LOOKSMAXXING

Join 84,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

Register Log in
  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

RRM67

Joel said:
I misspoke. It's technically against the rules, I added it in the rules that you cannot artificially increase your rep points. It's just not in the moderation guidelines, which is the guidebook I wrote for moderators on how to issue punishments.

It's a gay differences but I thought I'd clarify.
Click to expand...
ok give me contributor badge tbh i deserve it after all this
 
RRM67 said:
i will ask kali to teach me how to make shitty megathreads with high engagement
Click to expand...
When I want to leave this place for good we can make one last bird thread to get your rep back and we both can get banned together kapeesh
 
Kaari said:
When I want to leave this place for good we can make one last bird thread to get your rep back and we both can get banned together kapeesh
Click to expand...
yes
 
RRM67 said:
incel
Click to expand...
Calling someone an incel while repbotting on an incel forum
image.gif
 
Quncho said:
:waitwhat: :waitwhat:
View attachment 192139
Click to expand...
It might be because me and Dean are older, but we grew up where you were told not to share something on the internet unless you were okay with it being around forever, because there'd always be a copy of it. "The internet stays forever" and so on.

On .org it makes sense why it's a policy, because they're trying to protect their users from outsiders. But from a moderation stand point it's unusual and won't get you banned on any other site.
 
Joel said:
It might be because me and Dean are older, but we grew up where you were told not to share something on the internet unless you were okay with it being around forever, because there'd always be a copy of it. "The internet stays forever" and so on.

On .org it makes sense why it's a policy, because they're trying to protect their users from outsiders. But from a moderation stand point it's unusual and won't get you banned on any other site.
Click to expand...
Didn't save me from getting doxxed :kekw:
 
Night said:
its funny cause I was banned because someone shared an ip to me, that's why I think
Click to expand...
We banned you for being dorky about the sharing personal info around. Actually sharing where someone lives or visits is by definition doxxing. Though the user should still probably practice basic opsec and remove metadata, I didn't like how you guys handled it publicly.

The younger generation is pretty ignorant about internet opsec so I feel bad when they eat dirt so badly.
 
Joel said:
We banned you for being dorky about the sharing personal info around. Actually sharing where someone lives or visits is by definition doxxing. Though the user should still probably practice basic opsec and remove metadata, I didn't like how you guys handled it publicly.

The younger generation is pretty ignorant about internet opsec so I feel bad when they eat dirt so badly.
Click to expand...
Before you tell me "should've installed opsec :kekw: ." I do and have always kept opsec on my phone which is the way I got doxxed anyway the first time. The second time, my Jewish Chromebook didn't have opsec.
 
Quncho said:
Before you tell me "should've installed opsec :kekw: ." I do and have always kept opsec on my phone which is the way I got doxxed anyway the first time. The second time, my Jewish Chromebook didn't have opsec.
Click to expand...
The metadata comment wasn't referring to you, it was about why Night and another user was originally banned.

I don't know anything about your situation. I was just explaining it was more than them just sharing around an IP, they made a public announcement about it instead of trying to privately inform someone they were vulnerable. We're a community and there was no need to publicly target a user like that, even though I understand it probably wasn't malicious.
 
Joel said:
The metadata comment wasn't referring to you, it was about why Night and another user was originally banned.

I don't know anything about your situation. I was just explaining it was more than them just sharing around an IP, they made a public announcement about it instead of trying to privately inform someone they were vulnerable. We're a community and there was no need to publicly target a user like that, even though I understand it probably wasn't malicious.
Click to expand...
Ik but still.
 
Joel said:
The metadata comment wasn't referring to you, it was about why Night and another user was originally banned.

I don't know anything about your situation. I was just explaining it was more than them just sharing around an IP, they made a public announcement about it instead of trying to privately inform someone they were vulnerable. We're a community and there was no need to publicly target a user like that, even though I understand it probably wasn't malicious.
Click to expand...
thanks for clarifying, now I know the reasons of my ban

I should've warned the victim before it happened, but at least I learnt something.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (Looksmaxxers: 0, Guests: 1)
Back
Top