Join 27,800+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Theres a extreme masculinization of women without any doubt

Buddy Boyo

LGBTQP+ supporter
Knowledgeable
Reputable
Established
Joined
Jul 24, 2019
Messages
1,002
Reputation
1,589
Location
Neoples Buttcunt
along with a feminization of men

Look at her f*****g square chin, she has the typical high prenatal/high aggressiveness chin, angular, thick and stunted

Her mid mandible is also thick as hell

chin mog.jpg

She chinmogs this whole Forum, no one here has such a strong androgenic chin than her, she chinmogs astrosky to hell and back

But thats not everything, just look at the limb length proportions of modern western average Girls...

This Girl here represents perfectly the average Body of all teen Girls ive encountered yet in all WhatsApp Groups and even in real life

limb mog.jpg

A typical dumb brainwashed normie will now think "Theres Nothing wrong with her Body, she has nice sexy feminine long legs"

but Long legs ARE NOT a normal feminine trait! Long legs and limbs in General are a totally anti-estrogenic trait

Our Pop and modelling culture has made us perceive Long legs as a feminine trait, while in reality it's a trait which is typically associated with a Absence of estrogen


https://books.google.de/books?id=a5S11w5VVSMC&pg=PA7&lpg=PA7&dq=legs+relative+height+women+women&#v=onepage&q=legs relative height women women&f=false


"women are generally shorter than men because their higher level of estrogen cause earlier fusing of the epiphysial growth plates. So compared to men, women have shorter arms and legs relative to height"



Such proportions like on this Girl are de-estrogenic and androygnous, most Girls These days ARE EXTREMELY athletically privileged due to their strong dimorphic and non-neotenous proportions

In the meanwhile, only a very few androgenic and non-estrogenic Boys are able to be a true athletic competition

this has Nothing to do with height, a 1.70cm Woman can easily outperform a 1.90 guy if the guy has short limbs and a non-dimorphic male Body with Broad hips and narrow shoulders

humanoid Men are naturally supposed to have longer limbs in relation to their upper body and thus a higher gravity Point, they are naturally supposed to make longer steps during running


this guy here perfectly represents the modern average Boys proportions, he might be objectively tall, but his leg to Torso Ratio is just subhuman Tier, from a athletic view he's totally disadvantaged

No matter how hard he Trains, he will never be a explosive sprinter/Basketball/Soccer or Football Player etc. because his short legs cannot store nearly as much Energy as a guy at his height with Long legs, he Needs to permanently compensate for his small Baby steps by running faster which why he's forced to spend a ridiculous high amount of ernergy just for a moderate fast 50m sprint interval
short limbs subhuman.jpg


This is just sooooo f*****g wrong, MEN ARE SUPPOSED TO BE THE FAST EXPLOSIVE SPRINTING GENDER!!!!, but nowadays most grown men look like overgrown toddlers with their proportions

look into literature from 200 years ago, back then women were described as short and stubby with neotenous proportions

While nowadays most Young girls leg mog most men into oblivion, it's just ridiculous seeing Long legged tall Girls with Broad square shoulders in a Group of tall but totally sloped and neotenous proportionized "Men"
 
fbf4d2d0d12165ea7fe5f6d24001596f.jpg


Lmao are you saying everyone's coping then?

Personally I am a 12 for mens, according to this scale.

.
 
Last edited:
I don't get this graphic tbh.
I'm 14
Which one is the most attractive
I, regardless of the normie coping factor, believe women should have proportionally longer legs than men.
The lengths may very for sure.
If you go according to OP's theory, then 14 is the most attractive.
If you go according to the graph's and the standard theory of genuine physical attraction, then 14 is the least attractive, as shown in the graph.
So according to the world, your leg to torso ratio is unattractive and feminine.

The proportionally longer the legs are for women, the better.
Vice versa for men.
 
I, regardless of the normie coping factor, believe women should have proportionally longer legs than men.
The lengths may very for sure.
If you go according to OP's theory, then 14 is the most attractive.
If you go according to the graph's and the standard theory of genuine physical attraction, then 14 is the least attractive, as shown in the graph.
So according to the world, your leg to torso ratio is unattractive and feminine.

The proportionally longer the legs are for women, the better.
Vice versa for men.
Idk I think longer legs look better on everyone and short legs are subhuman.
I personally prefer a woman with long legs
 
  • Thread Starter Thread Starter
  • #9
I, regardless of the normie coping factor, believe women should have proportionally longer legs than men.
The lengths may very for sure.
If you go according to OP's theory, then 14 is the most attractive.
If you go according to the graph's and the standard theory of genuine physical attraction, then 14 is the least attractive, as shown in the graph.
So according to the world, your leg to torso ratio is unattractive and feminine.

The proportionally longer the legs are for women, the better.
Vice versa for men.

Extreme short legs look neither good on women or men

This graphic you Showed might be representing our modern societies view on what is Beautiful and what not

But it does not represent natures intention
 
fbf4d2d0d12165ea7fe5f6d24001596f.jpg


Lmao are you saying everyone's coping then?

Personally I am a 12 for mens, according to this scale.

.
along with a feminization of men

Look at her f*****g square chin, she has the typical high prenatal/high aggressiveness chin, angular, thick and stunted

Her mid mandible is also thick as hell

View attachment 7051

She chinmogs this whole Forum, no one here has such a strong androgenic chin than her, she chinmogs astrosky to hell and back

But thats not everything, just look at the limb length proportions of modern western average Girls...

This Girl here represents perfectly the average Body of all teen Girls ive encountered yet in all WhatsApp Groups and even in real life

View attachment 7052

A typical dumb brainwashed normie will now think "Theres Nothing wrong with her Body, she has nice sexy feminine long legs"

but Long legs ARE NOT a normal feminine trait! Long legs and limbs in General are a totally anti-estrogenic trait

Our Pop and modelling culture has made us perceive Long legs as a feminine trait, while in reality it's a trait which is typically associated with a Absence of estrogen


https://books.google.de/books?id=a5S11w5VVSMC&pg=PA7&lpg=PA7&dq=legs+relative+height+women+women&#v=onepage&q=legs relative height women women&f=false

"women are generally shorter than men because their higher level of estrogen cause earlier fusing of the epiphysial growth plates. So compared to men, women have shorter arms and legs relative to height"



Such proportions like on this Girl are de-estrogenic and androygnous, most Girls These days ARE EXTREMELY athletically privileged due to their strong dimorphic and non-neotenous proportions

In the meanwhile, only a very few androgenic and non-estrogenic Boys are able to be a true athletic competition

this has Nothing to do with height, a 1.70cm Woman can easily outperform a 1.90 guy if the guy has short limbs and a non-dimorphic male Body with Broad hips and narrow shoulders

humanoid Men are naturally supposed to have longer limbs in relation to their upper body and thus a higher gravity Point, they are naturally supposed to make longer steps during running


this guy here perfectly represents the modern average Boys proportions, he might be objectively tall, but his leg to Torso Ratio is just subhuman Tier, from a athletic view he's totally disadvantaged

No matter how hard he Trains, he will never be a explosive sprinter/Basketball/Soccer or Football Player etc. because his short legs cannot store nearly as much Energy as a guy at his height with Long legs, he Needs to permanently compensate for his small Baby steps by running faster which why he's forced to spend a ridiculous high amount of ernergy just for a moderate fast 50m sprint interval
View attachment 7057


This is just sooooo f*****g wrong, MEN ARE SUPPOSED TO BE THE FAST EXPLOSIVE SPRINTING GENDER!!!!, but nowadays most grown men look like overgrown toddlers with their proportions

look into literature from 200 years ago, back then women were described as short and stubby with neotenous proportions

While nowadays most Young girls leg mog most men into oblivion, it's just ridiculous seeing Long legged tall Girls with Broad square shoulders in a Group of tall but totally sloped and neotenous proportionized "Men"
I'm telling you these 'Jews' (Satanists/Luciferians) are behind all this gender fluid bs and androgenous models etc.
They want a twisted world where anyone and everyone is anything but what they naturally are.
Next they are already pushing pedophilia
 
along with a feminization of men

Look at her f*****g square chin, she has the typical high prenatal/high aggressiveness chin, angular, thick and stunted

Her mid mandible is also thick as hell

View attachment 7051

She chinmogs this whole Forum, no one here has such a strong androgenic chin than her, she chinmogs astrosky to hell and back

But thats not everything, just look at the limb length proportions of modern western average Girls...

This Girl here represents perfectly the average Body of all teen Girls ive encountered yet in all WhatsApp Groups and even in real life

View attachment 7052

A typical dumb brainwashed normie will now think "Theres Nothing wrong with her Body, she has nice sexy feminine long legs"

but Long legs ARE NOT a normal feminine trait! Long legs and limbs in General are a totally anti-estrogenic trait

Our Pop and modelling culture has made us perceive Long legs as a feminine trait, while in reality it's a trait which is typically associated with a Absence of estrogen


https://books.google.de/books?id=a5S11w5VVSMC&pg=PA7&lpg=PA7&dq=legs+relative+height+women+women&#v=onepage&q=legs relative height women women&f=false

"women are generally shorter than men because their higher level of estrogen cause earlier fusing of the epiphysial growth plates. So compared to men, women have shorter arms and legs relative to height"



Such proportions like on this Girl are de-estrogenic and androygnous, most Girls These days ARE EXTREMELY athletically privileged due to their strong dimorphic and non-neotenous proportions

In the meanwhile, only a very few androgenic and non-estrogenic Boys are able to be a true athletic competition

this has Nothing to do with height, a 1.70cm Woman can easily outperform a 1.90 guy if the guy has short limbs and a non-dimorphic male Body with Broad hips and narrow shoulders

humanoid Men are naturally supposed to have longer limbs in relation to their upper body and thus a higher gravity Point, they are naturally supposed to make longer steps during running


this guy here perfectly represents the modern average Boys proportions, he might be objectively tall, but his leg to Torso Ratio is just subhuman Tier, from a athletic view he's totally disadvantaged

No matter how hard he Trains, he will never be a explosive sprinter/Basketball/Soccer or Football Player etc. because his short legs cannot store nearly as much Energy as a guy at his height with Long legs, he Needs to permanently compensate for his small Baby steps by running faster which why he's forced to spend a ridiculous high amount of ernergy just for a moderate fast 50m sprint interval
View attachment 7057


This is just sooooo f*****g wrong, MEN ARE SUPPOSED TO BE THE FAST EXPLOSIVE SPRINTING GENDER!!!!, but nowadays most grown men look like overgrown toddlers with their proportions

look into literature from 200 years ago, back then women were described as short and stubby with neotenous proportions

While nowadays most Young girls leg mog most men into oblivion, it's just ridiculous seeing Long legged tall Girls with Broad square shoulders in a Group of tall but totally sloped and neotenous proportionized "Men"
Do you have solutions to fix my long philtrum?
Astro said mewing will shorten it but does it work for females like me?
 
Women have option to choose whether they want to be emasculined or not, and androgenous women DON'T look as near as attractive, it is like a man but much worse, take members of feminism for example, they're all taking testosterone, competing to be better than men (and fail) and it's just worst looking, no masculine nor feminine features either, full tranny

The girls you refered as to look masculine in picture, actually looks feminine in my oppinion.
chin mog.jpg
I mean yeah having squared jaw, chiseled facial features, it's all considerate 'manly' right?; False, it goes for both sexes to have good or bad facial features. ESTROGENIZATION of BOTH sexes is real, emasculinization is an option.

Women are rude and arrogant because of it's particular reason, and not because they are having higher levels of t.
 
Women have option to choose whether they want to be emasculined or not, and androgenous women DON'T look as near as attractive, it is like a man but much worse, take members of feminism for example, they're all taking testosterone, competing to be better than men (and fail) and it's just worst looking, no masculine nor feminine features either, full tranny

The girls you refered as to look masculine in picture, actually looks feminine in my oppinion.
View attachment 7067
I mean yeah having squared jaw, chiseled facial features, it's all considerate 'manly' right?; False, it goes for both sexes to have good or bad facial features. ESTROGENIZATION of BOTH sexes is real, emasculinization is an option.

Women are rude and arrogant because of it's particular reason, and not because they are having higher levels of t.
Ok it's confirmed you like manly women. You basically are attracted to men. There is a difference between having sharp features vs manly features.
A broad square chin is exclusively manly trait no feminine women should possess.
 
Long legs crew

You can't judge people with clothes on tho. Female clothes make legs look longer.
A lot of mens jeans have extra room bellow crotch and end short up the waist. Also trend is to have slightly longer tshirts
 
“The world is changing, music is changing,drugs are changing, even men and women are changing. One thousand years from now there’ll be no guys and no girls, just wankers.” Renton, Trainspotting (1996)
 
@xDNickGurr @Fat @john @Bengt the real fifles ☝☝☝☝
I told you
I don't give af about the real and fake Fifles anymore.
All everyone should know is that this forum is supposed to be devoid of female users, due to their hateful, hypocritical and slandering nature.
So if you are here Fifles, go suck off a cow and never return.
 

Back
Top