Join 84,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

If you are MTN, I'm sorry...

saw_escapingmtn

6'1 and asymmetrical
Joined
Oct 6, 2026
Messages
203
Solutions
4
Online time
2d 4h
Reputation
253
I write this thread as a guy with an MMTN front and a HTN side profile (look at rating post and comments if u dont believe me)

MTN is interpreted as either being average (<50th percentile) or as being above average statistically yet being above average due to general softmaxxes (leanness, dying, skincare, etc.)

Well I hate to say it but not even MTN (in both forms) can guarantee a proper relationship (presupposing that you go for looksmatch). People will still realise that you are not in the above echolon of looks theoretically. this ties into another theory I have which I will describe down below:

People KNOW your looks potential even if you are not softmaxxed. This could potentially be on a subconscious assessment (if ur skull is at all visible, people know your genetic components which are either a turn on/off. People will know if ur colouring is natural or not. Selecting a sexual partner is a vital subconscious trait that most likely sees through dyed eyebrows or mastic gum jaw training). The inevitability is this: even if u hook up or even get into a relationship with someone in or above ur league, they will still ultimately not see you as reproductively or sexually beneficial. This is why i think some girls can be into more conventionally unattractive guys: they can detect a man's genetic potential, not just what their misc/leanness is. it really is all about bone structure and pheno. this is why rira is worshipped but jeremy allen white (who has better misc) is seen as "ugly in a hot way"
 
thats if you assume every girl you meet is nothing but superficial
 
ig ts forum has made its own version of the psl scale mtn is over average
 
it didn’t, op is a r****d

he’s lucky he’s good looking
i literally clarified that MTN has 2 definitions. above average statistically and average genetically. did u not read the post? even if ur mtn statistically, its not enough to be seriously loved by looksmatch as ppl see thru cosmetic softmaxxes if u got to mtn thru softmaxxing means
 
ig ts forum has made its own version of the psl scale mtn is over average
intellectually disabled. MTN is around psl 4. it is the average genetic makeup of a person possible. if u knew shit about the psl scale in how its used u would know that mtn is dead average objectively. u just dont see as many mtns in public bc most ppl treat their health like shit
 
intellectually disabled. MTN is around psl 4. it is the average genetic makeup of a person possible. if u knew shit about the psl scale in how its used u would know that mtn is dead average objectively. u just dont see as many mtns in public bc most ppl treat their health like shit
Dnr o algo
 
I write this thread as a guy with an MMTN front and a HTN side profile (look at rating post and comments if u dont believe me)

MTN is interpreted as either being average (<50th percentile) or as being above average statistically yet being above average due to general softmaxxes (leanness, dying, skincare, etc.)

Well I hate to say it but not even MTN (in both forms) can guarantee a proper relationship (presupposing that you go for looksmatch). People will still realise that you are not in the above echolon of looks theoretically. this ties into another theory I have which I will describe down below:

People KNOW your looks potential even if you are not softmaxxed. This could potentially be on a subconscious assessment (if ur skull is at all visible, people know your genetic components which are either a turn on/off. People will know if ur colouring is natural or not. Selecting a sexual partner is a vital subconscious trait that most likely sees through dyed eyebrows or mastic gum jaw training). The inevitability is this: even if u hook up or even get into a relationship with someone in or above ur league, they will still ultimately not see you as reproductively or sexually beneficial. This is why i think some girls can be into more conventionally unattractive guys: they can detect a man's genetic potential, not just what their misc/leanness is. it really is all about bone structure and pheno. this is why rira is worshipped but jeremy allen white (who has better misc) is seen as "ugly in a hot way"
do people actually think MTN is average?
 
u still got a 2026 joindate jfl why u acting like ur different. i been lurking since 2022 but all that matters is arguments
Im gonna lie now and say i been lurking since 2021 wow i won the argument holy shit
 
Im gonna lie now and say i been lurking since 2021 wow i won the argument holy shit
genuinely how retarded are u. the point is that arguments matter more than joindate even if ive been tapped in for years. u have bad arguments so u lose thats the point
 
genuinely how retarded are u. the point is that arguments matter more than joindate even if ive been tapped in for years. u have bad arguments so u lose thats the point
Keep talking im almost there
 
i accept ur apology
 
Normgroid. MTN is slightly above average what is so hard to understand abt that. the average person is LTN and as it rises the better looking and the less average. Even those shitty BP editors understand this
 
Normgroid. MTN is slightly above average what is so hard to understand abt that. the average person is LTN and as it rises the better looking and the less average. Even those shitty BP editors understand this
ur just asserting ur own definition man cmon. theres 2 common ways people use the term mtn. whatever one you use, i still think my post applies
 
ur just asserting ur own definition man cmon. theres 2 common ways people use the term mtn. whatever one you use, i still think my post applies
MTN is slightly above average ppl not the average person. and there is no such thing as Mid Mtn it's js MTN such as their is know mid LTN or Mid HTN they are HTN and LTN respectively. u can't js change something set in stone by putting ur own definition in place.
 
MTN is slightly above average ppl not the average person. and there is no such thing as Mid Mtn it's js MTN such as their is know mid LTN or Mid HTN they are HTN and LTN respectively. u can't js change something set in stone by putting ur own definition in place.
Prolly the most irrelevant point to do with this post. “Slightly above average” still not necessarily enough to secure looksmatch
 
Prolly the most irrelevant point to do with this post. “Slightly above average” still not necessarily enough to secure looksmatch
Hypergamy is a facade of your thought and what u see online. Yes ofc it exists irl but it is not as prevelent as u think. if u would look with ur eyes you'd see their are multiple couples around u that r looksmatches
 
Hypergamy is a facade of your thought and what u see online. Yes ofc it exists irl but it is not as prevelent as u think. if u would look with ur eyes you'd see their are multiple couples around u that r looksmatches
Oofy doofys
 
Hypergamy is a facade of your thought and what u see online. Yes ofc it exists irl but it is not as prevelent as u think. if u would look with ur eyes you'd see their are multiple couples around u that r looksmatches
not only that but hypergamy (not to the degree it’s present today) makes biological sense.

sexual relationships are far riskier for women.

that being said i still do not enjoy women as whole
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top