Join 65,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

typa shit i’m on rn

snoopy12

okay
Banned
Reputable ★★★
Established ★★
Joined
Jan 3, 2026
Messages
8,482
Time Online
14d 20h
Reputation
16,185
IMG_8273.webp
 
Register to hide this ad
WOWWW i love ur feed lemme follow u
I cant because my irl friends follow me and for some reason a bunch of them put their full names
 
To be reincarnated into a better life, you must have good karma. Karma comes from good/bad acts. The thing with buddhism is you will always want someone to need help.

For example, a buddhist gives $20 to a beggar. What a good dead! He's getting good karma.
The next day, the beggar is gone, he's ascended and living lavishly with his $20. The buddhist can no longer get good karma from him.
But... if the beggar were to throw the money away, the buddhist can keep giving him money. In turn, he will keep recieving good karma. To simplify it, the buddhist would prefer for the beggar to stay destitute.

All of their good deeds are for selfish returns. But again, they still commit good deads. They're not bad people, just self-centered.
 
To be reincarnated into a better life, you must have good karma. Karma comes from good/bad acts. The thing with buddhism is you will always want someone to need help.

For example, a buddhist gives $20 to a beggar. What a good dead! He's getting good karma.
The next day, the beggar is gone, he's ascended and living lavishly with his $20. The buddhist can no longer get good karma from him.
But... if the beggar were to throw the money away, the buddhist can keep giving him money. In turn, he will keep recieving good karma. To simplify it, the buddhist would prefer for the beggar to stay destitute.

All of their good deeds are for selfish returns. But again, they still commit good deads. They're not bad people, just self-centered.
that’s the case for most religions
what could is christian charity if not for heaven?
humans are inherently selfish and having a divine institution lead you down a path of good deeds, whether or not it be for the promise of something better, is morally justifiable because without that “bribery” there wouldn’t be proper community and/or goodness
 
that’s the case for most religions
what could is christian charity if not for heaven?
Christian reward is more based on faith/devotion, whereas buddhism is more about good deeds towards others.

humans are inherently selfish and having a divine institution lead you down a path of good deeds, whether or not it be for the promise of something better, is morally justifiable because without that “bribery” there wouldn’t be proper community and/or goodness
Yeah, religious ethos is necessary for larger society. Most people are not strong enough to form their own morality. I would hate to imagine a secular, libertarian world. It would be fucking hell.

People usually say that religion was bad for society, but I think not. It was necessary as a source of hope, values, and community over the many years.
 
Christian reward is more based on faith/devotion, whereas buddhism is more about good deeds towards others.
no necessarily christianity is a mix of both
i’ve been going to catholic school forever and there’s an absurd push for community service it’s required for everyone but whatever for the sake of the argument it’s the same in islam where charity is one of the pillars
Yeah, religious ethos is necessary for larger society. Most people are not strong enough to form their own morality. I would hate to imagine a secular, libertarian world. It would be fucking hell.
exactly, it’s more than appropriate to justify “moral” acts of charity and help for religion because we wouldn’t function any other way
People usually say that religion was bad for society, but I think not. It was necessary as a source of hope, values, and community over the many years.
i have a lot to say about this LOL but yes i agree i just dont feel like typing it all rn
 
no necessarily christianity is a mix of both
i’ve been going to catholic school forever and there’s an absurd push for community service it’s required for everyone but whatever for the sake of the argument it’s the same in islam where charity is one of the pillars
Ye ye, I'm a catholic school boyo too. I think that's just the community surronding Christianity. Obviously, Jesus taught to treat others how you would like to be treated etc etc, but when it comes down to it, all you must do is accept Jesus into your heart.
 
Ye ye, I'm a catholic school boyo too. I think that's just the community surronding Christianity. Obviously, Jesus taught to treat others how you would like to be treated etc etc, but when it comes down to it, all you must do is accept Jesus into your heart.
that’s very true but mirroring His life and ministry is also very important
as Christians it’s your job to work to be as Christ-like as possible and that includes serving those less fortunate, etc
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top