Join 68,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

it’s illegal to criticise islam in the uk now

Sorry but do you understand why the rates are lower? Because of things like marital r**e. r**e gets underrepresented because it puts women in danger, because action is rarley taken.

In western countries the numbers are "higher" because it's safer and more likely to get correctly dealt with (while the numbers are still in the low single digit percentages)
underreporting is a real issue in many placesincluding some Muslim-majority countries. But it’s not unique to them. Even in Western countries, a large percentage of assaults go unreported due to fear, stigma, or lack of trust in the system. So you can’t simply say “higher reported rates = safer societies” or “lower rates = all hidden” both sides have reporting gaps.
Also, it’s not accurate to claim lower rates are mainly because of ignoring marital r**e. Legal definitions, cultural norms, policing, family structures, and overall crime levels all affect statistics. Reducing it to one factor is cherry-picking. and importantly, Islam as a framework (through concepts like nikah) doesn’t explicitly permit r**e so youreblaming the religion itself for reporting issues mixes up law, culture, and enforcement.
 
You’re mixing a few different points and some don’t hold up well

yes power dynamics and social pressure can exist in any society, including some Muslim ones. That’s a real criticism of how rules are applied culturally. But that’s different from saying Islam itself endorses coercion. The nikah framework still includes mutual rights and a clear principle of no harm, even if some interpretations skew male authority
Your whole arguement here is yes but maybe not. Anyway we all know harm is defined differently and questionably by many different cultures and religions.
the claim that people are “born rapists” isn’t supported behavior like that is shaped by environment, psychology, and choices, not fixed destiny.
This is like saying gay people aren't born gay. Just because we can't pinpoint exactly why they're gay doesn't mean that if they were raised any different they wouldn't be. The fact that r**e and similar behaviours are so common in the west still proves otherwise in fact.

Your whole point was that rapists can somehow be prevented anyways which is untrue. Look at the sex crime reoffence rates
 
Your whole arguement here is yes but maybe not. Anyway we all know harm is defined differently and questionably by many different cultures and religions.

This is like saying gay people aren't born gay. Just because we can't pinpoint exactly why they're gay doesn't mean that if they were raised any different they wouldn't be. The fact that r**e and similar behaviours are so common in the west still proves otherwise in fact.

Your whole point was that rapists can somehow be prevented anyways which is untrue. Look at the sex crime reoffence rates
Being “born gay” is supported by evidence from genetics, brain development, and lifelong patterns not just upbringing. r**e, on the other hand, is a criminal behavior with no biological marker or fixed identity the way sexual orientation is studied in humans. So the comparison doesn’t hold scientifically.
Sex crime recidivism also doesn’t prove people are “born rapists.” It shows that some offenders have high reoffending risk, especially without treatment or supervision vut many do not reoffend, and rates vary widely depending on intervention, psychology, and environment. That points to behavioral risk factors, not a fixed innate identity.

Also, high crime or reoffending in any society doesn’t prove inevitability or biological destiny it reflects enforcement, deterrence, social conditions, and reporting systems.
 
While this is true, practicing modest helps avoid it
Dude how? You think clothes will change a woman's brain? If anything you'd think to let them wear what they want to see which ones are "bad"

Humans want to look good because it benefits them in many ways. You're on a looksmaxxing forum, this should be obvious
 
Dude how? You think clothes will change a woman's brain? If anything you'd think to let them wear what they want to see which ones are "bad"

Humans want to look good because it benefits them in many ways. You're on a looksmaxxing forum, this should be obvious
n***a u made me use all my brain its 3 am im fried
 
especially without treatment or supervision vut many
There's no way to prevent it tho...

So that's why the clothing arguement is shit and dehumanising

Not to mention the risk it puts women to. Men can disguise themselves as women and this has been reported many times before
 
There's no way to prevent it tho...

So that's why the clothing arguement is shit and dehumanising

Not to mention the risk it puts women to. Men can disguise themselves as women and this has been reported many times before
Yes but again you're blaming religion for the bad done by some individuals. The religion itself commands you to respect women and to not r**e them, so you can't blame the religion for the actions of sinners. The clothing part isnt dehumanising, on many reoccurring cases women even in the west report creeps stopped staring at them and approaching them after they started wearing the hijab. Yes it won't save her from a rapist but it'll save her from the gazes of many creeps.
 
Dude how? You think clothes will change a woman's brain? If anything you'd think to let them wear what they want to see which ones are "bad"

Humans want to look good because it benefits them in many ways. You're on a looksmaxxing forum, this should be obvious
Modesty is also lowering gaze, a man can't lust for what he cant see
 
Modesty is also lowering gaze, a man can't lust for what he cant see
Yes if you can't look at a woman and control yourself that's genuinely disgusting. Not looking at someone is also disrespectful tbh
 
Actually the West fucked up the Muslim world, turned chill places into warzones, gave terrorists weapons, did 9/11 just to invade a country who had nothing to do with it, lets compare Pakistan and India, Muslim majority Pakistan has been said to be safer for women
are you a muzzie?
 
i just cant comprehend whyd they want sharia law
it fucked up the entire muslim world with it being a shithole and unsafe for women
thats why they migrated here cuz its so much better but then they want to ruin it with their podophilic laws
problem is their race, not religion (although this too, but to a lower degree)
 
the sharia law protected women (take the ottoman empire for example) it was peaceful with all religions living there in harmony


The claim that the prophet married a 6 year old is false, firstly they counted the years AFTER puberty making her at the time around 18. Maybe read the Qur'an it advocates for women's rights and protects them, making it also that men aren't allowed to do anything with them without their consent.
n***a he fucked her when she was 9
 
propaganda
your prophet is a pedophile, all muslims and other browns are subhumans. Lol check this, even white WOMEN mog these sandniggers to shit
1775870977688.webp
 
all religions are beautiful to the people who practice them, that's what makes them unique. Everyone has there own opinions and no amount of argument is gonna change that. Don’t let the bad apples define the whole batch.
 
all religions are beautiful to the people who practice them, that's what makes them unique. Everyone has there own opinions and no amount of argument is gonna change that. Don’t let the bad apples define the whole batch.
Interesting take
 
all religions are beautiful to the people who practice them, that's what makes them unique. Everyone has there own opinions and no amount of argument is gonna change that. Don’t let the bad apples define the whole batch.
what if the whole batch lives in shit, r**e children, brown and ethnic as fuck, fuck goats and they are terrorists?
 
what if the whole batch lives in shit, r**e children, brown and ethnic as fuck, fuck goats and they are terrorists?
interesting take, i'd recommend reading 'factfulness' by hans rosling and 'the danger of a single story'
 
why would I read that?
i'm not criticising your take, they're just really knowledgeable book. the hans rosling one especially talks about how different ethnicities are portrayed + the psychological effect news and stuff has on our brains and its backed by lots of really intellectual people.
 
i'm not criticising your take, they're just really knowledgeable book. the hans rosling one especially talks about how different ethnicities are portrayed + the psychological effect news and stuff has on our brains and its backed by lots of really intellectual people.
I'm not talking about ethnicities tho, but about races and religions
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • eternal love
  • fsidsss
  • Rololongs
  • iamdrago
  • bonzerpie
  • Derpman
  • ecoli
Back
Top