not a moid, but if I was I probably wouldn't no. Like I said what the minor wants doesn't make it right as there's a power imbalance

"Yes saar my morals come from rules the pedophile baby eaters made! They told me it's good so I follow their rules like a good bhai saar"

Again. Where did I say 12-20? Where and when. You are putting words in my mouth that I never have said. I very clear.

I think our talk is finished here. It is clear you cannot argue beyond emotional logic. You have made it rather loud that you cannot argue beyond logic; which is why you make up arguement points that I have and no one else has made.

 

[Penalizer69]

"Yes saar my morals come from rules the pedophile baby eaters made! They told me it's good so I follow their rules like a good bhai saar"

Again. Where did I say 12-20? Where and when. You are putting words in my mouth that I never have said.

It was an example ape brain.

Like I said its a rule that happens to be right, like the rule that murder of an innocent being bad. The difference here is I'm saying it's okay because (Insert my own reasoning), you said its okay, because the law says it is, as a point.

 

[Inanimate Pragmatist]

It was an example ape brain.

Like I said its a rule that happens to be right, like the rule that murder of an innocent being bad. The difference here is I'm saying it's okay because (Insert my own reasoning), you said its okay, because the law says it is, as a point.

That you clearly did not exclaim as one so you can gain moral high ground on me. Yes, it is okay in my nation. Which I have made from the very start that I had no intention of spreading. Then who are you and why are you getting your emotions fried for?

 

[Almighty Sigma Wolf]

Tell me. How really is different 14-18? How? Both are still children, both are not finished developing their brains until they reach the age of 25-30 if not even later due to the worse conditions of what is imposed on the current generations. Answer me that clearly, if you are willing to write a line on a number then why not on the stage of one's literal brain development?

Both are not still children tho, brain development does not mark the difference between a child and adult
The end of puberty does biologically

Bro I just realized this is inanimate, how I feel typing this while being on ignore

 

[Penalizer69]

That you clearly did not exclaim as one so you can gain moral high ground on me. Yes, it is okay in my nation. Which I have made from the very start that I had no intention of spreading. Then who are you and why are you getting your emotions fried for?

You've had to much to drink, you're incoherent.

 

[Penalizer69]

That you clearly did not exclaim as one so you can gain moral high ground on me. Yes, it is okay in my nation. Which I have made from the very start that I had no intention of spreading. Then who are you and why are you getting your emotions fried for?

The 14 Yr old age of consent, not the 18 one which I created myself based on no laws

 

[vespertine]

my head genuinely hurts

 

[Inanimate Pragmatist]

You've had to much to drink, you're incoherent.

The 14 Yr old age of consent, not the 18 one which I created myself based on no laws

I think it is clear since I missed out the commas.

What I said clearly was: You did not make it clear that you were using that 12-20 age gap as an example since I never had said I support that. You were using that as moral high ground against me.

 

[Inanimate Pragmatist]

The 14 Yr old age of consent, not the 18 one which I created myself based on no laws

That sounds like a personal issue. Not a lawful one.

my head genuinely hurts

You never had an obligation to read this. You can leave anytime.

 

[vespertine]

You never had an obligation to read this. You can leave anytime.

my head hurting isn't to do with reading this, if thats what your implying. i am aware that i can leave anytime

 

[Gothed]

I'm 17

Either she hit puberty at age 9 or you belong in prison gang, wtf

 

[trvecel]

 

[SevenColorCrystalBall]

maybe don't look online

Well IRL isn't gonna happen for me

 

[SevenColorCrystalBall]

Either she hit puberty at age 9 or you belong in prison gang, wtf

Its hard to tell what age transmen are, okay

 

[TFC]

13? Are you a fucking pedo?

 

[SevenColorCrystalBall]

13? Are you a fucking pedo

He looked way older in his pictures and he was talking about getting a job and graduating