Join 65,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Discussion Extremes are always beneficial(Theory)

Userwasnotthere

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 12, 2025
Messages
237
Time Online
1d 4h
Reputation
440
Peacock theory is wrong because it is reversed.
Huge useless tail to signal females that tou are fit enough to afford such tail.

WRONG!

What is more likelly, is that extreme drive off competition.

Example:

disgustingly musclar men, often turn off some women, but the ones that remain will cheat less often on those guys often because the men around will be insecure and intimidated.

Same strategy goes for women.

Women obsess with being as thin and beautiful as possible not because it attracts more mates but because of female competition.

Men build muscles in prison where there are only men, to drive off other men.

Women prostitute themselves with male guards in prison in exchange for weight loss drugs and makeup, to drive off competition.

So even when attracting the opposite gender is not possible because they are in literal prison. Both women and men care about reaching physical extremes.


What do you think about my line of thought?
 
Register to hide this ad
so many retards on this forum recently
 
no i would say you, @AscensionOnly and a few more
That's funny, because I'd say you're one of the retards as well. It's my word against yours. See how stupid your "judgments" are?

You're not in your safe space and you won't be treated specially for having a cumhole.
 
That's funny, because I'd say you're one of the retards
Coming from an obnoxious, raging, incel, this doesnt really bother me the way you think it would. I’ll enjoy my life with my handsome boyfriend while you stay behind your computer and cope about his height 🥹
 
Coming from an obnoxious, raging, incel,
There it is, just like I said women do.

You are pathetically and hilariously predictable.

No argument = "Incel, teehee."

this doesnt really bother me the way you think it would.
I don't care whether it bothers you or not. I'm not trying to bother you. I'm just replying to your comments.

But it certainly bothers you a bit, otherwise you would just let it go and move on, but you have an urge to reply because you know the things I said are true.

I’ll enjoy my life with my handsome boyfriend while you stay behind your computer and cope about his height 🥹

"Enjoy my life" = Argue with random people on an obscure internet forum.

While Stacies live the time of their lives, you spend your days rotting on this forum like the "incels" you despise.

While Stacies enjoy their lives, you argue with "incels" online.

So are you really enjoying life? I think not. I think your life is a worse kinda experience that Stacies have, but there's nothing you can do about it because you're a low-tier-Becky and nothing more, sweetheart.
 
Peacock theory is wrong because it is reversed.
Huge useless tail to signal females that tou are fit enough to afford such tail.

WRONG!

What is more likelly, is that extreme drive off competition.

Example:

disgustingly musclar men, often turn off some women, but the ones that remain will cheat less often on those guys often because the men around will be insecure and intimidated.

Same strategy goes for women.

Women obsess with being as thin and beautiful as possible not because it attracts more mates but because of female competition.

Men build muscles in prison where there are only men, to drive off other men.

Women prostitute themselves with male guards in prison in exchange for weight loss drugs and makeup, to drive off competition.

So even when attracting the opposite gender is not possible because they are in literal prison. Both women and men care about reaching physical extremes.


What do you think about my line of thought?
Your thoughts are quite interesting and align with the concept of 'Intrasexual Selection' in evolutionary psychology. The idea that extreme physical traits sometimes repel the opposite sex but exert pressure on one's own sex is a scientifically debated topic.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top