Join 65,000+ Looksmaxxing Members!

Register a FREE account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox.

  • DISCLAIMER: DO NOT ATTEMPT TREATMENT WITHOUT LICENCED MEDICAL CONSULTATION AND SUPERVISION

    This is a public discussion forum. The owners, staff, and users of this website ARE NOT engaged in rendering professional services to the individual reader. DO NOT use the content of this website as an alternative to personal examination and advice from licenced healthcare providers. DO NOT begin, delay, or discontinue treatments and/or exercises without licenced medical supervision. Learn more

Guide The Importance of Percentiles in Looksmaxxing/Ratings

Gothed

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 12, 2026
Messages
181
Time Online
1d 9h
Reputation
344
Mainly water but good read regardless, especially for greys and people who mistake ltn for subhuman. If I've ever rated you in the past, this is a good reference.


Why Percentiles Matter:
No matter how accurate a rater is, the PSL scale will always be biased, as there is no universal scale any rater goes off of. What one objective rater sees as a mmtn will likely be what another sees as a hltn or a lhtn. The only real way to measure a ratings accuracy is to go off of what percentile a rater deems someone to fall under. The percentile most raters go off of is from any densely populated North American city/suburb. Percentiles can vary massively depending on your location. Someone who falls into the 45% range can easily be in the 70% range if they are in a region which has a higher unattractive average.


Below are examples of men and women who aren't considered significantly overweight (as a high bfp lowers your true rating by a substantial margin) who fall into each percentile range in a North American city/suburb along with what I personally believe their rating to be:

0-2% - Subhuman:
1773613584262.webp
1773630096308.webp

People in this range are rare to come across, and you are unlikely to see any in a given day.

2-15% - LLTN:

1773617205879.webp
1773618312719.webp

The 4 least attractive people in a classroom/work environment are likely to fall into this range.

15-35% - MLTN/B:

1773616329971.webp
1773616486349.webp

These people are slightly below average, but appear average to some.

35-65% - HLTN/B:

1773617931149.webp
1773617116533.webp

These people are average. Most people you see on a day to day basis are likely to be in this range.

65-75% - LMTN/B:

1773618855176.webp
1773617638994.webp

These people are slightly above average. This is the first range where dating success is fairly common.

75-85% - MMTN/B:

1773617287843.webp
1773618510563.webp

These people are attractive, but seen as slightly above average by some.

85-93% - HMTN/B:

1773624327065.webp
1773619430184.webp

These people are undeniably attractive. The 2 most attractive people in a classroom/work environment are likely to fall into this range.

93-98% - LHTN/B:

1773625218234.webp
1773626120196.webp

These people are strikingly attractive and relatively rare to come across.

98-99.7% - HTN/B:
1773626569301.webp
1773626334300.webp

The 10 most attractive people in your highschool likely fall into this range.

99.7-99.999% - CL/SL:

1773630401765.webp
1773630496253.webp

The most attractive person you'll come across in your life will likely fall into this range.

99.999+% - C/S:
There are less than 10,000 people worldwide that fall into this range.


How your region impacts your percentile/dating success:

As I mentioned previously, the examples above are based on densely populated North American cities and their surrounding suburbs. Percentiles are typically inflated in areas that are more rural/secluded in the west, with each tier essentially being treated as the tier above it. Most countries that are considered 3rd world are typically heavily inflated, with each tier of looks being treated as if it were 2 tiers above.

It is safe to assume that anyone above the 65th percentile of any given region can be successful in dating someone in a similar or lower percentile than themselves. Anyone above the 85th percentile will typically be sought after by others, and anyone above the 98th percentile will have very easy dating success. If you are unsure of what percentile you fall under, take a rough estimate of how many people out of 100 in your surrounding area are more objectively attractive than you, and you can have a rough estimate of where you fall.
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Mainly water but good read regardless, especially for greys and people who mistake ltn for subhuman. If I've ever rated you in the past, this is a good reference.


Why Percentiles Matter:
No matter how accurate a rater is, the PSL scale will always be biased, as there is no universal scale any rater goes off of. What one objective rater sees as a mmtn will likely be what another sees as a hltn or a lhtn. The only real way to measure a ratings accuracy is to go off of what percentile a rater deems someone to fall under. The percentile most raters go off of is from any densely populated North American city/suburb. Percentiles can vary massively depending on your location. Someone who falls into the 45% range can easily be in the 70% range if they are in a region which has a higher unattractive average.


Below are examples of men and women who aren't considered significantly overweight (as a high bfp lowers your true rating by a substantial margin) who fall into each percentile range in a North American city/suburb along with what I personally believe their rating to be:

0-2% - Subhuman:
View attachment 308045View attachment 308290
People in this range are rare to come across, and you are unlikely to see any in a given day.

2-15% - LLTN:

View attachment 308086View attachment 308102
The 4 least attractive people in a classroom/work environment are likely to fall into this range.

15-35% - MLTN/B:

View attachment 308070View attachment 308078
These people are slightly below average, but appear average to some.

35-65% - HLTN/B:

View attachment 308097View attachment 308085
These people are average. Most people you see on a day to day basis are likely to be in this range.

65-73% - LMTN/B:

View attachment 308108View attachment 308094
These people are slightly above average. This is the first range where dating success is fairly common.

73-85% - MMTN/B:

View attachment 308088View attachment 308106
These people are attractive, but seen as slightly above average to some.
85-93% - HMTN/B:

View attachment 308189View attachment 308123
These people are undeniably attractive. The 2 most attractive people in a classroom/work environment are likely to fall into this range.
93-98% - LHTN/B:

View attachment 308198View attachment 308207
These people are strikingly attractive and relatively rare to come across.

98-99.7% - HTN/B:
View attachment 308212View attachment 308210
The 10 most attractive people in your highschool likely fall into this range.

99.7-99.999% - CL/SL:

The most attractive person you'll come across in your life will likely fall into this range.

99.999+% - C/S:
There are less than 10,000 people worldwide that fall into this range.


How your region impacts your percentile/dating success:

As I mentioned previously, the examples above are based on densely populated North American cities and their surrounding suburbs. Percentiles are typically inflated in areas that are more rural/secluded in the west, with each tier essentially being treated as the tier above it. Most countries that are considered 3rd world are typically heavily inflated, with each tier of looks being treated as if it were 2 tiers above.

It is safe to assume that anyone above the 65th percentile of any given region can be successful in dating someone in a similar or lower percentile than themselves. Anyone above the 85th percentile will typically be sought after by others, and anyone above the 98th percentile will have very easy dating success. If you are unsure of what percentile you fall under, take a rough estimate of how many people out of 100 in your surrounding area are more objectively attractive than you, and you can have a rough estimate of where you fall.
skewered
 
Doesnt matter bc everyone’s area perxentile is drastically different and this forum is stupid to comprehend social looks hierachy objectively
 
Doesnt matter bc everyone’s area perxentile is drastically different and this forum is stupid to comprehend social looks hierachy objectively
Fair, I don't think you can realistically comprehend the social looks hierarchy objectively in the first place though. Rating 100 random people out of your city and quickly estimating where you'd stand within that sample would be the closest thing to seeing where you'd fall under within your surrounding area though, so its still better than nothing. Plus the thread stops n*****s from crying over getting hltn/ltn because they think that shit means they're deformed as fuck
 
Mainly water but good read regardless, especially for greys and people who mistake ltn for subhuman. If I've ever rated you in the past, this is a good reference.


Why Percentiles Matter:
No matter how accurate a rater is, the PSL scale will always be biased, as there is no universal scale any rater goes off of. What one objective rater sees as a mmtn will likely be what another sees as a hltn or a lhtn. The only real way to measure a ratings accuracy is to go off of what percentile a rater deems someone to fall under. The percentile most raters go off of is from any densely populated North American city/suburb. Percentiles can vary massively depending on your location. Someone who falls into the 45% range can easily be in the 70% range if they are in a region which has a higher unattractive average.


Below are examples of men and women who aren't considered significantly overweight (as a high bfp lowers your true rating by a substantial margin) who fall into each percentile range in a North American city/suburb along with what I personally believe their rating to be:

0-2% - Subhuman:
View attachment 308045View attachment 308290
People in this range are rare to come across, and you are unlikely to see any in a given day.

2-15% - LLTN:

View attachment 308086View attachment 308102
The 4 least attractive people in a classroom/work environment are likely to fall into this range.

15-35% - MLTN/B:

View attachment 308070View attachment 308078
These people are slightly below average, but appear average to some.

35-65% - HLTN/B:

View attachment 308097View attachment 308085
These people are average. Most people you see on a day to day basis are likely to be in this range.

65-75% - LMTN/B:

View attachment 308108View attachment 308094
These people are slightly above average. This is the first range where dating success is fairly common.

75-85% - MMTN/B:

View attachment 308088View attachment 308106
These people are attractive, but seen as slightly above average by some.

85-93% - HMTN/B:

View attachment 308189View attachment 308123
These people are undeniably attractive. The 2 most attractive people in a classroom/work environment are likely to fall into this range.

93-98% - LHTN/B:

View attachment 308198View attachment 308207
These people are strikingly attractive and relatively rare to come across.

98-99.7% - HTN/B:
View attachment 308212View attachment 308210
The 10 most attractive people in your highschool likely fall into this range.

99.7-99.999% - CL/SL:

View attachment 308295View attachment 308298
The most attractive person you'll come across in your life will likely fall into this range.

99.999+% - C/S:
There are less than 10,000 people worldwide that fall into this range.


How your region impacts your percentile/dating success:

As I mentioned previously, the examples above are based on densely populated North American cities and their surrounding suburbs. Percentiles are typically inflated in areas that are more rural/secluded in the west, with each tier essentially being treated as the tier above it. Most countries that are considered 3rd world are typically heavily inflated, with each tier of looks being treated as if it were 2 tiers above.

It is safe to assume that anyone above the 65th percentile of any given region can be successful in dating someone in a similar or lower percentile than themselves. Anyone above the 85th percentile will typically be sought after by others, and anyone above the 98th percentile will have very easy dating success. If you are unsure of what percentile you fall under, take a rough estimate of how many people out of 100 in your surrounding area are more objectively attractive than you, and you can have a rough estimate of where you fall.
The HTB is not a HTB at all and Madisson beer isn’t SL bffr
 
Mainly water but good read regardless, especially for greys and people who mistake ltn for subhuman. If I've ever rated you in the past, this is a good reference.


Why Percentiles Matter:
No matter how accurate a rater is, the PSL scale will always be biased, as there is no universal scale any rater goes off of. What one objective rater sees as a mmtn will likely be what another sees as a hltn or a lhtn. The only real way to measure a ratings accuracy is to go off of what percentile a rater deems someone to fall under. The percentile most raters go off of is from any densely populated North American city/suburb. Percentiles can vary massively depending on your location. Someone who falls into the 45% range can easily be in the 70% range if they are in a region which has a higher unattractive average.


Below are examples of men and women who aren't considered significantly overweight (as a high bfp lowers your true rating by a substantial margin) who fall into each percentile range in a North American city/suburb along with what I personally believe their rating to be:

0-2% - Subhuman:
View attachment 308045View attachment 308290
People in this range are rare to come across, and you are unlikely to see any in a given day.

2-15% - LLTN:

View attachment 308086View attachment 308102
The 4 least attractive people in a classroom/work environment are likely to fall into this range.

15-35% - MLTN/B:

View attachment 308070View attachment 308078
These people are slightly below average, but appear average to some.

35-65% - HLTN/B:

View attachment 308097View attachment 308085
These people are average. Most people you see on a day to day basis are likely to be in this range.

65-75% - LMTN/B:

View attachment 308108View attachment 308094
These people are slightly above average. This is the first range where dating success is fairly common.

75-85% - MMTN/B:

View attachment 308088View attachment 308106
These people are attractive, but seen as slightly above average by some.

85-93% - HMTN/B:

View attachment 308189View attachment 308123
These people are undeniably attractive. The 2 most attractive people in a classroom/work environment are likely to fall into this range.

93-98% - LHTN/B:

View attachment 308198View attachment 308207
These people are strikingly attractive and relatively rare to come across.

98-99.7% - HTN/B:
View attachment 308212View attachment 308210
The 10 most attractive people in your highschool likely fall into this range.

99.7-99.999% - CL/SL:

View attachment 308295View attachment 308298
The most attractive person you'll come across in your life will likely fall into this range.

99.999+% - C/S:
There are less than 10,000 people worldwide that fall into this range.


How your region impacts your percentile/dating success:

As I mentioned previously, the examples above are based on densely populated North American cities and their surrounding suburbs. Percentiles are typically inflated in areas that are more rural/secluded in the west, with each tier essentially being treated as the tier above it. Most countries that are considered 3rd world are typically heavily inflated, with each tier of looks being treated as if it were 2 tiers above.

It is safe to assume that anyone above the 65th percentile of any given region can be successful in dating someone in a similar or lower percentile than themselves. Anyone above the 85th percentile will typically be sought after by others, and anyone above the 98th percentile will have very easy dating success. If you are unsure of what percentile you fall under, take a rough estimate of how many people out of 100 in your surrounding area are more objectively attractive than you, and you can have a rough estimate of where you fall.
holy sneak in for mmtn
 
That’s not how percentiles work…
It kinda is… generally attractive people aren’t that rare in the US and “average” people are even more common than ugly n*****s. You can get a percentile for literally anything not just looks. This just lays out the foundation for getting your percentile in looks. Realistically the bigger sample of people you have the better as it makes it more accurate
 
It kinda is… generally attractive people aren’t that rare in the US and “average” people are even more common than ugly n*****s. You can get a percentile for literally anything not just looks. This just lays out the foundation for getting your percentile in looks. Realistically the bigger sample of people you have the better as it makes it more accurate
That’s not what I’m even on about (even though this is also quite wrong). His understanding of what a percentile itself is wrong.
 
The HTB is not a HTB at all and Madisson beer isn’t SL bffr
Prime Kristen Stewart definitely wasn’t anything above HTB but her measurements and halos definitely put her above MTB. Maddison Beer in her prime was plastic asf but she had all the measurements and halos to put her in SL. She definitely had a top .3% face bsffr. Putting her at solid Stacy is just cope though, she still wouldn’t be that close to the golden ratio for women
 
holy sneak in for mmtn
They’re definitely “attractive” enough but their halos and failos just balance each other out, and nothing stands out too much. Only subjective preference would put them above or below mmtn jfl
 
That’s not what I’m even on about (even though this is also quite wrong). His understanding of what a percentile itself is wrong.
Literally how a percentile works gang. Let’s say you wanted to do ts for height. If you counted the height of a 1,000 n*****s and sorted them from tallest to lowest, the 10 shortest would fall into the bottom 1 percent and the 10 tallest would fall into the top 99%. Everything else in between would get a percentage according to where they fall. It’s the same fucking thing for looks, idk what youre on about
 
Mainly water but good read regardless, especially for greys and people who mistake ltn for subhuman. If I've ever rated you in the past, this is a good reference.


Why Percentiles Matter:
No matter how accurate a rater is, the PSL scale will always be biased, as there is no universal scale any rater goes off of. What one objective rater sees as a mmtn will likely be what another sees as a hltn or a lhtn. The only real way to measure a ratings accuracy is to go off of what percentile a rater deems someone to fall under. The percentile most raters go off of is from any densely populated North American city/suburb. Percentiles can vary massively depending on your location. Someone who falls into the 45% range can easily be in the 70% range if they are in a region which has a higher unattractive average.


Below are examples of men and women who aren't considered significantly overweight (as a high bfp lowers your true rating by a substantial margin) who fall into each percentile range in a North American city/suburb along with what I personally believe their rating to be:

0-2% - Subhuman:
View attachment 308045View attachment 308290
People in this range are rare to come across, and you are unlikely to see any in a given day.

2-15% - LLTN:

View attachment 308086View attachment 308102
The 4 least attractive people in a classroom/work environment are likely to fall into this range.

15-35% - MLTN/B:

View attachment 308070View attachment 308078
These people are slightly below average, but appear average to some.

35-65% - HLTN/B:

View attachment 308097View attachment 308085
These people are average. Most people you see on a day to day basis are likely to be in this range.

65-75% - LMTN/B:

View attachment 308108View attachment 308094
These people are slightly above average. This is the first range where dating success is fairly common.

75-85% - MMTN/B:

View attachment 308088View attachment 308106
These people are attractive, but seen as slightly above average by some.

85-93% - HMTN/B:

View attachment 308189View attachment 308123
These people are undeniably attractive. The 2 most attractive people in a classroom/work environment are likely to fall into this range.

93-98% - LHTN/B:

View attachment 308198View attachment 308207
These people are strikingly attractive and relatively rare to come across.

98-99.7% - HTN/B:
View attachment 308212View attachment 308210
The 10 most attractive people in your highschool likely fall into this range.

99.7-99.999% - CL/SL:

View attachment 308295View attachment 308298
The most attractive person you'll come across in your life will likely fall into this range.

99.999+% - C/S:
There are less than 10,000 people worldwide that fall into this range.


How your region impacts your percentile/dating success:

As I mentioned previously, the examples above are based on densely populated North American cities and their surrounding suburbs. Percentiles are typically inflated in areas that are more rural/secluded in the west, with each tier essentially being treated as the tier above it. Most countries that are considered 3rd world are typically heavily inflated, with each tier of looks being treated as if it were 2 tiers above.

It is safe to assume that anyone above the 65th percentile of any given region can be successful in dating someone in a similar or lower percentile than themselves. Anyone above the 85th percentile will typically be sought after by others, and anyone above the 98th percentile will have very easy dating success. If you are unsure of what percentile you fall under, take a rough estimate of how many people out of 100 in your surrounding area are more objectively attractive than you, and you can have a rough estimate of where you fall.
@Luxe @Auggy @Blackpillirony @foidslayer22 thoughts?
 
Prime Kristen Stewart definitely wasn’t anything above HTB but her measurements and halos definitely put her above MTB. Maddison Beer in her prime was plastic asf but she had all the measurements and halos to put her in SL. She definitely had a top .3% face bsffr. Putting her at solid Stacy is just cope though, she still wouldn’t be that close to the golden ratio for women
Ok ok idk I might rate too harshly then
 
They’re definitely “attractive” enough but their halos and failos just balance each other out, and nothing stands out too much. Only subjective preference would put them above or below mmtn jfl
we know its you bro
 
Mainly water but good read regardless, especially for greys and people who mistake ltn for subhuman. If I've ever rated you in the past, this is a good reference.


Why Percentiles Matter:
No matter how accurate a rater is, the PSL scale will always be biased, as there is no universal scale any rater goes off of. What one objective rater sees as a mmtn will likely be what another sees as a hltn or a lhtn. The only real way to measure a ratings accuracy is to go off of what percentile a rater deems someone to fall under. The percentile most raters go off of is from any densely populated North American city/suburb. Percentiles can vary massively depending on your location. Someone who falls into the 45% range can easily be in the 70% range if they are in a region which has a higher unattractive average.


Below are examples of men and women who aren't considered significantly overweight (as a high bfp lowers your true rating by a substantial margin) who fall into each percentile range in a North American city/suburb along with what I personally believe their rating to be:

0-2% - Subhuman:
View attachment 308045View attachment 308290
People in this range are rare to come across, and you are unlikely to see any in a given day.

2-15% - LLTN:

View attachment 308086View attachment 308102
The 4 least attractive people in a classroom/work environment are likely to fall into this range.

15-35% - MLTN/B:

View attachment 308070View attachment 308078
These people are slightly below average, but appear average to some.

35-65% - HLTN/B:

View attachment 308097View attachment 308085
These people are average. Most people you see on a day to day basis are likely to be in this range.

65-75% - LMTN/B:

View attachment 308108View attachment 308094
These people are slightly above average. This is the first range where dating success is fairly common.

75-85% - MMTN/B:

View attachment 308088View attachment 308106
These people are attractive, but seen as slightly above average by some.

85-93% - HMTN/B:

View attachment 308189View attachment 308123
These people are undeniably attractive. The 2 most attractive people in a classroom/work environment are likely to fall into this range.

93-98% - LHTN/B:

View attachment 308198View attachment 308207
These people are strikingly attractive and relatively rare to come across.

98-99.7% - HTN/B:
View attachment 308212View attachment 308210
The 10 most attractive people in your highschool likely fall into this range.

99.7-99.999% - CL/SL:

View attachment 308295View attachment 308298
The most attractive person you'll come across in your life will likely fall into this range.

99.999+% - C/S:
There are less than 10,000 people worldwide that fall into this range.


How your region impacts your percentile/dating success:

As I mentioned previously, the examples above are based on densely populated North American cities and their surrounding suburbs. Percentiles are typically inflated in areas that are more rural/secluded in the west, with each tier essentially being treated as the tier above it. Most countries that are considered 3rd world are typically heavily inflated, with each tier of looks being treated as if it were 2 tiers above.

It is safe to assume that anyone above the 65th percentile of any given region can be successful in dating someone in a similar or lower percentile than themselves. Anyone above the 85th percentile will typically be sought after by others, and anyone above the 98th percentile will have very easy dating success. If you are unsure of what percentile you fall under, take a rough estimate of how many people out of 100 in your surrounding area are more objectively attractive than you, and you can have a rough estimate of where you fall.
Romulus is way higher than a hmtn lhtn. otherwise accurate and good thread
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top