- Joined
- Dec 3, 2025
- Messages
- 6,847
- Time Online
- 15d 12h
- Reputation
- 17,674
hear me out…
1. He posted a 17 year old (under 18)
2. He didnt know the age of the person at the time of posting it
3. He is 16 years old (younger than the victim)
He is a bad guy for posting a naked person, but everyone is assuming he posted literal porn of a small child. He says he is very embarrassed now that people misinterpret the situation and think this of him.
He said he will stand trial but most likely be excused of the crime.
@</3 @yasy @BigDihDiddy @PingPong
1. He posted a 17 year old (under 18)
2. He didnt know the age of the person at the time of posting it
3. He is 16 years old (younger than the victim)
He is a bad guy for posting a naked person, but everyone is assuming he posted literal porn of a small child. He says he is very embarrassed now that people misinterpret the situation and think this of him.
He said he will stand trial but most likely be excused of the crime.
@</3 @yasy @BigDihDiddy @PingPong