Info Objective Attractiveness Scale (Ratings)

[ruby]

bro i was too lazy to find perfect examples
i think dasha is lsl but i was reluctant putting charli there
too lazy to do it again though

dasha looks like an average girl to me meanwhile charli looks like a sloth, the ratings are a little generous i think

 

[genio]

dasha looks like an average girl to me meanwhile charli looks like a sloth, the ratings are a little generous i think

dasha is not average son
charli does have that failo but not ltb either
how about the men’s ratings?

 

[ruby]

dasha is not average son

she’s not significantly above it

charli does have that failo but not ltb either

never rate again

 

[genio]

she’s not significantly above it

never rate again

she is significantly above the average or she wouldve never gotten so much media attention
u never rate again

 

[ruby]

she is significantly above the average or she wouldve never gotten so much media attention
u never rate again

sophie rain also has media attention, doesn’t change the fact she’s on the lower end of mtb what’s your point

 

[genio]

sophie rain also has media attention, doesn’t change the fact she’s on the lower end of mtb what’s your point

yeah then you realize sophie rain sells her body online for $5 a month
dasha is a model and a beauty influencer

 

[Byro]

dnr byros scale is more accurate

Why are you back

 

[genio]

Why are you back

for this edih

 

[Byro]

for this edih
View attachment 380899

Ur Asian cube is not getting anyone

 

[genio]

Ur Asian cube is not getting anyone

itd fill in your british hole

 

[viasco]

for this edih
View attachment 380899

slayer

 

[genio]

slayer

eslayer

 

[glamora]

accurate for the most part, a bit generous with a few of them however

 

[genio]

accurate for the most part, a bit generous with a few of them however

which

 

[glamora]

which

i wouldnt put taylor hill that high, shes like hsl and so is megan fox
charlies a bit high too id say maybe 5.75 range but nonetheless high effort decent list

 

[genio]

i wouldnt put taylor hill that high, shes like hsl and so is megan fox
charlies a bit high too id say maybe 5.75 range but nonetheless high effort decent list

how about the men?

 

[glamora]

how about the men?

imo jacob elordi can get bumped up to 6.0
oconner is no where near 8 more like 7.5 realistically, ian is like hcl if we're pushing it
the rest are pretty spot on tho good job

 

[genio]

imo jacob elordi can get bumped up to 6.0
oconner is no where near 8 more like 7.5 realistically, ian is like hcl if we're pushing it
the rest are pretty spot on tho good job

oconnor low chad
so is ian

 

[Byro]

oconnor low chad
so is ian

Faggor

 

[glamora]

oconnor low chad
so is ian

I gave u a complement and u didnt even say thanks f****t

 

[genio]

Faggor

i love ranking men i find attractive while i wait for my tren to be delivered

 

[genio]

I gave u a complement and u didnt even say thanks f****t

thanks glamora

 

[BrazilianKen]

Objective Attractiveness Scale (Ratings)
BY GENIO

View attachment 380868

Spoiler: Intro

Why am I making this?
I see too many inaccurate ratings and uninformed talk about ratings within this community. I understand that there is subjectivity within the rating space at some degree, but the current rating space is much too inaccurate for it to be chalked up to that. I will be trying to give the most objective scale.

What are the ratings included here based off?
I specifically chose faces that are well-known in the community and commonly cited as this or that. Although I eye-balled a lot of ratings here, they should be non-controversial and quite accurate ratings based off community consensus.

Where are you getting these percentiles and rarities?
I'm getting them off a bell-curve with the mean as 4.5 and standard deviation as 0.625. They will vary based on where you are in the world, but globally I think 4.5 is a fair average. I do believe that 4.75 is actually average in the west and 4.25 is average in the east, so you can adjust the curve based off where you are if you intend to use this same curve. Obviously it will not be perfectly accurate, but I tried hard to make an objective curve based off what I've seen in real life. I believe this curve is accurate up until 8.0+, as faces those attractive are simply anomalies.

​

---

Spoiler: 8.0+ (Chad/Stacy)

View attachment 380851
≥ 9 - Adamlite/Evelite, Adam/Eve Contender, etc.
The Most Attractive Face of Multiple Generations

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in ??? (I'd estimate 4,000,000,000+)
Percentile: 100th

< 9 - High Chad/Stacy
The Most Attractive Face of an Entire Generation

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in ??? (I'd estimate 750,000,000+)
Percentile: 100th

8.5 - Mid Chad/Stacy
One of The Most Attractive Faces of a Generation

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in ??? (I'd estimate 250,000,000+)
Percentile: 100th

≥ 8.0 - Low Chad/Stacy
The Most Attractive Face in a Mid-Sized Country

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in ??? (I'd estimate 25,000,000+)
Percentile: 100th

​

---

Spoiler: 7.0+ (Chadlite/Stacylite)

View attachment 380850
< 8.0 - High Chadlite/Stacylite
The Most Attractive Face in Hollywood (at times)

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 10,016,587 (7.75)
Percentile: 100th

7.5 - Mid Chadlite/Stacylite
Attractive Enough to Easily Become a Supermodel

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 1,258,887 (7.5)
Percentile: 100th

≥ 7.0 - Low Chadlite/Stacylite
Attractive Enough to Make a Living Purely Off Their Looks

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 31,560 (7.0), 1 in 184,606 (7.25)
Percentile: 99.99683th Percentile, 99.99946th Percentile

​

---

Spoiler: 6.0+ (HTN/HTB)

View attachment 380866
< 7.0 - High HTN/HTB
The Most Attractive Person at a College Campus

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 6,284 (6.75)
Percentile: 99.984th Percentile

6.5 - Mid HTN/HTB
The Most Attractive Person at a High School

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 1,455 (6.5)
Percentile: 99.93th Percentile

≥ 6.0 - Low HTN/HTB
The Most Attractive Person in a Grade

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 122 (6.0), 1 in 391 (6.25)
Percentile: 99.18th Percentile, 99.746th Percentile

​

---

Spoiler: 5.0+ (MTN/MTB)

View attachment 380869
< 6.0 - High MTN/MTB
The Most Attractive in a Large Classroom

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 44 (5.75)
Percentile: 97.725th Percentile

5.5 - Mid MTN/MTB
The Most Attractive in a Small Classroom

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 18 (5.5)
Percentile: 94.52th Percentile

≥ 5.0 - Low MTN/MTB
Alright-Looking

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 5 (5.0), 1 in 9 (5.25)
Percentile: 80th Percentile, 89th Percentile

​

---

Spoiler: 3.0+ (LTN/LTB)

View attachment 380876
< 5.0 - High LTN/LTB
Dead Average

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 2 (4.5)
Percentile: 50th Percentile

4.0 - Mid LTN/LTB
Ordinarily Ugly

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 5 (4.0)
Percentile: 21.186th Percentile

≥ 3.0 - Low LTN/LTB
Very Ugly

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 122 (3.0), 1 in 18 (3.5)
Percentile: 0.81975th Percentile, 6.48th Percentile

---

Spoiler: <3.0 (Sub-3)

View attachment 380879
< 3.0 - Sub-3
Extraordinarily Ugly

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 127+ (2.99)
Percentile: 0.78460th Percentile and Lower

​

---

Spoiler: MassTag

@Blackpillirony @Glamour @1894 @mtren @submissivechud @giga.mia @nani @benny @foidslayer @Motivated Dandelions @Nenestar @Superior @jony🖤bp @emeraldpill @vampi @ToryToad @Ladiesman217 @isntnotrepellent @nonu @Newday @BigDihDiddy ⚦ @Mia @negativ @rope_maxxer @WhitepiII @ecoli @Duchesse @zaycism @P1et @PingPong @muscipla @arisu @splanky @Pentatonic @nomi @Histy @Spongebob CirclePants @trvecel @SevenColorCrystalBall @Almighty Sigma Wolf @lazerdim @BrazilianKen @TonyDr @Huntergirl @Insomnia @Nbernical @Randomized @Starlet @draftLexy @jest @fatfuckingchud @shigeharu @Gen5ivee @Currycelloser
@kimothy @Penalizer69 @Luxe @Byro @paulyune @rand anon @FoidhaterlolllW @tragaleon @Trevor @RottingCarrie @derpy @Rebdoomark @Tealovingfool @Hibiscus @HerculesJr. @KittyBreath @Xx_Sh4tteredHe4rt_xX @nacerskates @i_got.a.lilo @broccoli @</3 @emo @TrueFakeCel @perculez @hoodsickle @Cortisol @LaWi @Foid @Garce @vespertine @kelksub @doll @grey @chudlite67 @knightmaxxer @Galvatron @bby @Mandy? @vespertine @avzrael @Bloxy @Krusty @Iblamemyeyes @iqmaxx

inb4 dnr
​

This doesn’t matter because I said so

 

[isntnotrepellent]

This doesn’t matter because I said so

facts

 

[mtren]

Objective Attractiveness Scale (Ratings)
BY GENIO

View attachment 380868

Spoiler: Intro

Why am I making this?
I see too many inaccurate ratings and uninformed talk about ratings within this community. I understand that there is subjectivity within the rating space at some degree, but the current rating space is much too inaccurate for it to be chalked up to that. I will be trying to give the most objective scale.

What are the ratings included here based off?
I specifically chose faces that are well-known in the community and commonly cited as this or that. Although I eye-balled a lot of ratings here, they should be non-controversial and quite accurate ratings based off community consensus.

Where are you getting these percentiles and rarities?
I'm getting them off a bell-curve with the mean as 4.5 and standard deviation as 0.625. They will vary based on where you are in the world, but globally I think 4.5 is a fair average. I do believe that 4.75 is actually average in the west and 4.25 is average in the east, so you can adjust the curve based off where you are if you intend to use this same curve. Obviously it will not be perfectly accurate, but I tried hard to make an objective curve based off what I've seen in real life. I believe this curve is accurate up until 8.0+, as faces those attractive are simply anomalies.

​

---

Spoiler: 8.0+ (Chad/Stacy)

View attachment 380851
≥ 9 - Adamlite/Evelite, Adam/Eve Contender, etc.
The Most Attractive Face of Multiple Generations

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in ??? (I'd estimate 4,000,000,000+)
Percentile: 100th

< 9 - High Chad/Stacy
The Most Attractive Face of an Entire Generation

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in ??? (I'd estimate 750,000,000+)
Percentile: 100th

8.5 - Mid Chad/Stacy
One of The Most Attractive Faces of a Generation

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in ??? (I'd estimate 250,000,000+)
Percentile: 100th

≥ 8.0 - Low Chad/Stacy
The Most Attractive Face in a Mid-Sized Country

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in ??? (I'd estimate 25,000,000+)
Percentile: 100th

​

---

Spoiler: 7.0+ (Chadlite/Stacylite)

View attachment 380850
< 8.0 - High Chadlite/Stacylite
The Most Attractive Face in Hollywood (at times)

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 10,016,587 (7.75)
Percentile: 100th

7.5 - Mid Chadlite/Stacylite
Attractive Enough to Easily Become a Supermodel

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 1,258,887 (7.5)
Percentile: 100th

≥ 7.0 - Low Chadlite/Stacylite
Attractive Enough to Make a Living Purely Off Their Looks

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 31,560 (7.0), 1 in 184,606 (7.25)
Percentile: 99.99683th Percentile, 99.99946th Percentile

​

---

Spoiler: 6.0+ (HTN/HTB)

View attachment 380866
< 7.0 - High HTN/HTB
The Most Attractive Person at a College Campus

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 6,284 (6.75)
Percentile: 99.984th Percentile

6.5 - Mid HTN/HTB
The Most Attractive Person at a High School

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 1,455 (6.5)
Percentile: 99.93th Percentile

≥ 6.0 - Low HTN/HTB
The Most Attractive Person in a Grade

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 122 (6.0), 1 in 391 (6.25)
Percentile: 99.18th Percentile, 99.746th Percentile

​

---

Spoiler: 5.0+ (MTN/MTB)

View attachment 380869
< 6.0 - High MTN/MTB
The Most Attractive in a Large Classroom

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 44 (5.75)
Percentile: 97.725th Percentile

5.5 - Mid MTN/MTB
The Most Attractive in a Small Classroom

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 18 (5.5)
Percentile: 94.52th Percentile

≥ 5.0 - Low MTN/MTB
Alright-Looking

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 5 (5.0), 1 in 9 (5.25)
Percentile: 80th Percentile, 89th Percentile

​

---

Spoiler: 3.0+ (LTN/LTB)

View attachment 380876
< 5.0 - High LTN/LTB
Dead Average

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 2 (4.5)
Percentile: 50th Percentile

4.0 - Mid LTN/LTB
Ordinarily Ugly

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 5 (4.0)
Percentile: 21.186th Percentile

≥ 3.0 - Low LTN/LTB
Very Ugly

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 122 (3.0), 1 in 18 (3.5)
Percentile: 0.81975th Percentile, 6.48th Percentile

---

Spoiler: <3.0 (Sub-3)

View attachment 380879
< 3.0 - Sub-3
Extraordinarily Ugly

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 127+ (2.99)
Percentile: 0.78460th Percentile and Lower

​

---

Spoiler: MassTag

@Blackpillirony @Glamour @1894 @mtren @submissivechud @giga.mia @nani @benny @foidslayer @Motivated Dandelions @Nenestar @Superior @jony🖤bp @emeraldpill @vampi @ToryToad @Ladiesman217 @isntnotrepellent @nonu @Newday @BigDihDiddy ⚦ @Mia @negativ @rope_maxxer @WhitepiII @ecoli @Duchesse @zaycism @P1et @PingPong @muscipla @arisu @splanky @Pentatonic @nomi @Histy @Spongebob CirclePants @trvecel @SevenColorCrystalBall @Almighty Sigma Wolf @lazerdim @BrazilianKen @TonyDr @Huntergirl @Insomnia @Nbernical @Randomized @Starlet @draftLexy @jest @fatfuckingchud @shigeharu @Gen5ivee @Currycelloser
@kimothy @Penalizer69 @Luxe @Byro @paulyune @rand anon @FoidhaterlolllW @tragaleon @Trevor @RottingCarrie @derpy @Rebdoomark @Tealovingfool @Hibiscus @HerculesJr. @KittyBreath @Xx_Sh4tteredHe4rt_xX @nacerskates @i_got.a.lilo @broccoli @</3 @emo @TrueFakeCel @perculez @hoodsickle @Cortisol @LaWi @Foid @Garce @vespertine @kelksub @doll @grey @chudlite67 @knightmaxxer @Galvatron @bby @Mandy? @vespertine @avzrael @Bloxy @Krusty @Iblamemyeyes @iqmaxx

inb4 dnr
​

20th rating post

 

[genio]

20th rating post

give me an hour

 

[HerculesJr.]

Objective Attractiveness Scale (Ratings)
BY GENIO

View attachment 380868

Spoiler: Intro

Why am I making this?
I see too many inaccurate ratings and uninformed talk about ratings within this community. I understand that there is subjectivity within the rating space at some degree, but the current rating space is much too inaccurate for it to be chalked up to that. I will be trying to give the most objective scale.

What are the ratings included here based off?
I specifically chose faces that are well-known in the community and commonly cited as this or that. Although I eye-balled a lot of ratings here, they should be non-controversial and quite accurate ratings based off community consensus.

Where are you getting these percentiles and rarities?
I'm getting them off a bell-curve with the mean as 4.5 and standard deviation as 0.625. They will vary based on where you are in the world, but globally I think 4.5 is a fair average. I do believe that 4.75 is actually average in the west and 4.25 is average in the east, so you can adjust the curve based off where you are if you intend to use this same curve. Obviously it will not be perfectly accurate, but I tried hard to make an objective curve based off what I've seen in real life. I believe this curve is accurate up until 8.0+, as faces those attractive are simply anomalies.

​

---

Spoiler: 8.0+ (Chad/Stacy)

View attachment 380851
≥ 9 - Adamlite/Evelite, Adam/Eve Contender, etc.
The Most Attractive Face of Multiple Generations

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in ??? (I'd estimate 4,000,000,000+)
Percentile: 100th

< 9 - High Chad/Stacy
The Most Attractive Face of an Entire Generation

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in ??? (I'd estimate 750,000,000+)
Percentile: 100th

8.5 - Mid Chad/Stacy
One of The Most Attractive Faces of a Generation

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in ??? (I'd estimate 250,000,000+)
Percentile: 100th

≥ 8.0 - Low Chad/Stacy
The Most Attractive Face in a Mid-Sized Country

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in ??? (I'd estimate 25,000,000+)
Percentile: 100th

​

---

Spoiler: 7.0+ (Chadlite/Stacylite)

View attachment 380850
< 8.0 - High Chadlite/Stacylite
The Most Attractive Face in Hollywood (at times)

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 10,016,587 (7.75)
Percentile: 100th

7.5 - Mid Chadlite/Stacylite
Attractive Enough to Easily Become a Supermodel

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 1,258,887 (7.5)
Percentile: 100th

≥ 7.0 - Low Chadlite/Stacylite
Attractive Enough to Make a Living Purely Off Their Looks

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 31,560 (7.0), 1 in 184,606 (7.25)
Percentile: 99.99683th Percentile, 99.99946th Percentile

​

---

Spoiler: 6.0+ (HTN/HTB)

View attachment 380866
< 7.0 - High HTN/HTB
The Most Attractive Person at a College Campus

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 6,284 (6.75)
Percentile: 99.984th Percentile

6.5 - Mid HTN/HTB
The Most Attractive Person at a High School

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 1,455 (6.5)
Percentile: 99.93th Percentile

≥ 6.0 - Low HTN/HTB
The Most Attractive Person in a Grade

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 122 (6.0), 1 in 391 (6.25)
Percentile: 99.18th Percentile, 99.746th Percentile

​

---

Spoiler: 5.0+ (MTN/MTB)

View attachment 380869
< 6.0 - High MTN/MTB
The Most Attractive in a Large Classroom

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 44 (5.75)
Percentile: 97.725th Percentile

5.5 - Mid MTN/MTB
The Most Attractive in a Small Classroom

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 18 (5.5)
Percentile: 94.52th Percentile

≥ 5.0 - Low MTN/MTB
Alright-Looking

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 5 (5.0), 1 in 9 (5.25)
Percentile: 80th Percentile, 89th Percentile

​

---

Spoiler: 3.0+ (LTN/LTB)

View attachment 380876
< 5.0 - High LTN/LTB
Dead Average

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 2 (4.5)
Percentile: 50th Percentile

4.0 - Mid LTN/LTB
Ordinarily Ugly

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 5 (4.0)
Percentile: 21.186th Percentile

≥ 3.0 - Low LTN/LTB
Very Ugly

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 122 (3.0), 1 in 18 (3.5)
Percentile: 0.81975th Percentile, 6.48th Percentile

---

Spoiler: <3.0 (Sub-3)

View attachment 380879
< 3.0 - Sub-3
Extraordinarily Ugly

Spoiler: Percentile/Rarity Estimates

Rarity: 1 in 127+ (2.99)
Percentile: 0.78460th Percentile and Lower

​

---

Spoiler: MassTag

@Blackpillirony @Glamour @1894 @mtren @submissivechud @giga.mia @nani @benny @foidslayer @Motivated Dandelions @Nenestar @Superior @jony🖤bp @emeraldpill @vampi @ToryToad @Ladiesman217 @isntnotrepellent @nonu @Newday @BigDihDiddy ⚦ @Mia @negativ @rope_maxxer @WhitepiII @ecoli @Duchesse @zaycism @P1et @PingPong @muscipla @arisu @splanky @Pentatonic @nomi @Histy @Spongebob CirclePants @trvecel @SevenColorCrystalBall @Almighty Sigma Wolf @lazerdim @BrazilianKen @TonyDr @Huntergirl @Insomnia @Nbernical @Randomized @Starlet @draftLexy @jest @fatfuckingchud @shigeharu @Gen5ivee @Currycelloser
@kimothy @Penalizer69 @Luxe @Byro @paulyune @rand anon @FoidhaterlolllW @tragaleon @Trevor @RottingCarrie @derpy @Rebdoomark @Tealovingfool @Hibiscus @HerculesJr. @KittyBreath @Xx_Sh4tteredHe4rt_xX @nacerskates @i_got.a.lilo @broccoli @</3 @emo @TrueFakeCel @perculez @hoodsickle @Cortisol @LaWi @Foid @Garce @vespertine @kelksub @doll @grey @chudlite67 @knightmaxxer @Galvatron @bby @Mandy? @vespertine @avzrael @Bloxy @Krusty @Iblamemyeyes @iqmaxx

inb4 dnr
​

I wanna be 6+ one day

 

[genio]

I wanna be 6+ one day

id sau youre already borderline 5.75-6

 

[HerculesJr.]

id sau youre already borderline 5.75-6

 

[genio]

View attachment 381086

demoted to 2.5 thanks

 

[HerculesJr.]

demoted to 2.5 thanks

You're so tsundere

 

[genio]

You're so tsundere

1.25

 

[Mandy?]

Very homo

 

[genio]

Very homo

JBG mogs

 

[Mandy?]

JBG mogs

Lacks breast milk and period blood necessary to ascend

 

[genio]

Lacks breast milk and period blood necessary to ascend

then go for the t****y ftm
anyways, what do you think about topical AA applied to the clit to prevent clitoromegaly in women using anavar?

 

[Mandy?]

then go for the t****y ftm
anyways, what do you think about topical AA applied to the clit to prevent clitoromegaly in women using anavar?

Women shouldn’t use Anavar or even be very lean but like how is AA on clit gonna solve other tissues like the femivar voice? Generally women should look into progesterone instead of oxandrolone

 

[genio]

Women shouldn’t use Anavar or even be very lean but like how is AA on clit gonna solve other tissues like the femivar voice? Generally women should look into progesterone instead of oxandrolone

they can drink RU58841 to get rid of voice sides

 

[Mandy?]

they can drink RU58841 to get rid of voice sides

Wouldn’t that just cause systemtic AR downregulation completely that Anavar serves no gains? I also cant tell if this is sarcastic or not have patience

 

[genio]

Wouldn’t that just cause systemtic AR downregulation completely that Anavar serves no gains? I also cant tell if this is sarcastic or not have patience

i am joking bhai
it is just a funny topic i found myself pondering
a DMSO, RU58841 cream formulation applied to the clit for maximum penetration then 30-60 minutes in occlusion sounds effective for var clit disregarding irritation JFL

 

[HerculesJr.]

1.25

Genio is forgetting I am the guy on the right and he is the guy on the left