- Joined
- May 15, 2025
- Messages
- 31,521
- Solutions
- 22
- Time Online
- 18d 4h
- Reputation
- 122,135
First off I like to use the best photos of them, aslong as they're not obviously edited or giga frauded (and in this thread I will be doing such)
It's important to get multiple angles though. Look for multiple photos and in motion footage too (but all while in prime)
On my scale the global average would be around a 4 or ltn. While in the west it would be hltn for reference.
Sometimes I will know stuff that will bump up my score. For example, their harmony being quiet high
DIMORPHISM
How masculine/feminine their features are
ANGULARITY
How sharp their bonestructure and features are. This is where it's important to see other angles, paticularly 3/4 so we can see the zygo projection
Then obviously features. I don't autistically analyse them or anything, but instead just look at the obvious main ones. Tldr this is all eye test estimates
CHICO
People tend to shit on his angularity, but it's actually not bad at all, he's no andreas eriksen but he's got above average angularity for sure, I'd give it a 6.5.
Dimorphism is noticeably a weak point. he's no femboy, but he's no vasily either, 5.5.
Features is his strong point. He doesn't have many noticeable flaws, but he's not paticularly sticking either. What makes him so attractive is that he has high facial averageness. His features get a 7 imo.
Total score: 6.5 - hhtn
elias de poot
Weirdly enough I like looking at blurred/low quality photos, it's a really good show of angularity. His is clearly elite, look at that zygo projection - 8.5 out of 10.
He's clearly highly dimoprhic, his side and narrower jaw brings him down slightly, but he's definitely elite here too 7.5.
Features are where he shines imo. Eye area is near perfect, technically too positively tilted, but whether that's even a failo in his case is debatable. Nose is near ideal too. Lips are full, but proportion are off, namely top to bottom ratio (should be 1:1.5.) Jaw is still above average but still his worst feature - 8.75 features
Overall - 8.25
THON STRIJD
Arguably the best colouring of all time which is a huge hailo.
Not insane dimorphism but better than chico for sure, not as good as de poot - 7
Incredible eye area, good nose, good mouth, good chin - 8.75 no real failos
Angularity is pretty boring tbh. He's not boneless though or he couldn't have his eye area or features - 6.5
Overall and 8 but he gets higher on the eye test for sure - 8.5
Misc is why his score is so high btw
O'PRY
another colouring God
Highly dimoprhic - 8
Angularity - 7 good jawline visablility, consistent hollows but nothing unreal looking.
Features. near perfect lips, top 5 eye area, nose is his biggest downfall - 8.75
Overall 8.25
SHIELDS
Elite dimorphism, I don't want to hear the jaw cope. Female dimorphism is incredibly misunderstood - 9
No major failos - 9.75
Overall - 9.5
BOMER
Dimorphism - 8.5 (some of his dimorphic traits are bad btw) this is why I think dimorphism is flawed
Angularity - I couldn't find images but in motion it looks insane sometimes - 8
Features - thin lips, big forehead, and then some improvements could be made for eyes. Not brooke shields level like people make out - 9 out of 10
Overall - 8.75
CHAD VANDERLOO (MY FAVOURITE)
I like mass effect because it shows how insane his angularity is with an in motion example
This Photo also shows it off well. In some of his runway walks it's kind of unreal - 8.75
Dimorphism - his failos are his chin here, other than that insanely dimoprhic- 8.5
Features - ideal lips (closest to male perfection I've seen), ideal nose but ratios are slightly off from the side, eye area could be slightly improved but through features that don't really add to score - 8.75
Overall - 8.6
It's important to get multiple angles though. Look for multiple photos and in motion footage too (but all while in prime)
On my scale the global average would be around a 4 or ltn. While in the west it would be hltn for reference.
Sometimes I will know stuff that will bump up my score. For example, their harmony being quiet high
DIMORPHISM
How masculine/feminine their features are
ANGULARITY
How sharp their bonestructure and features are. This is where it's important to see other angles, paticularly 3/4 so we can see the zygo projection
Then obviously features. I don't autistically analyse them or anything, but instead just look at the obvious main ones. Tldr this is all eye test estimates
CHICO
People tend to shit on his angularity, but it's actually not bad at all, he's no andreas eriksen but he's got above average angularity for sure, I'd give it a 6.5.
Dimorphism is noticeably a weak point. he's no femboy, but he's no vasily either, 5.5.
Features is his strong point. He doesn't have many noticeable flaws, but he's not paticularly sticking either. What makes him so attractive is that he has high facial averageness. His features get a 7 imo.
Total score: 6.5 - hhtn
elias de poot
Weirdly enough I like looking at blurred/low quality photos, it's a really good show of angularity. His is clearly elite, look at that zygo projection - 8.5 out of 10.
He's clearly highly dimoprhic, his side and narrower jaw brings him down slightly, but he's definitely elite here too 7.5.
Features are where he shines imo. Eye area is near perfect, technically too positively tilted, but whether that's even a failo in his case is debatable. Nose is near ideal too. Lips are full, but proportion are off, namely top to bottom ratio (should be 1:1.5.) Jaw is still above average but still his worst feature - 8.75 features
Overall - 8.25
THON STRIJD
Arguably the best colouring of all time which is a huge hailo.
Not insane dimorphism but better than chico for sure, not as good as de poot - 7
Incredible eye area, good nose, good mouth, good chin - 8.75 no real failos
Angularity is pretty boring tbh. He's not boneless though or he couldn't have his eye area or features - 6.5
Overall and 8 but he gets higher on the eye test for sure - 8.5
Misc is why his score is so high btw
O'PRY
Highly dimoprhic - 8
Angularity - 7 good jawline visablility, consistent hollows but nothing unreal looking.
Features. near perfect lips, top 5 eye area, nose is his biggest downfall - 8.75
Overall 8.25
SHIELDS
Elite dimorphism, I don't want to hear the jaw cope. Female dimorphism is incredibly misunderstood - 9
No major failos - 9.75
Overall - 9.5
BOMER
Dimorphism - 8.5 (some of his dimorphic traits are bad btw) this is why I think dimorphism is flawed
Angularity - I couldn't find images but in motion it looks insane sometimes - 8
Features - thin lips, big forehead, and then some improvements could be made for eyes. Not brooke shields level like people make out - 9 out of 10
Overall - 8.75
CHAD VANDERLOO (MY FAVOURITE)
I like mass effect because it shows how insane his angularity is with an in motion example
This Photo also shows it off well. In some of his runway walks it's kind of unreal - 8.75
Dimorphism - his failos are his chin here, other than that insanely dimoprhic- 8.5
Features - ideal lips (closest to male perfection I've seen), ideal nose but ratios are slightly off from the side, eye area could be slightly improved but through features that don't really add to score - 8.75
Overall - 8.6
Last edited:
️
