Looksmaxxing Forum Logo

Join 70,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

Register Log in
  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Hypothesis Bell Curve of Numerical Ratings (Theoretical)

genio
genio

genio

owned by James
VIP
Contributor
Reputable ★★★
Established ★★★
Joined
Apr 8, 2026
Messages
12,928
Solutions
51
Online time
22d 2h
Reputation
27,816
NUMERICAL LOOKS SCORE BELL CURVE
download (1).webp



BELL CURVE DISTRIBUTION
-3 SD: 2.9 as 0.135th percentile (1/741) Roughly Sub-3
-2 SD: 3.5 as 2.275th percentile (1/44) Roughly LLTN
-1 SD: 4.1 as 15.866th percentile (1/6) Roughly LLTN-MLTN
0 SD: 4.7 as 50th percentile (1/2) Roughly MLTN-HLTN
+1 SD: 5.3 as 84.134th percentile (1/6) Roughly LMTN-MMTN
+2 SD: 5.9 as 97.725th percentile (1/44) Roughly HMTN
+3 SD: 6.5 as 99.865th percentile (1/741) Exact MHTN
THE BELL CURVE IS KNOWN TO GET VERY SHAKY OVER 3 STANDARD DEVIATIONS
TAKE EVERYTHING BEYOND THIS POINT WITH A GRAIN OF SALT JFL
+4 SD: 7.1 as 99.997th percentile (1/31,560) Roughly Low Chadlite
+5 SD: 7.7 as 100th percentile (1/3,483,046) Roughly Mid to High Chadlite
+6 SD: 8.3 as 100th percentile (1/1,009,976,564) Roughly Low to Mid Chad
+7 SD: 8.9 as 100th percentile (1/776,348,841,126) Roughly High Chad
+8 SD: 9.5 as 100th percentile (1/1,501,199,875,790,165) Exact Mid Adamlite

MY THOUGHTS
I made this bell curve with the intention to give a realistic distribution of looks with the average being MLTN-HLTN, slightly leaning to HLTN. I feel like it's quite accurate (in my opinion as there is no real way to know) up to the +3 SD mark, then it goes off the rails and starts giving absurd numbers that are obviously just untrue JFL. To be honest, there is no real way of finding the rarity of each numerical rating, but I feel like the bell curve is a good start if anybody else wants to try quantifying facial rarity. We would need a sample of hundreds of thousands to even millions and a very accurate rating system to actually quantify the rarity of a face, but far too many people still think HTN is like top 10% or some bullshit.

@foidslayer @Dandelions @Penalizer69
 
Register to hide this ad
genio said:
NUMERICAL LOOKS SCORE BELL CURVE
View attachment 348917


BELL CURVE DISTRIBUTION
-3 SD: 2.9 as 0.135th percentile (1/741) Roughly Sub-3
-2 SD: 3.5 as 2.275th percentile (1/44) Roughly LLTN
-1 SD: 4.1 as 15.866th percentile (1/6) Roughly LLTN-MLTN
0 SD: 4.7 as 50th percentile (1/2) Roughly MLTN-HLTN
+1 SD: 5.3 as 84.134th percentile (1/6) Roughly LMTN-MMTN
+2 SD: 5.9 as 97.725th percentile (1/44) Roughly HMTN
+3 SD: 6.5 as 99.865th percentile (1/741) Exact MHTN
THE BELL CURVE IS KNOWN TO GET VERY SHAKY OVER 3 STANDARD DEVIATIONS
TAKE EVERYTHING BEYOND THIS POINT WITH A GRAIN OF SALT JFL
+4 SD: 7.1 as 99.997th percentile (1/31,560) Roughly Low Chadlite
+5 SD: 7.7 as 100th percentile (1/3,483,046) Roughly Mid to High Chadlite
+6 SD: 8.3 as 100th percentile (1/1,009,976,564) Roughly Low to Mid Chad
+7 SD: 8.9 as 100th percentile (1/776,348,841,126) Roughly High Chad
+8 SD: 9.5 as 100th percentile (1/1,501,199,875,790,165) Exact Mid Adamlite

MY THOUGHTS
I made this bell curve with the intention to give a realistic distribution of looks with the average being MLTN-HLTN, slightly leaning to HLTN. I feel like it's quite accurate (in my opinion as there is no real way to know) up to the +3 SD mark, then it goes off the rails and starts giving absurd numbers that are obviously just untrue JFL. To be honest, there is no real way of finding the rarity of each numerical rating, but I feel like the bell curve is a good start if anybody else wants to try quantifying facial rarity. We would need a sample of hundreds of thousands to even millions and a very accurate rating system to actually quantify the rarity of a face, but far too many people still think HTN is like top 10% or some bullshit.

@foidslayer @Dandelions @Penalizer69
Click to expand...
Lwk perfect graph
 
genio said:
NUMERICAL LOOKS SCORE BELL CURVE
View attachment 348917


BELL CURVE DISTRIBUTION
-3 SD: 2.9 as 0.135th percentile (1/741) Roughly Sub-3
-2 SD: 3.5 as 2.275th percentile (1/44) Roughly LLTN
-1 SD: 4.1 as 15.866th percentile (1/6) Roughly LLTN-MLTN
0 SD: 4.7 as 50th percentile (1/2) Roughly MLTN-HLTN
+1 SD: 5.3 as 84.134th percentile (1/6) Roughly LMTN-MMTN
+2 SD: 5.9 as 97.725th percentile (1/44) Roughly HMTN
+3 SD: 6.5 as 99.865th percentile (1/741) Exact MHTN
THE BELL CURVE IS KNOWN TO GET VERY SHAKY OVER 3 STANDARD DEVIATIONS
TAKE EVERYTHING BEYOND THIS POINT WITH A GRAIN OF SALT JFL
+4 SD: 7.1 as 99.997th percentile (1/31,560) Roughly Low Chadlite
+5 SD: 7.7 as 100th percentile (1/3,483,046) Roughly Mid to High Chadlite
+6 SD: 8.3 as 100th percentile (1/1,009,976,564) Roughly Low to Mid Chad
+7 SD: 8.9 as 100th percentile (1/776,348,841,126) Roughly High Chad
+8 SD: 9.5 as 100th percentile (1/1,501,199,875,790,165) Exact Mid Adamlite

MY THOUGHTS
I made this bell curve with the intention to give a realistic distribution of looks with the average being MLTN-HLTN, slightly leaning to HLTN. I feel like it's quite accurate (in my opinion as there is no real way to know) up to the +3 SD mark, then it goes off the rails and starts giving absurd numbers that are obviously just untrue JFL. To be honest, there is no real way of finding the rarity of each numerical rating, but I feel like the bell curve is a good start if anybody else wants to try quantifying facial rarity. We would need a sample of hundreds of thousands to even millions and a very accurate rating system to actually quantify the rarity of a face, but far too many people still think HTN is like top 10% or some bullshit.

@foidslayer @Dandelions @Penalizer69
Click to expand...
Yo n****r ur hacking blud gpt owner fr
 
genio said:
NUMERICAL LOOKS SCORE BELL CURVE
View attachment 348917


BELL CURVE DISTRIBUTION
-3 SD: 2.9 as 0.135th percentile (1/741) Roughly Sub-3
-2 SD: 3.5 as 2.275th percentile (1/44) Roughly LLTN
-1 SD: 4.1 as 15.866th percentile (1/6) Roughly LLTN-MLTN
0 SD: 4.7 as 50th percentile (1/2) Roughly MLTN-HLTN
+1 SD: 5.3 as 84.134th percentile (1/6) Roughly LMTN-MMTN
+2 SD: 5.9 as 97.725th percentile (1/44) Roughly HMTN
+3 SD: 6.5 as 99.865th percentile (1/741) Exact MHTN
THE BELL CURVE IS KNOWN TO GET VERY SHAKY OVER 3 STANDARD DEVIATIONS
TAKE EVERYTHING BEYOND THIS POINT WITH A GRAIN OF SALT JFL
+4 SD: 7.1 as 99.997th percentile (1/31,560) Roughly Low Chadlite
+5 SD: 7.7 as 100th percentile (1/3,483,046) Roughly Mid to High Chadlite
+6 SD: 8.3 as 100th percentile (1/1,009,976,564) Roughly Low to Mid Chad
+7 SD: 8.9 as 100th percentile (1/776,348,841,126) Roughly High Chad
+8 SD: 9.5 as 100th percentile (1/1,501,199,875,790,165) Exact Mid Adamlite

MY THOUGHTS
I made this bell curve with the intention to give a realistic distribution of looks with the average being MLTN-HLTN, slightly leaning to HLTN. I feel like it's quite accurate (in my opinion as there is no real way to know) up to the +3 SD mark, then it goes off the rails and starts giving absurd numbers that are obviously just untrue JFL. To be honest, there is no real way of finding the rarity of each numerical rating, but I feel like the bell curve is a good start if anybody else wants to try quantifying facial rarity. We would need a sample of hundreds of thousands to even millions and a very accurate rating system to actually quantify the rarity of a face, but far too many people still think HTN is like top 10% or some bullshit.

@foidslayer @Dandelions @Penalizer69
Click to expand...
Yo geino no way u wrote all that iqpill is a brutal mog icl impressed
 
Dandelions said:
Gang how is he HMTN he’s literally mogging Zeta
Click to expand...
Skull mog maybe
That n***a nose is ugly and i dont like his haircut
Also i rated zeta based off my prior knowledge of him and his mog videos ive watched
Other n***a idk
 
genio said:
THE BELL CURVE IS KNOWN TO GET VERY SHAKY OVER 3 STANDARD DEVIATIONS
TAKE EVERYTHING BEYOND THIS POINT WITH A GRAIN OF SALT JFL
+4 SD: 7.1 as 99.997th percentile (1/31,560) Roughly Low Chadlite
+5 SD: 7.7 as 100th percentile (1/3,483,046) Roughly Mid to High Chadlite
+6 SD: 8.3 as 100th percentile (1/1,009,976,564) Roughly Low to Mid Chad
+7 SD: 8.9 as 100th percentile (1/776,348,841,126) Roughly High Chad
+8 SD: 9.5 as 100th percentile (1/1,501,199,875,790,165) Exact Mid Adamlite
Click to expand...
after a certain point tho attractiveness becomes very subjective. I've seen people give examples of stacys that I though looked more like MTBs
 
icnone said:
after a certain point tho attractiveness becomes very subjective. I've seen people give examples of stacys that I though looked more like MTBs
Click to expand...
n***a thats not even the point
 
genio said:
NUMERICAL LOOKS SCORE BELL CURVE
View attachment 348917


BELL CURVE DISTRIBUTION
-3 SD: 2.9 as 0.135th percentile (1/741) Roughly Sub-3
-2 SD: 3.5 as 2.275th percentile (1/44) Roughly LLTN
-1 SD: 4.1 as 15.866th percentile (1/6) Roughly LLTN-MLTN
0 SD: 4.7 as 50th percentile (1/2) Roughly MLTN-HLTN
+1 SD: 5.3 as 84.134th percentile (1/6) Roughly LMTN-MMTN
+2 SD: 5.9 as 97.725th percentile (1/44) Roughly HMTN
+3 SD: 6.5 as 99.865th percentile (1/741) Exact MHTN
THE BELL CURVE IS KNOWN TO GET VERY SHAKY OVER 3 STANDARD DEVIATIONS
TAKE EVERYTHING BEYOND THIS POINT WITH A GRAIN OF SALT JFL
+4 SD: 7.1 as 99.997th percentile (1/31,560) Roughly Low Chadlite
+5 SD: 7.7 as 100th percentile (1/3,483,046) Roughly Mid to High Chadlite
+6 SD: 8.3 as 100th percentile (1/1,009,976,564) Roughly Low to Mid Chad
+7 SD: 8.9 as 100th percentile (1/776,348,841,126) Roughly High Chad
+8 SD: 9.5 as 100th percentile (1/1,501,199,875,790,165) Exact Mid Adamlite

MY THOUGHTS
I made this bell curve with the intention to give a realistic distribution of looks with the average being MLTN-HLTN, slightly leaning to HLTN. I feel like it's quite accurate (in my opinion as there is no real way to know) up to the +3 SD mark, then it goes off the rails and starts giving absurd numbers that are obviously just untrue JFL. To be honest, there is no real way of finding the rarity of each numerical rating, but I feel like the bell curve is a good start if anybody else wants to try quantifying facial rarity. We would need a sample of hundreds of thousands to even millions and a very accurate rating system to actually quantify the rarity of a face, but far too many people still think HTN is like top 10% or some bullshit.

@foidslayer @Dandelions @Penalizer69
Click to expand...
and still it will be incorrect
 
kys said:
no shit

pretty sure there are better chances rather than 1 in 8 billion
Click to expand...
n***a did you read the part where it says after 3 sd its shaky and shluld be taken with a grain of salt
 
genio said:
n***a did you read the part where it says after 3 sd its shaky and shluld be taken with a grain of salt
Click to expand...
n***a just wokeup ANYTHING to make you seem wrong + wait a couple of hours nd i'll reread it and give muh opinion
 
kys said:
n***a just wokeup ANYTHING to make you seem wrong + wait a couple of hours nd i'll reread it and give muh opinion
Click to expand...
Shut up n****r
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (Looksmaxxers: 0, Guests: 1)
Back
Top