Join 75,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

@emeraldpill

genio

tren and forget | 120131
Reputable ★★★
Established ★★★
Joined
Apr 8, 2026
Messages
21,153
Solutions
69
Online time
1mo 5d
Reputation
51,307
Screenshot_20260601_132058_Chrome-1.webp

@emeraldpill
 
Register to hide this ad
I know this study has been cited a lot in the community already but not on .com so
 
No but the roids would make a 5 year old look too muscular that’s weird
 
No significant difference is not the same as no effect especially in a trial this size, a difference would have to be large to be statistically significant

Also idk because it doesn’t clarify but if they’re repeating the same test 3 times you’d assume both groups would improve regardless of treatment? Same as people can ‘improve’ iq by practicing or repeating tests
This would make it harder to distinguish a difference

And I haven’t read the study so maybe bullshit but a 2025 one says th opposite

In that cohort, memory impairment occurred in 21.9% of the letrozole-plus-GH group versus 6.3% on anastrozole and 0% on the GnRH analog, with some children also reporting anxiety and sleep problems. The authors explicitly note that cognitive function and risk-taking behaviour may be affected by AI treatment, and that letrozole readily crosses the blood–brain barrier in primates.

Different approach so it’s hard to compare it directly but not worth discarding
 
No significant difference is not the same as no effect especially in a trial this size, a difference would have to be large to be statistically significant

Also idk because it doesn’t clarify but if they’re repeating the same test 3 times you’d assume both groups would improve regardless of treatment? Same as people can ‘improve’ iq by practicing or repeating tests
This would make it harder to distinguish a difference

And I haven’t read the study so maybe bullshit but a 2025 one says th opposite



Different approach so it’s hard to compare it directly but not worth discarding
Yeh id advise to take DHED anyways if someone was planning to nuke e2 and had the money but i think its safe tbh
 
Yeh id advise to take DHED anyways if someone was planning to nuke e2 and had the money but i think its safe tbh
Is there any real source for dhed?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top