I think more girls should be strippers

[n4evis]

No historical or prehistorical example just all cope

You're the one that's coping lmfao. Women have superior prefrontal cortex, the part of the brain responsible for making you a good leader. But traits like communication, intelligence and experience are crucial and BOTH women and men can excel in these areas

 

[James Othy]

Women today outpace men in college enrollment and outperform in various categories, which is why we see some men telling women to stop pursuing education and focus on motherhood(take Harrison Butker’s speech as an example) and they even advocate for restricting women's right to education. Skills aren't determined by gender. People of any gender can be diverse in their skills, intelligence and problem solving approaches

Academic prowess and intelligence are not the same thing. I'm pretty damn smart but I never went to college, and only really got C's and D's in school. I love learning but hate school. Statistics show that the majority of CEOs got average grades throughout their academic careers. Getting straight A's usually just signifies that you're good at following directions and will most likely grow up to fill a lot.

 

[volny]

You're the one that's coping lmfao. Women have superior prefrontal cortex, the part of the brain responsible for making you a good leader. But traits like communication, intelligence and experience are crucial and BOTH women and men can excel in these areas

Source 404

 

[n4evis]

Academic prowess and intelligence are not the same thing. I'm pretty damn smart but I never went to college, and only really got C's and D's in school. I love learning but hate school. Statistics show that the majority of CEOs got average grades throughout their academic careers. Getting straight A's usually just signifies that you're good at following directions and will most likely grow up to fill a lot.

I know, i never said that academic sucess = intelligence. And you didn't get the point.
What I’m trying to say is that historically, men stopped women from getting an education, often claiming women were too "dumb" and "useless" to deserve it. Now, as women finally got rights and are outperforming men in many areas, some men have become insecure about this.This insecurity leads to attempts to take away women's rights once again

 

[James Othy]

Speaking from a biological perspective, women are wired to lead and i already explained why

You haven't explained anything. I have no idea what you're talking about.

Women are not wired to lead because if they were they would have been doing that for most of recorded history. They're not even leading now. Intelligence always supersedes physical strength. If women were generally more intelligent than men, and not the other way around, then we would have been on your tits since the beginning of time coming to you for everything. You would have been using us for our physical labor and giving us pats on the back.

Women are wired to be led.

 

[AstroSky]

Women thrive in security, within a leader’s household, where they can nurture, guide, and support. Throughout history, as soon as civilization crumbles, it is men who stand between chaos and order.... between the wild and those who seek to harm. Weapons may level the playing field, but proficiency with them often falls to men, thanks to centuries of honing hand-eye coordination as archers, hunters, and warriors.

Yet, instead of dividing ourselves into “better” or “worse,” we should recognize what each sex brings to the table. Nature did not create one entirely useful and the other expendable. Women possess deep emotional intelligence and intuition. While they may not always engage in long-term strategic thinking in the same way men do, their insight into people and situations can be invaluable.

Men, by design, endure. We take blows.. both physical and mental.... without letting them break us. The ability to push through pain, loss, and hardship without losing our core values is a hallmark of masculinity. A man who is tested by suffering can still stand tall and strive to do good. A woman, however, is more deeply affected by trauma, particularly physical violence.... one experience can leave scars that last a lifetime.

This is the fundamental difference between men and women: resilience manifests differently. Men bear the brunt of the storm, standing firm even in suffering, while women guide. Men may hold the shield, standing as warriors against the world, but it is women who provide the light that shows the path forward.

Instead of debating superiority, we should embrace our natural strengths and work together ... shield and light, strength and wisdom..... building a future where both thrive.

 

[n4evis]

Source 404

Novel findings from 2,838 Adult Brains on Sex Differences in Gray Matter Brain Volume - Scientific Reports

There is still disagreement among studies with respect to the magnitude, location, and direction of sex differences of local gray matter volume (GMV) in the human brain. Here, we applied a state-of-the-art technique examining GMV in a well-powered sample (n = 2,838) validating effects in two...

www.nature.com

Sex Differences in Cortical Thickness Mapped in 176 Healthy Individuals between 7 and 87 Years of Age - PMC

Findings from previous magnetic resonance imaging studies of sex differences in gray matter have been inconsistent, with some showing proportionally increased gray matter in women and some showing no differences between the sexes. Regional sex ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

 

[James Othy]

I know, i never said that academic sucess = intelligence. And you didn't get the point.
What I’m trying to say is that historically, men stopped women from getting an education, often claiming women were too "dumb" and "useless" to deserve it. Now, as women finally got rights and are outperforming men in many areas, some men have become insecure about this.This insecurity leads to attempts to take away women's rights once again

It's not about being smart enough to deserve it. It's about practicality. And women are not outperforming men. Maybe in shooting. Women are better at markanship, at least when a target isn't shooting back, than men.

Show me where women are outperforming men. I'm not talking about getting accepted to Universities. Where are they outperforming men in the real world?

 

[AstroSky]

It's not about being smart enough to deserve it. It's about practicality. And women are not outperforming men. Maybe in shooting. Women are better at markanship, at least when a target isn't shooting back, than men.

Show me where women are outperforming men. I'm not talking about getting accepted to Universities. Where are they outperforming men in the real world?

Highly doubt women are better at shooting. Too many top class snipers that are men than women. Perhaps only edged by the difference that they have to deal with an actual stressful situation which ties back to my original point that men excell in being mentally resilient which in war and shooting a real target that shoots back. You freaking need.

 

[n4evis]

You haven't explained anything. I have no idea what you're talking about.

I already explained about the prefrontal cortex and linked some studies, you just didn't read what i said

Women are not wired to lead because if they were they would have been doing that for most of recorded history. They're not even leading now. Intelligence always supersedes physical strength. If women were generally more intelligent than men, and not the other way around, then we would have been on your tits since the beginning of time coming to you for everything. You would have been using us for our physical labor and giving us pats on the back.

This is due to the patriarchy and the use of physical force from men to maintain power. In early societies, men used their physical 'advantage' to enforce laws, control and stay in power. And over time this led to patriarchal systems where men held power, while women were excluded. Even today, women still face stereotypes that question their leadership abilities

 

[ey88]

In mumbai

 

[n4evis]

It's not about being smart enough to deserve it. It's about practicality. And women are not outperforming men. Maybe in shooting. Women are better at markanship, at least when a target isn't shooting back, than men.

Show me where women are outperforming men. I'm not talking about getting accepted to Universities.

This study shows that women reinvest up to 90% of their income back into their families and communities, compared to 30-40% for men, leading to economical and social benefits:

Why Investing in Women Benefits us All

The World Economic Forum’s global gender gap score, which measures gender parity around the world, stands at 68 percent. At the current pace of improvement, it will take 268 years to close this gap. For context, 268 years ago, the United States did not even exist.

www.hks.harvard.edu

Companies with greater gender diversity in leadership positions are 21% more likely to outperform on profitability:

https://www.multifamilyexecutive.com/business-finance/diverse-leadership-promotes-better-business-results_o

And countries led by women, such as New Zealand (Jacinda Ardern) and Germany (Angela Merkel), have been recognized for effective crisis management during the Covid-19 pandemic

Where are they outperforming men in the real world?

I'm sure you'll find even more examples if u do your own research

 

[James Othy]

I already explained about the prefrontal cortex and linked some studies, you just didn't read what i said

This is due to the patriarchy and the use of physical force from men to maintain power. In early societies, men used their physical 'advantage' to enforce laws, control and stay in power. And over time this led to patriarchal systems where men held power, while women were excluded. Even today, women still face stereotypes that question their leadership abilities

If women were naturally more intelligent and had better leadership capabilities this "patriarchy" would have been done away with a long time ago and there would be a matriarchy in its place. A the best system in the world wouldn't last even 30 years against an intelligent majority that oppose it. You've been lied to in school.

Anyways, please quote me what you said about the prefrontal cortex and the linked studies. I must have accidentally skipped over it accidentally.

 

[neymar]

Feminism > evolution
Got it

Both are nonsensical

 

[James Othy]

This study shows that women reinvest up to 90% of their income back into their families and communities, compared to 30-40% for men, leading to economical and social benefits:

Why Investing in Women Benefits us All

The World Economic Forum’s global gender gap score, which measures gender parity around the world, stands at 68 percent. At the current pace of improvement, it will take 268 years to close this gap. For context, 268 years ago, the United States did not even exist.

www.hks.harvard.edu

Companies with greater gender diversity in leadership positions are 21% more likely to outperform on profitability:

https://www.multifamilyexecutive.com/business-finance/diverse-leadership-promotes-better-business-results_o

And countries led by women, such as New Zealand (Jacinda Ardern) and Germany (Angela Merkel), have been recognized for effective crisis management during the Covid-19 pandemic

I'm sure you'll find even more examples if u do your own research

 

[James Othy]

You're the one that's coping lmfao. Women have superior prefrontal cortex, the part of the brain responsible for making you a good leader. But traits like communication, intelligence and experience are crucial and BOTH women and men can excel in these areas

What makes a good leader though?

 

[UglyFag]

Gender wars in big 25

 

[neymar]

Gender wars in big 25

n*****s cant even talk ab strip clubs no more without fighting

 

[zygos]

We dont need beauticians, lash technician, influencers we should have more strippers and strip clubs

are docotrs an option.

 

[neymar]

are docotrs an option.

We need surgeons and strippers not general doctors

 

[n4evis]

If women were naturally more intelligent and had better leadership capabilities this "patriarchy" would have been done away with a long time ago and there would be a matriarchy in its place. A the best system in the world wouldn't last even 30 years against an intelligent majority that oppose it. You've been lied to in school.

Patriarchy can't simply be 'done', because men hold physical force within societal systems, which gives them significant power in enforcing rights, social norms, religions etc + even some men are still too insecure to vote for a female president. And also, some countries led by women have often thrived or did very well (like Germany and New Zealand when they were led by women during the pandemic)

Anyways, please quote me what you said about the prefrontal cortex and the linked studies. I must have accidentally skipped over it accidentally.

And i never said that women are better leaders overall. I was just speaking from a biological perspective. Leadership isn't determined by gender and is subjective. You're the one that keeps insisting that men are better leaders, which doesn't even make sense, because neuroscience and research studies say otherwise. Like this study for example:

New Research Shows Women Are Better at Using Soft Skills Crucial for Effective Leadership and Superior Business Performance, Finds Korn Ferry

www.kornferry.com

The only place where women didn't outperform men was: Emotional self-control, where no gender differences were found (they had equal results)

 

[James Othy]

Patriarchy can't simply be 'done', because men hold physical force within societal systems, which gives them significant power in enforcing rights, social norms, religions etc + even some men are still too insecure to vote for a female president. And also, some countries led by women have often thrived or did very well (like Germany and New Zealand when they were led by women during the pandemic)

And i never said that women are better leaders overall. I was just speaking from a biological perspective. Leadership isn't determined by gender and is subjective. You're the one that keeps insisting that men are better leaders, which doesn't even make sense, because neuroscience and research studies say otherwise. Like this study for example:

New Research Shows Women Are Better at Using Soft Skills Crucial for Effective Leadership and Superior Business Performance, Finds Korn Ferry

www.kornferry.com

The only place where women didn't outperform men was: Emotional self-control, where no gender differences were found (they had equal results)

"Research shows, however, that the reality is often the opposite. If more men acted like women in employing their emotional and social competencies, they would be substantially and distinctly more effective in their work.”

This article is just about empathy. I don't agree that empathy is conducive to a good working environment. And it's certainly not the most important quality of leadership.

As for voting, I would vote for a woman if she's a Republican running against a male Democrat every time. I think the reason a lot of men didn't vote for Hillary or Kamal wasn't because of insecurity, it's because Hillary and Kamala are fucking mentally retarded.

I don't know anything how Zambia, Germany or New Zealand handled Covid. But I believe you're saying they did a good job because it correlates to your values. Myself, along with a lot of other people, might not value the way they handled it. I'd have to know what they did.

 

[n4evis]

This article is just about empathy. I don't agree that empathy is conducive to a good working environment. And it's certainly not the most important quality of leadership.

"18.4% of women demonstrate the competency consistently compared to just 9.9% of men.Other competencies in which women outperform men are coaching & mentoring, influence, inspirational leadership, conflict management, organizational awareness, adaptability, teamwork and achievement orientation"

As for voting, I would vote for a woman if she's a Republican running against a male Democrat every time. I think the reason a lot of men didn't vote for Hillary or Kamal wasn't because of insecurity, it's because Hillary and Kamala are fucking mentally retarded.

Many men hesitate to vote for female presidential candidates just because they're women. It's not about the candidates themselves, but rather perceptions and stereotypes about women in power (in some cases ofc)

I don't know anything how Zambia, Germany or New Zealand handled Covid. But I believe you're saying they did a good job because it correlates to your values. Myself, along with a lot of other people, might not value the way they handled it. I'd have to know what they did.

"Female-led countries handled coronavirus better", study suggests. It's based off data, not personal opinion.

 

[James Othy]

"18.4% of women demonstrate the competency consistently compared to just 9.9% of men.Other competencies in which women outperform men are coaching & mentoring, influence, inspirational leadership, conflict management, organizational awareness, adaptability, teamwork and achievement orientation"

Many men hesitate to vote for female presidential candidates just because they're women. It's not about the candidates themselves, but rather perceptions and stereotypes about women in power (in some cases ofc)

"Female-led countries handled coronavirus better", study suggests. It's based off data, not personal opinion.

The article fails to mention any sources or how the "research" was carried out.

And what does "better" exactly mean in regard to how the female led countries handled the coronavirus? Because when there's no mention of what that is it's left to opinion. "Better" to you might mean more measures were put in place. "Better" to me might mean less restrictions/lockdowns. "Better" to Tommy Francis Jr. might mean less % of the population died as a result of the virus. What does does it mean by "Female-led countries handled coronavirus better"? What does "better" mean?

 

[n4evis]

The article fails to mention any sources or how the "research" was carried out.

"Data from 55,000 professionals across 90 countries and all levels of management, collected between 2011-2015, using the Emotional and social Emotional and Social Competency Inventory (ESCI), developed and co-owned by Richard E. Boyatzis, Daniel Goleman and Korn Ferry"

And what does "better" exactly mean in regard to how the female led countries handled the coronavirus? Because when there's no mention of what that is it's left to opinion. "Better" to you might mean more measures were put in place. "Better" to me might mean less restrictions/lockdowns. "Better" to Tommy Francis Jr. might mean less % of the population died as a result of the virus. What does does it mean by "Female-led countries handled coronavirus better"? What does "better" mean?

Countries led by women had “systematically and significantly better” Covid-19 outcomes, research appears to show: Earlier implementation of lockdowns, lower mortality rate(approximately half the numbers of death compared to male-led countries)

 

[lesh01]

You're the one that's coping lmfao. Women have superior prefrontal cortex, the part of the brain responsible for making you a good leader. But traits like communication, intelligence and experience are crucial and BOTH women and men can excel in these areas

agreed
women should be rulers
it is literaly how nature made us
man dominate women rule
every single social life form creates a social structure in which females rule

 

[lesh01]

Academic prowess and intelligence are not the same thing. I'm pretty damn smart but I never went to college, and only really got C's and D's in school. I love learning but hate school. Statistics show that the majority of CEOs got average grades throughout their academic careers. Getting straight A's usually just signifies that you're good at following directions and will most likely grow up to fill a lot.

mf takes jordan seriously
fucking r****d

 

[neymar]

"18.4% of women demonstrate the competency consistently compared to just 9.9% of men.Other competencies in which women outperform men are coaching & mentoring, influence, inspirational leadership, conflict management, organizational awareness, adaptability, teamwork and achievement orientation"

Many men hesitate to vote for female presidential candidates just because they're women. It's not about the candidates themselves, but rather perceptions and stereotypes about women in power (in some cases ofc)

"Female-led countries handled coronavirus better", study suggests. It's based off data, not personal opinion.

What a terrible study

 

[James Othy]

"Data from 55,000 professionals across 90 countries and all levels of management, collected between 2011-2015, using the Emotional and social Emotional and Social Competency Inventory (ESCI), developed and co-owned by Richard E. Boyatzis, Daniel Goleman and Korn Ferry"

Countries led by women had “systematically and significantly better” Covid-19 outcomes, research appears to show: Earlier implementation of lockdowns, lower mortality rate(approximately half the numbers of death compared to male-led countries)

So how was the research carried out? How was workplace cohesion recorded?

Anyways in Zambia 53% of the population is rural. In Germany 22% of the population is rural. New Zealand has a rural population of only about 13%, but it's a remote island nation. Sweden, which had no lockdowns, has a rural population of 11%. Still there were only around 2,000 covid related deaths in Sweden.

 

[James Othy]

mf takes jordan seriously
fucking r****d

So he doesn't have any good points?

 

[n4evis]

So how was the research carried out? How was workplace cohesion recorded?

Korn Ferry's research assessed over 55,000 professionals using a tool called the ESCI

Anyways in Zambia 53% of the population is rural. In Germany 22% of the population is rural. New Zealand has a rural population of only about 13%, but it's a remote island nation. Sweden, which had no lockdowns, has a rural population of 11%. Still there were only around 2,000 covid related deaths in Sweden.

Sweden had approximately 27,407 deaths from Covid-19 by April 2024, i have no idea where u got that number from lmao https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/sweden/
Also, rural populations can affect how disease spread but other factors matter more when comparing Covid-19 outcomes. Countries led by women took quicker actions which helped lower deaths. Germany had more deaths than Sweden overall, but considering its much larger population, it's death per capita was still lower than Sweden's.

 

[James Othy]

Korn Ferry's research assessed over 55,000 professionals using a tool called the ESCI

Sweden had approximately 27,407 deaths from Covid-19 by April 2024, i have no idea where u got that number from lmao https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/sweden/
Also, rural populations can affect how disease spread but other factors matter more when comparing Covid-19 outcomes. Countries led by women took quicker actions which helped lower deaths. Germany had more deaths than Sweden overall, but considering its much larger population, it's death per capita was still lower than Sweden's.

Year 2021 deaths.

Anyways, response to covid means nothing. Just that women are more suggestible and reactive. You win some sometimes. They ended up being right for covid but in a lot of cases they would have been overreacting. And we still don't even know the long term effects that the lockdowns caused. Psychologically speaking. In the end it still might have done more harm than good.

I'm sorry, but how did they asses them with the Ferry research?

Lol, ok I just did some research of my own and it's just as I thought. I actually took this test 3 weeks ago because I just got a second job working at a group home for people with traumatic brain injuries. On so many of the questions I instinctively knew to lie.

"I work beast when not being bothered at work."

* Strongly Agree
* Agree
* Neutral
* Disagree
* Strongly Disagree

This test is just a behavioral assessment. It's to see how agreeable you are. How well you can fill a slot. It's meant to see if you're a good follower. Not whether or not you're a good leader. Of course women will do much better on this test than men. Men who pass it will get hired. And the men who ace it, because they're smart enough to know what it's really about and lied, are the ones whom the women that do very well on it will end up working for in the future.

Since September 2021 I've supported my wife and child along with myself working three days a week at a fast food restaurant in the American Midwest. We live in the center of town renting a two bedroom apartment. My wife is a full time stay at home mother (earns zero income). I'm not a manager at the restaurant where I work, just an associate. I'm estranged from my family and my wife's family lives in a village in a developing country on the other side of the planet. I get no government assistance/benefits whatsoever, or any other kind of help from anyone.

The reason I'm able to afford the lifestyle I've got with four consecutive days off a week, only working at a fast food restaurant as an associate, is because I know how to take what I want. I know how to negotiate for a higher salary than everyone else (getting paid the same as an assistant supervisor), how/when to use leverage, and I'm very adept at execution. I also teach people how they're going to treat me. When higher ups talk to me in a way I don't like I hold eye contact until they're finished speaking but give them no rapport whatsoever. If they ask me a question in a way I don't like then I answer them in a way, sometimes following up with a question of my own, that causes them to exit the interaction feeling stupid. Why am I working at a fast food restaurant if I've got such high ability? Simply because I'm lazy and only want to do the bare minimum.

I came back to this country only so that my wife can get citizenship. Now that's she's finally got it I'm gonna work two jobs. In a few more months I'll have enough cushion and will move us back overseas to figure out what I'm gonna do next.

Anyways, If I had answered the questions on this test honestly I would have gotten a very low score.

 

[n4evis]

Year 2021 deaths.

Anyways, response to covid means nothing. Just that women are more suggestible and reactive. You win some sometimes. They ended up being right for covid but in a lot of cases they would have been overreacting. And we still don't even know the long term effects that the lockdowns caused. Psychologically speaking. In the end it still might have done more harm than good.

I'm sorry, but how did they asses them with the Ferry research?

Lol, ok I just did some research of my own and it's just as I thought. I actually took this test 3 weeks ago because I just got a second job working at a group home for people with traumatic brain injuries. On so many of the questions I instinctively knew to lie.

"I work beast when not being bothered at work."

* Strongly Agree
* Agree
* Neutral
* Disagree
* Strongly Disagree

This test is just a behavioral assessment. It's to see how agreeable you are. How well you can fill a slot. It's meant to see if you're a good follower. Not whether or not you're a good leader. Of course women will do much better on this test than men. Men who pass it will get hired. And the men who ace it, because they're smart enough to know what it's really about and lied, are the ones whom the women that do very well on it will end up working for in the future.

Since September 2021 I've supported my wife and child along with myself working three days a week at a fast food restaurant in the American Midwest. We live in the center of town renting a two bedroom apartment. My wife is a full time stay at home mother (earns zero income). I'm not a manager at the restaurant where I work, just an associate. I'm estranged from my family and my wife's family lives in a village in a developing country on the other side of the planet. I get no government assistance/benefits whatsoever, or any other kind of help from anyone.

The reason I'm able to afford the lifestyle I've got with four consecutive days off a week, only working at a fast food restaurant as an associate, is because I know how to take what I want. I know how to negotiate for a higher salary than everyone else (getting paid the same as an assistant supervisor), how/when to use leverage, and I'm very adept at execution. I also teach people how they're going to treat me. When higher ups talk to me in a way I don't like I hold eye contact until they're finished speaking but give them no rapport whatsoever. If they ask me a question in a way I don't like then I answer them in a way, sometimes following up with a question of my own, that causes them to exit the interaction feeling stupid. Why am I working at a fast food restaurant if I've got such high ability? Simply because I'm lazy and only want to do the bare minimum.

I came back to this country only so that my wife can get citizenship. Now that's she's finally got it I'm gonna work two jobs. In a few more months I'll have enough cushion and will move us back overseas to figure out what I'm gonna do next.

Anyways, If I had answered the questions on this test honestly I would have gotten a very low score.

My point is that leadership abilities are not determined by gender and both men and women can excel as leaders. It's absurd to say that women are bad leaders(especially when it's proven by neuroscience that they aren't), should just stay at home and give birth to children, or were created by God for men.Women aren't supposed to "submit" to men, men and women are supposed to cooperate. We're objectively different male vs female so despite our similarities we will also have different needs and natures which will conflict and clash, hence why i think cooperation is essential.

 

[James Othy]

My point is that leadership abilities are not determined by gender and both men and women can excel as leaders. It's absurd to say that women are bad leaders(especially when it's proven by neuroscience that they aren't), should just stay at home and give birth to children, or were created by God for men.Women aren't supposed to "submit" to men, men and women are supposed to cooperate. We're objectively different male vs female so despite our similarities we will also have different needs and natures which will conflict and clash, hence why i think cooperation is essential.

You seem smart. You should know very well that two people can not cohabitate exclusively with eachother and remain equals. One person is going to take headship and that's something nobody in that situation can escape. In the West nowdays it usually ends up being the woman, because most men have been conditioned to be pussies. Women usually set the tone while choosing a handful of undesired behaviors of their husbands' or whatever that they're willing to tolerate in order to give them a facade of "equality" and cooperation. The men are domesticated. This leads to all sorts of problems. In a healthy relationship though a woman compliments her man and his lifestyle. It's the man who sets the tone and chooses which of his wife's undesired behaviors he's willing to tolerate out of benevolence.

Women can certainly excel as leaders, but generally speaking leadership abilities are determined by a Y chromosome.

 

[N30N]

And I think that moids' opinions don't matter; girls aren't here for men.

Aren't you Christian, read the Bible.

 

[n4evis]

You seem smart. You should know very well that two people can not cohabitate exclusively with eachother and remain equals. One person is going to take headship and that's something nobody in that situation can escape. In the West nowdays it usually ends up being the woman, because most men have been conditioned to be pussies. Women usually set the tone while choosing a handful of undesired behaviors of their husbands' or whatever that they're willing to tolerate in order to give them a facade of "equality" and cooperation. The men are domesticated. This leads to all sorts of problems. In a healthy relationship though a woman compliments her man and his lifestyle. It's the man who sets the tone and chooses which of his wife's undesired behaviors he's willing to tolerate out of benevolence.

Women can certainly excel as leaders, but generally speaking leadership abilities are determined by a Y chromosome.

What i mean is that in a healthy relationship, there's no need for one person to submit while the other one dominates. The desire to dominate rather than cooperate with a woman reflects a poor prefrontal cortex, responsible for executive function, empathy and what makes us mentally mature and civilised. True masculinity doesn't need to dominate: it embraces the complexity and strenght of a woman. And no, leadership abilities are not determined by the Y chromosome

 

[James Othy]

What i mean is that in a healthy relationship, there's no need for one person to submit while the other one dominates. The desire to dominate rather than cooperate with a woman reflects a poor prefrontal cortex, responsible for executive function, empathy and what makes us mentally mature and civilised. True masculinity doesn't need to dominate: it embraces the complexity and strenght of a woman. And no, leadership abilities are not determined by the Y chromosome

When two people go alone together someone's gotta take charge. I think you might be a little bit naive. I've never needed to dominate. That's just what inevitably happens. I choose to take charge. It's a choice not born from a need. It comes natural and my instincts tell me it's just the best thing for everyone. It's a responsibility.

Anyways, do you even know what empathy is? I really don't think you do.

 

[n4evis]

When two people go alone together someone's gotta take charge. I think you might be a little bit naive. I've never needed to dominate. That's just what inevitably happens. I choose to take charge. It's a choice not born from a need. It comes natural and my instincts tell me it's just the best thing for everyone. It's a responsibility.

Okay, that's your point of view. I personally don't agree but i respect your opinion. You do you ig

Anyways, do you even know what empathy is? I really don't think you do.

Nope, never heard of that word before lol