Userwasnotthere
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2025
- Messages
- 237
- Time Online
- 1d 4h
- Reputation
- 440
Peacock theory is wrong because it is reversed.
Huge useless tail to signal females that tou are fit enough to afford such tail.
WRONG!
What is more likelly, is that extreme drive off competition.
Example:
disgustingly musclar men, often turn off some women, but the ones that remain will cheat less often on those guys often because the men around will be insecure and intimidated.
Same strategy goes for women.
Women obsess with being as thin and beautiful as possible not because it attracts more mates but because of female competition.
Men build muscles in prison where there are only men, to drive off other men.
Women prostitute themselves with male guards in prison in exchange for weight loss drugs and makeup, to drive off competition.
So even when attracting the opposite gender is not possible because they are in literal prison. Both women and men care about reaching physical extremes.
What do you think about my line of thought?
Huge useless tail to signal females that tou are fit enough to afford such tail.
WRONG!
What is more likelly, is that extreme drive off competition.
Example:
disgustingly musclar men, often turn off some women, but the ones that remain will cheat less often on those guys often because the men around will be insecure and intimidated.
Same strategy goes for women.
Women obsess with being as thin and beautiful as possible not because it attracts more mates but because of female competition.
Men build muscles in prison where there are only men, to drive off other men.
Women prostitute themselves with male guards in prison in exchange for weight loss drugs and makeup, to drive off competition.
So even when attracting the opposite gender is not possible because they are in literal prison. Both women and men care about reaching physical extremes.
What do you think about my line of thought?