Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Why do you hate women as a man?

Dressing like sluts isn't something to respect.
 
All this gender war bs is so ass n***a
If a stacy wanted to a fuck a man who “hates women” theyd still fuck
If a chad wanted to a fuck a woman who “hates men” theyd still fuck
 
All this gender war bs is so ass n***a
If a stacy wanted to a fuck a man who “hates women” theyd still fuck
If a chad wanted to a fuck a woman who “hates men” theyd still fuck
If both have no morals or dignity then probably
 
The study demonstrates a sex difference in performance on a novel, incentivized probability-reporting version of Raven's matrices, but the authors then make a much broader conceptual leap by labeling this “intelligence.” Their outcome measure combines fluid reasoning with confidence calibration, risk preferences, and willingness to express uncertainty. The traditional Raven condition actually showed poorer female performance, while the female advantage emerged after introducing the novel confidence-reporting mechanism. Thus, the study provides evidence that sex differences in metacognitive calibration and risk-sensitive responding may affect how certain cognitive tests measure performance; it does not establish that women have higher general intelligence than men or that conventional IQ tests systematically underestimate female intelligence.


here you go even chatgpt knows the truth

countless studies done on intelligence men are the ones claiming the higher rankings of intelligence
 
If both have no morals or dignity then probably
Yeah and neither of those traits are gender-specific
So what the fuck is the point in saying “women > men” “men > women” there is good and bad within both genders its literally just an individual thing
 
Law is for the protection of the weak, not for me in this case. You are a women and you fucking need law much more than me
If a man rapes you dont report it, youre also physically inferior to other men if you forgot, if you feel the need to abuse somebody half your size to feel strong and good about yourself youre just a wimp.
 
The study demonstrates a sex difference in performance on a novel, incentivized probability-reporting version of Raven's matrices, but the authors then make a much broader conceptual leap by labeling this “intelligence.” Their outcome measure combines fluid reasoning with confidence calibration, risk preferences, and willingness to express uncertainty. The traditional Raven condition actually showed poorer female performance, while the female advantage emerged after introducing the novel confidence-reporting mechanism. Thus, the study provides evidence that sex differences in metacognitive calibration and risk-sensitive responding may affect how certain cognitive tests measure performance; it does not establish that women have higher general intelligence than men or that conventional IQ tests systematically underestimate female intelligence.


here you go even chatgpt knows the truth

countless studies done on intelligence men are the ones claiming the higher rankings of intelligence
Gpt slop
 
If a man rapes you dont report it, youre also physically inferior to other men if you forgot, if you feel the need to abuse somebody half your size to feel strong and good about yourself youre just a wimp.
I thought you were superior so how is he a wimp for taking on somebody superior? your logic is shattering
 
The study demonstrates a sex difference in performance on a novel, incentivized probability-reporting version of Raven's matrices, but the authors then make a much broader conceptual leap by labeling this “intelligence.” Their outcome measure combines fluid reasoning with confidence calibration, risk preferences, and willingness to express uncertainty. The traditional Raven condition actually showed poorer female performance, while the female advantage emerged after introducing the novel confidence-reporting mechanism. Thus, the study provides evidence that sex differences in metacognitive calibration and risk-sensitive responding may affect how certain cognitive tests measure performance; it does not establish that women have higher general intelligence than men or that conventional IQ tests systematically underestimate female intelligence.


here you go even chatgpt knows the truth

countless studies done on intelligence men are the ones claiming the higher rankings of intelligence
The study demonstrates a sex difference in performance on a novel, incentivized probability-reporting version of Raven's matrices, but the authors then make a much broader conceptual leap by labeling this “intelligence.” Their outcome measure combines fluid reasoning with confidence calibration, risk preferences, and willingness to express uncertainty. The traditional Raven condition actually showed poorer female performance, while the female advantage emerged after introducing the novel confidence-reporting mechanism. Thus, the study provides evidence that sex differences in metacognitive calibration and risk-sensitive responding may affect how certain cognitive tests measure performance; it does not establish that women have higher general intelligence than men or that conventional IQ tests systematically underestimate female intelligence.


here you go even chatgpt knows the truth

countless studies done on intelligence men are the ones claiming the higher rankings of intelligence
Read that shit and use your critical thinking you dumb male
 
I thought you were superior so how is he a wimp for taking on somebody superior? your logic is shattering
If he wants to abuse someone so bad then it should be someone his size, whom he has a chance with. Its like me saying ill abuse a kid to prove im strong stfu
 
Read that shit and use your critical thinking you dumb male
Read the countless other studies and use your critical thinking but one study that claims intelligence when it's not even about intelligence is supposedly the basis right
 
If he wants to abuse someone so bad then it should be someone his size, whom he has a chance with. Its like me saying ill abuse a kid to prove im strong stfu
But i thought you were superior? how come you don't have a chance with him
 
If a man rapes you dont report it, youre also physically inferior to other men if you forgot, if you feel the need to abuse somebody half your size to feel strong and good about yourself youre just a wimp.
No the difference is i wouldnt just scream help help mmphh aah ah help, i would throw in some punches and have a chance to r**e him instead to assert dominance, you dont. You are a bitch tied to law in a lot of things
 
Read the countless other studies and use your critical thinking but one study that claims intelligence when it's not even about intelligence is supposedly the basis right
Link me a study then?
 
No the difference is i wouldnt just scream help help mmphh aah ah help, i would throw in some punches and have a chance to r**e him instead to assert dominance, you dont. You are a bitch tied to law in a lot of things
I would also have a chance with a man my size idk what ur trying to prove
 
So a r****d seems to understand the world better than you? says alot doesn't it
He just has the same retarded views as you, youre hearing what you want to be said not whats true
 
He just has the same retarded views as you, youre hearing what you want to be said not whats true
My views are based off of studies, so you're saying data backed research is retarded?
 
My views are based off of studies, so you're saying data backed research is retarded?
LInk one then? Go ahead. Not physically tho since its obvious and biology
 
Lmao source trust me


 


Ill actually give it a read instead of copy pasting gpt slop
 
It also isnt for n*****s to go in the replies and be like “oh look at me im not one of the guys youre talking about i love women please give me your attention”
I didnt do thst ill show u my pms rn n***a
 
Studies show men rank higher in intelligence and strength

so how are women superior
Strength literally doesnt matter, but mentally theyre not superior lmao
 
Can your strenght stop a gunshot i dont think so
You have to rely on tools and even with a deadly instrument of death you might not even win cause of the adrenaline pumping into him
 
You have to rely on tools and even with a deadly instrument of death you might not even win cause of the adrenaline pumping into him
Sure id love to see him survive a gunshot in that scenario😂😂
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top