- Joined
- Jul 21, 2025
- Messages
- 13,596
- Solutions
- 9
- Time Online
- 21d 19h
- Reputation
- 45,939
- Guild
- .com logic bureau
Stop coping with the bullshit buccal corridor shit that orthotropics/mewing feeds you.
		
		
	
	
		 
	
Buccal corridors are the amount of black spaces/the dark triangles that show up on the outside of your smile, and it is pure cope; the only thing it is good for is assessing palatal width. It makes virtually no difference on smile esthetics, and is very controversial as is. This is because "the prosthodontic literature describes a smile lacking buccal corridors as unrealistic-looking and denture-like" while "orthodontists refer to buccal corridors as "negative" spaces to be eliminated by transverse maxillary expansion". And orthodontists and orthotropists are the only ones who give 2 shits about buccal corridors, as "repeated surveys of lay persons have failed to establish any adverse esthetic perception of negative spaces".
Smile arc is immensely more important to smile esthetics than buccal corridor cope. "The smile arc is the relationship between a hypothetical curve drawn along the edges of the maxillary anterior teeth and the inner contour of the lower lip in the posed smile".
You want to aim for a smile arc that looks like this:
		 
	
Not like this:
		 
	
It is important to note that "Smile arcs were found to be flatter in orthodontically treated patients than in an untreated group with normal occlusions, resulting in a "denture mouth" appearance". Furthermore, "the smile arc can be unintentionally flattened during orthodontic treatment by any or all of the following three techniques." The article cited below goes into more detail on this.
So there you have it, stop coping about your smile being narrow being the cause of a bad smile. Smile arc is much more important and buccal corridors are irrelevant for smile esthetics, and only relevant for assessing palatal width.
Source: The Eight Components of a Balanced Smile
Edit: forgot the source
				
			Buccal corridors are the amount of black spaces/the dark triangles that show up on the outside of your smile, and it is pure cope; the only thing it is good for is assessing palatal width. It makes virtually no difference on smile esthetics, and is very controversial as is. This is because "the prosthodontic literature describes a smile lacking buccal corridors as unrealistic-looking and denture-like" while "orthodontists refer to buccal corridors as "negative" spaces to be eliminated by transverse maxillary expansion". And orthodontists and orthotropists are the only ones who give 2 shits about buccal corridors, as "repeated surveys of lay persons have failed to establish any adverse esthetic perception of negative spaces".
Smile arc is immensely more important to smile esthetics than buccal corridor cope. "The smile arc is the relationship between a hypothetical curve drawn along the edges of the maxillary anterior teeth and the inner contour of the lower lip in the posed smile".
You want to aim for a smile arc that looks like this:
Not like this:
It is important to note that "Smile arcs were found to be flatter in orthodontically treated patients than in an untreated group with normal occlusions, resulting in a "denture mouth" appearance". Furthermore, "the smile arc can be unintentionally flattened during orthodontic treatment by any or all of the following three techniques." The article cited below goes into more detail on this.
So there you have it, stop coping about your smile being narrow being the cause of a bad smile. Smile arc is much more important and buccal corridors are irrelevant for smile esthetics, and only relevant for assessing palatal width.
Source: The Eight Components of a Balanced Smile
Edit: forgot the source
			
				Last edited: 
			
		
	
								
								
									
	
								
							
							 
 
	 
 
		
 
 
		 
			 
 
		 
 
		

 
 
		 I have full lips and cupids bow but cutie patootie neotenous lips JFL
 I have full lips and cupids bow but cutie patootie neotenous lips JFL
 
 
		
