Join 70,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Info Its over for raw milk

Joined
Mar 19, 2026
Messages
33
Time Online
5h 39m
Reputation
48
Raw milk fits well into the “natural food” category that some people on here like to promote, but I just can’t recommend it for the following problems:

1. Any “probiotics or beneficial bacteria” are mogged to death by yogurt and keifer in probiotic concentration. And raw milk has a 150x higher risk of foodborne illness than pasteurized milk.
2. Any allergy or asthma-reducing effects are confounded by other variables in the studies examining them, and are only correlational.
3. Raw milk is not more nutritious. Any breaking down of micronutrients/vitamins in the pasteurization process is usually just a very slight amount of Vitamin C and B (which milk is not a good source of anyways). Protein, calcium, vitamin D ( what ppl drink milk for) are all intact.


Infant mortality and foodborne illnesses dropped dramatically after pasteurization was invented. Why not drink ultra-filtered milk instead, which has amazing macros? And if you don’t want to support the dairy industry, there’s nothing wrong with simply pasteurizing it yourself at home. But its retarded to ignore this life-saving invention of pasteurization.
 
Register to hide this ad
Raw milk fits well into the “natural food” category that some people on here like to promote, but I just can’t recommend it for the following problems:

1. Any “probiotics or beneficial bacteria” are mogged to death by yogurt and keifer in probiotic concentration. And raw milk has a 150x higher risk of foodborne illness than pasteurized milk.
2. Any allergy or asthma-reducing effects are confounded by other variables in the studies examining them, and are only correlational.
3. Raw milk is not more nutritious. Any breaking down of micronutrients/vitamins in the pasteurization process is usually just a very slight amount of Vitamin C and B (which milk is not a good source of anyways). Protein, calcium, vitamin D ( what ppl drink milk for) are all intact.


Infant mortality and foodborne illnesses dropped dramatically after pasteurization was invented. Why not drink ultra-filtered milk instead, which has amazing macros? And if you don’t want to support the dairy industry, there’s nothing wrong with simply pasteurizing it yourself at home. But its retarded to ignore this life-saving invention of pasteurization.
that's true i just drink jersey milk
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top