Join 68,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Discussion LMHFV Bone-Building Protocol

TrueFakeCell

LMHFV
Joined
Mar 18, 2026
Messages
108
Solutions
1
Time Online
13h 15m
Reputation
118
Location
United States
I know this community is full of retards but I have a theory to propose.

Bone smashing is unoptimal because it relies on blunt trauma to cause micro-fractures which results in inflammatory calluses rather than structured bone. These calluses often reabsorb or grow irregularly and the risk of nerve damage is high.


The real theory behind Wolff’s Law is that bone is a piezoelectric material that generates a microscopic electrical charge when subjected to mechanical stress. This charge signals osteoblasts to build new dense mineral layers while stopping osteoclasts from breaking them down.


To bio-hack this you target the mechanotransduction process occurring in the fluid-filled channels inside the bone. Vibrating the bone at 90 Hz creates fluid shear stress which tricks the internal sensor cells into thinking the face is under a massive constant load.
 
Register to hide this ad
Did not READ but bonesmashing works i don’t care what anybody says
 
Did not READ but bonesmashing works i don’t care what anybody says
I’ll keep it short
-wolf’s law “a bone under stress grows”
-blunt force is uneven stress
-there is better ways
(I explained it in detail if you want read it)
 
I know this community is full of retards but I have a theory to propose.

Bone smashing is unoptimal because it relies on blunt trauma to cause micro-fractures which results in inflammatory calluses rather than structured bone. These calluses often reabsorb or grow irregularly and the risk of nerve damage is high.


The real theory behind Wolff’s Law is that bone is a piezoelectric material that generates a microscopic electrical charge when subjected to mechanical stress. This charge signals osteoblasts to build new dense mineral layers while stopping osteoclasts from breaking them down.


To bio-hack this you target the mechanotransduction process occurring in the fluid-filled channels inside the bone. Vibrating the bone at 90 Hz creates fluid shear stress which tricks the internal sensor cells into thinking the face is under a massive constant load.
whatever you say brotato
 
How will we expose the bone to a 90 Hz vibration?
 
How will we expose the bone to a 90 Hz vibration?
We expose the bone to 90 Hz by using a tactile transducer and a mini amplifier We cannot use a standard vibrator because it is too erratic and only shakes the skin.

All in theory right now but the logic is there
 
I know this community is full of retards but I have a theory to propose.

Bone smashing is unoptimal because it relies on blunt trauma to cause micro-fractures which results in inflammatory calluses rather than structured bone. These calluses often reabsorb or grow irregularly and the risk of nerve damage is high.


The real theory behind Wolff’s Law is that bone is a piezoelectric material that generates a microscopic electrical charge when subjected to mechanical stress. This charge signals osteoblasts to build new dense mineral layers while stopping osteoclasts from breaking them down.


To bio-hack this you target the mechanotransduction process occurring in the fluid-filled channels inside the bone. Vibrating the bone at 90 Hz creates fluid shear stress which tricks the internal sensor cells into thinking the face is under a massive constant load.
your correct, the problem is you cant apply frequencies like that to your face.
i could get more in depth mabye :pepejam:
 
Dokunsal bir dönüştürücü ve mini bir amplifikatör kullanarak kemiği 90 Hz'e maruz bırakıyoruz. Standart bir vibratör kullanamıyoruz çünkü çok düzensiz ve sadece cildi sallıyor.

Şu anda hepsi teoride ama mantık orada
Teorik olarak işe yarıyor gibi görünüyor, ancak soru bunun gerçekten etkili olup olmadığıdır—ve eğer öyleyse, herhangi bir yan etki olacak mı?
 
Teorik olarak işe yarıyor gibi görünüyor, ancak soru bunun gerçekten etkili olup olmadığıdır—ve eğer öyleyse, herhangi bir yan etki olacak mı?
That is what I want to study I am going to get the equipment soon but according to the math I’m doing you literally have to have little to no face fat to even use this method and it will grow about a millimeter or 2 of bone after a year
 
That is what I want to study I am going to get the equipment soon but according to the math I’m doing you literally have to have little to no face fat to even use this method and it will grow about a millimeter or 2 of bone after a year
That sounds like a lot of trouble, so I guess the best option is to have surgery
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top