Join 70,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

It's crazy how you can tell if a user is male or female just from talking with them

Register to hide this ad
Colloquialism is not incorrect, but what word I feel like fits this phenomenon best would be 'sociolinguistics'. Colloquialism is more like 'gonna' or 'finna' instead of 'going to', 'y'all' instead of 'you all', and so on. There's not that much study in regards of internet/online communication differences due to gender, so I feel like you can make the argument it should have it's own category (in general) in linguistics, but until then I would say it fits the sociolinguistics category.

1746320176635.png
 
Colloquialism is not incorrect, but what word I feel like fits this phenomenon best would be 'sociolinguistics'. Colloquialism is more like 'gonna' or 'finna' instead of 'going to', 'y'all' instead of 'you all', and so on. There's not that much study in regards of internet/online communication differences due to gender, so I feel like you can make the argument it should have it's own category (in general) in linguistics, but until then I would say it fits the sociolinguistics category.

View attachment 96049
Yeah, sounds better suited for the statement. I was thinking of 'yas' and shit.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top