Why are some interracial couples tolerated and others viewed with disdain?

[933127]

It seems that Black male & White female, BMWF pairings face the most negative criticism. My theory is that it’s because blacks have a greater degree of aesthetic distance from a white perspective when compared to other “non white” races. The deviant is not just skin color and hair texture but also facial features. Mulatto children almost always look entirely black, unless the black parent has some non-black admixture.



WMAF (white male, asian female) is becoming the most common interracial pairing. It’s so common that most people seem to tolerate it and not fuss about it. The deviation Asians have from Whites is the eye area; monolids, lack of depth in brow ridge, shape of nose. Hapa children are a mixed bag. Some are unlucky, will look 100% Asian, inheriting the stereotypical “c***k” look.

Example (2019 school shooter, Nathaniel Tennosuke Berhow)
https://abc7.com/nathaniel-tennosuke-berhow-nate-saugus-high-school-santa-clarita-shooting/5699170/


Others will look ambigious, others will look Eurasian with good expression of Caucasoid traits. They will be light complexion with straight hair, so not too much deviation when compared to mulattos. AMWF (asian male, white female) is so rare, general public is not bothered by it.

Hispanics (as long as not too Amerindian looking) and Middle Easterns tend to have similar brow ridge structure and deep set eyes as Whites. The offspring of these two admixture pairing with a White spouse can pass off as white as long as skin is light complexion.

It seems that interracial couples will face either tolerance or disdain/opposition based on how much difference in their facial features from one another there is and what their potential offspring will look like.

In other words how much deviation is there from the western aesthetic standard?

For those reading, do you agree or disagree?

 

[Spuffy]

why did you have to pick a school shooter as your example wtf

 

[Spuffy]

It seems that Black male & White female, BMWF pairings face the most negative criticism. My theory is that it’s because blacks have a greater degree of aesthetic distance from a white perspective when compared to other “non white” races. The deviant is not just skin color and hair texture but also facial features. Mulatto children almost always look entirely black, unless the black parent has some non-black admixture.



WMAF (white male, asian female) is becoming the most common interracial pairing. It’s so common that most people seem to tolerate it and not fuss about it. The deviation Asians have from Whites is the eye area; monolids, lack of depth in brow ridge, shape of nose. Hapa children are a mixed bag. Some are unlucky, will look 100% Asian, inheriting the stereotypical “c***k” look.

Example (2019 school shooter, Nathaniel Tennosuke Berhow)
https://abc7.com/nathaniel-tennosuke-berhow-nate-saugus-high-school-santa-clarita-shooting/5699170/


Others will look ambigious, others will look Eurasian with good expression of Caucasoid traits. They will be light complexion with straight hair, so not too much deviation when compared to mulattos. AMWF (asian male, white female) is so rare, general public is not bothered by it.

Hispanics (as long as not too Amerindian looking) and Middle Easterns tend to have similar brow ridge structure and deep set eyes as Whites. The offspring of these two admixture pairing with a White spouse can pass off as white as long as skin is light complexion.

It seems that interracial couples will face either tolerance or disdain/opposition based on how much difference in their facial features from one another there is and what their potential offspring will look like.

In other words how much deviation is there from the western aesthetic standard?

For those reading, do you agree or disagree?

I do agree that black men and white women as a couple tend to face disproportionate scrutiny, and a lot of that stems from racism

White men often project both fetishization and resentment toward black men (think of the “bbc” stereotype), while simultaneously idealizing white women. On the other hand, within some black communities, white women are dehumanized or viewed with suspicion - that white women are inherently racist and will would only be with a black man for sexual reasons

so when the two are together, it disrupts both of these narratives. some black women and men may feel a sense of betrayal or erasure, seeing whiteness, especially white femininity, being centered or idealized. they automatically assume that the man is actively choosing white women over black women, even if it isnt the case, and they just happened to fall in love. at the same time, some white men respond with hostility, often reducing the relationship to harmful sexual stereotypes. i think this stems from so many men watching porn with this agenda

 

[midtiernormiecel1]

It seems that Black male & White female, BMWF pairings face the most negative criticism. My theory is that it’s because blacks have a greater degree of aesthetic distance from a white perspective when compared to other “non white” races. The deviant is not just skin color and hair texture but also facial features. Mulatto children almost always look entirely black, unless the black parent has some non-black admixture.



WMAF (white male, asian female) is becoming the most common interracial pairing. It’s so common that most people seem to tolerate it and not fuss about it. The deviation Asians have from Whites is the eye area; monolids, lack of depth in brow ridge, shape of nose. Hapa children are a mixed bag. Some are unlucky, will look 100% Asian, inheriting the stereotypical “c***k” look.

Example (2019 school shooter, Nathaniel Tennosuke Berhow)
https://abc7.com/nathaniel-tennosuke-berhow-nate-saugus-high-school-santa-clarita-shooting/5699170/


Others will look ambigious, others will look Eurasian with good expression of Caucasoid traits. They will be light complexion with straight hair, so not too much deviation when compared to mulattos. AMWF (asian male, white female) is so rare, general public is not bothered by it.

Hispanics (as long as not too Amerindian looking) and Middle Easterns tend to have similar brow ridge structure and deep set eyes as Whites. The offspring of these two admixture pairing with a White spouse can pass off as white as long as skin is light complexion.

It seems that interracial couples will face either tolerance or disdain/opposition based on how much difference in their facial features from one another there is and what their potential offspring will look like.

In other words how much deviation is there from the western aesthetic standard?

For those reading, do you agree or disagree?

 

[rand anon]

t seems that Black male & White female, BMWF pairings face the most negative criticism. My theory is that it’s because blacks have a greater degree of aesthetic distance from a white perspective when compared to

yes, but I'd say ur theory is overcomplicated. It's simply just cause everyone knows the type of individuals that are in BMWF pairings

same thing with WMAF, the only reason it doesn't get as much flack is cause these pairings are non-threatening/not as rachet, but even normies are aware of the dynamic of those couples jfl

 

[Spuffy]

yes, but I'd say ur theory is overcomplicated. It's simply just cause everyone knows the type of individuals that are in BMWF pairings

same thing with WMAF, the only reason it doesn't get as much flack is cause these pairings are non-threatening/not as rachet, but even normies are aware of the dynamic of those couples jfl

your response legit proves my point tbh

 

[rand anon]

your response legit proves my point tbh

not rly
according to ur theory bmwf and wmbf would face the same amount of scrutiny, whereas I'd say the latter wouldn't face any

 

[Spuffy]

not rly
according to ur theory bmwf and wmbf would face the same amount of scrutiny, whereas I'd say the latter wouldn't face any

I had written this before but ended up deleting it. Still, I think it’s worth bringing back with more clarity. but youre absolutely right. One reason we don’t see the same level of outrage when white men date black women is because, in recent years, it’s become celebrated. Often, all it takes is for a white man to publicly express interest in black women, and he’s immediately praised. we see this kind of couple more often now because what society finds attractive has shifted

many black women have experienced lifelong marginalization and have often been overlooked in mainstream beauty standards. genuine interest, especially from outside their community, can feel rare and validating

this dynamic has contributed to white men being idealized in dating spaces, particularly when it comes to interracial relationships for ALL races. theres more i could say but yeah thats my general opinion

 

[rand anon]

I had written this before but ended up deleting it. Still, I think it’s worth bringing back with more clarity. but youre absolutely right. One reason we don’t see the same level of outrage when white men date black women is because, in recent years, it’s become celebrated. Often, all it takes is for a white man to publicly express interest in black women, and he’s immediately praised. we see this kind of couple more often now because what society finds attractive has shifted

many black women have experienced lifelong marginalization and have often been overlooked in mainstream beauty standards. genuine interest, especially from outside their community, can feel rare and validating

this dynamic has contributed to white men being idealized in dating spaces, particularly when it comes to interracial relationships for ALL races. theres more i could say but yeah thats my general opinion

I disagree with some of that. Firstly I don't think we're seeing wmbf couples more, bmwf is prob at it's peak. And secondly, I don't the scrutiny is correlated with the lack of exposure of those pairings, it more so has to do with the dynamics of those couples

bmwf and wmaf are both pairings that are entirely built off of fetishes, where the former pairing is made up of r selected degens and in the latter is composed of white incels who either couldn't get a white woman or hve an asian fetish, and noodles who want to be.. colonized

wmbf and amwf are way more genuine, black women who aren't hoodrats can't find brothas that are squares so they go for white guys

 

[933127]

why did you have to pick a school shooter as your example wtf

Yeah sorry. I was trying to illustrate that children of mixed heritage are a crapshoot if the parents have too much deviation in aesthetics. If the half asian male offspring looks like Hapa model Max Ando then its fine.


If the half asian female offspring is evenly mixed looking or even white passing, its considered a major win in the genetic lottery sweepstakes
https://chuck-nbc.fandom.com/wiki/Kristin_Kreuk

But if the half asian offspring still looks completely asian due to strong influence of non-white parent and inherited features that fit the stereotype too closely like a flat wide face or slanted eyes, it makes the offspring look too alien for Western society and the offspring will have a harder time fitting in and having a positive identity. Nathaniel Tennosuke Berhow was best example I can come up with.

 

[Spuffy]

I disagree with some of that. Firstly I don't think we're seeing wmbf couples more, bmwf is prob at it's peak. And secondly, I don't the scrutiny is correlated with the lack of exposure of those pairings, it more so has to do with the dynamics of those couples

bmwf and wmaf are both pairings that are entirely built off of fetishes, where the former pairing is made up of r selected degens and in the latter is composed of white incels who either couldn't get a white woman or hve an asian fetish, and noodles who want to be.. colonized

wmbf and amwf are way more genuine, black women who aren't hoodrats can't find brothas that are squares so they go for white guys

i can see why you think that

 

[rand anon]

i can see why you think that

I just realized I wasn't replying to the op jfl

 

[midtiernormiecel1]

Yeah sorry. I was trying to illustrate that children of mixed heritage are a crapshoot if the parents have too much deviation in aesthetics. If the half asian male offspring looks like Hapa model Max Ando then its fine.


If the half asian female offspring is evenly mixed looking or even white passing, its considered a major win in the genetic lottery sweepstakes
https://chuck-nbc.fandom.com/wiki/Kristin_Kreuk

But if the half asian offspring still looks completely asian due to strong influence of non-white parent and inherited features that fit the stereotype too closely like a flat wide face or slanted eyes, it makes the offspring look too alien for Western society and the offspring will have a harder time fitting in and having a positive identity. Nathaniel Tennosuke Berhow was best example I can come up with.

Still over for him

 

[Decay]

I do agree that black men and white women as a couple tend to face disproportionate scrutiny, and a lot of that stems from racism

White men often project both fetishization and resentment toward black men (think of the “bbc” stereotype), while simultaneously idealizing white women. On the other hand, within some black communities, white women are dehumanized or viewed with suspicion - that white women are inherently racist and will would only be with a black man for sexual reasons

so when the two are together, it disrupts both of these narratives. some black women and men may feel a sense of betrayal or erasure, seeing whiteness, especially white femininity, being centered or idealized. they automatically assume that the man is actively choosing white women over black women, even if it isnt the case, and they just happened to fall in love. at the same time, some white men respond with hostility, often reducing the relationship to harmful sexual stereotypes. i think this stems from so many men watching porn with this agenda

I don’t watch porn, and i don’t buy the whole BBC thing because it’s factually incorrect. However, women believe it is true, and that’s why they end up dating them with absolutely no consideration of their future children, culture, or bloodline whatsoever. These women are possibly the biggest pieces of shit the world has to offer.

 

[Decay]

This is one of the many reasons, yes. The child won’t even see himself as white nor claim it, and only claim it in isolated scenarios where it benefits them. You will essentially just have n****r children.

 

[Prismatic]

It seems that Black male & White female, BMWF pairings face the most negative criticism. My theory is that it’s because blacks have a greater degree of aesthetic distance from a white perspective when compared to other “non white” races. The deviant is not just skin color and hair texture but also facial features. Mulatto children almost always look entirely black, unless the black parent has some non-black admixture.



WMAF (white male, asian female) is becoming the most common interracial pairing. It’s so common that most people seem to tolerate it and not fuss about it. The deviation Asians have from Whites is the eye area; monolids, lack of depth in brow ridge, shape of nose. Hapa children are a mixed bag. Some are unlucky, will look 100% Asian, inheriting the stereotypical “c***k” look.

Example (2019 school shooter, Nathaniel Tennosuke Berhow)
https://abc7.com/nathaniel-tennosuke-berhow-nate-saugus-high-school-santa-clarita-shooting/5699170/


Others will look ambigious, others will look Eurasian with good expression of Caucasoid traits. They will be light complexion with straight hair, so not too much deviation when compared to mulattos. AMWF (asian male, white female) is so rare, general public is not bothered by it.

Hispanics (as long as not too Amerindian looking) and Middle Easterns tend to have similar brow ridge structure and deep set eyes as Whites. The offspring of these two admixture pairing with a White spouse can pass off as white as long as skin is light complexion.

It seems that interracial couples will face either tolerance or disdain/opposition based on how much difference in their facial features from one another there is and what their potential offspring will look like.

In other words how much deviation is there from the western aesthetic standard?

For those reading, do you agree or disagree?

Well the ones committing the racism (or even just the ones at the top of the "racism" hierarchy, other races do act for them) are on the good side of one of these relationships, and they are the negative (exclusion basically) side on the other one. Also, for beauty I believe Black-White is more attractive than Asian-White, but this might be a bias due to representation in media both social and traditional. Especially since in the great sum, there are MUCH MORE Black-White than Asian-White, so they have more beauties, but also probably more uglies so it is hard to see a distribution.

 

[Prismatic]

bmwf and wmaf are both pairings that are entirely built off of fetishes

The first much more than the former by the way. Yes, Asian women do prefer White men because of their fetish, but they still tend to both be higher economic status, same social groups, etc... the Asian girl just overlooks the Asian male for the White guy next to him. BMWF is weird since it transcends even social classes and things.

 

[rand anon]

but they still tend to both be higher economic status, same social groups, etc...

the avg asian american guy shares even more of those with the noodle than a white guy

the Asian girl just overlooks the Asian male for the White guy next to him

it's worse than that though, she'd rather take a white guy that looks worse, makes less etc, who's in every way worse than the asian

 

[Prismatic]

WMAF (white male, asian female) is becoming the most common interracial pairing. It’s so common that most people seem to tolerate it and not fuss about it. The deviation Asians have from Whites is the eye area; monolids, lack of depth in brow ridge, shape of nose. Hapa children are a mixed bag. Some are unlucky, will look 100% Asian, inheriting the stereotypical “c***k” look.

This may be true in America? Although if you're going by marriage rates consider that the rates of "black marriage" is much lower, but like the continent of South America just puts this to rest kind of, it's not even close at all globally, I am mixed myself and I come from this continent, I wouldn't be surprised if in like 20 years there's more mulattos than blacks/whites combined in latam

 

[Spuffy]

This is one of the many reasons, yes. The child won’t even see himself as white nor claim it, and only claim it in isolated scenarios where it benefits them. You will essentially just have n****r children.

I think your distaste stems either from racism in general or dislike for race mixing - views that don't reflect the majority and honestly carry little weight regarding what i am trying to say

 

[Decay]

I think your distaste stems either from racism in general or dislike for race mixing - views that don't reflect the majority and honestly carry little weight regarding what i am trying to say

Sure, i might be racist, but that’s not exactly the reason i dislike mixing. Mixing is generally bad for any race, not just whites.

 

[Spuffy]

Sure, i might be racist, but that’s not exactly the reason i dislike mixing. Mixing is generally bad for any race, not just whites.

but thats also not a common reason people hate interracial relationships, i dont think. some people just get triggered to see their race prefer somebody else lol

 

[Decay]

but thats also not a common reason people hate interracial relationships, i dont think. some people just get triggered to see their race prefer somebody else lol

Nah, you are simply ignoring my point. I think it is also pretty common for anyone with braincells to see why race mixing can be bad.

I also couldn’t care less who anyone prefers as long as it doesn’t disrupt an entire culture, race, and gene pool, which it does.

 

[Spuffy]

Nah, you are simply ignoring my point. I think it is also pretty common for anyone with braincells to see why race mixing can be bad.

I also couldn’t care less who anyone prefers as long as it doesn’t disrupt an entire culture, race, and gene pool, which it does.

my point wasn’t to argue whether all interracial relationships are good or bad. i was specifically exploring why certain interracial couples seem to receive more public disdain than others. im not coming from a place of personal bias or judgment. im reflecting on how society views these dynamics shaped by history, media, and ingrained racial perceptions. Youre sharing a personal opinion rooted in concern over things like the "gene pool," but thats not the angle im taking. im just analyzing the broader social reactions. we clearly both have different opinions about this as you think the common person could explain to you why race mixing is bad, while i would disagree and say that its not a common idea for people. im dropping this now because i dont think this conversation will get anywhere that i would be interested in anymore

 

[Decay]

my point wasn’t to argue whether all interracial relationships are good or bad. i was specifically exploring why certain interracial couples seem to receive more public disdain than others. im not coming from a place of personal bias or judgment. im reflecting on how society views these dynamics shaped by history, media, and ingrained racial perceptions. Youre sharing a personal opinion rooted in concern over things like the "gene pool," but thats not the angle im taking. im just analyzing the broader social reactions. we clearly both have different opinions about this as you think the common person could explain to you why race mixing is bad, while i would disagree and say that its not a common idea for people. im dropping this now because i dont think this conversation will get anywhere that i would be interested in anymore

No i don’t think it’s a common idea, i just think it’s the correct idea. And i think people are smart enough to understand why, but ignorance blinds them. They try so hard to comply with social norms that they will not admit it.

 

[AuggyDauggy]

It seems that Black male & White female, BMWF pairings face the most negative criticism. My theory is that it’s because blacks have a greater degree of aesthetic distance from a white perspective when compared to other “non white” races. The deviant is not just skin color and hair texture but also facial features. Mulatto children almost always look entirely black, unless the black parent has some non-black admixture.



WMAF (white male, asian female) is becoming the most common interracial pairing. It’s so common that most people seem to tolerate it and not fuss about it. The deviation Asians have from Whites is the eye area; monolids, lack of depth in brow ridge, shape of nose. Hapa children are a mixed bag. Some are unlucky, will look 100% Asian, inheriting the stereotypical “c***k” look.

Example (2019 school shooter, Nathaniel Tennosuke Berhow)
https://abc7.com/nathaniel-tennosuke-berhow-nate-saugus-high-school-santa-clarita-shooting/5699170/


Others will look ambigious, others will look Eurasian with good expression of Caucasoid traits. They will be light complexion with straight hair, so not too much deviation when compared to mulattos. AMWF (asian male, white female) is so rare, general public is not bothered by it.

Hispanics (as long as not too Amerindian looking) and Middle Easterns tend to have similar brow ridge structure and deep set eyes as Whites. The offspring of these two admixture pairing with a White spouse can pass off as white as long as skin is light complexion.

It seems that interracial couples will face either tolerance or disdain/opposition based on how much difference in their facial features from one another there is and what their potential offspring will look like.

In other words how much deviation is there from the western aesthetic standard?

For those reading, do you agree or disagree?

BMWF couples have the greatest contrast, hence why it’s picked on more. Unlike other couples, this mix is more visually different than the others. I think that’s why honestly.

And stereotypes. “She’s gonna be a single mother” “Pray he doesn’t get the milk”

 

[Decay]

BMWF couples have the greatest contrast, hence why it’s picked on more. Unlike other couples, this mix is more visually different than the others. I think that’s why honestly.

And stereotypes. “She’s gonna be a single mother” “Pray he doesn’t get the milk”

I find it so weird how everyone downplays and outright ignores statistics and calls them “stereotypes”…

 

[Prismatic]

I find it so weird how everyone downplays and outright ignores statistics and calls them “stereotypes”…
View attachment 99653

True. I think these stats are all terrible though no? I see WS post both stats and like isn’t 30% absent father still crazy from the white side, but yeah Black is normally triple or double in these stats

 

[midtiernormiecel1]

It seems that Black male & White female, BMWF pairings face the most negative criticism. My theory is that it’s because blacks have a greater degree of aesthetic distance from a white perspective when compared to other “non white” races. The deviant is not just skin color and hair texture but also facial features. Mulatto children almost always look entirely black, unless the black parent has some non-black admixture.



WMAF (white male, asian female) is becoming the most common interracial pairing. It’s so common that most people seem to tolerate it and not fuss about it. The deviation Asians have from Whites is the eye area; monolids, lack of depth in brow ridge, shape of nose. Hapa children are a mixed bag. Some are unlucky, will look 100% Asian, inheriting the stereotypical “c***k” look.

Example (2019 school shooter, Nathaniel Tennosuke Berhow)
https://abc7.com/nathaniel-tennosuke-berhow-nate-saugus-high-school-santa-clarita-shooting/5699170/


Others will look ambigious, others will look Eurasian with good expression of Caucasoid traits. They will be light complexion with straight hair, so not too much deviation when compared to mulattos. AMWF (asian male, white female) is so rare, general public is not bothered by it.

Hispanics (as long as not too Amerindian looking) and Middle Easterns tend to have similar brow ridge structure and deep set eyes as Whites. The offspring of these two admixture pairing with a White spouse can pass off as white as long as skin is light complexion.

It seems that interracial couples will face either tolerance or disdain/opposition based on how much difference in their facial features from one another there is and what their potential offspring will look like.

In other words how much deviation is there from the western aesthetic standard?

For those reading, do you agree or disagree?

BMWF is such cope for n*****s it barely happens and when it does it’s in the Deep South with subhuman tier white foids but yeah keep coping thinking the BBC pill is real JBN (Just be Nordic) is law

 

[AuggyDauggy]

BMWF is such cope for n*****s it barely happens and when it does it’s in the Deep South with subhuman tier white foids but yeah keep coping thinking the BBC pill is real JBN (Just be Nordic) is law

That doesn’t explain why there’s a lot of BMWF couples out there though

 

[Prismatic]

BMWF is such cope for n*****s it barely happens and when it does it’s in the Deep South with subhuman tier white foids but yeah keep coping thinking the BBC pill is real JBN (Just be Nordic) is law

This is just statistically false? I mean no need to crash out, but there’s over a million married BMWF by 2025. It depends where you live though because I never see WMAF because there’s like 0.5% Asians in Miami

 

[Prismatic]

This is just statistically false? I mean no need to crash out, but there’s over a million married BMWF by 2025. It depends where you live though because I never see WMAF because there’s like 0.5% Asians in Miami

I guess if I went to say Bay Area I would ONLY see WMAF

 

[Prismatic]

This is just statistically false? I mean no need to crash out, but there’s over a million married BMWF by 2025. It depends where you live though because I never see WMAF because there’s like 0.5% Asians in Miami

Ironically most of the interest i get as mixed male ltn is from latinas and white girls, black girls never match me or talk to me

 

[Prismatic]

BMWF couples have the greatest contrast, hence why it’s picked on more. Unlike other couples, this mix is more visually different than the others. I think that’s why honestly.

AMWF have the greatest contrast imo. The white womens bone makes her look ogre compared to the BF

 

[rand anon]

Sure, i might be racist, but that’s not exactly the reason i dislike mixing. Mixing is generally bad for any race, not just whites.

Skull mixing
Race mixing

 

[933127]

AMWF have the greatest contrast imo. The white womens bone makes her look ogre compared to the BF

What to you mean by "white womens bone"? Do you mean the more prominent brow ridge and deep set eyes the white women will have compared to her asian male partner?

That will depend on how stereotypically Asian looking his features are I suppose, and that would be on a case by case basis.


https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-b...-in-attendance-for-andre-agassi-38211200.html

 

[midtiernormiecel1]

That doesn’t explain why there’s a lot of BMWF couples out there though

it does- the only GL white women w/ black guys is when black guys r rich- most rich n*****s play sports or make shit music so status attracts a certain type fs- so basically most races with rich men can pull decent looking women JFL

 

[933127]

On social media, it looks like white women really do seem to get the most amount of criticism especially if they mate with a dark complexion man with features that don't align with western aesthetics. No harsh criticism for white men who mate with an Asian women. Greatest scrutiny always is on white women, especially if the offspring they produce end up looking like the father and don't align with western esthetics in the looks department.

 

[machineovercooked]

On social media, it looks like white women really do seem to get the most amount of criticism especially if they mate with a dark complexion man with features that don't align with western aesthetics. No harsh criticism for white men who mate with an Asian women. Greatest scrutiny always is on white women, especially if the offspring they produce end up looking like the father and don't align with western esthetics in the looks department.

yes i completely agree, especially seeing how these are literal children and you don't know what they even look like yet
white men are idealised in whatever studies they are

and i see much criticism of asian women online with a white man, no matter what the other party looks like, it's always oxford study

 

[neymar]

Because black women marrying white men ends in sucess

Black men marrying black women ends in failure (they barely even get married)

Black men marrying white women also ends in failure

Black men are the common problem