Join 58,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Rage Men hypocrisy

Status
Not open for further replies.
Send a clear front face no shaving for five months pic, then let me rate you. Make up on women is literally engrained into our society lmao. Yes my rating would suffer if I’m not wearing make up. So would yours if you didn’t do male grooming lmao. Also you ignored what I said about physique which plays more of a role for women than for men again… Also you managed to make this about my looks, so you could ignore the point that was made about you wanting Stacy not being about love at all
I personally think that being good looking makes a man (or woman, but we’re talking about men rn) admire and see you as something special and valuable. I don’t really believe in the whole love thing since it relays on looks.
My point is that the reason that men still “tap” below average women is desperation for sex, which doesn’t actually mean that men have lower standards, but just that they care more about the act itself rather than who they do it with (if they’re not able to pull above their league). We all care about looks, let’s just be honest, the only difference is that men still have sex/relationship with women they actually don’t like (and respect as well, since men only treat right women they find attractive).
The point of this thread is not openly hate on men (I may have used the wrong title, but I think it was adequate for a discussion with WOMEN, I repeat) , but underline the fact that both genders are deeply influenced by the bp.
I’d say that is women do rely on makeup and have inflated egos, but doesn’t change the fact that we’ve been pressured into bp/looksmaxxing way before men even knew what taking care of themselves was, because society is patriarchal , and even if it may seems like we are the center of attention and such, we’re just pretty trophies and sexual entertainment for men. Our role in life is basically to be attractive and capture men’s attention, it’s something that we feel the duty/need to do for some reason since we are literally children. If a feminine (usually straight Ig) girl feel/is ugly and undesired , everything around her crumbles and looses meaning. Men often live peacefully for years doing their men things (sport, friends etc) without even realizing how much appearance impact lives, your life is worthy and valuable because well, you’re the man. Man in here may care about looks just because of his final purpose (sex, maybe with more attractive partners) it’s an incomparable pain to a woman who basically chases what makes her feel worth of living .
 
That doesn't mean it's not natural

Using your logic, then is losing weight wouldn't be natural, right?
Loosing weight is done for health reasons as well. There are no health benefits in male grooming or make up. It’s done purely for superficial reasons.
 
I personally think that being good looking makes a man (or woman, but we’re talking about men rn) admire and see you as something special and valuable. I don’t really believe in the whole love thing since it relays on looks.
My point is that the reason that men still “tap” below average women is desperation for sex, which doesn’t actually mean that men have lower standards, but just that they care more about the act itself rather than who they do it with (if they’re not able to pull above their league). We all care about looks, let’s just be honest, the only difference is that men still have sex/relationship with women they actually don’t like (and respect as well, since men only treat right women they find attractive).
The point of this thread is not openly hate on men (I may have used the wrong title, but I think it was adequate for a discussion with WOMEN, I repeat) , but underline the fact that both genders are deeply influenced by the bp.
I’d say that is women do rely on makeup and have inflated egos, but doesn’t change the fact that we’ve been pressured into bp/looksmaxxing way before men even knew what taking care of themselves was, because society is patriarchal , and even if it may seems like we are the center of attention and such, we’re just pretty trophies and sexual entertainment for men. Our role in life is basically to be attractive and capture men’s attention, it’s something that we feel the duty/need to do for some reason since we are literally children. If a feminine (usually straight Ig) girl feel/is ugly and undesired , everything around her crumbles and looses meaning. Men often live peacefully for years doing their men things (sport, friends etc) without even realizing how much appearance impact lives, your life is worthy and valuable because well, you’re the man. Man in here may care about looks just because of his final purpose (sex, maybe with more attractive partners) it’s an incomparable pain to a woman who basically chases what makes her feel worth of living .
Theyre never gonna accept this. They‘ll deny this experience so they can play the victim cause they didn’t get laid immediately.
 
@candycaro wait why did you ignore me, your looksmatch is NOT neither mtn or htn
I didn’t. I pointed out the fact that you would deduct my rating due to make up. Already explained it all. Also that that isn’t my looksmtach is your opinion based on your rating of me. The rating varies from person to person. At the end it doesn’t matter and I also pointed out the fact that you made this about my looks and ignored the point I made about you wanting Stacy not being about love.
 
Theyre never gonna accept this. They‘ll deny this experience so they can play the victim cause they didn’t get laid immediately.
What she said as true (some of it at least)

This is because women are tribalistic by nature to act this way, so don't cope with "muh soyciety". Read the study I linked a few replies back, it explains it really well
 
I didn’t. I pointed out the fact that you would deduct my rating due to make up. Already explained it all. Also that that isn’t my looksmtach is your opinion based on your rating of me. The rating varies from person to person. At the end it doesn’t matter and I also pointed out the fact that you made this about my looks and ignored the point I made about you wanting Stacy not being about love.
I didnt deduct anything actually, i wanted to see your real face
 
What she said as true (some of it at least)

This is because women are tribalistic by nature to act this way, so don't cope with "muh soyciety". Read the study I linked a few replies back, it explains it really well
All of it was true. You just don’t wanna listen to women. You don’t even wanna understand. We literally tell you our real life experience straight up and you’re still gonna be like “I doubt it”. Also i skimmed the study and from what i got it literally proves my point…I never said physical attributes don’t factor into women’s attraction for men. The study literally says though that women choose their mates based on social and material resources. I don’t even know why you brought it up or what you’re trying to prove. Trying to argue that looks are more important for men in 2025…
 
You are ltb with makeup, pipe down already and date your looksmatch
You don’t have any argument, so you’re going for my looks now lmao. Continue chasing Stacy, you’ll never get her. Also I can’t date looksmatch or below cause men don’t approach or put in effort, they want ONS only preferably with Stacy and then come and cry on this forum when that doesn’t happen.
 
All of it was true. You just don’t wanna listen to women. You don’t even wanna understand. We literally tell you our real life experience straight up and you’re still gonna be like “I doubt it”. Also i skimmed the study and from what i got it literally proves my point…I never said physical attributes don’t factor into women’s attraction for men. The study literally says though that women choose their mates based on social and material resources. I don’t even know why you brought it up or what you’re trying to prove. Trying to argue that looks are more important for men in 2025…
I literally admitted she was right in some aspects and you're still coping jfl

And I brought up the study to prove women are hypergamous by nature, if that's what you got from skimming through the study, you clearly didn't do a good job. Even then you're misinterpreting it.
 
I literally admitted she was right in some aspects and you're still coping jfl

And I brought up the study to prove women are hypergamous by nature, if that's what you got from skimming through the study, you clearly didn't do a good j*b. Even then you're misinterpreting it.
And what does that prove?
 
so you'll date high LTN?

you literally said before: "i'd date any guy that's a personality match" in YOUR words. now it's different?
No it’s not. I would but I can’t. Cause they don’t approach, they don’t put in effort etc. And the statistics prove it. The attitudes in this forum as well.
 
You claim that women have it the same difficulty as men, and you claim "any guy can get an LTB as looksmatch, no looksmaxxing required". But this isn't true when hypergamy is prevelant
Hypergamy isn’t based on physicality alone omg. This study is literally based on evolutionary concepts where males had to hunt to get resources. Ability to get resources had a direct correlation to physicality. It’s not the same in modern times.
 
You don’t have any argument, so you’re going for my looks now lmao. Continue chasing Stacy, you’ll never get her. Also I can’t date looksmatch or below cause men don’t approach or put in effort, they want ONS only preferably with Stacy and then come and cry on this forum when that doesn’t happen.
You are literally chopped, i can make a full face analysis for a min if you are so naive. Ltb with makeup. Your looksmatch is a ltn to lmtn
 
Hypergamy isn’t based on physicality alone omg. This study is literally based on evolutionary concepts where males had to hunt to get resources. Ability to get resources had a direct correlation to physicality. It’s not the same in modern times.
Obviously hypergamy isn't only based on looks, that's not what I said. Looks is obviously a strong factor though.

Ability to get recourses does have a correlation to physicality but that's not what the fucking study says, and I don't even know what you're trying to prove here
 
Obviously hypergamy isn't only based on looks, that's not what I said. Looks is obviously a strong factor though.

Ability to get recourses does have a correlation to physicality but that's not what the fucking study says, and I don't even know what you're trying to prove here
My point was never that looks aren’t a factor but that it’s a stronger factor for women than men!! And it’s crazy y’all refuse to believe that considering the way our society is structured. The study doesn’t say that physicality has a correlation to ability to get resources that’s just logic. It literally says that women care about the ability. Then details the looks they want in a man. Takes just a little critical thinking to understand that them wanting the tall fit man is because he would be better at getting those resources. But obviously in the present you don’t need to be tall or fit to get them.
 
Wanting the guy to ask you out or them not only wanting you for sex, preferably on the first date, is too much to ask these days ig
Well, if you're talking from personal experience, men only want you for sex because they don't see you as anything more than that. Notice the highlighted words
 
Yeah you literally said your looksmatch is a htn, heavily contradicting yourself
I said some people rate me in the range mtb-htb. Whatever my looksmatch would be it doesn’t work as easily as you’d think it would. And for the millionth time you’re the one contradicting yourself for saying wanting Stacy is love
 
Well, if you're talking from personal experience, men only want you for sex because they don't see you as anything more than that. Notice the highlighted words
The thread was literally about that. It’s a common experience not only mine. And it is indeed due to the fact that men care mainly about looks and their brains are thoroughly rotted by modern media. But like I said continue chasing Stacy and see where it gets you.
 
The thread was literally about that. It’s a common experience not only mine. And it is indeed due to the fact that men care mainly about looks and their brains are thoroughly rotted by modern media.
"Men's brains are rotted by modern media."
But isn't Love Island literally the most loved and watched show by women?
 
I said some people rate me in the range mtb-htb. Whatever my looksmatch would be it doesn’t work as easily as you’d think it would. And for the millionth time you’re the one contradicting yourself for saying wanting Stacy is love
NOBODY is rating YOU as htb holy iq
 
First of all, do you agree that women are hypergamous?
I’m done discussing cause all y’all can do is attack my character or my looks lmao. EVERYONE, who grew up in this society, with at least a single brain cell can agree that looks are more important for women than for men. But keep on acting like it’s the most important for you princess.
 
I’m done discussing cause all y’all can do is attack my character or my looks lmao. EVERYONE, who grew up in this society, with at least a single brain cell can agree that looks are more important for women than for men. But keep on acting like it’s the most important for you princess.
I never attacked your looks JFL, straight up lying.

All I asked you is that if you agreed with women being hypergamous, and you just ranted instead of answering jfl
 
I never attacked your looks JFL, straight up lying.

All I asked you is that if you agreed with women being hypergamous, and you just ranted instead of answering jfl
I was talking about the other guy. You attacked my character though. This is literally a thread about an observation a woman made trying to relate to other women. What the actual fuck are you even doing here and why are you here trying so hard to deny our experience or twist it damn
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top