Join 20,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!


    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website are not engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. Do not use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. Do not begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Brutal Sugar Pill

You can say that this reasearch is written by 'vegan propaganda',but they even recommend eating some meat.Anyways,more plants and less animal products-->better for longevity.I haven't found study that says otherwise
That's because most of these studies are junk psuedoscience as usual.

Red meat causes cancer because it has a low smoke point, its the same principle that the anti-weedlets used to denigrate weed. Weed only causes cancer because you literally light it on fire, just as breathing smoke fumes of any substance generally is carcinogenic. In theory, if you only heat red meat to 200 F it should not be carcinogenic then. You should still reduce your red meat intake anyway, since its extremely energy inefficient to produce red meat as compared to other things such as soy, thus by eating red meat you will naturally increase the rate of climate change and carbon emissions.

Similar threads