Looksmaxxing Forum Logo

Join 70,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

Register Log in
  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Info Super-Gaussian Curve for Harmony

Ldar_till_htn said:
Yeah but this is the idea for an optimal harmony formula ?
Click to expand...
Well its one of the many factors that goes into an optimal formula
But yes, the curve is more optimized than tiers
 
Also bruh I didn’t really understand the math shit im just assuming its a formula where you replace the values you got into
genio said:
Well its one of the many factors that goes into an optimal formula
But yes, the curve is more optimized than tiers
Click to expand...
Ye ye I get it , it’s like a combination of both just better
 
Ldar_till_htn said:
Also bruh I didn’t really understand the math shit im just assuming its a formula where you replace the values you got into

Ye ye I get it , it’s like a combination of both just better
Click to expand...
Youre saying retarded shit js dni bro
 
genio said:
Youre saying retarded shit js dni bro
Click to expand...
I just skimmed over the text and was tryna guess how it works 😭😭, n***a caught me let me acctually read it
 
Alright I understand it now
 
genio said:
After i optimize my formula cuh
Who should i analyze
Click to expand...
Someone more niche cuz I’m sick of seeing the same analysis on people like Hernan drago and shit , maybe some model . I would say me but all my media is blurry 😭
 
Ldar_till_htn said:
Someone more niche cuz I’m sick of seeing the same analysis on people like Hernan drago and shit , maybe some model . I would say me but all my media is blurry 😭
Click to expand...
Js take better media
Also ur face looks boring to analyze
@benny @Niggard
Any of you want a free frontal harmony analysis
Harmony only cuz i eyeball everything else
 
genio said:
Js take better media
Also ur face looks boring to analyze
@benny @Niggard
Any of you want a free frontal harmony analysis
Harmony only cuz i eyeball everything else
Click to expand...
Idk whenever I try to take undistorted media from a few feet away it becomes dogshit ye also you have seen most of my anylisis so u got spoiled 😭
 
Ldar_till_htn said:
Idk whenever I try to take undistorted media from a few feet away it becomes dogshit ye also you have seen most of my anylisis so u got spoiled 😭
Click to expand...
n***a i have not seen ur analysis
U js look boring i can already tell ur harmony is like 50% to 60% from a glance
 
genio said:
n***a i have not seen ur analysis
U js look boring i can already tell ur harmony is like 50% to 60% from a glance
Click to expand...
It’s 43% 💔
 
genio said:
Js take better media
Also ur face looks boring to analyze
@benny @Niggard
Any of you want a free frontal harmony analysis
Harmony only cuz i eyeball everything else
Click to expand...
Sure
IMG_20260603_125454.webp
IMG_20260531_141938.webp
IMG_20260212_182240.webp
 
genio said:
n***a i have not seen ur analysis
U js look boring i can already tell ur harmony is like 50% to 60% from a glance
Click to expand...
Not an insult i can js tell
I have no clue about umtn or toma
 
genio said:
n***a shitty ass images i will genuinely r**e you
Give me the ones u used to measure ur fwhr
Click to expand...
Btw ill do it tomorrow
 
Curious how the ratios are calculated. You worked on new ones but meanwhile zogged corpos like faceiq labs hide theirs. Do you think yours matches up based on some aesthetic theory rules or both just estimating off what seems most attractive
 
genio said:
90% of you n*****s won't understand this
I didn't write well and it's quite complex

I'd recommend reading this (the Harmony portion of my thread The 4 Pillars of Attractiveness (Revised) beforehand:

1. Harmony
In short, facial harmony is how balanced and proportionate your face is. It uses ratios and math to measure how each feature on your face interacts with other features.

There are many ratios depending on what formula you use as it could up to as high as 40 or more purely off the front profile. Every ratio has a different level of importance.

There are two profiles measured for harmony; front profile and side profile. The frontal profile should always be more important than the side profile no matter the formula. Personally, I weigh frontal harmony as 66.7% of your total harmony and side harmony as 33.3%.

Important ratios include:
ESR, FWHR, Facial Thirds, Canthal Tilt, TFWHR Midface Ratio, Bigonial-Bizygo, etc.

Here's CA's old formula. It's outdated and will probably give you an inflated score, but it serves a little use nonetheless. I'd subtract 10% off the final score personally. Anyways, you just add up all your values depending on what value is assigned to that tier and ratio, then divide it by either 2.625 for the frontal or 1.365 for the side.

View attachment 358959
View attachment 358961

View attachment 358962
View attachment 358963

In harmony, we usually score ratios based off a tier system. It's simple and convenient.
For example:
View attachment 358925

However, in recent times, raters like FaceIQ have used Super-Gaussian bell curves that score your ratios out of 10 based on a decay system.
But how do you do this?
THROUGH THIS FUCKING RETARDED ASS FORMULA THAT TOOK ME WAY TOO FUCKING LONG TO FIGURE OUT!!!
View attachment 358924
a = Plateau Height (I like to use 10, so that you get a value out of 10 based off your measurement)
p = Center Position
w = Plateau Half-Width (the distance from the center (p) to the edge where the flat top ends and the curve begins)
d = Decay Spread (Standard Deviation of the Tails)
x = Your Measurement of Your Specific Ratio

Basically, you set this up, then you put x equal whatever your measurement is (say if you're measuring ESR, you'd put your ESR measurement here).
Then, you should get a score out of the plateau height value (I usually put 10, so I'd get a value out of 10).

Here's an example I used for ESR (Eye Separation Ratio) with an ideal of between 45.6-47.7
View attachment 358926
Let's say your ESR is 42.77422 here, it would get 5/10

But there's still an issue even with this Super-Gaussian curve; there were negative points in the tier system, so how do we replicate this with the new system?
ANOTHER FUCK ASS FORMULA n*****s
View attachment 358930
g = Max Points (on the specific ratio in your formula (check example for better understanding))
v = Value on Curve (earlier, in the ESR example, a 42.77422 gets 5/10, the 5 would be used here)
a = Plateau Height (previously mentioned)

Here's an example of a formula where ESR's maximum value is +20.
View attachment 358942
If you got 5/10 on the Super-Gaussian after inputting your measurement (x) and your Plateau Height (a) as 10, you'd get 0 as your score to go towards your formula.
If you got 9/10 with the same conditions mentioned above, you'd get 16 as your score to go towards your formula. 3/10 would get -8 and 0/10 would get -20.

This shit was some of the most effort I've ever put into a thread. Just for 90% of you n*****s to not understand. Thank you for reading.
Click to expand...
I like the idea, but faceiqlabs is shit at rating harmony.

Surgerymax and other raters said that the harmony score look random almost. Where even with proper placement it gives bad harmony scores
 
Syniq said:
I like the idea, but faceiqlabs is shit at rating harmony.

Surgerymax and other raters said that the harmony score look random almost. Where even with proper placement it gives bad harmony scores
Click to expand...
Son surgerymax uses a bell curve 🫩
The placement and wtv have nothing to do with the curve
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 15 (Looksmaxxers: 0, Guests: 15)
Back
Top