- Joined
- Mar 20, 2020
- Messages
- 531
- Reputation
- 277
So I was looking over some old posts in .me and I found one particularly intriguing : https://looksmax.me/threads/mandible-zygos-are-more-important-than-maxilla.7143/
this guy is Stephen James. And he just doesn’t make sense to me. Clearly negative orbital vector and shitty maxilla position in general.
He has good zygo projection. How come it looks so great in 3/4 view if his maxilla is like this? Is zygo width really all that matters or is there something else at play here?
Original poster in .me said thisnot sure how he has forward projecting zygos in the first place.
this is kind of a lifefuel for me as I have insane zygo projection from the side but a recessed maxilla. Meaning if I have the potential for a 3/4 like his it won’t be in view until really low body fat
this guy is Stephen James. And he just doesn’t make sense to me. Clearly negative orbital vector and shitty maxilla position in general.
He has good zygo projection. How come it looks so great in 3/4 view if his maxilla is like this? Is zygo width really all that matters or is there something else at play here?
Original poster in .me said thisnot sure how he has forward projecting zygos in the first place.
this is kind of a lifefuel for me as I have insane zygo projection from the side but a recessed maxilla. Meaning if I have the potential for a 3/4 like his it won’t be in view until really low body fat