Join 82,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Dimorphism > Misc GTFIH

It doesn’t matter whose fucking wrong or fucking right the only thing an argument is useful for is to figure out what is true
But this whole thing isn’t even practical to improving your looks I don’t see any purpose in continuing
It’s like a n***a who is leaner is gonna look dimorphic that should be fucking water but ig not
The point is that increasing your dimo will increase harmony and ang

meaning dimo is more important to focus on than misc if both were low
 
The point is that increasing your dimo will increase harmony and ang
Dimo can decrease harmony too it’s not fucking linear positive correlation stupid n****r
120% bigonial = insane dimo, shit harmony
meaning dimo is more important to focus on than misc if both were low
n***a JUST FUCKING DO BOTH IT DOESNT MATTER LMAOOOO
 
Dimo can decrease harmony too it’s not fucking linear positive correlation stupid n****r
120% bigonial = insane dimo, shit harmony

n***a JUST FUCKING DO BOTH IT DOESNT MATTER LMAOOOO
If you only had enough for tret would you blast it or go buy some cleanser n***a
 
I would get more fucking money and buy fucking $0.50 skincare from indiamart alongside my $17 vial of tren n***a 😂😂😂
50 cent skincare it's like you're asking for indian piss to be slathered across your forehead
 

DIMORPHISM > MISC

Why dimorphism has more importance than its standalone weighting suggests

​




THE CORE IDEA​


Dimorphism has a relatively low standalone weighting, sitting around 20% alongside angularity.

Looking at that number alone makes dimorphism appear less important than other categories.

But dimorphism has significant cross-category influence.


It feeds directly into both harmony and angularity, which means its practical influence extends far beyond its standalone percentage.





DIMORPHISM -> HARMONY​


Harmony has a much higher weighting than dimorphism itself.

A major reason dimorphism is important is that it contributes heavily to how the face is perceived as a cohesive whole.

Dimorphism affects the masculine/feminine expression of the facial structure, which in turn affects how the different features interact with one another.

​

Because harmony carries a high weighting, dimorphism's influence through harmony is much larger than its standalone weighting suggests.





DIMORPHISM -> ANGULARITY​


The same principle applies to angularity.

Angular features don't exist independently from sexual dimorphism. The way a face reads as angular, robust, sharp or structurally defined is heavily influenced by its dimorphic characteristics.

In other words, a large part of what makes male facial structure appear strongly angular is the underlying masculine structural development.


This creates another major cross-category relationship.

And because angularity itself is a significant category, this further increases the practical importance of dimorphism.






THE EFFECT​


Dimorphism therefore isn't isolated to its own 20% category.

Its influence branches into multiple heavily relevant aspects of facial aesthetics:




DIMORPHISM



↙       ↘



HARMONY    ANGULARITY



↘       ↙



OVERALL RATING

​

This is why

"Dimorphism is only 20%, therefore it isn't very important."


doesn't accurately represent its total influence.

The 20% is its standalone category weighting, not the full amount of influence it has throughout the entire assessment.






DIMORPHISM VS MISC​


Miscellaneous traits generally have much less cross-category influence.

Dimorphism affects:

➜ Its own category

➜ Harmony
➜ Angularity

Misc doesn't have the same level of influence across major categories.

So even if misc and dimorphism were given similar standalone consideration, dimorphism would still have greater practical importance because of its cross-category effects.





TL;DR


Dimorphism ≈ 20% standalone

But dimorphism strongly influences

HARMONY

+
ANGULARITY

Both are major components of overall facial aesthetics.

So its effective influence is considerably greater than its raw percentage suggests.

DIMORPHISM > MISC
​


Don't ever tag me again.
 

DIMORPHISM > MISC

Why dimorphism has more importance than its standalone weighting suggests

​




THE CORE IDEA​


Dimorphism has a relatively low standalone weighting, sitting around 20% alongside angularity.

Looking at that number alone makes dimorphism appear less important than other categories.

But dimorphism has significant cross-category influence.


It feeds directly into both harmony and angularity, which means its practical influence extends far beyond its standalone percentage.





DIMORPHISM -> HARMONY​


Harmony has a much higher weighting than dimorphism itself.

A major reason dimorphism is important is that it contributes heavily to how the face is perceived as a cohesive whole.

Dimorphism affects the masculine/feminine expression of the facial structure, which in turn affects how the different features interact with one another.

​

Because harmony carries a high weighting, dimorphism's influence through harmony is much larger than its standalone weighting suggests.





DIMORPHISM -> ANGULARITY​


The same principle applies to angularity.

Angular features don't exist independently from sexual dimorphism. The way a face reads as angular, robust, sharp or structurally defined is heavily influenced by its dimorphic characteristics.

In other words, a large part of what makes male facial structure appear strongly angular is the underlying masculine structural development.


This creates another major cross-category relationship.

And because angularity itself is a significant category, this further increases the practical importance of dimorphism.






THE EFFECT​


Dimorphism therefore isn't isolated to its own 20% category.

Its influence branches into multiple heavily relevant aspects of facial aesthetics:




DIMORPHISM



↙       ↘



HARMONY    ANGULARITY



↘       ↙



OVERALL RATING

​

This is why

"Dimorphism is only 20%, therefore it isn't very important."


doesn't accurately represent its total influence.

The 20% is its standalone category weighting, not the full amount of influence it has throughout the entire assessment.






DIMORPHISM VS MISC​


Miscellaneous traits generally have much less cross-category influence.

Dimorphism affects:

➜ Its own category

➜ Harmony
➜ Angularity

Misc doesn't have the same level of influence across major categories.

So even if misc and dimorphism were given similar standalone consideration, dimorphism would still have greater practical importance because of its cross-category effects.





TL;DR


Dimorphism ≈ 20% standalone

But dimorphism strongly influences

HARMONY

+
ANGULARITY

Both are major components of overall facial aesthetics.

So its effective influence is considerably greater than its raw percentage suggests.

DIMORPHISM > MISC
​


does thsi mean im chad?
 

DIMORPHISM > MISC

Why dimorphism has more importance than its standalone weighting suggests

​




THE CORE IDEA​


Dimorphism has a relatively low standalone weighting, sitting around 20% alongside angularity.

Looking at that number alone makes dimorphism appear less important than other categories.

But dimorphism has significant cross-category influence.


It feeds directly into both harmony and angularity, which means its practical influence extends far beyond its standalone percentage.





DIMORPHISM -> HARMONY​


Harmony has a much higher weighting than dimorphism itself.

A major reason dimorphism is important is that it contributes heavily to how the face is perceived as a cohesive whole.

Dimorphism affects the masculine/feminine expression of the facial structure, which in turn affects how the different features interact with one another.

​

Because harmony carries a high weighting, dimorphism's influence through harmony is much larger than its standalone weighting suggests.





DIMORPHISM -> ANGULARITY​


The same principle applies to angularity.

Angular features don't exist independently from sexual dimorphism. The way a face reads as angular, robust, sharp or structurally defined is heavily influenced by its dimorphic characteristics.

In other words, a large part of what makes male facial structure appear strongly angular is the underlying masculine structural development.


This creates another major cross-category relationship.

And because angularity itself is a significant category, this further increases the practical importance of dimorphism.






THE EFFECT​


Dimorphism therefore isn't isolated to its own 20% category.

Its influence branches into multiple heavily relevant aspects of facial aesthetics:




DIMORPHISM



↙       ↘



HARMONY    ANGULARITY



↘       ↙



OVERALL RATING

​

This is why

"Dimorphism is only 20%, therefore it isn't very important."


doesn't accurately represent its total influence.

The 20% is its standalone category weighting, not the full amount of influence it has throughout the entire assessment.






DIMORPHISM VS MISC​


Miscellaneous traits generally have much less cross-category influence.

Dimorphism affects:

➜ Its own category

➜ Harmony
➜ Angularity

Misc doesn't have the same level of influence across major categories.

So even if misc and dimorphism were given similar standalone consideration, dimorphism would still have greater practical importance because of its cross-category effects.





TL;DR


Dimorphism ≈ 20% standalone

But dimorphism strongly influences

HARMONY

+
ANGULARITY

Both are major components of overall facial aesthetics.

So its effective influence is considerably greater than its raw percentage suggests.

DIMORPHISM > MISC
​


Since when are 50 people active on this forum
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top