- Joined
- Nov 20, 2019
- Messages
- 801
- Reputation
- 774
I came across this article which caught my attention, idk if this has already been posted or discussed here, so I am going to post it anyway:
The shoulders of the guy with higher set acromions look less sloped, more broad and aesthetic from the back, but this also results in him having v-shaped clavicles, unlike the guy with lower set acromions who has straight clavicles.
This makes me wonder if v-shaped clavicles are so bad after all.
@Buddy Boyo I would like to hear what you have to say about this, maybe you could help clear some things up, since this got me confused ngl.
Pitchers vs. Swimmers - EricCressey.com
Not too long ago, I evaluated a baseball pitcher (left) and swimmer (right) back-to-back. It should serve as a reminder that not all overhead athletes are created equal - both in terms of the demands of their sports and the way they adapt to those demands.
ericcressey.com
The pitcher is a classic scapular depression example. Notice how “flat” the clavicle presentation is. He’s very lat dominant and struggles to get scapular elevation as part of upward rotation as the arms go overhead. He needs more upper trap activity.
Conversely, the swimmer is a scapular elevation presentation. Notice the significant upslope of the collarbone. He’s already so elevated that he struggles to get the rotational component of upward rotation. He needs more serratus anterior and lower trap, but less upper trap.
The shoulders of the guy with higher set acromions look less sloped, more broad and aesthetic from the back, but this also results in him having v-shaped clavicles, unlike the guy with lower set acromions who has straight clavicles.
This makes me wonder if v-shaped clavicles are so bad after all.
@Buddy Boyo I would like to hear what you have to say about this, maybe you could help clear some things up, since this got me confused ngl.