My truth nukes (feel free to discuss)

[Isaythetruth]

1. Mediterranean gods won, Nordics lost. The truth is Southern Europeans always win because of their past history of being conquerors and world’s most important civilization. They shaped our beauty standards. Nordics were literal nobodies until 10th century, they all look like clones of each other, blonde and pure blue eyes is alien. Mediterranean gods have more variety and unique beauty traits from curly hair to ethnic noses. Mixed /ethnically ambiguous people are sought after by modeling companies. I still rank anglos lower than Nordics. JBW (white as in blonde hair blue eyes) is copium

2. Is it better to be a pretty boy or a PSL chad? The truth is if you’re a PSL chad or chad lite (very masc + stereotypical chad/zoomer hair + sharp jawline + hunter eyes + negative canal tilt) Stacies will throw themselves at you, but the population of true stacies in society is small. Beckies (lower tier women) on the other hand find extremely masculine features to be unattractive, to them you look like the Habsburgs. But 1000s of them throw themselves at pretty boys on social media who are a mix of both. Why is this true? Because stacies can be classified as extremely feminine (which is why they’re stacies in the first place), they want to their kitty shredded in bed by a 6”5 chad. they don’t mind if he’s black or white, as long as he’s above 6 feet, handsome looking and it’s above 6 inches they don’t care. Beckies on the other hand, tend to be more masculine and self conscious, which is why they like a mix of both masculine and feminine in their partner. So this whole debate boils down to quantity over quality, but imo pretty boys won because they have a larger dating pool and PR options (like being in a band or a K-pop idol)

3. Being a f*mboy is simply sub5 COPE. The truth is that 90% of these so called “femboys” are sub 5 chuds wearing thigh highs to asphyxiate their legs and make their thighs look bigger. This is why they all look the same, the mask to hide their face, the musty hair (which they think is anime hair), recessed chin, poor build due to a lack of going outside. Sterotypical low quality, consumerist goonslop clothing like thigh highs and maid dresses because they think the beauty standards revolve around discord. Even an anorexic woman is biologically curvier than them. I believe they should be ranked below sub5s on tier lists. Any femboy that claims he’s “superior to women” is purely delusion. No femboy will match the beauty of Marylin Monroe or Brooke Shields no matter how hard they try. And they cannot pull any man above a 5. (Harsh truth) TLDR; Pretty boys win again

 

[Deleted Member 60441]

Marylin Monroe

Fogged by Lauren Bacall, Ava gardner, brutally fogged by Audrey Hebpurn and Brigitte Bardot, destroyed by Grace Kelly

 

[Isaythetruth]

Fogged by Lauren Bacall, Ava gardner, brutally fogged by Audrey Hebpurn and Brigitte Bardot, destroyed by Grace Kelly

mogs by modern standards, but Marlyn monroe was the bombshell of the 50s


Also up I need more interaction

 

[Deleted Member 60441]

mogs by modern standards, but Marlyn monroe was the bombshell of the 50s


Also up I need more interaction

I mentioned old actresses

 

[Isaythetruth]

“1950s beauty standards were shaped by post-World War II ideals of femininity, domesticity, and glamour. Women were encouraged to embrace a curvaceous hourglass figure, with a small waist, full bust, and rounded hips—exemplified by stars like Marilyn Monroe, Elizabeth Taylor, and Sophia Loren.”

Audrey Hepburn, Ava Gardner, whoever else looks more attractive to the modern eye, but she doesn’t have the body type of the 50s
Brigitte doesn’t rlly mog anybody she looks like Paris Hilton, still pretty tho

 

[Deleted Member 60441]

Brigitte doesn’t rlly mog anybody she looks like Paris Hilton, still pretty tho

Dnrd+ignore list

 

[Deleted Member 60441]

1950s beauty standards were shaped by post-World War II ideals of femininity, domesticity, and glamour. Women were encouraged to embrace a curvaceous hourglass figure, with a small waist, full bust, and rounded hips—exemplified by stars like Marilyn Monroe, Elizabeth Taylor, and Sophia Loren

Thanks chat gpt

 

[Isaythetruth]

^^ copium

 

[Faxx]

View attachment 121400
1. Mediterranean gods won, Nordics lost. The truth is Southern Europeans always win because of their past history of being conquerors and world’s most important civilization. They shaped our beauty standards. Nordics were literal nobodies until 10th century, they all look like clones of each other, blonde and pure blue eyes is alien. Mediterranean gods have more variety and unique beauty traits from curly hair to ethnic noses. Mixed /ethnically ambiguous people are sought after by modeling companies. I still rank anglos lower than Nordics. JBW (white as in blonde hair blue eyes) is copium

2. Is it better to be a pretty boy or a PSL chad? The truth is if you’re a PSL chad or chad lite (very masc + stereotypical chad/zoomer hair + sharp jawline + hunter eyes + negative canal tilt) Stacies will throw themselves at you, but the population of true stacies in society is small. Beckies (lower tier women) on the other hand find extremely masculine features to be unattractive, to them you look like the Habsburgs. But 1000s of them throw themselves at pretty boys on social media who are a mix of both. Why is this true? Because stacies can be classified as extremely feminine (which is why they’re stacies in the first place), they want to their kitty shredded in bed by a 6”5 chad. they don’t mind if he’s black or white, as long as he’s above 6 feet, handsome looking and it’s above 6 inches they don’t care. Beckies on the other hand, tend to be more masculine and self conscious, which is why they like a mix of both masculine and feminine in their partner. So this whole debate boils down to quantity over quality, but imo pretty boys won because they have a larger dating pool and PR options (like being in a band or a K-pop idol)

3. Being a f*mboy is simply sub5 COPE. The truth is that 90% of these so called “femboys” are sub 5 chuds wearing thigh highs to asphyxiate their legs and make their thighs look bigger. This is why they all look the same, the mask to hide their face, the musty hair (which they think is anime hair), recessed chin, poor build due to a lack of going outside. Sterotypical low quality, consumerist goonslop clothing like thigh highs and maid suits because they think the beauty standards revolve around discord. Even an anorexic woman is biologically curvier than them. I believe they should be ranked below sub5s on tier lists. Any femboy that claims he’s “superior to women” is purely delusion. No femboy will match the beauty of Marylin Monroe or Brooke Shields no matter how hard they try. And they cannot pull any man above a 5. (Harsh truth) TLDR; Pretty boys win again

Am I a pretty boy?

 

[TonyDr]

they want to their kitty shredded

Hold on he locks in

 

[TonyDr]

Brigitte doesn’t rlly mog anybody she looks like Paris Hilton, still pretty tho

*angry french noises* comment ça mon reuf

 

[Deleted Member 60441]

Thanks chat gpt

Also: Virna lisi>sophia loren

 

[boxeur]

View attachment 121400
1. Mediterranean gods won, Nordics lost. The truth is Southern Europeans always win because of their past history of being conquerors and world’s most important civilization. They shaped our beauty standards. Nordics were literal nobodies until 10th century, they all look like clones of each other, blonde and pure blue eyes is alien. Mediterranean gods have more variety and unique beauty traits from curly hair to ethnic noses. Mixed /ethnically ambiguous people are sought after by modeling companies. I still rank anglos lower than Nordics. JBW (white as in blonde hair blue eyes) is copium

2. Is it better to be a pretty boy or a PSL chad? The truth is if you’re a PSL chad or chad lite (very masc + stereotypical chad/zoomer hair + sharp jawline + hunter eyes + negative canal tilt) Stacies will throw themselves at you, but the population of true stacies in society is small. Beckies (lower tier women) on the other hand find extremely masculine features to be unattractive, to them you look like the Habsburgs. But 1000s of them throw themselves at pretty boys on social media who are a mix of both. Why is this true? Because stacies can be classified as extremely feminine (which is why they’re stacies in the first place), they want to their kitty shredded in bed by a 6”5 chad. they don’t mind if he’s black or white, as long as he’s above 6 feet, handsome looking and it’s above 6 inches they don’t care. Beckies on the other hand, tend to be more masculine and self conscious, which is why they like a mix of both masculine and feminine in their partner. So this whole debate boils down to quantity over quality, but imo pretty boys won because they have a larger dating pool and PR options (like being in a band or a K-pop idol)

3. Being a f*mboy is simply sub5 COPE. The truth is that 90% of these so called “femboys” are sub 5 chuds wearing thigh highs to asphyxiate their legs and make their thighs look bigger. This is why they all look the same, the mask to hide their face, the musty hair (which they think is anime hair), recessed chin, poor build due to a lack of going outside. Sterotypical low quality, consumerist goonslop clothing like thigh highs and maid dresses because they think the beauty standards revolve around discord. Even an anorexic woman is biologically curvier than them. I believe they should be ranked below sub5s on tier lists. Any femboy that claims he’s “superior to women” is purely delusion. No femboy will match the beauty of Marylin Monroe or Brooke Shields no matter how hard they try. And they cannot pull any man above a 5. (Harsh truth) TLDR; Pretty boys win again

me and @Darkeningstar very much approve the first one

 

[2R0I2P0]

1. Mediterranean gods won, Nordics lost. The truth is Southern Europeans always win because of their past history of being conquerors and world’s most important civilization. They shaped our beauty standards. Nordics were literal nobodies until 10th century, they all look like clones of each other, blonde and pure blue eyes is alien. Mediterranean gods have more variety and unique beauty traits from curly hair to ethnic noses. Mixed /ethnically ambiguous people are sought after by modeling companies. I still rank anglos lower than Nordics. JBW (white as in blonde hair blue eyes) is copium

If we just go for the history, the mongol empire was the biggest in extent, the british empire was the most successful and rich and the chinese dynasties are most long-lived single civilization, so if we use that just to determine "beauty" that's a stupid argument.

And side note the french where the most prolific as they influenced literally every point on culture and politics.

 

[Isaythetruth]

The ancient Greeks and Roman Empire were far more influential to culture than the British, mongol, Chinese, French. Mongols were only successful in terms of conquering, Chinese culture (it is beautifull) is still isolated from the rest of the world. British culture became globalized

If we just go for the history, the mongol empire was the biggest in extent, the british empire was the most successful and rich and the chinese dynasties are most long-lived single civilization, so if we use that just to determine "beauty" that's a stupid argument.

And side note the french where the most prolific as they influenced literally every point on culture and politics.

 

[2R0I2P0]

The ancient Greeks and Roman Empire were far more influential to culture than the British, mongol, Chinese, French. Mongols were only successful in terms of conquering, Chinese culture (it is beautifull) is still isolated from the rest of the world. British culture became globalized

And no, greek and roman where not that influential as they syncretized every other culture in their arm that's why when they fell very distinct cultures where already formed, instead of everyone seeing themselves as roman or greek. Maybe the greeks a little bit on their openness of science, but they were literally egyptians or turks as they didn't even live in what we call modern greece.

The fact that english culture is the only one that went global is literally the point, they were the most successful and rich

And our law is inspired by french law, the most famous authors of the last century are french, in science you see the advancements of it and you see french people.

And no i do not believe that alone makes them beautiful, as the concept of beauty is always to the current point of view.

 

[pogdude]

1. Mediterranean gods won, Nordics lost. The truth is Southern Europeans always win because of their past history of being conquerors and world’s most important civilization. They shaped our beauty standards. Nordics were literal nobodies until 10th century, they all look like clones of each other, blonde and pure blue eyes is alien. Mediterranean gods have more variety and unique beauty traits from curly hair to ethnic noses. Mixed /ethnically ambiguous people are sought after by modeling companies. I still rank anglos lower than Nordics. JBW (white as in blonde hair blue eyes) is copium

Me when i get the athens twink genes instead of the big burly spartan genes

 

[ikramy]

2. Is it better to be a pretty boy or a PSL chad? The truth is if you’re a PSL chad or chad lite (very masc + stereotypical chad/zoomer hair + sharp jawline + hunter eyes + negative canal tilt) Stacies will throw themselves at you, but the population of true stacies in society is small. Beckies (lower tier women) on the other hand find extremely masculine features to be unattractive, to them you look like the Habsburgs. But 1000s of them throw themselves at pretty boys on social media who are a mix of both. Why is this true? Because stacies can be classified as extremely feminine (which is why they’re stacies in the first place), they want to their kitty shredded in bed by a 6”5 chad. they don’t mind if he’s black or white, as long as he’s above 6 feet, handsome looking and it’s above 6 inches they don’t care. Beckies on the other hand, tend to be more masculine and self conscious, which is why they like a mix of both masculine and feminine in their partner. So this whole debate boils down to quantity over quality, but imo pretty boys won because they have a larger dating pool and PR options (like being in a band or a K-pop idol) Im a grey

 

[mxri]

Dark looks without being ethnic is ideal for men ig

 

[ikramy]

Dark looks without being ethnic is ideal for men ig

barret coulring is ideal

 

[0das0ky0]

View attachment 121400
1. Mediterranean gods won, Nordics lost. The truth is Southern Europeans always win because of their past history of being conquerors and world’s most important civilization. They shaped our beauty standards. Nordics were literal nobodies until 10th century, they all look like clones of each other, blonde and pure blue eyes is alien. Mediterranean gods have more variety and unique beauty traits from curly hair to ethnic noses. Mixed /ethnically ambiguous people are sought after by modeling companies. I still rank anglos lower than Nordics. JBW (white as in blonde hair blue eyes) is copium

2. Is it better to be a pretty boy or a PSL chad? The truth is if you’re a PSL chad or chad lite (very masc + stereotypical chad/zoomer hair + sharp jawline + hunter eyes + negative canal tilt) Stacies will throw themselves at you, but the population of true stacies in society is small. Beckies (lower tier women) on the other hand find extremely masculine features to be unattractive, to them you look like the Habsburgs. But 1000s of them throw themselves at pretty boys on social media who are a mix of both. Why is this true? Because stacies can be classified as extremely feminine (which is why they’re stacies in the first place), they want to their kitty shredded in bed by a 6”5 chad. they don’t mind if he’s black or white, as long as he’s above 6 feet, handsome looking and it’s above 6 inches they don’t care. Beckies on the other hand, tend to be more masculine and self conscious, which is why they like a mix of both masculine and feminine in their partner. So this whole debate boils down to quantity over quality, but imo pretty boys won because they have a larger dating pool and PR options (like being in a band or a K-pop idol)

3. Being a f*mboy is simply sub5 COPE. The truth is that 90% of these so called “femboys” are sub 5 chuds wearing thigh highs to asphyxiate their legs and make their thighs look bigger. This is why they all look the same, the mask to hide their face, the musty hair (which they think is anime hair), recessed chin, poor build due to a lack of going outside. Sterotypical low quality, consumerist goonslop clothing like thigh highs and maid dresses because they think the beauty standards revolve around discord. Even an anorexic woman is biologically curvier than them. I believe they should be ranked below sub5s on tier lists. Any femboy that claims he’s “superior to women” is purely delusion. No femboy will match the beauty of Marylin Monroe or Brooke Shields no matter how hard they try. And they cannot pull any man above a 5. (Harsh truth) TLDR; Pretty boys win again

the only good looking femboy is milky ray, cuz hes a pretty boy as a dude,

 

[0das0ky0]

The ancient Greeks and Roman Empire were far more influential to culture than the British, mongol, Chinese, French. Mongols were only successful in terms of conquering, Chinese culture (it is beautifull) is still isolated from the rest of the world. British culture became globalized

what is British culture, the language English, recessed jaws?

 

[Naticel]

Mediterranean gods won, Nordics lost

are you a 'teen?

 

[SubhumanEyes]

Mediterranean gods won

shitoko typed this btw

 

[SubhumanEyes]

are you a 'teen?

he's a jassycuck

 

[Isaythetruth]

“the only good looking femboy is milky ray, cuz hes a pretty boy as a dude,” makeup maxxed and he looks like a generic 5/10 egirl with heavy makeup.

Mana sama mogs him to oblivion (yes this is a dude)