Hypothesis Bell Curve of Numerical Ratings (Theoretical)

[genio]

not far off hmtn by july lhtn by dec

Lms ur face

 

[mtren]

Lms ur face

elaborate?

 

[genio]

elaborate?

Wyll n***a pm me

 

[mtren]

Wyll n***a pm me

alright lemme get them frauding pics

 

[Deleted Member 100091]

NUMERICAL LOOKS SCORE BELL CURVE
View attachment 348917


BELL CURVE DISTRIBUTION
-3 SD: 2.9 as 0.135th percentile (1/741) Roughly Sub-3
-2 SD: 3.5 as 2.275th percentile (1/44) Roughly LLTN
-1 SD: 4.1 as 15.866th percentile (1/6) Roughly LLTN-MLTN
0 SD: 4.7 as 50th percentile (1/2) Roughly MLTN-HLTN
+1 SD: 5.3 as 84.134th percentile (1/6) Roughly LMTN-MMTN
+2 SD: 5.9 as 97.725th percentile (1/44) Roughly HMTN
+3 SD: 6.5 as 99.865th percentile (1/741) Exact MHTN
THE BELL CURVE IS KNOWN TO GET VERY SHAKY OVER 3 STANDARD DEVIATIONS
TAKE EVERYTHING BEYOND THIS POINT WITH A GRAIN OF SALT JFL
+4 SD: 7.1 as 99.997th percentile (1/31,560) Roughly Low Chadlite
+5 SD: 7.7 as 100th percentile (1/3,483,046) Roughly Mid to High Chadlite
+6 SD: 8.3 as 100th percentile (1/1,009,976,564) Roughly Low to Mid Chad
+7 SD: 8.9 as 100th percentile (1/776,348,841,126) Roughly High Chad
+8 SD: 9.5 as 100th percentile (1/1,501,199,875,790,165) Exact Mid Adamlite

MY THOUGHTS
I made this bell curve with the intention to give a realistic distribution of looks with the average being MLTN-HLTN, slightly leaning to HLTN. I feel like it's quite accurate (in my opinion as there is no real way to know) up to the +3 SD mark, then it goes off the rails and starts giving absurd numbers that are obviously just untrue JFL. To be honest, there is no real way of finding the rarity of each numerical rating, but I feel like the bell curve is a good start if anybody else wants to try quantifying facial rarity. We would need a sample of hundreds of thousands to even millions and a very accurate rating system to actually quantify the rarity of a face, but far too many people still think HTN is like top 10% or some bullshit.

@foidslayer @Dandelions @Penalizer69

Curious to know if you thought of this because you got inspired by looksiq, since the site also displays the user's placement on the bell curve.

 

[Deleted Member 100091]

Curious to know if you thought of this because you got inspired by looksiq, since the site also displays the user's placement on the bell curve.

Also, based on how you categorize the distribution, I am a HLTB-LMTB (111 looksiq, a little less than +1 SD).

 

[catlady]

NUMERICAL LOOKS SCORE BELL CURVE
View attachment 348917


BELL CURVE DISTRIBUTION
-3 SD: 2.9 as 0.135th percentile (1/741) Roughly Sub-3
-2 SD: 3.5 as 2.275th percentile (1/44) Roughly LLTN
-1 SD: 4.1 as 15.866th percentile (1/6) Roughly LLTN-MLTN
0 SD: 4.7 as 50th percentile (1/2) Roughly MLTN-HLTN
+1 SD: 5.3 as 84.134th percentile (1/6) Roughly LMTN-MMTN
+2 SD: 5.9 as 97.725th percentile (1/44) Roughly HMTN
+3 SD: 6.5 as 99.865th percentile (1/741) Exact MHTN
THE BELL CURVE IS KNOWN TO GET VERY SHAKY OVER 3 STANDARD DEVIATIONS
TAKE EVERYTHING BEYOND THIS POINT WITH A GRAIN OF SALT JFL
+4 SD: 7.1 as 99.997th percentile (1/31,560) Roughly Low Chadlite
+5 SD: 7.7 as 100th percentile (1/3,483,046) Roughly Mid to High Chadlite
+6 SD: 8.3 as 100th percentile (1/1,009,976,564) Roughly Low to Mid Chad
+7 SD: 8.9 as 100th percentile (1/776,348,841,126) Roughly High Chad
+8 SD: 9.5 as 100th percentile (1/1,501,199,875,790,165) Exact Mid Adamlite

MY THOUGHTS
I made this bell curve with the intention to give a realistic distribution of looks with the average being MLTN-HLTN, slightly leaning to HLTN. I feel like it's quite accurate (in my opinion as there is no real way to know) up to the +3 SD mark, then it goes off the rails and starts giving absurd numbers that are obviously just untrue JFL. To be honest, there is no real way of finding the rarity of each numerical rating, but I feel like the bell curve is a good start if anybody else wants to try quantifying facial rarity. We would need a sample of hundreds of thousands to even millions and a very accurate rating system to actually quantify the rarity of a face, but far too many people still think HTN is like top 10% or some bullshit.

@foidslayer @Dandelions @Penalizer69

I was wondering if it would be better to have a different one for each country tbh. Why would you need to compare yourself to people you will never see?

 

[genio]

Curious to know if you thought of this because you got inspired by looksiq, since the site also displays the user's placement on the bell curve.

Idk wtf looksiq is

 

[genio]

I was wondering if it would be better to have a different one for each country tbh. Why would you need to compare yourself to people you will never see?

n***a im not making one for every country

 

[genio]

NUMERICAL LOOKS SCORE BELL CURVE
View attachment 348917


BELL CURVE DISTRIBUTION
-3 SD: 2.9 as 0.135th percentile (1/741) Roughly Sub-3
-2 SD: 3.5 as 2.275th percentile (1/44) Roughly LLTN
-1 SD: 4.1 as 15.866th percentile (1/6) Roughly LLTN-MLTN
0 SD: 4.7 as 50th percentile (1/2) Roughly MLTN-HLTN
+1 SD: 5.3 as 84.134th percentile (1/6) Roughly LMTN-MMTN
+2 SD: 5.9 as 97.725th percentile (1/44) Roughly HMTN
+3 SD: 6.5 as 99.865th percentile (1/741) Exact MHTN
THE BELL CURVE IS KNOWN TO GET VERY SHAKY OVER 3 STANDARD DEVIATIONS
TAKE EVERYTHING BEYOND THIS POINT WITH A GRAIN OF SALT JFL
+4 SD: 7.1 as 99.997th percentile (1/31,560) Roughly Low Chadlite
+5 SD: 7.7 as 100th percentile (1/3,483,046) Roughly Mid to High Chadlite
+6 SD: 8.3 as 100th percentile (1/1,009,976,564) Roughly Low to Mid Chad
+7 SD: 8.9 as 100th percentile (1/776,348,841,126) Roughly High Chad
+8 SD: 9.5 as 100th percentile (1/1,501,199,875,790,165) Exact Mid Adamlite

MY THOUGHTS
I made this bell curve with the intention to give a realistic distribution of looks with the average being MLTN-HLTN, slightly leaning to HLTN. I feel like it's quite accurate (in my opinion as there is no real way to know) up to the +3 SD mark, then it goes off the rails and starts giving absurd numbers that are obviously just untrue JFL. To be honest, there is no real way of finding the rarity of each numerical rating, but I feel like the bell curve is a good start if anybody else wants to try quantifying facial rarity. We would need a sample of hundreds of thousands to even millions and a very accurate rating system to actually quantify the rarity of a face, but far too many people still think HTN is like top 10% or some bullshit.

@foidslayer @Dandelions @Penalizer69

@depersonalized

 

[trvecel]

NUMERICAL LOOKS SCORE BELL CURVE
View attachment 348917


BELL CURVE DISTRIBUTION
-3 SD: 2.9 as 0.135th percentile (1/741) Roughly Sub-3
-2 SD: 3.5 as 2.275th percentile (1/44) Roughly LLTN
-1 SD: 4.1 as 15.866th percentile (1/6) Roughly LLTN-MLTN
0 SD: 4.7 as 50th percentile (1/2) Roughly MLTN-HLTN
+1 SD: 5.3 as 84.134th percentile (1/6) Roughly LMTN-MMTN
+2 SD: 5.9 as 97.725th percentile (1/44) Roughly HMTN
+3 SD: 6.5 as 99.865th percentile (1/741) Exact MHTN
THE BELL CURVE IS KNOWN TO GET VERY SHAKY OVER 3 STANDARD DEVIATIONS
TAKE EVERYTHING BEYOND THIS POINT WITH A GRAIN OF SALT JFL
+4 SD: 7.1 as 99.997th percentile (1/31,560) Roughly Low Chadlite
+5 SD: 7.7 as 100th percentile (1/3,483,046) Roughly Mid to High Chadlite
+6 SD: 8.3 as 100th percentile (1/1,009,976,564) Roughly Low to Mid Chad
+7 SD: 8.9 as 100th percentile (1/776,348,841,126) Roughly High Chad
+8 SD: 9.5 as 100th percentile (1/1,501,199,875,790,165) Exact Mid Adamlite

MY THOUGHTS
I made this bell curve with the intention to give a realistic distribution of looks with the average being MLTN-HLTN, slightly leaning to HLTN. I feel like it's quite accurate (in my opinion as there is no real way to know) up to the +3 SD mark, then it goes off the rails and starts giving absurd numbers that are obviously just untrue JFL. To be honest, there is no real way of finding the rarity of each numerical rating, but I feel like the bell curve is a good start if anybody else wants to try quantifying facial rarity. We would need a sample of hundreds of thousands to even millions and a very accurate rating system to actually quantify the rarity of a face, but far too many people still think HTN is like top 10% or some bullshit.

@foidslayer @Dandelions @Penalizer69

Not a single word

I'm around here tho

 

[trvecel]

Adamlite

Kill yourself fucking n****r I hope you get r***d by several autistic clowns outside a cuck e cheese, I hope you get extorted by the mouse who lives in your walls, I hope your mom walks in on you while you're nutting, I hope that you trip over a banana like in Mario kart and fracture your skull making you a vegetable for your entire life, I hope Ronnie mcnutt gets resurrected just to give you a wedgie and dunk your head in a dirty toilet @Blackpillirony

 

[settings]

NUMERICAL LOOKS SCORE BELL CURVE
View attachment 348917


BELL CURVE DISTRIBUTION
-3 SD: 2.9 as 0.135th percentile (1/741) Roughly Sub-3
-2 SD: 3.5 as 2.275th percentile (1/44) Roughly LLTN
-1 SD: 4.1 as 15.866th percentile (1/6) Roughly LLTN-MLTN
0 SD: 4.7 as 50th percentile (1/2) Roughly MLTN-HLTN
+1 SD: 5.3 as 84.134th percentile (1/6) Roughly LMTN-MMTN
+2 SD: 5.9 as 97.725th percentile (1/44) Roughly HMTN
+3 SD: 6.5 as 99.865th percentile (1/741) Exact MHTN
THE BELL CURVE IS KNOWN TO GET VERY SHAKY OVER 3 STANDARD DEVIATIONS
TAKE EVERYTHING BEYOND THIS POINT WITH A GRAIN OF SALT JFL
+4 SD: 7.1 as 99.997th percentile (1/31,560) Roughly Low Chadlite
+5 SD: 7.7 as 100th percentile (1/3,483,046) Roughly Mid to High Chadlite
+6 SD: 8.3 as 100th percentile (1/1,009,976,564) Roughly Low to Mid Chad
+7 SD: 8.9 as 100th percentile (1/776,348,841,126) Roughly High Chad
+8 SD: 9.5 as 100th percentile (1/1,501,199,875,790,165) Exact Mid Adamlite

MY THOUGHTS
I made this bell curve with the intention to give a realistic distribution of looks with the average being MLTN-HLTN, slightly leaning to HLTN. I feel like it's quite accurate (in my opinion as there is no real way to know) up to the +3 SD mark, then it goes off the rails and starts giving absurd numbers that are obviously just untrue JFL. To be honest, there is no real way of finding the rarity of each numerical rating, but I feel like the bell curve is a good start if anybody else wants to try quantifying facial rarity. We would need a sample of hundreds of thousands to even millions and a very accurate rating system to actually quantify the rarity of a face, but far too many people still think HTN is like top 10% or some bullshit.

@foidslayer @Dandelions @Penalizer69

kys and your pseudoscience

 

[hfmogger]

NUMERICAL LOOKS SCORE BELL CURVE
View attachment 348917


BELL CURVE DISTRIBUTION
-3 SD: 2.9 as 0.135th percentile (1/741) Roughly Sub-3
-2 SD: 3.5 as 2.275th percentile (1/44) Roughly LLTN
-1 SD: 4.1 as 15.866th percentile (1/6) Roughly LLTN-MLTN
0 SD: 4.7 as 50th percentile (1/2) Roughly MLTN-HLTN
+1 SD: 5.3 as 84.134th percentile (1/6) Roughly LMTN-MMTN
+2 SD: 5.9 as 97.725th percentile (1/44) Roughly HMTN
+3 SD: 6.5 as 99.865th percentile (1/741) Exact MHTN
THE BELL CURVE IS KNOWN TO GET VERY SHAKY OVER 3 STANDARD DEVIATIONS
TAKE EVERYTHING BEYOND THIS POINT WITH A GRAIN OF SALT JFL
+4 SD: 7.1 as 99.997th percentile (1/31,560) Roughly Low Chadlite
+5 SD: 7.7 as 100th percentile (1/3,483,046) Roughly Mid to High Chadlite
+6 SD: 8.3 as 100th percentile (1/1,009,976,564) Roughly Low to Mid Chad
+7 SD: 8.9 as 100th percentile (1/776,348,841,126) Roughly High Chad
+8 SD: 9.5 as 100th percentile (1/1,501,199,875,790,165) Exact Mid Adamlite

MY THOUGHTS
I made this bell curve with the intention to give a realistic distribution of looks with the average being MLTN-HLTN, slightly leaning to HLTN. I feel like it's quite accurate (in my opinion as there is no real way to know) up to the +3 SD mark, then it goes off the rails and starts giving absurd numbers that are obviously just untrue JFL. To be honest, there is no real way of finding the rarity of each numerical rating, but I feel like the bell curve is a good start if anybody else wants to try quantifying facial rarity. We would need a sample of hundreds of thousands to even millions and a very accurate rating system to actually quantify the rarity of a face, but far too many people still think HTN is like top 10% or some bullshit.

@foidslayer @Dandelions @Penalizer69

is this PSL? LTN is 3.5-4.5.

 

[genio]

is this PSL? LTN is 3.5-4.5.

Not PSL
1-10

 

[osakasim]

NUMERICAL LOOKS SCORE BELL CURVE
View attachment 348917


BELL CURVE DISTRIBUTION
-3 SD: 2.9 as 0.135th percentile (1/741) Roughly Sub-3
-2 SD: 3.5 as 2.275th percentile (1/44) Roughly LLTN
-1 SD: 4.1 as 15.866th percentile (1/6) Roughly LLTN-MLTN
0 SD: 4.7 as 50th percentile (1/2) Roughly MLTN-HLTN
+1 SD: 5.3 as 84.134th percentile (1/6) Roughly LMTN-MMTN
+2 SD: 5.9 as 97.725th percentile (1/44) Roughly HMTN
+3 SD: 6.5 as 99.865th percentile (1/741) Exact MHTN
THE BELL CURVE IS KNOWN TO GET VERY SHAKY OVER 3 STANDARD DEVIATIONS
TAKE EVERYTHING BEYOND THIS POINT WITH A GRAIN OF SALT JFL
+4 SD: 7.1 as 99.997th percentile (1/31,560) Roughly Low Chadlite
+5 SD: 7.7 as 100th percentile (1/3,483,046) Roughly Mid to High Chadlite
+6 SD: 8.3 as 100th percentile (1/1,009,976,564) Roughly Low to Mid Chad
+7 SD: 8.9 as 100th percentile (1/776,348,841,126) Roughly High Chad
+8 SD: 9.5 as 100th percentile (1/1,501,199,875,790,165) Exact Mid Adamlite

MY THOUGHTS
I made this bell curve with the intention to give a realistic distribution of looks with the average being MLTN-HLTN, slightly leaning to HLTN. I feel like it's quite accurate (in my opinion as there is no real way to know) up to the +3 SD mark, then it goes off the rails and starts giving absurd numbers that are obviously just untrue JFL. To be honest, there is no real way of finding the rarity of each numerical rating, but I feel like the bell curve is a good start if anybody else wants to try quantifying facial rarity. We would need a sample of hundreds of thousands to even millions and a very accurate rating system to actually quantify the rarity of a face, but far too many people still think HTN is like top 10% or some bullshit.

@foidslayer @Dandelions @Penalizer69

is this what anthropologists do