- Joined
- Apr 8, 2026
- Messages
- 10,923
- Solutions
- 41
- Online time
- 17d 23h
- Reputation
- 21,573
90% of you n*****s won't understand this
I didn't write well and it's quite complex
I'd recommend reading this (the Harmony portion of my thread The 4 Pillars of Attractiveness (Revised) beforehand:
In harmony, we usually score ratios based off a tier system. It's simple and convenient.
For example:
However, in recent times, raters like FaceIQ have used Super-Gaussian bell curves that score your ratios out of 10 based on a decay system.
But how do you do this?
THROUGH THIS FUCKING RETARDED ASS FORMULA THAT TOOK ME WAY TOO FUCKING LONG TO FIGURE OUT!!!
a = Plateau Height (I like to use 10, so that you get a value out of 10 based off your measurement)
p = Center Position
w = Plateau Half-Width (the distance from the center (p) to the edge where the flat top ends and the curve begins)
d = Decay Spread (Standard Deviation of the Tails)
x = Your Measurement of Your Specific Ratio
Basically, you set this up, then you put x equal whatever your measurement is (say if you're measuring ESR, you'd put your ESR measurement here).
Then, you should get a score out of the plateau height value (I usually put 10, so I'd get a value out of 10).
Here's an example I used for ESR (Eye Separation Ratio) with an ideal of between 45.6-47.7
Let's say your ESR is 42.77422 here, it would get 5/10
But there's still an issue even with this Super-Gaussian curve; there were negative points in the tier system, so how do we replicate this with the new system?
ANOTHER FUCK ASS FORMULA n*****s
g = Max Points (on the specific ratio in your formula (check example for better understanding))
v = Value on Curve (earlier, in the ESR example, a 42.77422 gets 5/10, the 5 would be used here)
a = Plateau Height (previously mentioned)
Here's an example of a formula where ESR's maximum value is +20.
If you got 5/10 on the Super-Gaussian after inputting your measurement (x) and your Plateau Height (a) as 10, you'd get 0 as your score to go towards your formula.
If you got 9/10 with the same conditions mentioned above, you'd get 16 as your score to go towards your formula. 3/10 would get -8 and 0/10 would get -20.
This shit was some of the most effort I've ever put into a thread. Just for 90% of you n*****s to not understand. Thank you for reading.
I didn't write well and it's quite complex
I'd recommend reading this (the Harmony portion of my thread The 4 Pillars of Attractiveness (Revised) beforehand:
1. Harmony
In short, facial harmony is how balanced and proportionate your face is. It uses ratios and math to measure how each feature on your face interacts with other features.
There are many ratios depending on what formula you use as it could up to as high as 40 or more purely off the front profile. Every ratio has a different level of importance.
There are two profiles measured for harmony; front profile and side profile. The frontal profile should always be more important than the side profile no matter the formula. Personally, I weigh frontal harmony as 66.7% of your total harmony and side harmony as 33.3%.
Important ratios include:
ESR, FWHR, Facial Thirds, Canthal Tilt, TFWHR Midface Ratio, Bigonial-Bizygo, etc.
Here's CA's old formula. It's outdated and will probably give you an inflated score, but it serves a little use nonetheless. I'd subtract 10% off the final score personally. Anyways, you just add up all your values depending on what value is assigned to that tier and ratio, then divide it by either 2.625 for the frontal or 1.365 for the side.
In short, facial harmony is how balanced and proportionate your face is. It uses ratios and math to measure how each feature on your face interacts with other features.
There are many ratios depending on what formula you use as it could up to as high as 40 or more purely off the front profile. Every ratio has a different level of importance.
There are two profiles measured for harmony; front profile and side profile. The frontal profile should always be more important than the side profile no matter the formula. Personally, I weigh frontal harmony as 66.7% of your total harmony and side harmony as 33.3%.
Important ratios include:
ESR, FWHR, Facial Thirds, Canthal Tilt, TFWHR Midface Ratio, Bigonial-Bizygo, etc.
Here's CA's old formula. It's outdated and will probably give you an inflated score, but it serves a little use nonetheless. I'd subtract 10% off the final score personally. Anyways, you just add up all your values depending on what value is assigned to that tier and ratio, then divide it by either 2.625 for the frontal or 1.365 for the side.
In harmony, we usually score ratios based off a tier system. It's simple and convenient.
For example:
However, in recent times, raters like FaceIQ have used Super-Gaussian bell curves that score your ratios out of 10 based on a decay system.
But how do you do this?
THROUGH THIS FUCKING RETARDED ASS FORMULA THAT TOOK ME WAY TOO FUCKING LONG TO FIGURE OUT!!!
a = Plateau Height (I like to use 10, so that you get a value out of 10 based off your measurement)
p = Center Position
w = Plateau Half-Width (the distance from the center (p) to the edge where the flat top ends and the curve begins)
d = Decay Spread (Standard Deviation of the Tails)
x = Your Measurement of Your Specific Ratio
Basically, you set this up, then you put x equal whatever your measurement is (say if you're measuring ESR, you'd put your ESR measurement here).
Then, you should get a score out of the plateau height value (I usually put 10, so I'd get a value out of 10).
Here's an example I used for ESR (Eye Separation Ratio) with an ideal of between 45.6-47.7
Let's say your ESR is 42.77422 here, it would get 5/10
But there's still an issue even with this Super-Gaussian curve; there were negative points in the tier system, so how do we replicate this with the new system?
ANOTHER FUCK ASS FORMULA n*****s
g = Max Points (on the specific ratio in your formula (check example for better understanding))
v = Value on Curve (earlier, in the ESR example, a 42.77422 gets 5/10, the 5 would be used here)
a = Plateau Height (previously mentioned)
Here's an example of a formula where ESR's maximum value is +20.
If you got 5/10 on the Super-Gaussian after inputting your measurement (x) and your Plateau Height (a) as 10, you'd get 0 as your score to go towards your formula.
If you got 9/10 with the same conditions mentioned above, you'd get 16 as your score to go towards your formula. 3/10 would get -8 and 0/10 would get -20.
This shit was some of the most effort I've ever put into a thread. Just for 90% of you n*****s to not understand. Thank you for reading.
Last edited:
